AirBnb v. New York: Who is Winning the War Over Short-Term Rentals?


CLE Credits earned: 2 GEN

AirBnB is one of the original new-economy “disrupters” and has been wildly successful using a business model that pushes forward aggressively and asks questions later. Over the last few years, the City and State of New York have begun to push back against it and other short-term rental businesses that operate somewhere in the gulf between landlord-tenant and hotel laws. New York has begun taking a hard line on regulatory enforcement and has passed new legislation further restricting the use and advertisement of short-term rentals. Keeping up with these developments is essential for anyone representing residential (and sometimes commercial) property owners, practicing in housing court, or considering getting into the short-term rental business.

This course is co-sponsored by Wolters Kluwer.

Key topics to be discussed:

•   Lawful versus unlawful short-term rentals
•   New York Multiple Dwelling Law restrictions and New York City administrative regulations
•   Short-term rentals and private leases or residential building rules
•   Advertising ban on unlawful short-term rentals
•   Defending property-use violations for short-term rentals

Date / Time: June 1, 2018

•  2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
•  1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
•  12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
•  11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific

Choose a format:

•  Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
•  On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.

All Access Pass: Before you buy, access this class and all other myLawCLE programs, over 120 new live classes every year, for only $69 dollars per month. Purchase the All Access Pass first. Click here for more information.


Erin Lloyd, Esq. is a partner at Lloyd Patel LLP. After nearly five years advising judges in New York County supreme court and more than two years as a solo practitioner, Erin Lloyd is truly a general practitioner.

With an emphasis on litigation and dispute resolution, Erin’s practice focuses on labor and employment issues, commercial matters, and personal and property-based torts.
Erin also works with business and institutional clients, advising them on employment and compliance issues, drafting and negotiating commercial and employment contracts, and on other transactional matters.

Kyle C. Carraro, Esq. is an associate at Lloyd Patel LLP. Kyle works on every phase of the firm’s litigation practice and in handling client matters, including tort, contractual, employment, commercial and all other areas of the firm’s practice.

Before he joined Lloyd Patel LLP, Kyle represented tenants in Brooklyn Housing Court, where he received a Distinguished Service award from the New York State Courts for his work in assisting residents facing eviction. Kyle was also part of a legal team that represented an indefinitely-detained prisoner at Bagram Airbase, Afghanistan.

Accreditation Policy
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.

Automatic MCLE Approvals
All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AL, AR, CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, HI, ME, MO, MS, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, PA, PR, SD, UT, WV, WY and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)

Applied MCLE Approvals
myLawCLE seeks approval via application in all other states that are not automatically approved through myLawCLE’s state accreditation. (Some states may take up to 4 weeks to send in final accreditation, however attendees will receive accreditation according to the date the class was taken—the state of VA may take up to 12 weeks.)

Accreditation on Formats: Live Video Broadcasts, “Live” Re-Broadcasts and On-Demand CLEs

Live Video Broadcasts
Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except LA and PA—these two states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.

“Live” Re-Broadcasts
“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NM and LA.]

On-Demand CLEs
On-demand CLE classes are available 24/7 via the myLawCLE portal. Attendance to these classes is monitored and recorded via our login process and a certificate of completion is issued upon the close of viewing the program. These CLEs can be viewed at anytime and only qualify for self-study CLE credits.

Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, CO, CT, FL, GA, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NJ, NY, PR, SD and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.

myLawCLE Credit Guarantee
Additionally, on all online CLE programs application for approval will be made in all states where attending attorneys are primarily licensed in. If a registered attorney does not receive credit from their state for any reason, a full refund will be granted.

Section I. Overview of the legal controversy surrounding short-term rentals in New York and the policy implications behind it

Section II. Discuss the differences between lawful and unlawful short-term rentals

Section III. Outline the regulatory and statutory limitations on short-term rentals within New York City specifically and New York State more generally

Section IV. Address the various mechanisms the authorities have at their disposal to enforce these limitations