This program is only available to myLawCLE All-Access Pass subscribers. Subscribe now to unlock this class along with 1,000+ live webinars for only $395/yr — including 60+ new programs added every month.
Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $3952025-06-27 08:30:00
12.66 hours
2025-06-27 08:30:00
12.66 Credits
2025-06-27 08:30:00
12.66 hours
2025-06-27 08:30:00
12.66 hours
Course Overview
Attorneys will learn about Tax Division reorganization, criminal tax enforcement priorities, IRS collection processes, employment tax compliance, whistleblower program updates, and exempt organization enforcement issues.
Attorneys will gain practical strategies for CDP hearings, collection appeals, criminal trial defense, employment tax corrections, whistleblower submissions, and protecting exempt organizations from enforcement.
Attorneys will learn about Tax Division reorganization, criminal tax enforcement priorities, IRS collection processes, employment tax compliance, whistleblower program updates, and exempt organization enforcement issues.
Attorneys will gain practical strategies for CDP hearings, collection appeals, criminal trial defense, employment tax corrections, whistleblower submissions, and protecting exempt organizations from enforcement.
Agenda
Session 1
Welcome and Opening Remarks for Forum
Session 2
Tax Compliance and Enforcement Update Part One
Session 3
IRS Budget Policy and Future Enforcement Outlook
Session 4
IRS Independent Office of Appeals ADR Update
Session 5
Tax Court and IRS Chief Counsel Update
Session 6
Psychology's Impact on Tax Enforcement Compliance
Session 7
US Trade Agreements in Tax Disputes
Session 8
Partnership Audits and Litigation Under BBA
Session 9
Cross Border Information Gathering and Discovery
Session 10
Defending Audits of IRA Clean Energy Credits
Session 11
Tax Division Department of Justice Historic Update
Session 12
Criminal Tax Enforcement Update and Priorities
Session 13
IRS Whistleblower Office Program Improvements Update
Session 14
National Taxpayer Advocate Service Current Challenges
Session 15
IRS Collection Update Notices and Procedures
Session 16
Employment Taxes Civil and Criminal Enforcement
Session 17
Criminal Tax Trials Tales From Trenches
Session 18
Exempt Organizations Tax Enforcement Issues Update
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Opening remarks by Kathleen Costello to welcome attendees to the 17th Annual NYU Tax Controversy Forum. This brief session sets the stage for two days of comprehensive discussions on tax compliance and enforcement.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
An examination of how the IRS and DOJ pursue efficient methods to ensure correct tax payment. The session addresses how resource constraints across the federal government are affecting the future and efficacy of compliance programs.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Expert panelists examine the dramatic shift in IRS enforcement priorities following leadership turnover and major funding cuts. Discussion covers the uncertain future of IRS enforcement tied to legislative priorities including TCJA extensions and OECD Pillar 2 implementation.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The Chief of IRS Appeals discusses the renewed focus on alternative dispute resolution procedures to complement traditional conference procedures. In the current resource-constrained environment, Appeals and ADR programs are poised to play an increasingly important role in minimizing dispute resolution delays.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
This panel provides insight into the over 25,000 pending cases ranging from multibillion dollar transfer pricing disputes to collection due process matters. Discussion covers litigation prospects, case resolution in a resource-constrained environment, and the role of field counsel attorneys.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
This panel explores how psychological issues create or magnify tax compliance problems including non-filing, non-payment, and impaired IRS interactions. Properly understood, these issues can provide a basis for penalty relief, late filing relief, and other accommodations.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The panel reviews how Bilateral Investment Treaties and Free Trade Agreements give investors rights to recover taxes deemed indirect expropriation. Discussion includes potential use for taxes imposed under OECD Pillar 2 and for US taxes on foreign-owned companies.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
This session explains the centralized partnership audit regime under the Bipartisan Budget Act replacing TEFRA procedures. Panelists address recent audit trends, notice requirements, imputed underpayment computations, push-out elections, and litigation strategies.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Cases with cross-border issues raise complex substantiation challenges when documents located abroad are needed. The panel discusses IRS offshore information gathering techniques including FATCA research, exchange of information requests, and consent directives.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The clean energy credits under the Inflation Reduction Act present novel technical issues from qualification requirements to prevailing wage standards. Panelists provide insight on audit issues and steps taxpayers can take to prepare for and manage examinations.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The Tax Division faces historic restructuring with civil functions moving to Civil Division and criminal functions to Criminal Division. Despite reorganization, key processes including conference rights and Tax Division directives will be preserved as tax enforcement remains a priority.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
IRS Criminal Investigation has increased staffing to approximately 2,250 special agents with tax initiations up 13% year-to-date. Key enforcement areas include immigration-related employment tax cases, Employee Retention Credit fraud, and egregious tax preparer schemes.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The Whistleblower Office has embarked on an ambitious improvement plan focusing on increasing high-value claims and paying awards sooner through disaggregation. The program now covers all IRS investigations including financial crimes and FBAR violations following Section 7623(c) enactment.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
The Taxpayer Advocate Service faces significant headwinds with approximately 25% staff losses and concerns about future filing season preparation. Identity theft resolution times of 20-24 months remain unacceptable while proposed TAS Act legislation offers 68 provisions for systemic improvements.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
This session covers the collection notice sequence from CP-14 through final levy notices and Collection Due Process rights. Discussion includes CAP appeals, strategic CDP considerations, offer in compromise trends showing declining acceptance rates, and the new Organic Cannabis equitable tolling decision.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Employment taxes comprise approximately 70% of IRS revenue with non-compliance significantly contributing to the Tax Gap. The panel explores government priorities, enforcement tools including audits and criminal investigations, and defense strategies like the reasonable belief defense and Central Illinois doctrine.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Experienced trial lawyers share insights from recent criminal tax trials including a Hawaii bribery case resulting in full acquittal and a Florida roofing business case. Key lessons include the importance of joint defense coordination, strategic use of focus groups, and making the government prove every element.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Current litigation includes constitutional challenges to Schedule B requirements and the Johnson Amendment affecting religious organizations. The panel addresses church audit procedures under Section 7611, the illegality doctrine’s post-Roe implications, and defensive planning for organizations concerned about targeted enforcement.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
SESSION I
Deposing trucking company personnel…
SESSION II
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
SESSION III
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
SESSION IV
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
speakers
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Elizabeth (Liz) Askey is Of Counsel in Skadden’s Tax Group, which she joined in September 2025 after a distinguished career at the IRS and in private practice spanning more than 30 years. Most recently, she served as Chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals (2024–2025), overseeing the operations of nearly 1,800 Appeals employees and programs designed to resolve tax controversies without litigation. Prior to that role, she served as Deputy Chief of Appeals and as Deputy Division Counsel (International) for the IRS Office of Chief Counsel’s Large Business and International Division, where she directed the work of approximately 350 attorneys and paralegals. Earlier in her career, she served as an attorney-advisor and associate tax legislative counsel in Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy and spent nearly two decades in private practice at law and accounting firms and in private industry. She is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel and holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School (1990) and an A.B. in English (1987) from an undergraduate institution.
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Dean Zerbe is National Managing Director of alliantgroup and a partner at Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav LLP, a law firm specializing in tax whistleblowers and tax litigation. He is also a Senior Policy Advisor to the National Whistleblower Center. Dean spent more than 25 years in congressional service, including as Senior Counsel and Tax Counsel for the Chairman of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, from 2001 to 2008. In that role, he was the driving force behind the legislation that created the modern IRS Whistleblower Office and expanded the rewards for tax whistleblowers. He has represented several tax whistleblowers — including Bradley Birkenfeld, who received the largest individual whistleblower award in U.S. history ($104 million) — and led the landmark Tax Court case Whistleblower 21276-13W v. IRS (2017), which established the definition of ‘collected proceeds’ under the whistleblower law. He holds a J.D. from George Mason University and an LL.M. in Taxation from New York University (notably also holding a BFA in Film Production from NYU). He was recognized by National Journal as one of the ‘Hill 100’ top congressional staffers.
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Jennifer (Jenni) Black is a Managing Director in Citrin Cooperman’s National Tax Office, where she leads the Tax Procedure & Controversy practice. She brings more than two decades of combined legal and accounting experience to her role, with deep expertise in partnership audit procedures under both TEFRA and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Prior to joining Citrin Cooperman, Jenni served for 12 years as Senior Counsel in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel’s Procedure and Administration Division, where she was a principal author of the BBA regulations and played a central role in designing the forms and procedures for the BBA’s implementation. She earned a J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Richmond School of Law and an LL.M. in Taxation with Distinction from Georgetown University Law Center, and holds a B.S. in Accounting and Finance from the University of South Carolina.
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Elizabeth (Liz) Askey is Of Counsel in Skadden’s Tax Group, which she joined in September 2025 after a distinguished career at the IRS and in private practice spanning more than 30 years. Most recently, she served as Chief of the IRS Independent Office of Appeals (2024–2025), overseeing the operations of nearly 1,800 Appeals employees and programs designed to resolve tax controversies without litigation. Prior to that role, she served as Deputy Chief of Appeals and as Deputy Division Counsel (International) for the IRS Office of Chief Counsel’s Large Business and International Division, where she directed the work of approximately 350 attorneys and paralegals. Earlier in her career, she served as an attorney-advisor and associate tax legislative counsel in Treasury’s Office of Tax Policy and spent nearly two decades in private practice at law and accounting firms and in private industry. She is a Fellow of the American College of Tax Counsel and holds a J.D. from Harvard Law School (1990) and an A.B. in English (1987) from an undergraduate institution.
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
alliantgroup
Dean Zerbe is National Managing Director of alliantgroup and a partner at Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav LLP, a law firm specializing in tax whistleblowers and tax litigation. He is also a Senior Policy Advisor to the National Whistleblower Center. Dean spent more than 25 years in congressional service, including as Senior Counsel and Tax Counsel for the Chairman of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee, Senator Charles E. Grassley, from 2001 to 2008. In that role, he was the driving force behind the legislation that created the modern IRS Whistleblower Office and expanded the rewards for tax whistleblowers. He has represented several tax whistleblowers — including Bradley Birkenfeld, who received the largest individual whistleblower award in U.S. history ($104 million) — and led the landmark Tax Court case Whistleblower 21276-13W v. IRS (2017), which established the definition of ‘collected proceeds’ under the whistleblower law. He holds a J.D. from George Mason University and an LL.M. in Taxation from New York University (notably also holding a BFA in Film Production from NYU). He was recognized by National Journal as one of the ‘Hill 100’ top congressional staffers.
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
itrin Cooperman Advisors LLC
Jennifer (Jenni) Black is a Managing Director in Citrin Cooperman’s National Tax Office, where she leads the Tax Procedure & Controversy practice. She brings more than two decades of combined legal and accounting experience to her role, with deep expertise in partnership audit procedures under both TEFRA and the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015. Prior to joining Citrin Cooperman, Jenni served for 12 years as Senior Counsel in the IRS Office of Chief Counsel’s Procedure and Administration Division, where she was a principal author of the BBA regulations and played a central role in designing the forms and procedures for the BBA’s implementation. She earned a J.D., magna cum laude, from the University of Richmond School of Law and an LL.M. in Taxation with Distinction from Georgetown University Law Center, and holds a B.S. in Accounting and Finance from the University of South Carolina.
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Plans
| Access type | Individual Purchase | Basic | Premium Most Popular | Corporate CLE Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$95 – $245
Price varies based
on the course duration of 1 to 3+ hours |
$395/year
One-time purchase
|
$495/year
One-time purchase
|
Custom
based on firm size
|
| Access type | Pay per class | Unlimited annual access | Unlimited annual access | Unlimited access for all firm members |
| Number of Available Webinars | 1 | 1,000+ | 1,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Number of New Webinars Added Yearly | Limited | 500+ | 500+ | 500+ |
| Earn "Live" CLE credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Ask Questions During the Presentation via a Chat Box |
|
|
|
|
| Attend "Live" Re-Broadcasts |
|
|
|
|
| Exclusive Partner Webinars & Events |
|
|
|
|
|
Special credits (Ethics, Elimination of Bias, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
| Instant Certificates After Completion |
|
|
|
|
| Personalized CLE Platform |
|
|
|
|
| Live Conferences |
|
|
||
| Bootcamps |
|
|
| Access type |
Pay per class Unlimited annual access Unlimited annual access Unlimited access for all firm members |
|---|---|
| Number of Available Webinars | 1 1,000+ 1,000+ 1,000+ |
| Number of New Webinars Added Yearly | Limited 500+ 500+ 500+ |
| Earn "Live" CLE credit |
|
|
Ability to Ask Questions During the Presentation via a Chat Box |
|
| Attend "Live" Re-Broadcasts |
|
| Exclusive Partner Webinars & Events |
|
|
Special credits (Ethics, Elimination of Bias, etc.) |
|
| Instant Certificates After Completion |
|
| Personalized CLE Platform |
|
| Live Conferences |
|
| Bootcamps |
|
Why Attend
Being an attorney is hard enough without the bookkeeping/IOLTA nonsense. Ready to keep more of what you earn? Whether you’re launching a new law practice or been in your own practice for forty years, this program is your roadmap to slashing your tax bill and building real wealth. Want to write off that second home, or discover how to deduct your vacation? In this dynamic, eye-opening session, civil and criminal tax controversy attorney Eric Green will walk you through often-overlooked strategies to dramatically cut taxes, increase deductions, and protect your law practice from IRS audit adjustments. You’ll walk away armed with actionable insights you can put to work immediately and easily earn back 8-10X what you invested in this seminar!
The program will cover not just how to deduct these expenses but what documentation you need to maintain to make sure you are audit proof if Uncle Sam comes calling!
In this new expanded webinar, Eric and Leighanne will review other benefits like converting your practice to an S Corporation, retirement planning and discuss apps that can help tie all this together and make your record keeping a breeze!
Who Should Attend:
Don’t miss this opportunity to transform the way you think about taxes—and take home the tools you need to save thousands year after year.
Key topics to be discussed:
Closed-captioning available
2025-09-05 13:00:00
This program begins with the foundations of generative AI, introducing large language models and transformer architecture, then moves into practical applications for legal professionals. Participants will learn how to design and deploy custom GPTs in OpenAI and build agent-based automations in Microsoft Copilot, both of which enable legal teams to streamline repetitive work across transactional matters, litigation management, and broader legal operations. The program also highlights how to use OpenAI projects and Microsoft’s integrated tools to scale and organize AI-driven efficiencies across the legal function.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: December 19, 2025
Closed-captioning available
2025-10-30 14:00:00
Session I – Considerations: Revocable vs. Irrevocable – Georgia Bender
In this session, attorney Georgia Bender will present a brief analysis of the structures and considerations involved in revocable and irrevocable trusts and when each type of trust may be appropriate. Next, Ms. Bender will go into a broad discussion of revocable trusts and the advantages they bring in flexibility of administration, probate avoidance, and estate tax planning. She’ll then review who might be an ideal candidate for this type of trust.
Key topics to be discussed:
Session II – Irrevocable Trusts and Trust Administration – Joseph Donohue
In this session, Attorney Joseph Donohue will review four common types of irrevocable trusts and the contexts in which they are best used. Next, Mr. Donohue will offer some helpful drafting tips for trusts. Lastly, he will dive into topics surrounding trust administration from tax reporting to key phases, avoiding trust contests, and drafting documents to protect your fiduciary clients.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: December 11, 2025
Closed-captioning available
2026-05-08 14:00:00
FAQ
Yes — the Basic Unlimited Pass gives members access to all online live, replay, and on-demand CLEs, excluding only the live conferences. With the Premium Unlimited Pass, members receive access to over 11 multi-day live conferences as well.
Yes — myLawCLE is an officially accredited CLE provider and seeks CLE approval in all 50 states. Our live webinars, on-demand programs, and replays meet or exceed state bar requirements, ensuring your CLE credits are fully recognized wherever you practice.
Yes — after completing the CLE webinar, attendees select their state for CLE credit and fill out an online evaluation form. Once submitted, a CLE certificate is emailed to them and uploaded to their dashboard.
Yes — myLawCLE develops CLE programs meeting all required CLE types, including mental health, ethics, professionalism, technology, substance abuse, and elimination of bias.
myLawCLE maintains all CLE programs in its library for 12 months following the original broadcast date. Attendees can access any program that remains available in the system during this period.
Yes — all of myLawCLE’s programs are originally broadcast live, with a chat box available for attendees to submit questions during the webinar. Additionally, replays and on-demand versions offer email correspondence with the presenters for any follow-up questions.
Expand Your Legal Expertise
Requirements
The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.
Formats