Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Minors’ Data Under the New Privacy Stack: COPPA 2.0, Teen Privacy Under the State Laws, and the Compliance Playbook for Any Business Touching Children’s Data

Children’s data is now the most regulated data category in America, and the rules no longer stop at COPPA. Learn what the FTC’s amended COPPA Rule requires of operators today, how the minors’ and teen provisions in the state privacy laws reach users COPPA never covered, and how to build a compliance program that can survive and adapt in this new, complex world.

2026-10-07 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-07 14:30:00

2026-10-07 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

Program Details

2026-10-07 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-07 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-07 14:30:00

Course Overview

One product, one user under 18 — two enforceable regimes and a moving constitutional target

2026-10-07 14:30:00

A single minor-facing feature can now trigger the amended COPPA Rule for users under 13 and the teen-consent, sensitive-data, and profiling provisions of a growing set of state privacy laws for users 13 to 17, each with its own definitions, consent mechanics, and enforcement posture. Counsel advising any business that touches children’s or teens’ data must reconcile obligations that were never designed to fit together.

This program concentrates on the two regimes that are enforceable today. Hour one covers the amended COPPA Rule, and how the state privacy laws treat minors’ data as a distinct category. The state age-appropriate design codes will be addressed through a focused litigation status report rather than a compliance module, because their core provisions remain in active First Amendment litigation and are not a stable basis for design-stage advice. The second hour turns to execution: determining whether these regimes apply to a given product, walking through different compliance obligations and practical considerations, and assembling the documentation file that withstands an FTC or state attorney general inquiry.

Attendees leave with a practical playbook for advising minor-facing businesses under conditions of active regulatory flux — and a clear map of where the enforcement risk actually sits today.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
The Amended COPPA Rule
What changed on verifiable parental consent, retention limits, targeted advertising, and third-party data sharing — and the compliance deadlines that matter now.
02
Minors and Teens Under State Privacy Laws
Teen consent tiers, sensitive-data classification, and profiling and targeted-advertising limits across the state patchwork.
03
Applicability, Actual Knowledge, and Age Signals
Audience determination for child-directed and mixed-audience services, when actual knowledge attaches, and where the design-code litigation leaves age estimation.
04
The Compliance File and Enforcement Posture
Impact assessments for minor-facing features, vendor terms, and the documentation that protects the company, along with current FTC and state attorney general enforcement priorities.
05
The Design Codes in the Courts
A litigation status report on the state age-appropriate design codes: which provisions are currently enjoined, which remain enforceable, and what the First Amendment challenges mean for design-stage advice.
06
Advertising, Engagement Design, and Dark Patterns
Managing targeted advertising, engagement-design features, and dark-pattern exposure for minor users — and where these practices sit in the enforcement crosshairs.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

The New Regulatory Stack: COPPA's Amendments and the State Kids' Codes

This session maps the regulatory terrain. Attorneys will learn what the FTC’s amended COPPA Rule changed; how state privacy laws layer teen-consent tiers, sensitive-data treatment, and profiling and targeted advertising limits onto the federal baseline for the 13 to 17 band COPPA does not reach; and a status report on the state age-appropriate design codes, including which provisions are currently enjoined, which are enforceable.

Max L. LandawMax L. Landaw
Joyce KimJoyce Kim
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Building the Minors' Data Compliance Program That Survives an Investigation

This session turns the map into a playbook: determining whether a service is “directed to children” and when actual knowledge attaches, including the mixed-audience problem; implementing age assurance without over-collecting the very data the regimes protect; managing advertising, engagement-design, and dark-pattern exposure for minor users; and assembling the documentation file that holds up under FTC and state AG scrutiny. The session closes with Q&A and practical takeaways.

Max L. LandawMax L. Landaw
Joyce KimJoyce Kim
Max L. Landaw

Max L. Landaw

InfoLawGroup LLP

Joyce Kim

Joyce Kim

InfoLawGroup LLP

Max L. Landaw

Max L. Landaw

InfoLawGroup LLP

Max L. Landaw, Senior Counsel at InfoLawGroup, has over a decade of legal experience focused on counseling businesses of all kinds, with a particular focus on technology companies and businesses operating in closely regulated markets.  Max keeps abreast of technological developments that carry legal consequences and counsels clients on vendor transactions, privacy compliance, intellectual property protection, and marketing initiatives.

Education & Credentials

Max earned his Juris Doctor from UC Hastings College of the Law in 2011 and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from UC Berkeley in 2008. He is admitted to practice in California (2011), Texas (2019), and Illinois (2020).

Recognition & Leadership

Max serves as Treasurer of the Data Privacy Section of the Austin Bar Association.

Professional Involvement

Max is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and holds the CIPP/E, CIPP/US, and AIGP (Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional) certifications. He is also a member of the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

Experience

Max advises on privacy law, including rules around minor data protection, across more than fifteen jurisdictions spanning six continents, from the United States and Canada to the European Union, Israel, South Africa, the Gulf States, and markets across Asia Pacific. He drafts data protection agreements and addenda covering both controller-to-controller and controller-to-processor transfers, and advises on responding to data subject requests and inquiries from international supervisory authorities. He also advises on AI governance and on the legal issues raised by AI, drafting AI governance and acceptable use policies, negotiating AI-related provisions in contracts, and counseling on the intellectual property and confidentiality risks raised by AI tools. He has worked with the EU AI Act, and his AI practice frequently intersects with his biometrics work, where he advises on biometric data processing terms in vendor agreements. In helping clients implement privacy by design and default, Max supports new product launches and negotiates SaaS agreements, software licenses, developer and API agreements, and vendor and supplier agreements.
Joyce Kim

Joyce Kim

InfoLawGroup LLP

Joyce Kim is a skilled privacy professional with a focus on resolving complex privacy matters, covering topics such as, uses of consumer data, cookies and tracking technologies, data subject access requests, and data transfers.  A significant part of her practice involves the heightened rules that apply to children’s and student data, including COPPA compliance for child-directed and mixed-audience services and privacy counseling for ed-tech providers and the schools they serve. She has a particular mastery for drafting internal and consumer-facing policies, helping clients shape their business practices to safeguard privacy and stay compliant. Joyce is passionate about tracking evolving privacy legislation to keep clients well-informed of developments that may impact their operations.

Education & Credentials

Joyce earned her Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Washington University School of Law in 2020 and her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2016. She is admitted to practice in Illinois (2021).

Recognition & Leadership

At Washington University School of Law, Joyce sat on the Investigative Committee of the Honor Council, chaired the Pro Bono Committee of the Public Service Advisory Board, and served as an Associate Editor of the Washington University Journal of Law and Policy.

Professional Involvement

Joyce is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and is both a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP). She is also a member of the National Asian American Pacific Bar Association (NAPABA) and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

Experience

Joyce also brings a wealth of experience and versatile set of skills as a result of her litigation and M&A experience. As a corporate finance associate, Joyce advised on M&A transactions by conducting due diligence and preparing critical agreements. Her strong advocacy skills also stem from representing clients in legal disputes concerning real estate, antitrust, employment, products liability, commercial contracts, and intellectual property rights.
Max L. Landaw

Max L. Landaw

InfoLawGroup LLP

Max L. Landaw, Senior Counsel at InfoLawGroup, has over a decade of legal experience focused on counseling businesses of all kinds, with a particular focus on technology companies and businesses operating in closely regulated markets.  Max keeps abreast of technological developments that carry legal consequences and counsels clients on vendor transactions, privacy compliance, intellectual property protection, and marketing initiatives.

Education & Credentials

Max earned his Juris Doctor from UC Hastings College of the Law in 2011 and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from UC Berkeley in 2008. He is admitted to practice in California (2011), Texas (2019), and Illinois (2020).

Recognition & Leadership

Max serves as Treasurer of the Data Privacy Section of the Austin Bar Association.

Professional Involvement

Max is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and holds the CIPP/E, CIPP/US, and AIGP (Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional) certifications. He is also a member of the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

Experience

Max advises on privacy law, including rules around minor data protection, across more than fifteen jurisdictions spanning six continents, from the United States and Canada to the European Union, Israel, South Africa, the Gulf States, and markets across Asia Pacific. He drafts data protection agreements and addenda covering both controller-to-controller and controller-to-processor transfers, and advises on responding to data subject requests and inquiries from international supervisory authorities. He also advises on AI governance and on the legal issues raised by AI, drafting AI governance and acceptable use policies, negotiating AI-related provisions in contracts, and counseling on the intellectual property and confidentiality risks raised by AI tools. He has worked with the EU AI Act, and his AI practice frequently intersects with his biometrics work, where he advises on biometric data processing terms in vendor agreements. In helping clients implement privacy by design and default, Max supports new product launches and negotiates SaaS agreements, software licenses, developer and API agreements, and vendor and supplier agreements.
Joyce Kim

Joyce Kim

InfoLawGroup LLP

Joyce Kim is a skilled privacy professional with a focus on resolving complex privacy matters, covering topics such as, uses of consumer data, cookies and tracking technologies, data subject access requests, and data transfers.  A significant part of her practice involves the heightened rules that apply to children’s and student data, including COPPA compliance for child-directed and mixed-audience services and privacy counseling for ed-tech providers and the schools they serve. She has a particular mastery for drafting internal and consumer-facing policies, helping clients shape their business practices to safeguard privacy and stay compliant. Joyce is passionate about tracking evolving privacy legislation to keep clients well-informed of developments that may impact their operations.

Education & Credentials

Joyce earned her Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Washington University School of Law in 2020 and her Bachelor of Arts in Public Policy from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2016. She is admitted to practice in Illinois (2021).

Recognition & Leadership

At Washington University School of Law, Joyce sat on the Investigative Committee of the Honor Council, chaired the Pro Bono Committee of the Public Service Advisory Board, and served as an Associate Editor of the Washington University Journal of Law and Policy.

Professional Involvement

Joyce is a member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (“IAPP”) and is both a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP). She is also a member of the National Asian American Pacific Bar Association (NAPABA) and the Association of National Advertisers (ANA).

Experience

Joyce also brings a wealth of experience and versatile set of skills as a result of her litigation and M&A experience. As a corporate finance associate, Joyce advised on M&A transactions by conducting due diligence and preparing critical agreements. Her strong advocacy skills also stem from representing clients in legal disputes concerning real estate, antitrust, employment, products liability, commercial contracts, and intellectual property rights.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.0
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs