Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

AI Chatbot Litigation: The Next Frontier in Product Liability and Litigation

The first wave of AI chatbot psychological injury cases is being built now. Learn to screen claims for viability, plead around Section 230 and First Amendment defenses, construct chat-log causation timelines, and defend psychiatric expert opinions against Daubert attack.

2026-09-17 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-17 13:00:00

2026-09-17 13:00:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-09-17 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-17 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-17 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-17 13:00:00

Course Overview

Chatbot psychological injury claims are surviving motions to dismiss — and the defense playbook is already written.

2026-09-17 13:00:00

AI chatbot psychological injury litigation has moved from theory to filed cases. Causes of action are surviving motions to dismiss. MDL 3047 and California JCCP No. 5431 are already generating procedural lessons. A January 2026 California JCCP ruling informs how plaintiffs structure their expert teams.

Plead the wrong cause of action and Section 230 or the First Amendment ends the case at the pleading stage. Miss evidence preservation at intake and the chat logs that prove causation disappear. Frame harm as sole cause and the superseding-cause defense takes over in suicide cases. Face a Daubert challenge without differential etiology methodology and the pre-existing condition defense wins.

Attendees leave with practitioner work product. That includes an intake screening framework, statutory duty hooks, and a session-by-session chat-log causation timeline method. It closes with strategies for rebutting Daubert attacks and anticipating the defense playbook from day one. The value is practitioner judgment — screening calls and framing decisions no doctrinal summary supplies.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Intake Screening Framework
Screen chatbot psychological injury claims for viability at intake and preserve the chat logs that prove causation before they disappear.
02
Pleading Around Immunity
Use statutory duty hooks to plead causes of action that survive Section 230 and First Amendment defenses at the pleading stage.
03
Chat-Log Causation Timelines
Build a session-by-session chat-log causation timeline connecting chatbot interactions to self-harm, suicide, and psychotic-episode claims.
04
LLM Defect Theories
Frame sycophancy, automorphism, and the probabilistic reasoning of large language models as product defects in the emerging intimacy economy.
05
The Defense Playbook
Anticipate superseding-cause and pre-existing condition defenses, plus liability claims stemming from inaccurate or harmful chatbot advice, as standards of care and regulation evolve.
06
Daubert Expert Strategy
Defend psychiatric expert opinions with differential etiology methodology, informed by the January 2026 California JCCP ruling on plaintiff expert teams and MDL 3047 procedural lessons.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

AI Chatbots, Large Language Models, and Emerging Product Liability Risks

As artificial intelligence chatbots become increasingly integrated into everyday life, they are also creating new legal, ethical, and product liability challenges. This session explores the evolution of chatbot technology, beginning with the machine learning principles and self-improving algorithms that led to the development of today’s large language models (LLMs). Attendees will gain an understanding of how LLMs differ from traditional linear computing models and why their probabilistic reasoning can produce unpredictable or harmful outcomes.

The program will also examine the shift from the “attention economy” to the emerging “intimacy economy,” where AI systems are designed to foster increasingly personal and emotionally engaging interactions with users. Against this backdrop, the session will analyze potential product defects in AI chatbots, including issues such as automorphism—the tendency to attribute human characteristics and intent to AI systems—and sycophancy, where chatbots reinforce user beliefs or behaviors rather than providing accurate or balanced information. Through this discussion, participants will better understand the legal risks, emerging theories of liability, and practical considerations surrounding the design, deployment, and regulation of AI-powered conversational systems.

Matthew P. BergmanMatthew P. Bergman
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

AI Chatbots in Litigation: Emerging Liability, Malpractice, and Product Liability Claims

As AI chatbots become increasingly relied upon for information, advice, and emotional support, courts and regulators are beginning to confront the significant legal questions arising from their use. This session examines the growing body of cases involving allegations that chatbot interactions have contributed to self-harm, suicide, and psychotic episodes, as well as claims stemming from inaccurate or harmful advice that may give rise to malpractice and professional liability concerns. Attendees will explore the current landscape of pending litigation against AI developers and technology companies, including the legal theories being advanced by plaintiffs and the defenses likely to shape future case law. The program will conclude by addressing the broader challenges that lie ahead, including evolving standards of care, regulatory developments, product liability issues, and the responsibilities of organizations deploying AI-powered conversational systems in increasingly sensitive contexts.

Matthew P. BergmanMatthew P. Bergman
Matthew P. Bergman

Matthew P. Bergman

Social Media Victims Law Center

Matthew P. Bergman

Matthew P. Bergman

Social Media Victims Law Center

Matthew P. Bergman is an attorney, law professor, philanthropist, and advocate who has become the nation’s leading legal voice on social media accountability. As founder of the Social Media Victims Law Center, he pioneered the use of product liability law to overcome Section 230—the shield social media companies had relied on for decades to evade responsibility for their dangerously defective platforms—and his firm now represents more than 2,500 clients harmed by these companies. A veteran product liability litigator who has recovered over $1 billion for his clients, Matthew has carried the fight for injured victims from the courtroom to legislatures on both sides of the Atlantic.

Education & Credentials

Matthew earned his J.D. magna cum laude from Lewis & Clark Law School in 1989, where he was elected to the Cornelius Honor Society, and his B.A. in Sociology from Reed College in 1986. He is admitted to practice in Washington and Oregon and before numerous federal district courts and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. Following law school, he clerked for Judge Bobby R. Baldock of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Matthew has been named a Washington Super Lawyer every year since 2005 and is recognized among the National Trial Lawyers' Top 100. He received the Lewis & Clark Law School Distinguished Graduate Award in 2009. Over his career he has been appointed by the U.S. Trustee to represent asbestos claimants in more than a dozen major bankruptcy proceedings—including Kaiser Aluminum, Owens Corning/Fibreboard, Halliburton, and Georgia Pacific—and appointed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to serve on the trust advisory committees of several multibillion-dollar asbestos victims' trusts.

Professional Involvement

Beyond the courtroom, Matthew is a driving force in the global movement for online safety, working with lawmakers across the United States and Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom to protect children and young adults from the predatory design of social media. He teaches as an adjunct professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, where he created the litigation strategy course "Litigation and the Art of War." His civic and philanthropic commitments are wide-ranging: he founded the Maasai Children's Initiative, which built solar-powered schools and a well serving 300 Maasai girls in southern Kenya, and he serves on the boards of institutions spanning higher education (Lewis & Clark College and Law School), civil rights and worker protection (the Mississippi Center for Justice and Working Washington), national security (the American Jewish Committee's Arabian Gulf Institute), and the arts (the Tacoma Art Museum and Seattle Repertory Theater). He is a member of numerous bar and trial lawyer associations, including the American Association for Justice and the Washington State Association for Justice.

Experience

Matthew is nationally known for his product liability work, having litigated more than 1,200 product liability cases, conducted over 25 jury trials, and served as counsel in more than 20 reported appellate decisions. Before founding the Social Media Victims Law Center, he founded Bergman Draper Oslund Udo, the leading asbestos law firm in the Pacific Northwest, where he represented more than 850 mesothelioma victims and secured over $900 million in recoveries, shaping Washington and Oregon toxic-tort law through landmark appellate rulings on duty to warn and "take-home" asbestos exposure. He has testified before the U.S. Congress and chaired and keynoted national and international seminars on toxic tort litigation and bankruptcy. Today, he applies that deep product liability expertise to holding technology companies accountable—representing "KGM," the family behind a recent groundbreaking jury verdict against Meta and Google that pushes the industry closer to overhauling the algorithms designed to target and addict users—and his scholarship, including "Assaulting the Citadel of Section 230 Immunity," is helping define the emerging law of social media and AI accountability.
Matthew P. Bergman

Matthew P. Bergman

Social Media Victims Law Center

Matthew P. Bergman is an attorney, law professor, philanthropist, and advocate who has become the nation’s leading legal voice on social media accountability. As founder of the Social Media Victims Law Center, he pioneered the use of product liability law to overcome Section 230—the shield social media companies had relied on for decades to evade responsibility for their dangerously defective platforms—and his firm now represents more than 2,500 clients harmed by these companies. A veteran product liability litigator who has recovered over $1 billion for his clients, Matthew has carried the fight for injured victims from the courtroom to legislatures on both sides of the Atlantic.

Education & Credentials

Matthew earned his J.D. magna cum laude from Lewis & Clark Law School in 1989, where he was elected to the Cornelius Honor Society, and his B.A. in Sociology from Reed College in 1986. He is admitted to practice in Washington and Oregon and before numerous federal district courts and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Ninth and Tenth Circuits. Following law school, he clerked for Judge Bobby R. Baldock of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Matthew has been named a Washington Super Lawyer every year since 2005 and is recognized among the National Trial Lawyers' Top 100. He received the Lewis & Clark Law School Distinguished Graduate Award in 2009. Over his career he has been appointed by the U.S. Trustee to represent asbestos claimants in more than a dozen major bankruptcy proceedings—including Kaiser Aluminum, Owens Corning/Fibreboard, Halliburton, and Georgia Pacific—and appointed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to serve on the trust advisory committees of several multibillion-dollar asbestos victims' trusts.

Professional Involvement

Beyond the courtroom, Matthew is a driving force in the global movement for online safety, working with lawmakers across the United States and Members of Parliament in the United Kingdom to protect children and young adults from the predatory design of social media. He teaches as an adjunct professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, where he created the litigation strategy course "Litigation and the Art of War." His civic and philanthropic commitments are wide-ranging: he founded the Maasai Children's Initiative, which built solar-powered schools and a well serving 300 Maasai girls in southern Kenya, and he serves on the boards of institutions spanning higher education (Lewis & Clark College and Law School), civil rights and worker protection (the Mississippi Center for Justice and Working Washington), national security (the American Jewish Committee's Arabian Gulf Institute), and the arts (the Tacoma Art Museum and Seattle Repertory Theater). He is a member of numerous bar and trial lawyer associations, including the American Association for Justice and the Washington State Association for Justice.

Experience

Matthew is nationally known for his product liability work, having litigated more than 1,200 product liability cases, conducted over 25 jury trials, and served as counsel in more than 20 reported appellate decisions. Before founding the Social Media Victims Law Center, he founded Bergman Draper Oslund Udo, the leading asbestos law firm in the Pacific Northwest, where he represented more than 850 mesothelioma victims and secured over $900 million in recoveries, shaping Washington and Oregon toxic-tort law through landmark appellate rulings on duty to warn and "take-home" asbestos exposure. He has testified before the U.S. Congress and chaired and keynoted national and international seminars on toxic tort litigation and bankruptcy. Today, he applies that deep product liability expertise to holding technology companies accountable—representing "KGM," the family behind a recent groundbreaking jury verdict against Meta and Google that pushes the industry closer to overhauling the algorithms designed to target and addict users—and his scholarship, including "Assaulting the Citadel of Section 230 Immunity," is helping define the emerging law of social media and AI accountability.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs