Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Prosecuting Surveillance-Pricing Class Actions: First-Wave Complaints and the First Private Right of Action

Surveillance-pricing class actions are being filed now, and pleading errors will sink first-wave complaints. Learn to plead the ECPA crime-tort exception, select the strongest forum, structure certifiable classes, and build discovery plans against algorithmic pricing defendants.

2026-10-14 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-14 14:30:00

2026-10-14 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-10-14 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-14 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-14 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-14 14:30:00

Course Overview

The First Private Right of Action for Surveillance Pricing Takes Effect February 2027

2026-10-14 14:30:00

New Jersey’s Fair Price Protection Act takes effect February 1, 2027. It creates the first consumer private right of action for surveillance pricing. First-wave class actions, including Phillips v. JetBlue and Blink v. Washington Post, are already testing wiretap and consumer-protection theories. New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act and a broader state legislative surge are reshaping the litigation landscape.

The pleading errors are already visible. Plead the ECPA interception element thinly and the motion to dismiss succeeds. Courts are splitting on the crime-tort exception to one-party consent. Ignore the vendor-as-interceptor framing and the consent analysis collapses. Pick a forum without weighing remedial gaps and recovery shrinks. Skip preservation steps before the New Jersey effective date and essential discovery disappears.

Attendees walk out with concrete pleading guidance, a forum-selection framework, class definitions built to survive predominance attacks, and a discovery plan aimed at algorithmic pricing defendants. The strategy is drawn from the first filed complaints and the statutes themselves, practitioner judgment a doctrine summary cannot replace.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
First-Wave Complaints
What has been filed, the theories asserted, and the proof vulnerabilities exposed.
02
Crime-Tort Exception
How split ECPA rulings set the pleading specificity your complaint needs.
03
Consumer-Protection Theories
Which UDAP statutes and New York’s disclosure framework outlast dismissed ECPA claims.
04
Private Right of Action
What New Jersey’s Fair Price Protection Act gives plaintiffs, including damages and standing.
05
Forum Strategy
How remedial gaps across enacted and pending state statutes drive filing decisions.
06
Class Certification
How to plead the personal-data nexus and defeat predominance challenges.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

Pleading Surveillance-Pricing Class Claims Under Federal Wiretap and State ConsumerProtection Law

This session examines the pleading architecture of the first wave of surveillance-pricing class actions, with focus on the ECPA crime-tort exception theory and parallel state consumer-protection claims. Attorneys will learn how plaintiffs in cases like Phillips v. JetBlue have structured complaints naming both platform operators and data vendors, how courts are splitting on the wiretap theory, and how New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act and the broader state legislative surge are reshaping the litigation landscape. Attendees will leave with concrete pleading guidance — including the admissions-mining strategy, vendor-as-interceptor framing, and the class certification pitfalls specific to personalized pricing claims.

Blake Hunter YagmanBlake Hunter Yagman
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Litigating the First Private Right of Action for Surveillance Pricing

This session examines the pleading architecture of the first wave of surveillance-pricing class actions, with focus on the ECPA crime-tort exception theory and parallel state consumer-protection claims. Attorneys will learn how plaintiffs in cases like Phillips v. JetBlue have structured complaints naming both platform operators and data vendors, how courts are splitting on the wiretap theory, and how New York’s Algorithmic Pricing Disclosure Act and the broader state legislative surge are reshaping the litigation landscape. Attendees will leave with concrete pleading guidance — including the admissions-mining strategy, vendor-as-interceptor framing, and the class certification pitfalls specific to personalized pricing claims.

Blake Hunter YagmanBlake Hunter Yagman
Blake Hunter Yagman

Blake Hunter Yagman

Yagman PLLC

Blake Hunter Yagman

Blake Hunter Yagman

Yagman PLLC

Blake Hunter Yagman is the Founding Partner of Yagman PLLC. He represents the first ever class of consumers victimized by surveillance pricing, in which airfares were adjusted according to sensitive information collected about each of them. His practice centers on leveling the playing field for consumers, small businesses, and municipalities with significant economic injuries from violations of antitrust, consumer protection, and data privacy laws, with cases regularly involving unlawful digital tracking, surreptitious collection of biometric information, and theft of sensitive data and information in data breaches. Reporting on his cases has appeared in ESPN, The New York Times, Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Law360, Yahoo! News, Law.com, and Bloomberg.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Yagman earned his Juris Doctor from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, where his studies concentrated in Data and Intellectual Property Law, and his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Miami. He is admitted to the state courts of New York and Washington, D.C., and to the United States District Courts for the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District of New York, the District of Columbia, the District of Maryland, the District of Colorado, the Northern District of Illinois, and the Western District of Wisconsin.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Yagman holds court-facing leadership roles in complex consumer class actions. He serves in an interim co-lead capacity for a proposed class of millions of New Yorkers harmed by a significant data breach of New York's municipal hospital system, the largest municipal hospital system in the United States. He is a member of the steering committee representing a class of consumer egg purchasers who allege they paid supra competitive prices for shell eggs as a result of a purported algorithmic benchmarking scheme. He has also been named to the District of Columbia Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Yagman is a member of the Antitrust and Consumer Law Committee of the District of Columbia Bar Association and of the LGBTQ Bar Association of New York City. He has delivered guest lectures and symposium presentations at the University of Miami, the University of California (Irvine) School of Law, the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Hofstra University's Deane School of Law, and the University of Minnesota School of Law. He is a Founding Member of the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library and belongs to The United States Supreme Court Historical Society, The Theodore Roosevelt Association, and Friends of Sagamore Hill.

