Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

The Post-McLaughlin State of TCPA Litigation: Do Not Call—But Can I Text?

TCPA text claims that were worth millions may now be worth nothing, depending on the forum. Map favorable jurisdictions, plead around hostile ones, and evaluate certification risk and settlement value with post-McLaughlin benchmarks.

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-24 13:00:00

2026-09-24 13:00:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Course Overview

Hundreds of Millions in TCPA Judgments and Settlements Before 2025 Would Be Worth Zero Dollars in 2026

2026-09-24 13:00:00

Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation is being reshaped due to a fundamental and deepening split across federal circuits following the Supreme Court’s 2024 and 2025 rulings in Loper-Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo and McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. McKesson Corporation, respectively.

The SCOTUS directive seems deceptively simple: district courts need to read and interpret the statutory text of the TCPA. The outcome thus far is that only the Seventh Circuit has clarity on whether a large percentage of TCPA claims, those brought under Section 227(c) of the TCPA for unsolicited text messages, can even survive a motion to dismiss. Not only is there a lack of consistency across federal jurisdictions at the pleadings stage, Loper-Bright, McLaughlin, and other recent decisions have caused drastic fluctuations to the settlement value and certifiability of TCPA class actions.

This program equips attorneys who evaluate and litigate TCPA matters with the practical tools they need at every stage of litigation. Attendees will receive tangible takeaways, including a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction forum selection map, a pleading framework for hostile circuits, and benchmarks for evaluating and communicating settlement leverage.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Loper-Bright and McLaughlin
How the landmark rulings changed the way district courts must interpret the TCPA.
02
Forum Strategy
Assessing the spectrum of post-McLaughlin case law from Steidinger to Howard.
03
Pleading Frameworks
When to bring novel post-McLaughlin arguments and how to frame them by jurisdiction.
04
Discovery and Summary Judgment
Bifurcation decisions and early summary judgment motions that directly impact class certification arguments.
05
Certification and Predominance
How the consent-centered predominance battleground and Rule 23(a) factors develop across federal jurisdictions.
06
Settlement Value
Benchmarks and McLaughlin-era factors for evaluating what TCPA cases should settle for.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Pleading and Forum Strategy for TCPA Text Message Do-Not-Call Claims

This session addresses the rapidly shifting pleading and forum strategy landscape for TCPA Do-Not-Call claims based on text messages, focusing on the deepening circuit split over whether text messages qualify as “calls” under Section 227(c) of the statute. Attorneys will learn how to evaluate forum options and make post-McLaughlin arguments on both sides in hostile jurisdictions. Participants will leave with a concrete pleading framework and a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction forum map applicable to active and prospective text-based TCPA litigation.

Ashley R. FickelAshley R. Fickel
Maxwell LevinsMaxwell Levins
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Post-McLaughlin TCPA Class Certification Viability and Settlement Value

This session examines three variables that largely determine the value and viability of TCPA class actions across jurisdictions: the Rule 23(b)(3) predominance battleground, recent settlement benchmarks, and the advisability of summary judgment motions. Attorneys will leave with a working command of current TCPA circuit splits, certification strategies, and how to assess and communicate settlement leverage. The session is designed for attorneys who evaluate and/or litigate TCPA class actions.

Ashley R. FickelAshley R. Fickel
Maxwell LevinsMaxwell Levins
Ashley R. Fickel

Ashley R. Fickel

Stinson LLP

Maxwell Levins

Maxwell Levins

Stinson LLP

Ashley R. Fickel

Ashley R. Fickel

Stinson LLP

Ashley R. Fickel is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of Stinson LLP, where he concentrates his practice on business litigation, real estate litigation, construction litigation, consumer class action defense, and data and private cybersecurity. Drawing on two decades of courtroom experience, he has represented financial institutions, automotive and other manufacturers, and a diverse group of businesses and individuals facing individual and class action claims involving consumer financial services, consumer fraud, privacy, products liability, catastrophic injury, and complex business disputes.

Education & Credentials

Ashley earned his J.D., cum laude, from Pepperdine Caruso School of Law in 2004, where he was named to the Dean’s List and served on the Pepperdine Law Review. He received his B.A. from Westmont College in 1997 and is admitted to practice in California.

Recognition & Leadership

Ashley was nominated for the Los Angeles Business Journal’s “Leaders of Influence: Litigators & Trial Attorneys” award in 2023, named to the publication’s “Thriving in Their 40’s” list in 2022, and nominated for its “Leaders in Law” award in 2021. He was recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in General Litigation from 2009 to 2013 and from 2016 to 2020. He authored a chapter on consumer auto finance law in Practising Law Institute’s Consumer Financial Services Answer Book, and his recent commentary on litigation risk and consumer protection has appeared in Bloomberg Law, Law360, and the Los Angeles Daily Journal.

Professional Involvement

At Stinson, Ashley practices within the firm’s Business Litigation, Class Action, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, Construction, Consumer Financial Services, and Automotive Finance groups. He also serves his community as a board member of the Santa Barbara Tennis Patrons.

Experience

Ashley has defended national banks, financial services companies, debt collectors, and other entities in putative class actions alleging “blast fax,” automated dialer, and related claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), as well as unauthorized call recording and monitoring claims under California Penal Code sections 630 and 632. His consumer financial services work includes representing major debt collectors in individual and class cases under the FCRA and FDCPA, and representing mortgage servicers and lenders in foreclosure-related and loan modification litigation in state and federal court. He has also advised financial institutions on privacy issues arising under the GLBA and the CCPA.
Maxwell Levins

Maxwell Levins

Stinson LLP

Maxwell Levins is an Associate with Stinson LLP in the firm’s business litigation group, where he represents national banks and other businesses in a range of commercial disputes, including those brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. His work focuses on protecting the interests of clients throughout all stages of litigation, from trial court discovery to state and federal appellate proceedings.

Education & Credentials

Maxwell graduated from the University of California, Irvine School of Law in 2023 after receiving his undergraduate degree in economics from the University of Southern California. He is admitted to practice in the state of California, Central District of California, Northern District of California, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Recognition & Leadership

Maxwell has briefed trial and appellate litigation matters across several federal jurisdictions. During law school, Maxwell was a finalist in both Moot Court and Mock Trial.

Professional Involvement

Raised in Kansas City and residing in Orange County, Maxwell is connected in his local and professional communities through national events with the LGBTQ+ Bar Association as well as local events with Orange County’s Association of Business Trial Lawyers and Orange County’s Lavender Bar Association. Maxwell’s pro bono practice includes assisting veterans in appealing the denial of their benefits claims.

Experience

Maxwell has litigated dozens of Telephone Consumer Protection Act matters from demand letters to post-certification briefing. His focus includes advising clients on preventing actionable claims and litigating the claims that can arise despite following best practices. Maxwell understands how to chart the right path forward to minimize TCPA exposure at all stages of litigation.
Ashley R. Fickel

Ashley R. Fickel

Stinson LLP

Ashley R. Fickel is a Partner in the Los Angeles office of Stinson LLP, where he concentrates his practice on business litigation, real estate litigation, construction litigation, consumer class action defense, and data and private cybersecurity. Drawing on two decades of courtroom experience, he has represented financial institutions, automotive and other manufacturers, and a diverse group of businesses and individuals facing individual and class action claims involving consumer financial services, consumer fraud, privacy, products liability, catastrophic injury, and complex business disputes.

Education & Credentials

Ashley earned his J.D., cum laude, from Pepperdine Caruso School of Law in 2004, where he was named to the Dean’s List and served on the Pepperdine Law Review. He received his B.A. from Westmont College in 1997 and is admitted to practice in California.

Recognition & Leadership

Ashley was nominated for the Los Angeles Business Journal’s “Leaders of Influence: Litigators & Trial Attorneys” award in 2023, named to the publication’s “Thriving in Their 40’s” list in 2022, and nominated for its “Leaders in Law” award in 2021. He was recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers as a Rising Star in General Litigation from 2009 to 2013 and from 2016 to 2020. He authored a chapter on consumer auto finance law in Practising Law Institute’s Consumer Financial Services Answer Book, and his recent commentary on litigation risk and consumer protection has appeared in Bloomberg Law, Law360, and the Los Angeles Daily Journal.

Professional Involvement

At Stinson, Ashley practices within the firm’s Business Litigation, Class Action, Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, Construction, Consumer Financial Services, and Automotive Finance groups. He also serves his community as a board member of the Santa Barbara Tennis Patrons.

Experience

Ashley has defended national banks, financial services companies, debt collectors, and other entities in putative class actions alleging “blast fax,” automated dialer, and related claims under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), as well as unauthorized call recording and monitoring claims under California Penal Code sections 630 and 632. His consumer financial services work includes representing major debt collectors in individual and class cases under the FCRA and FDCPA, and representing mortgage servicers and lenders in foreclosure-related and loan modification litigation in state and federal court. He has also advised financial institutions on privacy issues arising under the GLBA and the CCPA.
Maxwell Levins

Maxwell Levins

Stinson LLP

Maxwell Levins is an Associate with Stinson LLP in the firm’s business litigation group, where he represents national banks and other businesses in a range of commercial disputes, including those brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. His work focuses on protecting the interests of clients throughout all stages of litigation, from trial court discovery to state and federal appellate proceedings.

Education & Credentials

Maxwell graduated from the University of California, Irvine School of Law in 2023 after receiving his undergraduate degree in economics from the University of Southern California. He is admitted to practice in the state of California, Central District of California, Northern District of California, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

Recognition & Leadership

Maxwell has briefed trial and appellate litigation matters across several federal jurisdictions. During law school, Maxwell was a finalist in both Moot Court and Mock Trial.

Professional Involvement

Raised in Kansas City and residing in Orange County, Maxwell is connected in his local and professional communities through national events with the LGBTQ+ Bar Association as well as local events with Orange County’s Association of Business Trial Lawyers and Orange County’s Lavender Bar Association. Maxwell’s pro bono practice includes assisting veterans in appealing the denial of their benefits claims.

Experience

Maxwell has litigated dozens of Telephone Consumer Protection Act matters from demand letters to post-certification briefing. His focus includes advising clients on preventing actionable claims and litigating the claims that can arise despite following best practices. Maxwell understands how to chart the right path forward to minimize TCPA exposure at all stages of litigation.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs