Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

To the Appeals Council and Beyond: Practical Advice After an ALJ Denial – 2026 Spring National Conference – Track I (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

Transform administrative law judge denials into wins, master Appeals Council review, identify reversible errors, and build federal court strategies that protect disability clients’ rights.

2026-04-21 15:15:00

1.25 hours

Program Details

2026-04-21 15:15:00

2026-04-21 15:15:00

1.25h CLE Credits

2026-04-21 15:15:00

1.25 hours

Program Details

2026-04-21 15:15:00

Program Details

2026-04-21 15:15:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-04-21 15:15:00

1.25 hours

Course Overview

Turn An ALJ Denial into the Next Opportunity to Win

2026-04-21 15:15:00

Attorneys examine appeal options after an administrative law judge denial, including Appeals Council review and federal court litigation. Understanding internal review processes and common remand grounds strengthens post-denial advocacy. Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Spring National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association. Recorded Tuesday, April 21, 2026.

Format

CLE Credit

1.25h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1.25

Key topics that will be covered

01
Decision review
Identify regulatory and evidentiary mistakes in written administrative law judge decisions.
02
Request drafting
Frame appeals council arguments clearly and persuasively for maximum impact.
03
Case screening
Understand how cases are reviewed internally and how that shapes strategy.
04
Federal preservation
Ensure arguments are properly raised during administrative appeals for court review.
05
Appellate findings
Challenge unsupported medical and vocational conclusions in administrative law judge decisions.
06
Denial strategy
Evaluate whether to pursue Appeals Council review, federal litigation, or redevelopment.

Program schedule

clock 3:15 pm - 4:15 pm EST

To the Appeals Council and Beyond: Practical Advice After an ALJ Denial

An administrative law judge denial is not the end of a disability case. Attorneys will learn how the Appeals Council evaluates cases, identify common remand grounds, and develop practical strategies for post-hearing appeals through federal courts.

Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour

This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Spring National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.

Recorded Tuesday, April 21, 2026.

Joseph Ira FrydmanJoseph Ira Frydman
Joseph Ira Frydman

Joseph Ira Frydman

Frydman Law LLC

Joseph Ira Frydman

Joseph Ira Frydman

Frydman Law LLC

Joseph is the founder of his own Social Security law firm, established in 2023 following more than 13 years of service at the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council. During his tenure at the Appeals Council, Joseph spent the majority of his career analyzing cases involved in federal court litigation — a specialized caseload that provided him with a panoramic view of the entire SSA appeals system and a granular understanding of the substantive reasons cases are remanded. Since launching his firm, he has applied that insider expertise to help clients obtain remands from the Appeals Council and the U.S. District Courts.

Education & Credentials

Joseph is a licensed attorney with deep specialization in Social Security appellate practice. His professional credentials are defined by over 13 years at the SSA Appeals Council, where he developed expertise in federal court litigation, appellate review, and the substantive legal standards that drive remand decisions across the SSA adjudication system. He also facilitated and developed training programs for Administrative Appeals Judges, managers, senior attorneys, and new attorneys at the agency. (Specific academic credentials are not included in the provided biography.)

Recognition & Leadership

Joseph received numerous awards for his work and training contributions during his tenure at the Social Security Administration. His recognition reflects both the quality of his analytical work on federal court litigation cases and his effectiveness as a trainer and educator within the agency. His role in facilitating and developing training for Administrative Appeals Judges, managers, and attorneys at multiple career levels placed him among the Appeals Council's most trusted institutional resources — a distinction that now informs the expertise he brings to his private practice clients.

Professional Involvement

During his time at the Appeals Council, Joseph was extensively involved in the training and development of SSA legal staff, facilitating and designing programs for new Administrative Appeals Judges, senior attorneys, managers, and incoming attorneys. This work established him as an educator and institutional leader within the agency well before he transitioned to private practice. Since founding his firm in 2023, he has remained engaged with the broader Social Security disability bar, sharing his unique perspective on the appellate process with practitioners seeking to understand how cases are viewed from the Appeals Council's vantage point.

Experience

Joseph spent more than 13 years at the SSA Appeals Council, where he primarily analyzed cases involved in federal court litigation. This specialized focus gave him an unusually complete understanding of the SSA appeals process — from how cases are reviewed internally to the specific substantive grounds on which courts remand decisions back to the agency. In 2023, he founded his own law firm to bring that expertise directly to claimants, focusing on securing remands from the Appeals Council and U.S. District Courts. His background on the agency side equips him with insights into the appellate review process that few claimants' attorneys possess, making him a distinctive and highly effective advocate at the most advanced stages of Social Security litigation.
Joseph Ira Frydman

Joseph Ira Frydman

Frydman Law LLC

Joseph is the founder of his own Social Security law firm, established in 2023 following more than 13 years of service at the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council. During his tenure at the Appeals Council, Joseph spent the majority of his career analyzing cases involved in federal court litigation — a specialized caseload that provided him with a panoramic view of the entire SSA appeals system and a granular understanding of the substantive reasons cases are remanded. Since launching his firm, he has applied that insider expertise to help clients obtain remands from the Appeals Council and the U.S. District Courts.

Education & Credentials

Joseph is a licensed attorney with deep specialization in Social Security appellate practice. His professional credentials are defined by over 13 years at the SSA Appeals Council, where he developed expertise in federal court litigation, appellate review, and the substantive legal standards that drive remand decisions across the SSA adjudication system. He also facilitated and developed training programs for Administrative Appeals Judges, managers, senior attorneys, and new attorneys at the agency. (Specific academic credentials are not included in the provided biography.)

Recognition & Leadership

Joseph received numerous awards for his work and training contributions during his tenure at the Social Security Administration. His recognition reflects both the quality of his analytical work on federal court litigation cases and his effectiveness as a trainer and educator within the agency. His role in facilitating and developing training for Administrative Appeals Judges, managers, and attorneys at multiple career levels placed him among the Appeals Council's most trusted institutional resources — a distinction that now informs the expertise he brings to his private practice clients.

Professional Involvement

During his time at the Appeals Council, Joseph was extensively involved in the training and development of SSA legal staff, facilitating and designing programs for new Administrative Appeals Judges, senior attorneys, managers, and incoming attorneys. This work established him as an educator and institutional leader within the agency well before he transitioned to private practice. Since founding his firm in 2023, he has remained engaged with the broader Social Security disability bar, sharing his unique perspective on the appellate process with practitioners seeking to understand how cases are viewed from the Appeals Council's vantage point.

Experience

Joseph spent more than 13 years at the SSA Appeals Council, where he primarily analyzed cases involved in federal court litigation. This specialized focus gave him an unusually complete understanding of the SSA appeals process — from how cases are reviewed internally to the specific substantive grounds on which courts remand decisions back to the agency. In 2023, he founded his own law firm to bring that expertise directly to claimants, focusing on securing remands from the Appeals Council and U.S. District Courts. His background on the agency side equips him with insights into the appellate review process that few claimants' attorneys possess, making him a distinctive and highly effective advocate at the most advanced stages of Social Security litigation.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.0
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Approved
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Not Eligible
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Approved
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Approved
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Approved
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Approved
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs