Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

The Affidavit of Support: The Federal Support Obligation That Survives Divorce

Your client’s divorce decree says support ends. Federal law says otherwise. Learn when the I-864 obligation terminates, who can sue on it, how to calculate the 125% Federal Poverty Guidelines duty after Adeyeye, and how to draft settlements that survive it.

2026-10-08 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-08 14:30:00

2026-10-08 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-10-08 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-08 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-08 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-08 14:30:00

Course Overview

The Support Obligation Your Divorce Decree Cannot Waive

2026-10-08 14:30:00

All family-based sponsor signs Form I-864, a federally created contract under INA § 213A and 8 U.S.C. § 1183a. It is not a formality. The obligation survives the divorce. And the June 2025 California Court of Appeal decision in In re Marriage of Adeyeye and Faramaye has refined how courts calculate what the sponsor owes.

Only five statutory events terminate the duty. Divorce is not one of them. Neither is a prenup, a postnup, or the immigrant’s own conduct. Draft a settlement that waives the I-864 and the waiver is unenforceable. Miscalculating the 125% Federal Poverty Guidelines figure and the judgment is wrong. Name a joint sponsor or I-864A household member and the liability follows them into the enforcement action. The sponsored immigrant can sue in federal or state court, and serial litigation carries res judicata risk.

You walk out with work products, not doctrine. A termination checklist. A damages framework under 8 C.F.R. § 213a.1 with income-offset rules. A map of which affirmative defenses succeed and which are categorically unavailable. A forum-selection strategy. Compliant settlement language that replaces unenforceable waiver clauses. All of it built for representing either the sponsor or the sponsored immigrant.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Termination Events and Myths
Only five statutory events under 8 U.S.C. § 1183a end the sponsor’s duty — divorce, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, and the immigrant’s own conduct do not.
02
Who Can Enforce
How the sponsored immigrant’s right to sue differs from government agencies’ statutory enforcement authority, and where that authority goes unused in practice.
03
Calculating the Obligation
How to compute the 125% Federal Poverty Guidelines duty and apply income-offset rules after In re Marriage of Adeyeye and Faramaye, avoiding the calculation errors common in divorce proceedings.
04
Joint Sponsor Liability
How to handle a joint sponsor or I-864A household member who is named in an enforcement action after the divorce.
05
Forum and Defense Strategy
How to choose between federal and state courts, manage the res judicata risk of serial litigation, and separate defenses that succeed from those categorically unavailable to sponsors.
06
Settlement Drafting
How to replace unenforceable waiver clauses with compliant language, address government-enforcement exposure, and prevent double recovery against state-law spousal support.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

SESSION 1 - The Affidavit of Support Obligation: When It Terminates and Who Can Enforce It | 2:30pm – 3:30pm

This session examines the I-864 Affidavit of Support as a federally created contractual obligation under INA § 213A and 8 U.S.C. § 1183a, focusing on the five statutory termination events, the legal consequences of divorce and private agreements on that obligation, and who holds the right to enforce it. Attorneys will learn how courts calculate the sponsor’s financial duty — including the 125% Federal Poverty Guidelines framework refined by the June 2025 California Court of Appeal decision in In re Marriage of Adeyeye and Faramaye — and will identify the distinct enforcement rights of the sponsored immigrant versus government agencies. Attendees will leave with a practical understanding of joint-sponsor liability under I-864A, common calculation errors in divorce proceedings, and the gap between statutory government-enforcement authority and real-world practice.

Gregory McLawsenGregory McLawsen
clock - 4:40 pm EST

Litigating Affidavit of Support Claims and Drafting Settlements Around Them

This session equips attorneys to litigate I-864 breach-of-contract claims from complaint through judgment and to draft divorce settlement agreements that account for the federal support obligation that cannot be waived. Attendees will learn how to calculate damages under 8 C.F.R. § 213a.1, assess available affirmative defenses and their limits, choose between federal and state forum, and structure settlement language that avoids unenforceable waiver clauses. Attorneys leave with a practical framework for representing either sponsors or sponsored immigrants in I-864 disputes arising out of divorce.

Devon Rood SlovenskyDevon Rood Slovensky
Devon Rood Slovensky

Devon Rood Slovensky

Slovensky Law PLLC

Gregory McLawsen

Gregory McLawsen

Sound Immigration

Devon Rood Slovensky

Devon Rood Slovensky

Slovensky Law PLLC

Devon Rood Slovensky is a family law attorney in Roanoke, Virginia, and the founder of Slovensky Law PLLC, where she handles contested and uncontested divorce, spousal support, child custody, and child support matters across Southwest Virginia. She litigated Madrid v. Robinson, the first case in the Western District of Virginia to enforce an I-864 immigration affidavit of support. A Certified Divorce Financial Analyst® since 2021, she is licensed in all Virginia courts, the U.S. District Courts in Virginia, and the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in Virginia.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Slovensky earned her J.D. from George Mason University School of Law and her B.A. in Economics and American Politics from the University of Virginia. She completed the National Institute for Trial Advocacy Public Service Trial College in 2015 and the National Trial Advocacy College in 2016. She holds the Certified Divorce Financial Analyst® (CDFA®) designation (2021) and is certified by the Supreme Court of Virginia as a guardian ad litem for incapacitated adults.

Recognition & Leadership

She was named the Roanoke Bar Association Young Lawyer of the Year in 2019, one of The Roanoker's 40 Under 40 in 2021, and a Virginia Skyline Girl Scouts Woman of Achievement in 2020. In 2017 she received the Pegasus Scholarship from the American Inns of Court, selected as one of two American attorneys to represent the organization in London, England, and she has been listed among Super Lawyers Rising Stars. She served as President of the Roanoke Chapter of the Virginia Women Attorneys Association (2015–2016) and on that organization's statewide board, sits on the Board of the Roanoke Bar Association, and was appointed to the Virginia State Bar Special Committee on Access to Legal Services.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Slovensky is a member of the Ted Dalton American Inn of Court, where she presented "Digital Evidence in Family Law" in March 2021, and she delivered a CLE presentation on guardianship at the Roanoke Bar Association Conference in May 2018. Her writing on the financial side of divorce includes "What You Need to Know About Money Before You Divorce" (ParentMap), and she authored the 2017 Pegasus Scholar Report. Her Pegasus Scholarship was featured by The Faculty of Advocates and Scottish Legal News in 2017.

Experience

Ms. Slovensky litigated Madrid v. Robinson, the first case in the Western District of Virginia to enforce an I-864 immigration affidavit of support. As a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst®, her practice centers on the financial dimensions of divorce, including spousal support, and extends to custody modifications, international child custody and abduction, protection orders, and stepparent and other adoptions. She began her career as a staff attorney for legal aid before establishing her own firm, and her firm reports more than 600 cases handled and more than 1,500 people helped.
Gregory McLawsen

Gregory McLawsen

Sound Immigration

Gregory McLawsen represents green card holders in federal lawsuits across the country to enforce the financial support obligation a sponsor undertakes on Form I-864. Enforcement of the affidavit of support is the exclusive focus of his Seattle-based firm, Sound Immigration, which has handled matters in more than 25 states and operates on a model that recovers fees from sponsors rather than requiring clients to pay up front. He is admitted to the United States Supreme Court, the Washington Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits, and U.S. District Courts in Washington, Texas, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia.

Education & Credentials

Mr. McLawsen earned his J.D. with distinction from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 2009, where he was named to the Order of the Coif, and his B.A. with honors in Psychology and Philosophy from the University of Washington in 2004. He began his legal career with a two-year judicial clerkship, followed by work at an immigration law firm, before founding his own practice.

Recognition & Leadership

He has been recognized by Super Lawyers in Washington State as a Rising Star and Super Lawyer in Consumer Immigration every year since 2015. He was a Fellow of the Washington Leadership Institute (2014–2015) and received the Washington Young Lawyer Committee Public Service Incentive Award in 2014. Within the bar, he chaired the Washington State Bar Association Small and Solo Practice Section (2015–2016) after serving as Chair-Elect, served on the Executive Committee of the American Immigration Lawyers Association Washington State Chapter as Secretary (2014–2015) and Treasurer (2013–2014), and has sat on the Clio Customer Advisory Board since 2020.

Professional Involvement

Mr. McLawsen has written on I-864 enforcement for more than a decade, including the recurring "Suing on the Form I-864" series in Bender's Immigration Bulletin (2012, 2014, 2017, and 2020); "The Federal Right to Immigration 'Alimony' under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support," Federal Bar Association Federal Litigation Section Side Bar (Spring 2021); "The I-864 Affidavit of Support: An Intro to the Immigration Form You Must Learn to Love/Hate," ABA Family Law Quarterly (Winter 2015); "The Rules Have Changed: Stop Drafting I-864s for Joint Sponsors," Bender's Immigration Bulletin (2015); and "The Contractual Duty to Support an Immigrant Spouse," Thurston Legal Brief (2012). He has also published on public charge inadmissibility and immigration practice management. He speaks regularly on the affidavit of support to family law and immigration audiences, including the State Bar of Texas programs "Enforcing the I-864 Affidavit of Support in divorce proceedings & federal court" (2022), "The Affidavit of Support and the Right to Lifelong Alimony" (2021), and I-864 Sponsor Obligations (2024); the Northwest Justice Project Statewide Family Law Task Force (2024); the Tennessee Alliance for Legal Services (2025); and American Immigration Lawyers Association chapters nationwide, including the Michigan, Kansas-Missouri, Dakotas, Arizona, Carolinas, Oregon, Hawai'i, New England, Idaho, Philadelphia, and Chicago chapters (2024–2025). He presented at the AILA National Conference (2015, 2023) and served as a guest lecturer on public charge inadmissibility and Form I-864 enforcement at Seattle University School of Law (2025).

Experience

Mr. McLawsen's I-864 enforcement work has produced published decisions in federal and state courts, including Asilonu v. Okeiyi, 550 F.Supp.3d 282 (M.D.N.C. 2021); Pachal v. Bugreeff, 495 F.Supp.3d 963 (D. Mont. 2020); Cyrousi v. Kashyap, 386 F.Supp.3d 1278 (C.D. Cal. 2019); Rahman v. Chen, 281 F.Supp.3d 1124 (W.D. Wash. 2017); Dorsaneo v. Dorsaneo, 261 F.Supp.3d 1052 (N.D. Cal. 2017); Liu v. Kell, 299 F.Supp.3d 1128 (W.D. Wash. 2017); and Khan v. Khan, 332 P.3d 1016 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). His practice began in family-based immigration and moved progressively toward affidavit-of-support litigation as he found that few attorneys handle these claims and that many immigrants with valid claims cannot afford traditional representation. That work now spans federal litigation and I-864 enforcement in divorce proceedings on behalf of sponsored immigrants.
Devon Rood Slovensky

Devon Rood Slovensky

Slovensky Law PLLC

Devon Rood Slovensky is a family law attorney in Roanoke, Virginia, and the founder of Slovensky Law PLLC, where she handles contested and uncontested divorce, spousal support, child custody, and child support matters across Southwest Virginia. She litigated Madrid v. Robinson, the first case in the Western District of Virginia to enforce an I-864 immigration affidavit of support. A Certified Divorce Financial Analyst® since 2021, she is licensed in all Virginia courts, the U.S. District Courts in Virginia, and the U.S. Bankruptcy Courts in Virginia.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Slovensky earned her J.D. from George Mason University School of Law and her B.A. in Economics and American Politics from the University of Virginia. She completed the National Institute for Trial Advocacy Public Service Trial College in 2015 and the National Trial Advocacy College in 2016. She holds the Certified Divorce Financial Analyst® (CDFA®) designation (2021) and is certified by the Supreme Court of Virginia as a guardian ad litem for incapacitated adults.

Recognition & Leadership

She was named the Roanoke Bar Association Young Lawyer of the Year in 2019, one of The Roanoker's 40 Under 40 in 2021, and a Virginia Skyline Girl Scouts Woman of Achievement in 2020. In 2017 she received the Pegasus Scholarship from the American Inns of Court, selected as one of two American attorneys to represent the organization in London, England, and she has been listed among Super Lawyers Rising Stars. She served as President of the Roanoke Chapter of the Virginia Women Attorneys Association (2015–2016) and on that organization's statewide board, sits on the Board of the Roanoke Bar Association, and was appointed to the Virginia State Bar Special Committee on Access to Legal Services.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Slovensky is a member of the Ted Dalton American Inn of Court, where she presented "Digital Evidence in Family Law" in March 2021, and she delivered a CLE presentation on guardianship at the Roanoke Bar Association Conference in May 2018. Her writing on the financial side of divorce includes "What You Need to Know About Money Before You Divorce" (ParentMap), and she authored the 2017 Pegasus Scholar Report. Her Pegasus Scholarship was featured by The Faculty of Advocates and Scottish Legal News in 2017.

Experience

Ms. Slovensky litigated Madrid v. Robinson, the first case in the Western District of Virginia to enforce an I-864 immigration affidavit of support. As a Certified Divorce Financial Analyst®, her practice centers on the financial dimensions of divorce, including spousal support, and extends to custody modifications, international child custody and abduction, protection orders, and stepparent and other adoptions. She began her career as a staff attorney for legal aid before establishing her own firm, and her firm reports more than 600 cases handled and more than 1,500 people helped.
Gregory McLawsen

Gregory McLawsen

Sound Immigration

Gregory McLawsen represents green card holders in federal lawsuits across the country to enforce the financial support obligation a sponsor undertakes on Form I-864. Enforcement of the affidavit of support is the exclusive focus of his Seattle-based firm, Sound Immigration, which has handled matters in more than 25 states and operates on a model that recovers fees from sponsors rather than requiring clients to pay up front. He is admitted to the United States Supreme Court, the Washington Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fourth, Sixth, and Ninth Circuits, and U.S. District Courts in Washington, Texas, Michigan, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia.

Education & Credentials

Mr. McLawsen earned his J.D. with distinction from the University of Nebraska College of Law in 2009, where he was named to the Order of the Coif, and his B.A. with honors in Psychology and Philosophy from the University of Washington in 2004. He began his legal career with a two-year judicial clerkship, followed by work at an immigration law firm, before founding his own practice.

Recognition & Leadership

He has been recognized by Super Lawyers in Washington State as a Rising Star and Super Lawyer in Consumer Immigration every year since 2015. He was a Fellow of the Washington Leadership Institute (2014–2015) and received the Washington Young Lawyer Committee Public Service Incentive Award in 2014. Within the bar, he chaired the Washington State Bar Association Small and Solo Practice Section (2015–2016) after serving as Chair-Elect, served on the Executive Committee of the American Immigration Lawyers Association Washington State Chapter as Secretary (2014–2015) and Treasurer (2013–2014), and has sat on the Clio Customer Advisory Board since 2020.

Professional Involvement

Mr. McLawsen has written on I-864 enforcement for more than a decade, including the recurring "Suing on the Form I-864" series in Bender's Immigration Bulletin (2012, 2014, 2017, and 2020); "The Federal Right to Immigration 'Alimony' under the Form I-864, Affidavit of Support," Federal Bar Association Federal Litigation Section Side Bar (Spring 2021); "The I-864 Affidavit of Support: An Intro to the Immigration Form You Must Learn to Love/Hate," ABA Family Law Quarterly (Winter 2015); "The Rules Have Changed: Stop Drafting I-864s for Joint Sponsors," Bender's Immigration Bulletin (2015); and "The Contractual Duty to Support an Immigrant Spouse," Thurston Legal Brief (2012). He has also published on public charge inadmissibility and immigration practice management. He speaks regularly on the affidavit of support to family law and immigration audiences, including the State Bar of Texas programs "Enforcing the I-864 Affidavit of Support in divorce proceedings & federal court" (2022), "The Affidavit of Support and the Right to Lifelong Alimony" (2021), and I-864 Sponsor Obligations (2024); the Northwest Justice Project Statewide Family Law Task Force (2024); the Tennessee Alliance for Legal Services (2025); and American Immigration Lawyers Association chapters nationwide, including the Michigan, Kansas-Missouri, Dakotas, Arizona, Carolinas, Oregon, Hawai'i, New England, Idaho, Philadelphia, and Chicago chapters (2024–2025). He presented at the AILA National Conference (2015, 2023) and served as a guest lecturer on public charge inadmissibility and Form I-864 enforcement at Seattle University School of Law (2025).

Experience

Mr. McLawsen's I-864 enforcement work has produced published decisions in federal and state courts, including Asilonu v. Okeiyi, 550 F.Supp.3d 282 (M.D.N.C. 2021); Pachal v. Bugreeff, 495 F.Supp.3d 963 (D. Mont. 2020); Cyrousi v. Kashyap, 386 F.Supp.3d 1278 (C.D. Cal. 2019); Rahman v. Chen, 281 F.Supp.3d 1124 (W.D. Wash. 2017); Dorsaneo v. Dorsaneo, 261 F.Supp.3d 1052 (N.D. Cal. 2017); Liu v. Kell, 299 F.Supp.3d 1128 (W.D. Wash. 2017); and Khan v. Khan, 332 P.3d 1016 (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). His practice began in family-based immigration and moved progressively toward affidavit-of-support litigation as he found that few attorneys handle these claims and that many immigrants with valid claims cannot afford traditional representation. That work now spans federal litigation and I-864 enforcement in divorce proceedings on behalf of sponsored immigrants.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs