Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Getting Paid for Doing Good: Practice Pointers to Avoid Reduction in Fees – Track II (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

Fees sought are not fees recovered. Two experienced Social Security litigators cover the stumbling blocks: 406(a) petitions when the expedited process doesn’t apply, EAJA objections from briefing time to partial wins, 406(b) fees without a contingent contract — and negotiating fees with SSA.

2026-10-15 11:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-10-15 11:00:00

Program Details

2026-10-15 11:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-15 11:00:00

1 hours

Course Overview

The Fee You Sought Isn't Always the Fee You Recover

2026-10-15 11:00:00

Doing good work doesn’t guarantee getting fully paid for it. Between the fee sought and the fee awarded sit the stumbling blocks — and two experienced Social Security litigators will address them across every fee source: 406(a), EAJA, and 406(b).

Each source has its own traps. The 406(a) expedited fee process does not always apply — and when it doesn’t, the fee petition has to succeed on its own. EAJA fees draw common objections: failure to recover on all issues, briefing time, clerical time, seeking extensions of time. In 406(b) litigation, windfall findings cut awards — and a missing contingent fee contract complicates the recovery entirely.

You walk out with the practice pointers: tips for successful 406(a) fee petitions, answers to the EAJA objections, 406(b) fees obtained without a contingent fee contract and defended against windfall findings — closing with effective strategies for negotiating fees with SSA.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
406(a) Fee Petitions
When the expedited fee process does not apply, and tips for successful 406(a) fee petitions.
02
Common EAJA Objections
Failure to recover on all issues, briefing time, clerical time, and seeking extensions of time.
03
Answering the Objections
Practice pointers for recovering EAJA fees over each stumbling block.
04
406(b) Without a Contract
Obtaining 406(b) fees without a contingent fee contract.
05
Avoiding Windfall Findings
Defending the 406(b) award in fee litigation.
06
Negotiating with SSA
Effective strategies for fee negotiations with the agency.

Program schedule

clock 11:00 am - 12:00 pm EST

Getting Paid for Doing Good: Practice Pointers to Avoid Reduction in Fees

Two experienced Social Security litigators will address stumbling blocks to recovering all fees sought. Topics covered include 406(a) fees and when the expedited fee process does not apply, along with tips for successful 406(a) fee petitions. The session will also cover EAJA fees, including common objections to EAJA fees such as failure to recover on all issues, briefing time, clerical time, and seeking extensions of time. Turning to 406(b) fees, the speakers will discuss obtaining 406(b) fees without a contingent fee contract and avoiding windfall findings in 406(b) fee litigation, before closing with effective strategies for negotiating fees with SSA.

Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour

This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Fall National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.

Recorded Thursday, October 15, 2026.

Lawrence D. RohlfingLawrence D. Rohlfing
Sarah H. BohrSarah H. Bohr
Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc. CPC

Sarah H. Bohr

Sarah H. Bohr

Bohr & Harrington LLC

Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc. CPC

Larry is a 30-year veteran of making presentations before NOSSCR and other organizations and 25 years addressing various fee issues.

Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from Whittier Law School and has been licensed in California since 1985.

Recognition & Leadership

He is a past president of the National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR), where he also served as Secretary, Treasurer, and Vice President, and is a past chair of the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Social Security Section.

Professional Involvement

He is a sustaining member of NOSSCR.

Experience

He successfully argued Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) convincing an eleven-judge panel that the lodestar did not apply after the panel violated Gisbrecht.
Sarah H. Bohr

Sarah H. Bohr

Bohr & Harrington LLC

Sarah H. Bohr is an appellate attorney who has specialized in Social Security law for over 40 years and for the past 20 years, has had an appellate practice writing Social Security federal court briefs for lawyers.

Education & Credentials

Sarah earned her B.A. from the College of Wooster in 1974 and her J.D. from the Antioch School of Law in 1977, and was admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Florida in 1978.

Recognition & Leadership

She is a past president of the NOSSCR and a current representative on the Board from the 11th Circuit and a member of its Executive Committee.

Professional Involvement

Sarah is a frequent speaker at national and regional Social Security conferences. She is the author of five Social Security publications and her new updated 2026 Editions addressing the Appeals Council, Rulings, Overview of Disability Law, and attorneys fees.

Experience

She learned Social Security law while working at Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc. for 21 years. Sarah is most proud of her successful argument before the Supreme Court 25 years ago, in Sims v. Apfel, 530 U.S. 103 (2000).
Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Lawrence D. Rohlfing

Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc. CPC

Larry is a 30-year veteran of making presentations before NOSSCR and other organizations and 25 years addressing various fee issues.

Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from Whittier Law School and has been licensed in California since 1985.

Recognition & Leadership

He is a past president of the National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives (NOSSCR), where he also served as Secretary, Treasurer, and Vice President, and is a past chair of the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Social Security Section.

Professional Involvement

He is a sustaining member of NOSSCR.

Experience

He successfully argued Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) convincing an eleven-judge panel that the lodestar did not apply after the panel violated Gisbrecht.
Sarah H. Bohr

Sarah H. Bohr

Bohr & Harrington LLC

Sarah H. Bohr is an appellate attorney who has specialized in Social Security law for over 40 years and for the past 20 years, has had an appellate practice writing Social Security federal court briefs for lawyers.

Education & Credentials

Sarah earned her B.A. from the College of Wooster in 1974 and her J.D. from the Antioch School of Law in 1977, and was admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Florida in 1978.

Recognition & Leadership

She is a past president of the NOSSCR and a current representative on the Board from the 11th Circuit and a member of its Executive Committee.

Professional Involvement

Sarah is a frequent speaker at national and regional Social Security conferences. She is the author of five Social Security publications and her new updated 2026 Editions addressing the Appeals Council, Rulings, Overview of Disability Law, and attorneys fees.

Experience

She learned Social Security law while working at Jacksonville Area Legal Aid, Inc. for 21 years. Sarah is most proud of her successful argument before the Supreme Court 25 years ago, in Sims v. Apfel, 530 U.S. 103 (2000).

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.0
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs