Jennifer Hoult, Esq. has served as a prosecutor, court-appointed children’s lawyer, court-appointed Family Court mediator, and certified rape crisis/trauma counselor. She has represented hundreds of children in custody and visitation cases. Her 2006 law review on Parental Alienation Syndrome (“PAS”) is cited in legal proceedings, legal scholarship, and mental health literature in the United States, Europe, and South America. She has presented her research findings on “parental alienation” (“PA”) and PAS as an invited keynote speaker at international conferences in the United States, Sweden, and Portugal, and for CLE presentations throughout the U.S. Ms. Hoult holds a B.A. from Barnard College, Columbia University with a double major in Computer Science and Religion; a B.M. degree from Manhattan School of Music in Harp; and a J.D., magna cum laude, from New York University School of Law. She is licensed in California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York.
“Reunification Therapy”: Science, Law, & Policy
Family Courts adjudicating custody and visitation frequently issue orders compelling third-party-witness-children to submit to “reunification therapy” (“RT”) as a legal remedy for the children’s emotional rejection of one of their parents. This CLE presents RT science, practices, and origins, and applicable law regarding personal and subject matter jurisdiction, evidentiary admissibility, and liability pursuant to constitutional, criminal, and civil laws and ethics rules.
Key topics to be discussed:
• Children’s constitutional and human rights
• RT components and origins
• Law and ethics rules that are applicable to RT
Date / Time: February 27, 2020
• 2:00 pm – 4:00 pm Eastern
• 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm Central
• 12:00 pm – 2:00 pm Mountain
• 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Pacific
Choose a format:
• Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
• On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.
- Automatic MCLE Approvals
All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, WV, and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)
- Live Video Broadcasts
Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.
- “Live” Re-Broadcasts
“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA]
Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, VT, NJ, NY, and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.
Section I. Children’s Rights to Liberty & Freedom of Speech/Opinion/Feeling & Association
a) First Amendment & Universal Declaration of Human Rights
b) Parental constitutional rights vs. children’s constitutional rights
c) Parental and governmental limits on children’s constitutional rights
Section II. Legal Context of “Reunification Therapy” (RT) Orders
a) Custody & visitation litigation: Litigant demographics
b) Blackstone’s Rule of Ten & parental abuse laws
c) Personal jurisdiction over third-party-witness children
d) Subject matter jurisdiction & First Amendment rights
i. Rights & remedies: psychological diagnoses vs. legal causes of action
ii. Psychological treatment & education vs. legal remedies
iii. DSM-V & child-parent estrangement
e) Third-party-witnesses’ Due Process rights for constitutional violation claims
f) Equal Protection rights of children estranged from their parents
Section III. RT: Science, Policy, & Law
a) RT practices & goals
b) Applicable science
c) Applicable ethics rules: Regulation and oversight
d) RT research claims vs. children’s reports
e) RT origins
f) RT & law
Section IV. Liability
a) 42 U.S.C. §1983
b) Criminal law
c) Civil law
d) Professional ethics rules: Law, psychology, & education
Section V. Policy
a) Earnings over ethics: Hoffman Report