Marcus Chatterton, Esq.—a partner in Balch & Bingham’s Birmingham office—is a tech-minded litigator experienced in intellectual property, social media, smart grid, electronic data, and general technology issues. Marcus represents large and small businesses, inventors, and creative clients in copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret disputes. Working hard to keep his clients out of court, Marcus often advises them on strategies to protect intellectual property, handle large volumes of data from systems like the “smart grid” or automated metering technologies, or to navigate Internet commerce issues and information governance. Marcus co-chairs the Copyright and Social Media Subcommittees for the Intellectual Property Committee of the American Bar Association’s Section of Litigation. Before becoming a lawyer, Marcus served in the US Marines for almost ten years.
Social Media Law 101: Rules of Admittance and What Lawyers Can and Can’t Do on Social Media [incl. 1 Ethics hour]
This course will explore aspects of social media law ranging from trial (how to collect, authenticate, and use social media evidence at trial); to ethics (what lawyers can and can’t do on social media when running their law practice or working their cases); to the nuts-and-bolts of how to use the legal process to attack trolls, imposters, and unfair competitors operating on the internet and social media.
Key topics to be discussed:
• Pursuing defamation claims for internet content
• Dealing with imposters and trolls
• Preserving and admitting social media evidence
• Lawyer ethics for social media and internet content
Date / Time: January 7, 2020
• 11:00 am – 2:10 pm Eastern
• 10:00 am – 1:10 pm Central
• 9:00 am – 12:10 pm Mountain
• 8:00 am – 11:10 am Pacific
Choose a format:
• Live Video Broadcast/Re-Broadcast: Watch Program “live” in real-time, must sign-in and watch program on date and time set above. May ask questions during presentation via chat box. Qualifies for “live” CLE credit.
• On-Demand Video: Access CLE 24/7 via on-demand library and watch program anytime. Qualifies for self-study CLE credit. On-demand versions are made available 7 business days after the original recording date and are view-able for up to one year.
myLawCLE seeks accreditation for all programs in all states. (Accreditation for paralegals sought thru NALA and NFPA paralegal associations.) Each attending attorney/paralegal will receive a certificate of completion following the close of the CLE program as proof of attendance. In required states, myLawCLE records attorney/paralegals attendance, in all other states attorney/paralegal is provided with the approved CLE certificate to submit to their state bar or governing association.
- Automatic MCLE Approvals
All myLawCLE CLE programs are accredited automatically either directly or via reciprocity in the following states: AK, AR, CA, CT, FL, HI, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, NJ, NY, WV, and VT. (AZ does not approve CLE programs, but accepts our certificates for CLE credit.)
- Live Video Broadcasts
Live video broadcasts are new live CLE programs being streamed and recorded for the first time. All of these programs qualify for “Live” CLE credit in all states except NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA —these states require in-person attendance to qualify for “Live” CLE credit.
- “Live” Re-Broadcasts
“Live” Re-broadcasts are replays of previous recorded CLE programs, set on a specific date and time and where the original presenting speakers calls in live at the end of the event to answer questions. This “live” element allows for “live” Re-broadcast CLEs to qualify for “Live” CLE credits in most states. [The following states DO NOT allow for “live” CLE credits on re-broadcast CLEs: NV, OH, MS, IN, UT, PA, GA, SC, and LA]
Many states allow for credit to be granted on a 1:1 reciprocal basis for courses approved in another mandatory CLE jurisdiction state. This is known as a reciprocity provision and includes the following states: AK, AR, HI, CT, FL, ME, MO, MT, ND, NH, NM, VT, NJ, NY, and WV. myLawCLE does not seek direct accreditation of live webinars or teleconferences in these states.
Section I. Handling social media evidence in litigation
Section II. The “ethical pitfalls” of social media for lawyers
Section III. How to battle trolls, imposters, and competitors on the internet and social media