Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Evaluating and Litigating Vehicle Crashworthiness Claims: Determining Viability and Building a Successful Case

Master vehicle crashworthiness claims—identify viable product liability theories, prove safer alternative designs, and unlock additional recovery in catastrophic injury and wrongful death cases.

2026-03-13 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-03-13 13:00:00

2026-03-13 13:00:00

2h CLE Credits

Program Details

2026-03-13 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-03-13 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-03-13 13:00:00

Course Overview

Unlock Hidden Crashworthiness Claims

2026-03-13 13:00:00

Participants learn to identify, evaluate, and litigate crashworthiness claims using forensic, medical, and engineering evidence. Attorneys gain tools to uncover additional recovery when traditional insurance falls short.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Crashworthiness principles
Understand five foundational safety principles governing occupant protection and enhanced-injury litigation.
02
Enhanced injury
Distinguish injuries from the initial collision versus those caused by defective vehicle design.
03
Case screening
Identify when to pursue or decline a crashworthiness claim based on liability strength.
04
Alternative design
Prove technologically and economically feasible safer designs that would have prevented the injury.
05
Expert strategy
Retain and coordinate reconstructionists, biomechanical engineers, and automotive design specialists across technical disciplines.
06
Common claim types
Recognize recurring crashworthiness patterns including roof crush, seatback failures, and airbag malfunctions.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 1:30 pm EST

Forensic, Medical, and Engineering Analysis in Crashworthiness Cases

Evaluating a crashworthiness case requires integrating accident reconstruction, vehicle dynamics, biomechanical analysis, and medical causation evidence. Attorneys assess whether injuries stem from the collision or safety system failures by analyzing intrusion, restraints, airbags, and alignment between physical evidence and medical findings.

Todd TracyTodd Tracy
clock 1:30 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Proving Feasible Safer Alternative Vehicle Designs

Proving a crashworthiness claim requires showing a safer alternative design was technologically feasible, economically practical, and would not impair vehicle utility. Attorneys must present industry standards, testing data, and demonstrate the design would have prevented or reduced injuries to overcome manufacturer defenses.

Todd TracyTodd Tracy
clock 2:10 pm - 2:30 pm EST

Knowing When and Why to Turndown A Potential Crashworthiness Case

Not every crash supports a viable crashworthiness claim, making early case screening essential. Attorneys must evaluate crash severity, intrusion, occupant movement, and injury consistency with defects. Identifying weak cases early avoids costly expert investments and strengthens long-term litigation success.

Todd TracyTodd Tracy
clock 2:30 pm - 2:50 pm EST

Knowing What Kind of Experts to Hire

Crashworthiness cases rely heavily on expert testimony across technical fields. Attorneys must retain reconstructionists, biomechanical engineers, design experts, and medical professionals who can link defects to injuries. Coordinated, credible expert analysis is essential to withstand challenges and succeed at summary judgment and trial.

Todd TracyTodd Tracy
clock 2:50 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Most Common Vehicle Crashworthiness Cases

Common crashworthiness cases include roof crush, seatback failures, defective restraints, airbag malfunctions, ejections, and post-collision fires. Recognizing these patterns helps attorneys identify product liability issues within negligence cases, guiding investigation strategies, expert selection, and uncovering additional avenues for recovery.

Todd TracyTodd Tracy
Todd Tracy

Todd Tracy

The Tracy Law Firm

Todd Tracy

Todd Tracy

The Tracy Law Firm

E. Todd Tracy is a Board-Certified Texas attorney who has spent more than 38 years litigating vehicle crashworthiness cases and holding the automotive industry accountable for safety failures. Throughout his career, he has tried 179 crashworthiness cases against major domestic and international manufacturers and suppliers, including GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Hyundai, Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz, Paccar, Kenworth, TRW, Key Safety, Takata, Tokai Rika, Dorel Juvenile Group, and Graco. With a degree in applied physics, Mr. Tracy combines technical knowledge with courtroom experience, handling cases in 42 states against every major vehicle manufacturer except Volvo. Over the past two decades, his firm has conducted 650 crash and sled tests to prove defect and safer alternative design—often performing testing when NHTSA and manufacturers did not—and he makes those tests publicly available to lawyers, regulators, and the industry. He has testified before House and Senate Committees on vehicle safety improvements and has remained active in the Texas Trial Lawyers Association for more than 30 years, teaching, writing, and speaking nationwide on product liability and vehicle safety issues.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Tracy holds a degree in applied physics, a foundation that informs his technical approach to vehicle defect litigation. He is Board Certified in Texas, reflecting his specialized experience and qualifications in his field of practice.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Tracy has testified before various U.S. House and Senate Committees on vehicle safety issues, including needed improvements to better protect occupants. He has been active in the Texas Trial Lawyers Association for over 30 years, taught for 20 years at TTLA’s Trial Advocacy College of Texas, spoken at TTLA and 35 other state trial lawyer organizations, and authored 178 articles to date.

Professional Involvement

Over the past 20 years, Mr. Tracy’s firm has conducted 650 crash and sled tests to prove defect and safer alternative design, including testing performed when NHTSA and manufacturers did not conduct such testing. He makes these tests available to other lawyers, NHTSA, and the vehicle industry, and has also taught product liability, cross-examination techniques, and design defect case development at numerous law schools nationwide.

Experience

For more than 38 years, Mr. Tracy has focused on vehicle crashworthiness litigation, trying 179 cases against major domestic and international manufacturers and suppliers. He has handled cases in 42 states and has litigated against every major vehicle manufacturer except Volvo, consistently working to hold the industry accountable for safety failures.
Todd Tracy

Todd Tracy

The Tracy Law Firm

E. Todd Tracy is a Board-Certified Texas attorney who has spent more than 38 years litigating vehicle crashworthiness cases and holding the automotive industry accountable for safety failures. Throughout his career, he has tried 179 crashworthiness cases against major domestic and international manufacturers and suppliers, including GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Nissan, Honda, Hyundai, Ferrari, Mercedes-Benz, Paccar, Kenworth, TRW, Key Safety, Takata, Tokai Rika, Dorel Juvenile Group, and Graco. With a degree in applied physics, Mr. Tracy combines technical knowledge with courtroom experience, handling cases in 42 states against every major vehicle manufacturer except Volvo. Over the past two decades, his firm has conducted 650 crash and sled tests to prove defect and safer alternative design—often performing testing when NHTSA and manufacturers did not—and he makes those tests publicly available to lawyers, regulators, and the industry. He has testified before House and Senate Committees on vehicle safety improvements and has remained active in the Texas Trial Lawyers Association for more than 30 years, teaching, writing, and speaking nationwide on product liability and vehicle safety issues.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Tracy holds a degree in applied physics, a foundation that informs his technical approach to vehicle defect litigation. He is Board Certified in Texas, reflecting his specialized experience and qualifications in his field of practice.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Tracy has testified before various U.S. House and Senate Committees on vehicle safety issues, including needed improvements to better protect occupants. He has been active in the Texas Trial Lawyers Association for over 30 years, taught for 20 years at TTLA’s Trial Advocacy College of Texas, spoken at TTLA and 35 other state trial lawyer organizations, and authored 178 articles to date.

Professional Involvement

Over the past 20 years, Mr. Tracy’s firm has conducted 650 crash and sled tests to prove defect and safer alternative design, including testing performed when NHTSA and manufacturers did not conduct such testing. He makes these tests available to other lawyers, NHTSA, and the vehicle industry, and has also taught product liability, cross-examination techniques, and design defect case development at numerous law schools nationwide.

Experience

For more than 38 years, Mr. Tracy has focused on vehicle crashworthiness litigation, trying 179 cases against major domestic and international manufacturers and suppliers. He has handled cases in 42 states and has litigated against every major vehicle manufacturer except Volvo, consistently working to hold the industry accountable for safety failures.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC
DE2.0
FL2.5
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.4
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Approved
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Approved
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Approved
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs