Copyright Act: Drafting work made for hire clauses and managing IP assets in tech contracts

Michael Shafer
Michael Shafer
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig

Michael Shafer has focused the vast majority of his practice on intellectual property matters. He has litigated intellectual property disputes in federal district courts in the United States, including trademark, copyright, and patent disputes.

Stephanie Fields
Stephanie Fields
Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig

Stephanie is a graduate of The George Washington University Law School. As a student attorney in the GW Law Intellectual Property & Technology Law Clinic, she helped clients understand the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) trademark registration process, prosecuted trademark applications, and overcame initial USPTO rejections.

On-Demand: September 30, 2024

2 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Session I – Foundations and Key Considerations in IP and Technology Contracts – Michael Shafer

This session covers Intellectual Property (IP) rights in technology contracts, focusing on the essential distinctions between copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets. Participants will explore the role of the Copyright Act in technology agreements and the significance of IP protection in technology and software development. By examining these aspects, attendees will gain valuable insights into managing IP assets effectively within tech contracts, ensuring robust legal protections, and navigating the complexities of IP law in the evolving tech landscape.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Intellectual property (IP) rights in technology contracts
  • Key differences between copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets
  • The Copyright Act’s role in tech contracts
  • Importance of IP protection in technology and software development

Session II - Mastering the Work Made for Hire Doctrine – Stephanie Fields

Participants will gain an in-depth understanding of the "Work Made for Hire" doctrine, including its legal criteria and statutory categories under the Copyright Act. The session will cover best practices for drafting and negotiating work made for hire clauses, emphasizing clear definition of ownership and rights in contractual agreements. Attendees will also learn to manage risks associated with work made for hire designations and understand the practical implications of this doctrine in various professional scenarios, ensuring effective and legally sound contract management.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Detailed explanation and legal criteria for the “work made for hire” doctrine
  • Analysis of statutory categories under the Copyright Act
  • Best practices for drafting and negotiating work made for hire clauses
  • Managing risks and practical implications of work made for hire designations

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Michael Shafer_myLawCLEMichael Shafer | Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig

Michael Shafer has focused the vast majority of his practice on intellectual property matters. He has litigated intellectual property disputes in federal district courts in the United States, including trademark, copyright, and patent disputes. Additionally, he has litigated both inter partes cancellation and opposition proceedings as well as appeals before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Through his litigation practice as well as counseling clients in transactional work, Michael has gained a familiarity with the concerns and pitfalls facing intellectual property owners in transactions both during the transaction and in the event of litigation. Michael began his career at an AmLaw 100 firm where he represented clients in multiple intellectual property transactions and disputes. Michael earned his J.D. from Harvard Law School.

 

Stephanie Fields_myLawCLEStephanie Fields | Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig

Stephanie is a graduate of The George Washington University Law School. As a student attorney in the GW Law Intellectual Property & Technology Law Clinic, she helped clients understand the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) trademark registration process, prosecuted trademark applications, and overcame initial USPTO rejections. As an associate attorney with Dunlap, Bennett & Ludwig, she continues to help entrepreneurs and companies protect their business interests. She handles trademark prosecution, copyright registration, domain-name disputes, licensing and consent agreements, contracts, and other business-related matters.

Agenda

Session I – Foundations and Key Considerations in IP and Technology Contracts | 1:30pm – 2:30pm

  • Intellectual property (IP) rights in technology contracts
  • Key differences between copyrights, patents, trademarks, and trade secrets
  • The Copyright Act’s role in tech contracts
  • Importance of IP protection in technology and software development

Break | 2:30pm – 2:40pm

Session II – Mastering the Work Made for Hire Doctrine | 2:40pm – 3:40pm

  • Detailed explanation and legal criteria for the “work made for hire” doctrine
  • Analysis of statutory categories under the Copyright Act
  • Best practices for drafting and negotiating work made for hire clauses
  • Managing risks and practical implications of work made for hire designations

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Arkansas's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Florida

Approved for CLE Credits
2.5 General

Certification Credits Approved:
2.5 Intellectual Property Law To request these credits, attorneys must contact us to issue a manual certificate.
Phone: (877) 406-8636
Email: registration@mylawcle.com

Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Louisiana

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Maryland

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Missouri

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney's behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
120 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey's recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
2.4 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “A”.
Ohio

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2.5 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
2 General Hours

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
2 General Hours Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
2 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 Law and Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
2 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
2.4 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Tue, April 29, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition)
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition) Wed, April 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
Ethics for Plaintiff Firms at Settlement
Ethics for Plaintiff Firms at Settlement Fri, May 9, 2025
Live Webcast
Alcohol Industry Legal Risks & Rules
Alcohol Industry Legal Risks & Rules Tue, May 13, 2025
Live Webcast