Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.
This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year
Or register for just this program
Program Details
2026-10-30 12:00:00
Over 1,000+ webinars
Course Overview
2026-10-30 12:00:00
2h CLE Credits
Intermediate
2
This session examines the privacy, consent, and regulatory considerations healthcare providers should address before deploying ambient AI scribing technology. It will cover HIPAA, state medical privacy laws, all-party consent requirements, and emerging legal developments affecting the recording, transcription, storage, and use of patient encounters. The session will also address how providers can develop patient-facing disclosures and consent documentation that create a defensible compliance record.
Dianne Bourque
William F. FarleyThis session focuses on the documentation and risk-management framework that should remain in place after an ambient AI scribe is activated. It will examine post-visit accuracy review, the treatment and retention of AI-generated notes and underlying data, and the contractual protections healthcare providers should seek from technology vendors. The discussion will also address how counsel can identify and mitigate privacy, clinical documentation, and regulatory risks associated with AI-generated patient records.
Dianne Bourque
William F. Farley
Holland & Knight (Boston

Holland & Knight (Chicago)

Holland & Knight (Boston
Ms. Bourque advises healthcare clients on data acquisition and use in artificial intelligence algorithm training, research, product development, and digital health applications, and counsels providers on HIPAA, 42 C.F.R. Part 2, and state medical privacy law compliance, including review of HIPAA-related contracts and forms and privacy-related due diligence. A substantial part of her practice involves counseling researchers and research sponsors on FDA- and OHRP-regulated clinical research, including patient consent, and she has served as counsel to a hospital’s Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee overseeing those consent processes. She was formerly in-house counsel to an academic medical center and is the first Suffolk University Law School graduate to hold a concentration in Health and Biomedical Law.

Holland & Knight (Chicago)
Mr. Farley’s data privacy practice includes defending consumer-facing clients in class actions involving website wiretap litigation under federal and state law, including claims under the Video Privacy Protection Act and the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), and he advises clients nationwide on data privacy compliance and on responding to data breaches and other security incidents. He is an International Association of Privacy Professionals Certified Information Privacy Professional for the U.S. private sector (CIPP/US) and has used artificial intelligence and automation technology to organize, evaluate, and defend large volumes of claims, and advises clients on legal issues involving the metaverse. His client industries include healthcare and life sciences, banking and financial services, insurance, and technology.

Holland & Knight (Boston
Ms. Bourque advises healthcare clients on data acquisition and use in artificial intelligence algorithm training, research, product development, and digital health applications, and counsels providers on HIPAA, 42 C.F.R. Part 2, and state medical privacy law compliance, including review of HIPAA-related contracts and forms and privacy-related due diligence. A substantial part of her practice involves counseling researchers and research sponsors on FDA- and OHRP-regulated clinical research, including patient consent, and she has served as counsel to a hospital’s Institutional Review Board and Ethics Committee overseeing those consent processes. She was formerly in-house counsel to an academic medical center and is the first Suffolk University Law School graduate to hold a concentration in Health and Biomedical Law.

Holland & Knight (Chicago)
Mr. Farley’s data privacy practice includes defending consumer-facing clients in class actions involving website wiretap litigation under federal and state law, including claims under the Video Privacy Protection Act and the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), and he advises clients nationwide on data privacy compliance and on responding to data breaches and other security incidents. He is an International Association of Privacy Professionals Certified Information Privacy Professional for the U.S. private sector (CIPP/US) and has used artificial intelligence and automation technology to organize, evaluate, and defend large volumes of claims, and advises clients on legal issues involving the metaverse. His client industries include healthcare and life sciences, banking and financial services, insurance, and technology.
Requirements
The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.
Formats