Licensing and Commercialization of Artificial Intelligence: What Attorneys Need to Know


CLE credits earned: 2 GENERAL (or 2 LAW & LEGAL for WA state)

Attendees will learn about the issues particular to artificial intelligence that affect licensing and commercialization of artificial intelligence, both from the supplier (licensor) and consumer (licensee) perspective.

Key topics to be discussed:

•   Commercialization of artificial intelligence
•   Regulation of artificial intelligence
•   Risks arising from artificial intelligence

Date / Time: June 27, 2019

•   2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
•   1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
•   12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
•   11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific

Choose a format:

•   Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
•   On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.

All Access Pass: Before you buy, access this class and all other myLawCLE programs, over 120 new live classes every year, for only $69 dollars per month. Purchase the All Access Pass first. Click here for more information.

Select your state to see if this class is approved for CLE credit.

Choose the format you want.


Original Broadcast Date: June 27, 2019

Heiko E. Burow, Esq. regularly advises clients on patent, copyright, trademark, and other intellectual property matters, including ownership, creation, and infringement assessments, both in and outside the context of litigation. Mr. Burow’s practice further focuses on domestic and international transactions involving intellectual property, including the negotiation, preparation, and assessment of licensing, acquisition, development, and commercialization of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual property rights. He also assists clients with domestic and international commercial agreements, including distribution, sales agency, service, manufacturing, and supply agreements.

Benjamin Kelly, Esq. is a Partner in Baker McKenzie’s award-winning global Intellectual Property practice, and is based in Dallas.

Ben has managed litigation enforcing and protecting a wide range of technologies, with a focus primarily in the electrical, communications, networking, and video display fields. He has extensive experience litigating patent, trade secret, and commercial disputes in federal district courts, including courts in Texas, Illinois, Virginia, and California, at the US International Trade Commission, and in international arbitrations.

Representative Matters and Experience
Trial counsel on behalf of patent owner in a multi-product and multi-patent ITC investigation concerning 3D cinema systems, with key responsibility for the infringement and domestic industry cases. After a full hearing on the merits, the Administrative Law Judge and Commission found infringement and issued an Exclusion Order applying to all accused products.

Successfully secured summary judgment of invalidity based on contested prior art in a long-standing, multi-jurisdictional patent fight between two telecommunication network equipment competitors. The summary judgment eliminated over USD 100 million in potential damages exposure. (N.D. Illinois)

Accreditation Policy
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.

    Automatic MCLE Approvals

All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, WV, and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)

    Live Video Broadcasts

Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.

    “Live” Re-Broadcasts

“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA]

Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, VT, NJ, NY, and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.

Section I. Commercial terms of licensing artificial intelligence

Section II. State of regulations of artificial intelligence

Section III. Considerations on ownership of artificial intelligence

Section IV. Allocation of risks and disputes involving artificial intelligence