How to Represent Your Client Effectively in Security Clearance Cases

$195.00

Re-Broadcast on August 17, 2017

Taught by experienced practitioners, this course provides basic background and training on security clearance cases and how to contest security clearance denials and revocations throughout the federal system, including representation of both federal employees and contractors.

This course is co-sponsored by the Federal Bar Association.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Legal Authorities
  • The Investigative Process
  • The Adjudicative Guidelines
  • Administrative Due Process

Date / Time: August 17, 2017

  • 2:00 pm – 5:15 pm Eastern
  • 1:00 pm – 4:15 pm Central
  • 12:00 pm – 3:15 pm Mountain
  • 11:00 am – 2:15 pm Pacific

Choose a format:

  • Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
  • On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.

All Access Pass: Before you buy, access this class and all other myLawCLE programs, over 120 new live classes every year, for only $69 dollars per month. Purchase the All Access Pass first. Click here for more information.

Clear

Re-Broadcast on August 17, 2017

LeslieMcAdooGordonLeslie McAdoo Gordon, Esq. | McAdoo Gordon & Associates, P.C.

Ms. McAdoo Gordon helps individuals and companies navigate the security clearance process. Prior to entering the field of law, Ms. McAdoo Gordon served as a Special Agent for the Defense Security Services (DSS), completing advanced DSS personnel and facility clearance training in order to conduct background investigations. Ms. McAdoo Gordon now consults with individuals and companies applying for security clearances. She also represents contractors and individuals facing administrative sanctions, including revocation of security clearances, and provides criminal defense for individuals with security clearances facing misdemeanor and/or felony charges, as well as “white collar” criminal offenses.


MarkZaidMark S. Zaid, Esq. specializes in litigation and lobbying on matters relating to international transactions, torts and crimes, national security, foreign sovereign and diplomatic immunity, defamation (plaintiff) and the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOI/PA).

Through his practice Mr. Zaid often represents former/current federal employees, intelligence and military officers, Whistleblowers and others who have grievances or have been wronged by agencies of the United States Government or foreign governments, as well as members of the media. Mr. Zaid teaches D.C. Bar Continuing Legal Education classes on “Defending Security Clearances” and “The Basics of Filing and Litigating Freedom of Information/Privacy Act Requests”. He has been named as a Washington, D.C. Super Lawyer every year since he was profiled in 2009, as well as a “Best Lawyer” by Washingtonian Magazine in 2009, 2011, 2013 and 2015 (issued bi-annually), for his national security work. As the National Law Journal once wrote, “if Agent Mulder ever needed a lawyer, Zaid would be his man.”

Mr. Zaid is also the Executive Director and founder of the James Madison Project, a Washington, D.C.-based organization with the primary purpose of educating the public on issues relating to intelligence gathering and operations, secrecy policies, national security and government wrongdoing. Starting in January 2014, Mr. Zaid also serves as an Adjunct Professor at Johns Hopkins University teaching in the Global Studies/National Security Certificate programs.

In connection with his legal practice on international and national security matters, Mr. Zaid has testified before, or provided testimony to, a variety of governmental bodies including the Senate Judiciary Committee, the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee, the House Judiciary Committee, the House Government Operations Committee, the Department of Energy, the Public Interest Declassification Board and the Assassination Records Review Board. “Curiously for this town,” wrote the American Bar Association Journal, “Zaid is an equal opportunity thorn out to pierce the sides of suit jackets bearing both elephants and donkeys on the lapels.”

A 1992 graduate of Albany Law School of Union University in New York, where he served as an Associate Editor of the Albany Law Review and is now a member of the school’s Board of Trustees, he completed his undergraduate education (cum laude) in 1989 at the University of Rochester, New York with honors in Political Science and high honors in History. Mr. Zaid is a member of the Bars of New York State, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maryland and several federal courts. He currently possesses TS/SCI eligibility and has had Q level access.

CLE Accreditation:
mylawCLE seeks approval in all states except VA.

CLE 3.00 – AK
CLE 3.00 – AL
CLE 3.00 – AR
CLE 3.00 – AZ
CLE 3.00 – CA
CLE 3.60 – CO
CLE 3.00 – DE
CLE 3.60 – FL
CLE 3.00 – GA
CLE 3.00 – HI

CLE 3.00 – IA
CLE 3.00 – ID
CLE 3.00 – IL
CLE 3.00 – IN
CLE 3.00 – KS
CLE 3.00 – KY
CLE 3.00 – LA
CLE 3.00 – ME
CLE 3.00 – MN
CLE 3.60 – MO

CLE 3.00 – MP
CLE 3.00 – MS
CLE 3.00 – MT
CLE 3.00 – NC
CLE 3.00 – ND
CLE 3.00 – NE
CLE 3.00 – NH
CLE 3.60 – NJ
CLE 3.00 – NM
CLE 3.00 – NV

CLE 3.60 – NY
CLE 3.00 – OH
CLE 3.60 – OK
CLE 3.00 – OR
CLE 3.00 – PA
CLE 3.00 – PR
CLE 3.60 – RI
CLE 3.00 – SC
CLE 3.00 – TN
CLE 3.00 – TX

CLE 3.00 – UT
CLE N/A – VA
CLE 3.60 – VI
CLE 3.00 – VT
CLE 3.00 – WA
CLE 3.60 – WI
CLE 3.60 – WV
CLE 3.00 – WY

Accreditation Policy
myLawCLE will seek credit where attending attorneys are primarily licensed for all of its live webinars and live teleconferences, except in states which allow for reciprocity (see reciprocity section below). Credit for CLE in a self-study format is sought for in most states; however, some states do not allow for CLE credit to be earned in a self-study format (see the self-study section below). Many states typically decide whether a program qualifies for MCLE credit in their jurisdiction 4-8 weeks after the program application is submitted. For many live events, credit approval is not received prior to the program. Credit hours granted are subject to approval from each state.

Reciprocity
Additionally, some states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, CO, FL, ME, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, PR, and SD. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.

On-demand CLE
myLawCLE will seek on-demand approval in all states except Virginia and Arkansas (outside reciprocal provisions stated above).


myLawCLE Credit Guarantee
myLawCLE offers a program and credit approval guarantee. If a registered attendee is unhappy with a CLE program they have attended, myLawCLE will offer that attended access to another complimentary CLE or a full refund in order to insure the attendeeís satisfaction.

Additionally, on all online CLE programs application for approval will be made in all states where attending attorneys are primarily licensed in. If a registered attorney does not receive credit from their state for any reason, a full refund will be granted.

Section I. Introduction: Brief overview of history, definitions and issues

Section II. Legal authorities

Section III. The investigative process
a) SF-86/EPSQ
b) Personnel security background investigations/OPM
c) Polygraphs examinations

Section IV. Interim Clearance/Suspension Determinations

Section V. Reciprocity

Section VI. Administrative Due Process
a) Common attributes of all review processes
b) Department of Defense Industrial Security Clearance Reviews – contractors (DOHA)
c) Department of Defense Personal Appearance Model (DoD civilians, military personnel and various other agencies)
d) CIA Review Model – including NRO, DIA, NGA
e) NSA Model – (SCI Access)/DOE Model (L & Q clearances)

Section VII. Adjudicative Guidelines
a) Strategies for Addressing Adjudicative Guidelines A through M
b) Exceptions to the Guidelines
        i. 10 USC 986 and its repeal

Section VIII. Litigation challenges
a) Department of Navy v. Egan
b) MSPB