Experience

For nearly a decade, Mr. Yagman has litigated against corporations accused of misconduct at the intersection of economic and social justice. His work in pricing and data cases includes the first ever consumer class action addressing surveillance pricing, in which airfares were allegedly adjusted according to sensitive information collected about each purchaser, and a proposed class of hundreds of independent pharmacies whose reimbursement rates for generic pharmaceutical sales were allegedly suppressed through algorithmic price fixing by pharmacy benefit managers. His data privacy matters include a data breach case of first impression brought on behalf of a proposed class of over 200 million victims against a social media company, a class of millions of minor plaintiffs in Illinois whose biometric data was allegedly collected by a social media company without adequate consent, and a proposed class of millions of concert and sporting event attendees who allegedly had their biometric data collected unlawfully by a well-known sporting venue. He has also represented a proposed class of airline ticket purchasers who paid supra-competitive prices due to an alleged unlawful agreement between two major airlines, a class of gasoline purchasers across an entire state who paid higher prices due to collusion by spot market financial traders, and a proposed class of sporting event ticket purchasers who were not refunded after a COVID-19 shortened and fan-less season. He also regularly represents purchasers of products and services that are mislabeled or sold using unfair acts and practices.
Blake Hunter Yagman

Blake Hunter Yagman

Yagman PLLC

Blake Hunter Yagman is the Founding Partner of Yagman PLLC. He represents the first ever class of consumers victimized by surveillance pricing, in which airfares were adjusted according to sensitive information collected about each of them. His practice centers on leveling the playing field for consumers, small businesses, and municipalities with significant economic injuries from violations of antitrust, consumer protection, and data privacy laws, with cases regularly involving unlawful digital tracking, surreptitious collection of biometric information, and theft of sensitive data and information in data breaches. Reporting on his cases has appeared in ESPN, The New York Times, Reuters, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Law360, Yahoo! News, Law.com, and Bloomberg.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Yagman earned his Juris Doctor from the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, where his studies concentrated in Data and Intellectual Property Law, and his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Miami. He is admitted to the state courts of New York and Washington, D.C., and to the United States District Courts for the Southern District of New York, the Eastern District of New York, the District of Columbia, the District of Maryland, the District of Colorado, the Northern District of Illinois, and the Western District of Wisconsin.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Yagman holds court-facing leadership roles in complex consumer class actions. He serves in an interim co-lead capacity for a proposed class of millions of New Yorkers harmed by a significant data breach of New York's municipal hospital system, the largest municipal hospital system in the United States. He is a member of the steering committee representing a class of consumer egg purchasers who allege they paid supra competitive prices for shell eggs as a result of a purported algorithmic benchmarking scheme. He has also been named to the District of Columbia Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Yagman is a member of the Antitrust and Consumer Law Committee of the District of Columbia Bar Association and of the LGBTQ Bar Association of New York City. He has delivered guest lectures and symposium presentations at the University of Miami, the University of California (Irvine) School of Law, the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Hofstra University's Deane School of Law, and the University of Minnesota School of Law. He is a Founding Member of the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library and belongs to The United States Supreme Court Historical Society, The Theodore Roosevelt Association, and Friends of Sagamore Hill.

Experience

For nearly a decade, Mr. Yagman has litigated against corporations accused of misconduct at the intersection of economic and social justice. His work in pricing and data cases includes the first ever consumer class action addressing surveillance pricing, in which airfares were allegedly adjusted according to sensitive information collected about each purchaser, and a proposed class of hundreds of independent pharmacies whose reimbursement rates for generic pharmaceutical sales were allegedly suppressed through algorithmic price fixing by pharmacy benefit managers. His data privacy matters include a data breach case of first impression brought on behalf of a proposed class of over 200 million victims against a social media company, a class of millions of minor plaintiffs in Illinois whose biometric data was allegedly collected by a social media company without adequate consent, and a proposed class of millions of concert and sporting event attendees who allegedly had their biometric data collected unlawfully by a well-known sporting venue. He has also represented a proposed class of airline ticket purchasers who paid supra-competitive prices due to an alleged unlawful agreement between two major airlines, a class of gasoline purchasers across an entire state who paid higher prices due to collusion by spot market financial traders, and a proposed class of sporting event ticket purchasers who were not refunded after a COVID-19 shortened and fan-less season. He also regularly represents purchasers of products and services that are mislabeled or sold using unfair acts and practices.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs