Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

The Judgment Is Not the Money: Enforcement, Charging Orders, and the Renewal Clock

A California money judgment is a right to collect, not a payment. Learn to profile judgment debtors, establish and protect liens, sequence levies and examinations, and unwind voidable transfers when debtors shield assets behind related entities.

2026-10-06 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-06 14:30:00

2026-10-06 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-10-06 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-06 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-06 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-06 14:30:00

Course Overview

A Winning Judgment Collects Nothing on Its Own

2026-10-06 14:30:00

California judgment enforcement now runs on two clocks at once. Reverse veil piercing under Curci Investments, LLC v. Baldwin now lets creditors reach debtors hiding behind entities. Code of Civil Procedure section 187 adds alter ego judgment debtors to an existing judgment. Meanwhile, renewal deadlines and lien issues quietly erode judgments that sit idle.

The stakes compound fast. Miss a renewal deadline and the judgment dies. Serve a levy without checking exemptions and the recovery shrinks. Overlook a transfer and the assets sit behind a related person or entity. California’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, alter ego liability, and reverse piercing each demand a different showing. Picking the wrong one wastes leverage.

This program delivers a coordinated enforcement plan. Attendees leave able to profile judgment debtors, establish and protect judgment liens, and sequence examinations, levies, and other remedies. They also gain a working framework for choosing among UVTA claims, alter ego theories, reverse piercing, and ordinary enforcement remedies. That selection judgment is the work product no form file supplies.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Enforcement Plan Design
How judgment review, debtor profiling, investigation, and cost considerations shape a coordinated enforcement strategy.
02
Liens, Priority, and Exemptions
How judgment liens, priority protection, and exemption limits shape which assets creditors actually reach.
03
Remedy Sequencing
How to sequence examinations, levies, and remedies against cash, income, receivables, and businesses.
04
Voidable Transfer Claims
How California’s UVTA actual-intent and constructive-transfer theories reach assets the debtor moved.
05
Alter Ego Liability
How Curci reverse veil piercing and CCP section 187 add alter ego debtors
06
Choosing the Theory
How to select among UVTA, alter ego, reverse piercing, and ordinary remedies.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

Developing and Executing a Judgment Enforcement Plan

The first hour addresses the practical framework for evaluating and enforcing a California money judgment. The presentation covers reviewing the judgment for enforceability, renewal deadlines, and lien issues; identifying and profiling individual and business judgment debtors; conducting public-record and asset investigations; establishing judgment liens and protecting priority; and using available enforcement remedies to reach cash, income, receivables, business interests, and other assets. The hour also addresses judgment debtor and third-party examinations, exemptions, cost considerations, and the sequencing of multiple remedies as part of a coordinated enforcement strategy.

Bryan M. GrundonBryan M. Grundon
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Reaching Assets the Debtor Has Transferred or Shielded

The second hour addresses more advanced enforcement issues that arise when ordinary collection remedies are unsuccessful or when assets have been transferred, concealed, or placed behind related persons or entities. The presentation covers California’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act, including actual-intent and constructive-transfer theories and available remedies against transferred assets and transferees. It also addresses alter ego liability, reverse veil piercing under Curci Investments, LLC v. Baldwin, and the use of Code of Civil Procedure section 187 to add alter ego judgment debtors. The hour concludes with a discussion of how to distinguish among UVTA, alter ego, reverse piercing, and ordinary enforcement remedies, and how to select the appropriate theory and procedural vehicle based on the facts of the case.

Bryan M. GrundonBryan M. Grundon
Bryan M. Grundon

Bryan M. Grundon

The Grundon Law Firm

Bryan M. Grundon

Bryan M. Grundon

The Grundon Law Firm

Bryan M. Grundon devotes his practice entirely to post-judgment enforcement under California law, acting for judgment creditors in complex, high-value collection matters throughout the state. He is regularly brought in by trial attorneys, out-of-state firms, financial institutions, and businesses that need an experienced California enforcement attorney once liability has been established, and his work centers on converting judgments into actual recoveries.

Education & Credentials

Bryan earned his Juris Doctor from the University of San Diego School of Law and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Cal Poly Humboldt in 2002. He has been admitted to practice in California since 2005 (State Bar No. 239234) and is licensed before all four United States District Courts in the state, with admissions to the Southern District of California (2009), the Central District of California (2010), the Eastern District of California (2020), and the Northern District of California (2022).

Recognition & Leadership

Bryan founded The Grundon Law Firm in 2008 and has led it since, growing it into a statewide California enforcement practice serving judgment creditors. His leadership extends beyond the profession as well; teams he helped direct as offensive coordinator at Rancho Bernardo High School earned three consecutive Palomar League Championships, two CIF Finals appearances, and a State Championship.

Professional Involvement

Outside of legal practice, Bryan, a native San Diegan, has been involved with the Rancho Bernardo High School football program for nearly two decades, including twelve years as offensive coordinator, and he continues to contribute to the program in an assistant coaching capacity.

Experience

Bryan has worked on judgment collection since his first year of law school, and in recent years his work has centered almost entirely on post-judgment execution in high-value matters. That work includes domestication and enforcement of sister-state and federal judgments, coordinated levy strategies, real property lien and priority analysis, assignment orders, and long-term recovery plans tailored to the debtor’s assets and structure. Since founding his firm in 2008, he has represented a broad range of creditors, including national banks, credit unions, insurance companies, and private businesses, in sophisticated enforcement and recovery matters across California. Before founding the firm, he practiced as an associate attorney at the Law Office of W. Jeffery Fulton from 2005 to 2007.
Bryan M. Grundon

Bryan M. Grundon

The Grundon Law Firm

Bryan M. Grundon devotes his practice entirely to post-judgment enforcement under California law, acting for judgment creditors in complex, high-value collection matters throughout the state. He is regularly brought in by trial attorneys, out-of-state firms, financial institutions, and businesses that need an experienced California enforcement attorney once liability has been established, and his work centers on converting judgments into actual recoveries.

Education & Credentials

Bryan earned his Juris Doctor from the University of San Diego School of Law and his Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from Cal Poly Humboldt in 2002. He has been admitted to practice in California since 2005 (State Bar No. 239234) and is licensed before all four United States District Courts in the state, with admissions to the Southern District of California (2009), the Central District of California (2010), the Eastern District of California (2020), and the Northern District of California (2022).

Recognition & Leadership

Bryan founded The Grundon Law Firm in 2008 and has led it since, growing it into a statewide California enforcement practice serving judgment creditors. His leadership extends beyond the profession as well; teams he helped direct as offensive coordinator at Rancho Bernardo High School earned three consecutive Palomar League Championships, two CIF Finals appearances, and a State Championship.

Professional Involvement

Outside of legal practice, Bryan, a native San Diegan, has been involved with the Rancho Bernardo High School football program for nearly two decades, including twelve years as offensive coordinator, and he continues to contribute to the program in an assistant coaching capacity.

Experience

Bryan has worked on judgment collection since his first year of law school, and in recent years his work has centered almost entirely on post-judgment execution in high-value matters. That work includes domestication and enforcement of sister-state and federal judgments, coordinated levy strategies, real property lien and priority analysis, assignment orders, and long-term recovery plans tailored to the debtor’s assets and structure. Since founding his firm in 2008, he has represented a broad range of creditors, including national banks, credit unions, insurance companies, and private businesses, in sophisticated enforcement and recovery matters across California. Before founding the firm, he practiced as an associate attorney at the Law Office of W. Jeffery Fulton from 2005 to 2007.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs