Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Legal AI in 2026: From Chatbots to AI Agents in Law Practice

AI work product now gets scrutinized in court. Learn what GPT-5.5, Claude 5, and Gemini 3.5 actually do in real legal work, match each model to litigation tasks, and build AI-assisted workflows that preserve attorney oversight and protect confidential information.

2026-08-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-08-24 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-08-24 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-08-24 13:00:00

Course Overview

AI Has Moved from Chat-Based Tools to Multi-Step Agents

2026-08-24 13:00:00

Legal AI in 2026 is no longer a chat window. It has moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents. That shift is reaching everyday practice across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work. This program shows what is real, what is emerging, and what is overclaimed.

The stakes are concrete. Select the wrong model and legal analysis suffers. Skip verification and hallucinations reach your work product. Mishandle client documents and confidential information is exposed. Using these models defensibly requires understanding their respective strengths and limitations — and keeping legal judgment central.

Attendees leave with a working playbook: when GPT-5.5, Claude 5, or Gemini 3.5 performs best for drafting, long-document review, and investigative work; practical approaches for discovery, chronologies, deposition outlines, and case assessments; and verification workflows that document attorney review and withstand scrutiny.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Models, Tools, Workflows, Agents
How AI moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents across three eras, and what each term means for practice.
02
Real vs. Overclaimed
Where AI actually sits in legal today: the four levels of impact across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work.
03
Matching Model to Task
When GPT-5.5, Claude 5, or Gemini 3.5 performs best for legal analysis, drafting, long-document review, and investigative work.
04
Discovery and Document Review
Using AI to organize productions, identify key themes, summarize large document sets, and accelerate first-pass analysis.
05
Faster Litigation Work Product
Developing chronologies, witness profiles, deposition outlines, investigation timelines, and case assessments with AI assistance.
06
Oversight, Confidentiality, and Judgment
Verifying AI-generated analyses, identifying hallucinations, documenting attorney review, and protecting privileged client information — the judgment that stays with counsel.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

AI in Legal Practice in 2026: From Tools to Agents

This session gives practicing attorneys a clear, practical picture of where AI actually stands in 2026 and how it is being used in real legal work today – what is real, what is emerging, and what is overclaimed. Rather than a compliance or ethics briefing, it focuses on the technology and its application: how AI has moved from chat-based tools to multi-step agents, and what that means for everyday practice. Through concrete case studies across transactions, disputes and investigations, and recurring work, attendees will see how lawyers are actually deploying AI while keeping legal judgment central. Professional responsibility considerations are noted where they arise, but the session is designed for general credit rather than as a formal ethics program.

Danielle BeneckeDanielle Benecke
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Using GPT-5.5, Claude 5, and Gemini 3.5 in Litigation, Investigations, and Document-Intensive Practice

Large language models have become valuable tools for litigation teams, investigations, and complex document review, but selecting the right model—and using it in a defensible manner—requires understanding their respective strengths and limitations. This session examines how GPT-5.5, Claude 5, and Gemini 3.5 fit into modern litigation workflows, including factual analysis, chronology development, document summarization, deposition preparation, and discovery strategy. Attendees will learn practical approaches for incorporating AI into high-volume legal work while preserving attorney oversight, protecting confidential information, and maintaining work product that can withstand scrutiny.

Adam G. GutbezahlAdam G. Gutbezahl
Danielle Benecke

Danielle Benecke

Baker McKenzie

Adam G. Gutbezahl

Adam G. Gutbezahl

Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C

Danielle Benecke

Danielle Benecke

Baker McKenzie

Danielle Benecke leads Baker McKenzie’s Applied AI practice, an award-winning team of lawyers and technologists delivering AI-enabled solutions for complex, high-stakes business and regulatory challenges. Her team partners directly with global clients to design and deploy intelligent, defensible workflows across major transactions, incident response, compliance programs, and operational matters. A technology lawyer by background, Danielle has spent her career advising global tech leaders on AI development, commercialization, and responsible use. She focuses on unlocking new legal capabilities that were not previously achievable, using frontier AI to build bespoke workflows embedded into live mandates. Danielle is recognized in Chambers Global, Lawdragon Global 100, and Forbes Top Lawyers, and has received industry honors including Law.com Innovator of the Year and Financial Times Changemaker of the Year. She holds a Masters from Stanford and serves as a venture coach with Stanford Law School’s CodeX.

Education & Credentials

Danielle holds a Master of Laws, Science, and Technology from Stanford University.

Recognition & Leadership

Fortune 500 clients have described her work as “nothing short of spectacular.” She has served on Baker McKenzie’s Global Digital Media and Copyright Steering Committee and on its North America IP and Technology leadership team.

Professional Involvement

At Stanford, Danielle was a member of the Graduate School of Business’ Venture Studio and a Fellow of the Legal Design Lab, and she has served as a venture coach in CodeX’s AI and Law program.

Experience

Danielle founded and leads Baker McKenzie’s Machine Learning Practice globally, building on her prior practice as a senior IP and technology lawyer with the firm.
Adam G. Gutbezahl

Adam G. Gutbezahl

Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C

Adam Gutbezahl speaks and writes extensively on the legal implications of generative AI, serves on multiple steering committees and task forces addressing its use, and publishes ChatAdamG, a monthly newsletter covering the legal perspective on AI in the workplace. He is a shareholder in the Litigation Department at Ruberto, Israel & Weiner in Boston, where he represents individuals and businesses in complex commercial, employment, land use, and real estate disputes. He has jury and bench trial experience in state and federal court, and in 2024 served as first chair for two RIW trial teams, achieving favorable outcomes in both cases.

Education & Credentials

Adam earned his J.D., cum laude, from The George Washington University Law School in 2013, where he served as an executive editor of The George Washington Law Review and as a member of the Moot Court Board. He holds a B.A., cum laude, from The George Washington University (2006). He is admitted in Massachusetts and before the United States District Court of Massachusetts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Adam received the National Business Institute’s Outstanding Faculty Award (2023). He has been named a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Excellence in Law Up and Coming Lawyer (2025), a Massachusetts Super Lawyers Rising Star in Real Estate (2024, 2025), a Boston Magazine Top Lawyer (2024, 2025), and one of the New England Real Estate Journal’s Ones to Watch – Rising Stars (2024). He was selected for the Boston Future Leaders Program, a 10-month leadership initiative by Harvard Business School and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce (2024), and was the MetroWest Chamber of Commerce’s Emerging Leader of the Year (2022).

Professional Involvement

Adam serves on the Boston Bar Association’s Privacy, Security, & Digital Law Group Steering Committee and its Curriculum Advisory Committee, and is a member of the American Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Group, the Massachusetts Bar Association’s Business Law Artificial Intelligence Practice Group, the Massachusetts Real Estate Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence Task Force, and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce’s Future Tech Leadership Council. His community roles have included the Performing Arts Center of Metrowest Board of Directors (2022–2026) and the Wayland Trust Fund Commission (2019 – Present).

Experience

Adam’s recent programs on generative AI include “Top ChatGPT and Generative AI Blunders Paralegals Are Currently Making” for the Institute for Paralegal Education (February 2026), the Boston Bar Association panel “Generative AI in Business: Ethical, Legal, and Practical Considerations for Lawyers” (February 2025), and “Balancing Efficiency & Ethics: AI in the Legal Profession” for Pilgrim Advocates (October 2025). He has presented twice for myLawCLE audiences: “Practical AI Tools for Litigators: Strengths and Weaknesses” (August 2024) and, with the Federal Bar Association, “ChatGPT and Generative AI: Transforming Estate Planning Strategies” (February 2024). His writing on the technology includes “Is Your AI Use Protected from Disclosure? It’s Complicated.” (August 2026) and “ChatGPT in the Workplace: Employers Beware” (June 2023).

In his litigation practice, Adam obtained summary judgment in land use disputes, secured a complete judgment for homeowner clients — including an award of attorneys’ fees under M.G.L. c. 93A — after a five-day jury trial in Middlesex Superior Court, and negotiated settlements across employment, contract, and tort-based claims. He counsels clients on best practices to avoid litigation and mitigate risk.
Danielle Benecke

Danielle Benecke

Baker McKenzie

Danielle Benecke leads Baker McKenzie’s Applied AI practice, an award-winning team of lawyers and technologists delivering AI-enabled solutions for complex, high-stakes business and regulatory challenges. Her team partners directly with global clients to design and deploy intelligent, defensible workflows across major transactions, incident response, compliance programs, and operational matters. A technology lawyer by background, Danielle has spent her career advising global tech leaders on AI development, commercialization, and responsible use. She focuses on unlocking new legal capabilities that were not previously achievable, using frontier AI to build bespoke workflows embedded into live mandates. Danielle is recognized in Chambers Global, Lawdragon Global 100, and Forbes Top Lawyers, and has received industry honors including Law.com Innovator of the Year and Financial Times Changemaker of the Year. She holds a Masters from Stanford and serves as a venture coach with Stanford Law School’s CodeX.

