Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Surveillance Pricing Enforcement: Responding to the California CCPA Sweep and New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Act

California’s CCPA surveillance pricing sweep and New York’s Instacart demand opened two state enforcement fronts in January 2026. Audit client personalization practices, map disclosure triggers under N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349-a, and build scalable multi-state compliance frameworks before the demand letters arrive.

2026-09-23 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-23 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-23 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-23 12:00:00

Course Overview

The Enforcement Letters Are Already Out

2026-09-23 12:00:00

January 2026 changed the posture on surveillance pricing. California’s Attorney General opened an investigative sweep of businesses that use consumer personal information to set individualized prices. New York’s Attorney General sent a demand letter to Instacart under the state’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act. Personalized pricing moved from legislative debate to active state enforcement.

The exposure is already concrete. Use personal data for unexpected price targeting and the CCPA sweep treats it as unlawful data processing. Deploy algorithmic pricing without clear and conspicuous disclosure and N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349-a exposure follows. Share pricing algorithms through a common vendor and California AB 325 adds Cartwright Act risk. Platform liability extends to third-party partners using marketplace pricing tools.

Attendees walk out with a structured audit of client personalization and pricing practices across four compliance tracks. A practical checklist flags gaps in client data flows, vendor contracts, privacy policies, and consumer-facing opt-out mechanisms. The program closes with scalable compliance frameworks built for the rapidly expanding multi-state legislative landscape rather than state-by-state point solutions.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
California Sweep Theories
The CCPA legal theories behind the Attorney General’s surveillance pricing enforcement sweep.
02
CCPA And ADMT Duties
Purpose limitation, notice obligations, and ADMT opt-out requirements under the 2026 regulations.
03
Cartwright Act Exposure
Shared pricing algorithm risk under California AB 325 for third-party vendor users.
04
Client Audit Roadmap
Data mapping, vendor diligence, and risk assessment readiness before enforcement letters arrive.
05
Section 349-a Enforcement
Statute scope, penalties, platform liability, and the Instacart demand as enforcement template.
06
Scalable Compliance Architecture
Trigger analysis, disclosure placement, vendor risk, and the multi-state legislative horizon.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Auditing Client Personalization Practices Against California's Surveillance Pricing Sweep

This session examines California’s January 2026 investigative sweep targeting businesses that use consumer personal information to set individualized prices, analyzing the CCPA legal theories the Attorney General is pursuing and the overlapping regulatory obligations now in effect. Attorneys will learn how to conduct a structured audit of client personalization and pricing practices across four compliance tracks: CCPA purpose limitation and notice, ADMT opt-out obligations, Cartwright Act shared-algorithm exposure under AB 325, and mandatory risk assessment readiness. Participants will leave with a practical checklist for identifying gaps in client data flows, vendor contracts, privacy policies, and consumer-facing opt-out mechanisms before enforcement letters arrive.

Toni Michelle JacksonToni Michelle Jackson
Joanna Rosen ForsterJoanna Rosen Forster
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Complying with New York's Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act After the Instacart Demand

This session covers New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act (N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law § 349-a), the Attorney General’s January 2026 demand letter to Instacart, and the practical compliance obligations that follow from both. Attorneys will learn how to identify which pricing mechanisms trigger the statute’s disclosure requirements, how the AG has interpreted ‘clear and conspicuous’ disclosure at every consumer-facing touchpoint, and how platform liability extends to third-party partners using marketplace pricing tools. The session also surveys the rapidly expanding multi-state legislative landscape so practitioners can build scalable compliance frameworks rather than state-by-state point solutions.

Toni Michelle JacksonToni Michelle Jackson
Joanna Rosen ForsterJoanna Rosen Forster
Toni Michelle Jackson

Toni Michelle Jackson

Crowell & Moring LLP

Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Rosen Forster

Crowell & Moring LLP

Toni Michelle Jackson

Toni Michelle Jackson

Crowell & Moring LLP

Toni Michelle Jackson is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and chair of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice Group. A first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.

Education & Credentials

Toni earned her B.B.A. from The George Washington University in 1988 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1991. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Minnesota and before the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and several federal district courts. She began her career as a law clerk to the Hon. Gerald W. Heaney of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and later clerked for the Hon. John M. “Jack” Mason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Recognition & Leadership

While serving as Deputy Attorney General in the Public Interest Division of the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General from 2018 to 2021, Toni received the Attorney General's Award for Outstanding Head of a Division in recognition of her contributions in leadership, service, and training. Her earlier leadership roles at the office include Chief of the Equity Section from 2015 to 2018 and Chief of General Litigation Section III of the Civil Litigation Division.

Professional Involvement

Toni chairs Crowell & Moring's State Attorneys General Practice Group and is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court Bar. Her recent speaking engagements include “Ensuring and Protecting Access to the Courts” at the DAGA Denver Policy Conference in September 2025.

Experience

Toni served as Senior Trial Attorney in the Employment Litigation Section of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division from 2008 to 2015 and held Assistant Attorney General and section leadership roles in the District of Columbia. Her representative matters include defending a major railroad in multidistrict litigation alleging a multibillion-dollar conspiracy to fix fuel prices, representing a leading e-commerce platform in a major antitrust lawsuit filed by the D.C. Attorney General challenging nationwide pricing policies, and representing a leading online retailer in a multistate Attorneys General investigation into driver tips. She also defends wage and hour class and collective actions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws in federal courts across the country.
Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Rosen Forster

Crowell & Moring LLP

Joanna Rosen Forster is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and a member of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice. A bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.

Education & Credentials

Joanna earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2006 and her B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 2000. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California. She served as a law clerk to the Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Joanna received the 2025 Burton Award for Distinguished Legal Writing and was named a Leading Commercial Litigator for 2026 by the Daily Journal. She previously served as Deputy Attorney General in the Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice from 2015 to 2021 and as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of ContextLogic, Inc., a publicly traded e-commerce platform operating in over 60 countries.

Professional Involvement

Joanna serves on the board of the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco and on the Family Services Committee of Family House Inc. She frequently speaks and publishes on issues integral to her practice, including a June 2026 Crowell & Moring webinar on surveillance and personalized pricing.

Experience

Joanna secured a jury verdict, judgment, and an eight-figure damages award for c3.ai, a leading enterprise AI software and application company, in a Delaware Superior Court matter alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract. Her other representative matters include defending a major retail platform against class action allegations of deceptive and unfair pricing practices and misleading online disclosures, and defending a nationwide e-tailer against claims of deceptive pricing and illegal processing of personal data. Earlier in her career, she served on the litigation team that secured over $1 billion in recovery for CalPERS and CalSTRS in residential mortgage-backed securities matters, work recognized with the Attorney General's Award for Excellence in 2019.
Toni Michelle Jackson

Toni Michelle Jackson

Crowell & Moring LLP

Toni Michelle Jackson is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and chair of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice Group. A first-chair litigator with more than 15 years of government service, she leads class and collective actions, multidistrict litigation, and other complex matters in federal and state courts, and advises clients facing State Attorneys General investigations, inquiries, and litigation.

Education & Credentials

Toni earned her B.B.A. from The George Washington University in 1988 and her J.D. from the University of Minnesota Law School in 1991. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Minnesota and before the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and several federal district courts. She began her career as a law clerk to the Hon. Gerald W. Heaney of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit and later clerked for the Hon. John M. “Jack” Mason of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Recognition & Leadership

While serving as Deputy Attorney General in the Public Interest Division of the District of Columbia Office of the Attorney General from 2018 to 2021, Toni received the Attorney General's Award for Outstanding Head of a Division in recognition of her contributions in leadership, service, and training. Her earlier leadership roles at the office include Chief of the Equity Section from 2015 to 2018 and Chief of General Litigation Section III of the Civil Litigation Division.

Professional Involvement

Toni chairs Crowell & Moring's State Attorneys General Practice Group and is a member of the District of Columbia Bar and the U.S. Supreme Court Bar. Her recent speaking engagements include “Ensuring and Protecting Access to the Courts” at the DAGA Denver Policy Conference in September 2025.

Experience

Toni served as Senior Trial Attorney in the Employment Litigation Section of the U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division from 2008 to 2015 and held Assistant Attorney General and section leadership roles in the District of Columbia. Her representative matters include defending a major railroad in multidistrict litigation alleging a multibillion-dollar conspiracy to fix fuel prices, representing a leading e-commerce platform in a major antitrust lawsuit filed by the D.C. Attorney General challenging nationwide pricing policies, and representing a leading online retailer in a multistate Attorneys General investigation into driver tips. She also defends wage and hour class and collective actions under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage and hour laws in federal courts across the country.
Joanna Rosen Forster

Joanna Rosen Forster

Crowell & Moring LLP

Joanna Rosen Forster is a partner at Crowell & Moring LLP and a member of the firm’s State Attorneys General Practice. A bet-the-company litigator, she represents companies from startups to publicly traded enterprises in high-stakes litigation, class actions, and government investigations, with a focus on technology, digital assets, e-commerce, and AI.

Education & Credentials

Joanna earned her J.D. from the University of California, Berkeley School of Law in 2006 and her B.A. in Political Science from the University of California, Berkeley in 2000. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern Districts of California. She served as a law clerk to the Hon. Consuelo B. Marshall of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Joanna received the 2025 Burton Award for Distinguished Legal Writing and was named a Leading Commercial Litigator for 2026 by the Daily Journal. She previously served as Deputy Attorney General in the Corporate Fraud Section of the California Department of Justice from 2015 to 2021 and as General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of ContextLogic, Inc., a publicly traded e-commerce platform operating in over 60 countries.

Professional Involvement

Joanna serves on the board of the Jewish Community Center of San Francisco and on the Family Services Committee of Family House Inc. She frequently speaks and publishes on issues integral to her practice, including a June 2026 Crowell & Moring webinar on surveillance and personalized pricing.

Experience

Joanna secured a jury verdict, judgment, and an eight-figure damages award for c3.ai, a leading enterprise AI software and application company, in a Delaware Superior Court matter alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and breach of contract. Her other representative matters include defending a major retail platform against class action allegations of deceptive and unfair pricing practices and misleading online disclosures, and defending a nationwide e-tailer against claims of deceptive pricing and illegal processing of personal data. Earlier in her career, she served on the litigation team that secured over $1 billion in recovery for CalPERS and CalSTRS in residential mortgage-backed securities matters, work recognized with the Attorney General's Award for Excellence in 2019.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs