Brian P. Worthington, Esq. is the principal attorney at Worthington Law, a San Diego firm founded in 2012. Before starting this firm, Mr. Worthington was a partner at Wingert, Grebing, Anello & Brubaker, and then Ryan, Mercaldo & Worthington. With 24 years’ experience litigating an array of civil cases in state and federal courts, Mr. Worthington’s practice now focuses primarily on Insurance Coverage and Bad Faith law for policyholders, and civil appeals and writs. Mr. Worthington is a past chair of the San Diego Appellate Court Committee, and is a past Board Member of the Conference of California Bar Associations. Mr. Worthington graduated with honors with a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin, and received his J.D. from the University of San Diego.
Federal Court 101: How to Take a Federal Court Case
Participants can expect to learn the essential basics of how to take a federal court case from the very beginning up to trial. This insightful course will provide you with an understanding of the processes and procedures for federal court, teach you how to stay on top of federal court deadlines, and show you how to successfully apply federal rules to key tasks. Confidently navigate through the federal court with your firm’s next case.
Key topics to be discussed:
• Procedural Timing and Requirements in Federal Court Civil Cases
• Discovery Rules and Strategies
• Rules for Experts in Federal Court
Date / Time: March 25, 2020
• 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
• 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
• 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
• 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific
Choose a format:
• Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
• On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.
- Automatic MCLE Approvals
All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, WV, and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)
- Live Video Broadcasts
Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.
- “Live” Re-Broadcasts
“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA]
Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, VT, NJ, NY, and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.
Section I. Complaints and Counterclaims
Section II. Removing a Case to Federal Court and Remand
Section III. Electronic Filing and Service
Section IV. Rule 26(f) Conferences and Initial Disclosures
Section V. Discovery Standards – “Proportionality”
Section VI. Written Discovery
Section VII. Expert Reports and the Daubert Standard