Education & Credentials

Danielle holds a Master of Laws, Science, and Technology from Stanford University.

Recognition & Leadership

Fortune 500 clients have described her work as “nothing short of spectacular.” She has served on Baker McKenzie’s Global Digital Media and Copyright Steering Committee and on its North America IP and Technology leadership team.

Professional Involvement

At Stanford, Danielle was a member of the Graduate School of Business’ Venture Studio and a Fellow of the Legal Design Lab, and she has served as a venture coach in CodeX’s AI and Law program.

Experience

Danielle founded and leads Baker McKenzie’s Machine Learning Practice globally, building on her prior practice as a senior IP and technology lawyer with the firm.
Adam G. Gutbezahl

Adam G. Gutbezahl

Ruberto, Israel & Weiner, P.C

Adam Gutbezahl speaks and writes extensively on the legal implications of generative AI, serves on multiple steering committees and task forces addressing its use, and publishes ChatAdamG, a monthly newsletter covering the legal perspective on AI in the workplace. He is a shareholder in the Litigation Department at Ruberto, Israel & Weiner in Boston, where he represents individuals and businesses in complex commercial, employment, land use, and real estate disputes. He has jury and bench trial experience in state and federal court, and in 2024 served as first chair for two RIW trial teams, achieving favorable outcomes in both cases.

Education & Credentials

Adam earned his J.D., cum laude, from The George Washington University Law School in 2013, where he served as an executive editor of The George Washington Law Review and as a member of the Moot Court Board. He holds a B.A., cum laude, from The George Washington University (2006). He is admitted in Massachusetts and before the United States District Court of Massachusetts, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Adam received the National Business Institute’s Outstanding Faculty Award (2023). He has been named a Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly Excellence in Law Up and Coming Lawyer (2025), a Massachusetts Super Lawyers Rising Star in Real Estate (2024, 2025), a Boston Magazine Top Lawyer (2024, 2025), and one of the New England Real Estate Journal’s Ones to Watch – Rising Stars (2024). He was selected for the Boston Future Leaders Program, a 10-month leadership initiative by Harvard Business School and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce (2024), and was the MetroWest Chamber of Commerce’s Emerging Leader of the Year (2022).

Professional Involvement

Adam serves on the Boston Bar Association’s Privacy, Security, & Digital Law Group Steering Committee and its Curriculum Advisory Committee, and is a member of the American Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence & Robotics Group, the Massachusetts Bar Association’s Business Law Artificial Intelligence Practice Group, the Massachusetts Real Estate Bar Association’s Artificial Intelligence Task Force, and the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce’s Future Tech Leadership Council. His community roles have included the Performing Arts Center of Metrowest Board of Directors (2022–2026) and the Wayland Trust Fund Commission (2019 – Present).

Experience

Adam’s recent programs on generative AI include “Top ChatGPT and Generative AI Blunders Paralegals Are Currently Making” for the Institute for Paralegal Education (February 2026), the Boston Bar Association panel “Generative AI in Business: Ethical, Legal, and Practical Considerations for Lawyers” (February 2025), and “Balancing Efficiency & Ethics: AI in the Legal Profession” for Pilgrim Advocates (October 2025). He has presented twice for myLawCLE audiences: “Practical AI Tools for Litigators: Strengths and Weaknesses” (August 2024) and, with the Federal Bar Association, “ChatGPT and Generative AI: Transforming Estate Planning Strategies” (February 2024). His writing on the technology includes “Is Your AI Use Protected from Disclosure? It’s Complicated.” (August 2026) and “ChatGPT in the Workplace: Employers Beware” (June 2023).

In his litigation practice, Adam obtained summary judgment in land use disputes, secured a complete judgment for homeowner clients — including an award of attorneys’ fees under M.G.L. c. 93A — after a five-day jury trial in Middlesex Superior Court, and negotiated settlements across employment, contract, and tort-based claims. He counsels clients on best practices to avoid litigation and mitigate risk.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Approved
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Approved
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs