Ken Moyle, Esq. is Managing Member of K6 Legal PLLC, a provider of fractional in-house legal services to early stage technology companies. A legal and policy veteran in the high tech community, Mr. Moyle has held in-house leadership positions at start-ups, “unicorns” and publicly traded enterprises, most recently as chief legal officer of DocuSign, Inc. Mr. Moyle is an internationally recognized expert in digital transactions, e-signature, and legal technologies. He is a graduate of University of Washington School of Law and is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Preparing Smart Contracts: Role of Counsel, Best Practices for Limiting Vulnerabilities
Legal practitioners must have a grasp of the technical and legal fundamentals of distributed ledger technologies (DLT) in order to provide value to business clients in almost any industry. The objective of this course is to enable non-technical attorneys to be able to engage their clients in meaningful discussions about DLT and “smart contracts.”
Note: This session will not address cryptocurrencies, nor will it address regulation of token sales or token exchanges.
Key topics to be discussed:
• DLT and Smart Contract technology primer
• Smart legal contracts: fact and fiction
• Legislative and Regulatory developments regarding distributed ledger technologies
• Advising clients on smart contracts
Date / Time: December 6, 2019
• 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
• 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
• 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
• 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific
Choose a format:
• Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
• On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.
- Automatic MCLE Approvals
All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, WV, and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)
- Live Video Broadcasts
Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.
- “Live” Re-Broadcasts
“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA]
Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, VT, NJ, NY, and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.
Section I. Technology primer and definitions
Section II. State and federal proposals for regulating & promoting DLT and smart contracts
Section III. International developments
Section IV. Lawyer vs. Developer mindset
Section V. Practical considerations
Section VI. The future of the legal profession