Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Commanding the Courtroom: Trial Persuasion Techniques That Win

A nine-figure verdict starts long before closing argument. Ed Dudensing walks through the persuasion techniques behind his recent elder neglect and wrongful death win: read jurors for authenticity, build a roadmap opening, extract cross-examination concessions, and prove reprehensibility at the punitive phase.

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-22 12:00:00

2026-09-22 12:00:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Course Overview

A winning trial narrative is built long before it is delivered

2026-09-22 12:00:00

Trial persuasion programs usually stop at legal theory. This one starts with a case file. Ed Dudensing recently secured a nine-figure elder neglect and wrongful death verdict. The defendants were Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust, and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm. He walks through the persuasion techniques he used at every phase of that trial.

Every phase carries its own risk. Precondition the jury and the defense will use it; weeding out beats preconditioning. Skip the roadmap in opening and jurors drop the themes before the case-in-chief. Stay too long on cross and hard-won concessions unravel. Mishandle the punitive phase and reprehensibility goes unproven, the defendant’s financial condition unused.

Attendees see exactly how a winning trial narrative is built and delivered, with real slides, witness strategy, and courtroom moments pulled directly from the case file. That includes anchor slides, statistical evidence, and syllogisms in closing, plus the structure of a rebuttal closing. This is courtroom judgment, not a doctrine walk-through.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Jury Selection
Read panelists for authenticity, likability, and vulnerability, and weed out rather than precondition.
02
Opening Statement
Use the roadmap technique, define the defendants early, and set themes jurors will carry through trial.
03
Case-in-Chief Strategy
Organize witnesses to tell a story, use documents tactically, and handle “surprise” evidence.
04
Cross-Examining the Defense
Extract concessions and know when to get in and out.
05
Closing and Rebuttal
Deploy anchor slides, statistical evidence, and syllogisms, confront defense arguments head-on, and structure the rebuttal closing argument.
06
Punitive Damages Phase
Prove reprehensibility and use the defendant’s financial condition effectively.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Building the Winning Narrative: Jury Selection, Opening Statement, and the Case-in-Chief

Trial attorney Ed Dudensing opens with the foundation of his recent nine-figure elder neglect and wrongful death verdict against Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust (REIT), and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm. Using real slides, witness strategy, and courtroom moments pulled directly from the case file, he shows how to read jurors for authenticity, likability, and vulnerability, and why weeding out beats preconditioning. He then turns to the roadmap technique for the opening statement, defining defendants early and setting themes jurors will carry through trial, and to case-in-chief strategy: organizing witnesses to tell a story, using documents tactically, and handling “surprise” evidence.

Ed DudensingEd Dudensing
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Closing the Case: Cross-Examination, Closing Arguments, and Punitive Damages

The second hour moves from the case-in-chief to the verdict. Mr. Dudensing demonstrates how to cross-examine the defense by extracting concessions and knowing when to get in and out. He then breaks down closing argument techniques, including anchor slides, statistical evidence, syllogisms, and confronting defense arguments head-on, and walks through the structure of the rebuttal closing argument. The session ends with the punitive damages phase: proving reprehensibility and using the defendant’s financial condition effectively.

Ed DudensingEd Dudensing
Ed Dudensing

Ed Dudensing

Dudensing Law

Ed Dudensing

Ed Dudensing

Dudensing Law

Ed Dudensing founded Dudensing Law and serves as its lead counsel. Since 2003, his practice has been devoted entirely to representing victims of elder neglect and abuse in skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, acute hospitals, home health agencies, and hospice agencies. Over a career of more than two decades, he has secured four of the largest elder abuse verdicts in California history and recovered well over $200 million on behalf of his clients, earning national recognition as one of the leading elder abuse attorneys in the United States.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Dudensing earned his undergraduate degree in political science from the University of California, Berkeley, and his Juris Doctor from the University of California, Davis School of Law, where he graduated in the top 3% of his class, was inducted into the Order of the Coif, served as Executive Editor of the UC Davis Law Review, and was elected to the Order of the Barrister for his skills in oral advocacy. After passing the bar in 1994, he clerked for two years for the Honorable Robert C. Broomfield, Chief Judge of the Federal District Court in Arizona, then practiced as a litigation associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe from 1996 to 1999. From 1999 to 2003, he served as a Deputy District Attorney in Sacramento County, where he first-chaired more than 50 trials to verdict, including murder, rape, and financial elder abuse cases. He is admitted to the State Bar of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Dudensing has been repeatedly selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer between 2011 and 2026. In 2026, the USA Chambers & Partners Guide ranked both him and his firm Band 3 for Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs in California, and he was named an Attorney of the Year finalist for Law.com’s California Legal Awards, listed among Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Lawyers in America, and included in Lawdragon’s 100 Managing Partners You Need to Know. His 2025 honors include selection as a Top 100 Lawyer by the Daily Journal, the William F. Taylor Memorial Award from California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform for lifetime achievement in elder abuse, and the Mentorship Award at the ALM/Law.com California Legal Awards. The Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association named him Advocate of the Year in 2023 and awarded him the Morton Friedman Humanitarian Award in 2026.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Dudensing was named to the Board of Directors of the Consumer Attorneys of California in 2025. He is the sole author of The Rutter Group’s Elder Abuse Litigation treatise and teaches elder abuse litigation as an adjunct professor at UC Law San Francisco. He speaks frequently before the American Association for Justice Nursing Home Litigation Group, the Consumer Attorneys of California, and California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), and holds memberships in the National Consumer Voice for Long-Term Care, CANHR, the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, and the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association. His commentary on long-term care accountability has appeared in national and state media, including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Hill, and The Sacramento Bee.

Experience

Mr. Dudensing has brought cases against some of California’s largest nursing home, assisted living, and healthcare operators. His jury verdicts include $29.1 million in 2010, $42.5 million in 2019, and $30.9 million in 2023. In March 2026, a Sacramento County jury returned a $110 million verdict against Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust, and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm, in a case arising from Greenhaven Estates, the largest elder abuse verdict against an assisted living facility in United States history. As lead appellate counsel, he has established significant precedents in elder law, including Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Group, 37 Cal. App. 5th 1076 (2019), Hutcheson v. Eskaton Fountainwood Lodge, 17 Cal. App. 5th 937 (2017), and Goldman v. Sunbridge Healthcare, 220 Cal. App. 4th 1160 (2013).
Ed Dudensing

Ed Dudensing

Dudensing Law

Ed Dudensing founded Dudensing Law and serves as its lead counsel. Since 2003, his practice has been devoted entirely to representing victims of elder neglect and abuse in skilled nursing facilities, assisted living facilities, acute hospitals, home health agencies, and hospice agencies. Over a career of more than two decades, he has secured four of the largest elder abuse verdicts in California history and recovered well over $200 million on behalf of his clients, earning national recognition as one of the leading elder abuse attorneys in the United States.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Dudensing earned his undergraduate degree in political science from the University of California, Berkeley, and his Juris Doctor from the University of California, Davis School of Law, where he graduated in the top 3% of his class, was inducted into the Order of the Coif, served as Executive Editor of the UC Davis Law Review, and was elected to the Order of the Barrister for his skills in oral advocacy. After passing the bar in 1994, he clerked for two years for the Honorable Robert C. Broomfield, Chief Judge of the Federal District Court in Arizona, then practiced as a litigation associate at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe from 1996 to 1999. From 1999 to 2003, he served as a Deputy District Attorney in Sacramento County, where he first-chaired more than 50 trials to verdict, including murder, rape, and financial elder abuse cases. He is admitted to the State Bar of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Dudensing has been repeatedly selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer between 2011 and 2026. In 2026, the USA Chambers & Partners Guide ranked both him and his firm Band 3 for Litigation: Mainly Plaintiffs in California, and he was named an Attorney of the Year finalist for Law.com’s California Legal Awards, listed among Lawdragon’s 500 Leading Lawyers in America, and included in Lawdragon’s 100 Managing Partners You Need to Know. His 2025 honors include selection as a Top 100 Lawyer by the Daily Journal, the William F. Taylor Memorial Award from California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform for lifetime achievement in elder abuse, and the Mentorship Award at the ALM/Law.com California Legal Awards. The Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association named him Advocate of the Year in 2023 and awarded him the Morton Friedman Humanitarian Award in 2026.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Dudensing was named to the Board of Directors of the Consumer Attorneys of California in 2025. He is the sole author of The Rutter Group’s Elder Abuse Litigation treatise and teaches elder abuse litigation as an adjunct professor at UC Law San Francisco. He speaks frequently before the American Association for Justice Nursing Home Litigation Group, the Consumer Attorneys of California, and California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform (CANHR), and holds memberships in the National Consumer Voice for Long-Term Care, CANHR, the San Francisco Trial Lawyers Association, and the Capitol City Trial Lawyers Association. His commentary on long-term care accountability has appeared in national and state media, including The New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, The Hill, and The Sacramento Bee.

Experience

Mr. Dudensing has brought cases against some of California’s largest nursing home, assisted living, and healthcare operators. His jury verdicts include $29.1 million in 2010, $42.5 million in 2019, and $30.9 million in 2023. In March 2026, a Sacramento County jury returned a $110 million verdict against Colony Capital, a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust, and Formation Capital, a private equity investment firm, in a case arising from Greenhaven Estates, the largest elder abuse verdict against an assisted living facility in United States history. As lead appellate counsel, he has established significant precedents in elder law, including Valentine v. Plum Healthcare Group, 37 Cal. App. 5th 1076 (2019), Hutcheson v. Eskaton Fountainwood Lodge, 17 Cal. App. 5th 937 (2017), and Goldman v. Sunbridge Healthcare, 220 Cal. App. 4th 1160 (2013).

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs