International Competition & Trade (Presented by Troutman Pepper Locke)

Barbara T. Sicalides
Daniel N. Anziska
Davit Akman
Gerrit Oosterhuis
Barbara T. Sicalides | Troutman Pepper Locke
Daniel N. Anziska | Troutman Pepper Locke
Davit Akman | Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
Gerrit Oosterhuis | Houthoff
Live Video-Broadcast: December 4, 2025

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $395.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
This program is only available to All-Access Pass Members.
All-Access Pass

Free access to all CLE programs w/active subscription. Annual subscription only $395/yr.

Program Summary

This CLE provides a concise, practical update on how global competition and trade regimes are shifting and what that means for cross-border transactions. It highlights key developments in international antitrust enforcement, including where regulators are focusing and how standards are evolving. The program also examines the growing role of national security and trade-regulation review in dealmaking, with attention to the added scrutiny these frameworks can bring. Attendees will leave with a clear roadmap for assessing and navigating these overlapping enforcement trends when evaluating and structuring transaction opportunities.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Key developments in international antitrust/competition enforcement
  • Rising national security and trade-regulation scrutiny impacting cross-border deals
  • How to navigate these enforcement trends when evaluating transaction opportunities

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Barbara T. Sicalides | Troutman Pepper Locke

Barbara’s practice covers the full range of antitrust and competition matters. She routinely handles antitrust litigation, conduct and merger investigations, and counseling, as well as distribution disputes and arrangements, for domestic and international companies.

Her antitrust litigation experience includes a wide range of antitrust claims, such as class action and individual plaintiff actions. Additionally, this experience includes actions challenging agreements among competitors such as price fixing, customer allocation, output restraints, and other similar horizontal agreements, as well as monopolization and claims challenging exclusionary conduct or agreements. She has also defended clients facing price discrimination, overlapping director, and numerous state statutory and common law unfair competition claims.

She has extensive experience responding to government investigations of alleged cartel activity, including price-fixing and market allocation. Most recently, she represented a successful applicant under the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Lenience Program, as well as other nonpublic criminal investigations.

Barbara advises clients on acquisitions and joint venture transactions before the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, state attorneys general, and international regulatory agencies. She is also experienced in non-merger civil and criminal antitrust investigations before the enforcement agencies, and defends against antitrust class actions and individual claims. Her counseling practice also involves helping international and domestic companies to minimize or avoid antitrust liability, and to implement effective compliance programs.

 

Daniel N. Anziska| Troutman Pepper Locke

Dan solves antitrust and related regulatory issues for businesses in the construction, modeling, sports, financial services, publishing, energy, retail, and health care industries. He collaborates with businesses on planning strategic acquisitions in concentrated markets, structuring joint ventures and other collaborations, advocating before enforcement agencies (DOJ, the FTC, and State AGs), and litigating complex antitrust cases in federal courts across the nation.

Utilizing his knowledge of markets and trade policy and dynamics, Dan similarly assists businesses with navigating trade and supply chain issues, including foreign direct investment (CFIUS), export controls (EAR) and tariffs, duties, and trade sanctions.

Renewable energy developers, electric vehicle manufacturers, and battery supply chain companies involved in the electrification ecosystem across the U.S. rely on Dan to navigate complex regulatory and policy matters to help develop a robust domestic green energy infrastructure.

 

Davit Akman| Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

Davit Akman serves as Chair of the firm’s Competition & Foreign Investment Group. A leader in his field, he advises market-leading domestic and international firms on all aspects of Canadian competition and foreign investment review law, including mergers & acquisitions, cartels and other criminal matters, private actions (including class actions), advertising and marketing practices, abuse of dominance and other reviewable trade practices.

Davit has cleared major multi-jurisdictional and domestic mergers in a wide array of industry sectors and advises non-Canadian investors (including state owned enterprises (SOEs)) on Canadian foreign investment issues under the Investment Canada Act (ICA) and other federal legislation and policies. He is a market leader in advising Canadian and foreign-owned mining companies as well as SOEs with respect to the Government of Canada’s October 2022 Policy Regarding Foreign Investments from State-Owned Enterprises in Critical Minerals under the ICA.

Davit has also served as counsel in a number of Canada’s most important competition litigation cases, including matters before the Supreme Court of Canada and the Canadian Competition Tribunal.

 

Gerrit Oosterhuis | Houthoff

Gerrit heads the Brussels office of Houthoff. He advises on Dutch and EU competition law as well as foreign direct investment screening (FDI). Gerrit’s competition law practice encompasses merger notifications, cartel investigations and stand-alone competition litigation as well as the international coordination of such practices. He also advises on complex behavioural practices such as distribution systems, creating joint ventures and compliance programs. In the field of investment screening, Gerrit has been involved in the most complex high tech cases in the Netherlands and regularly coordinates multijurisdictional filings. Gerrit represents clients from a wide range of sectors, specifically high tech, energy and food.

Agenda

I. Key developments in international antitrust/competition enforcement | 10:55am – 11:25am

II. Rising national security and trade-regulation scrutiny impacting cross-border deals | 11:25am – 11:55am

III. How to navigate these enforcement trends when evaluating transaction opportunities | 11:55am – 12:25pm

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washington via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Annual Pass Exclusive

This Class is Exclusive to Annual Pass Members

This program is only available to myLawCLE All-Access Pass subscribers. Subscribe now to unlock this class along with 1,000+ live webinars for only $395/yr — including 60+ new programs added every month.

Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $395

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs