Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

DExit After Rutledge: Advising Boards on Reincorporation to Texas and Nevada

Rutledge upheld SB 21, and boards are now asking whether to leave Delaware anyway. Learn to compare Delaware, Texas, and Nevada for a specific client, build a board record that earns deference, draft the comparative disclosure, and sequence the move.

2026-11-02 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-11-02 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-11-02 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-11-02 14:30:00

Course Overview

Rutledge Settled SB 21, but Whether to Leave Delaware Is Still an Open Question

2026-11-02 14:30:00

On February 27, 2026, the Delaware Supreme Court upheld SB 21 in Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group. The Section 144 safe harbors and the narrowed books-and-records right now stand. Delaware is more stable, yet franchise tax exposure and the litigation climate keep departures on board agendas. Texas SB 29 and Nevada AB 239 now offer credible, codified alternatives.

The risk sits in how the move is made. Under Maffei v. Palkon, the decision to leave gets business judgment review. Give the controller a non-ratable benefit and entire fairness returns. Draft a thin comparative disclosure and a business judgment case becomes a fiduciary duty case. Overlook change-of-domicile provisions in credit agreements and the move trips a covenant. Choose Nevada without pricing the missing business court and forum uncertainty follows the client.

Attendees walk out with a defensible, client-specific domicile comparison, a sequenced execution plan, and a checklist of the charter and bylaw terms to rewrite at the moment of the move. The guidance turns on which statutory advantages would actually change the litigation a company faces, practitioner judgment a statute summary cannot replace.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Delaware After Rutledge
How the upheld Section 144 safe harbors and narrowed Section 220 reset the case for staying, and what Rutledge left unfixed.
02
Standard of Review
How Maffei v. Palkon applies business judgment review to the move, and where entire fairness still reaches a conversion.
03
Texas Versus Nevada
What Texas SB 29, the Texas Business Court, and Nevada AB 239 deliver for controlled and founderled companies.
04
Board Record and Disclosure
How committee process, board materials, and side-by-side comparative disclosure preserve deference through the stockholder vote.
05
Structure and Mechanics
How to choose among conversion, domestication, and merger while clearing third-party consents and rewriting the charter and bylaws.
06
Litigation Exposure
Which pre-closing suits, books-and-records demands, and post-move forum questions the reincorporation invites.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

The Post-Rutledge Domicile Decision: Delaware After SB 21 and the Competing Texas and Nevada Regimes

This session takes stock of the reincorporation landscape after the Delaware Supreme Court’s February 2026 decision in Rutledge v. Clearway Energy Group upheld SB 21 against constitutional attack, leaving boards to compare a stabilized Delaware against two increasingly credible alternatives. Attorneys will learn what Rutledge actually settled about the Section 144 safe harbors and the narrowed books-and-records right, how Maffei v. Palkon frames the standard of review for the decision to leave and where entire fairness still reaches a conversion, what Texas SB 29 and the Texas Business Court deliver in practice, and how Nevada’s AB 239 regime compares for controlled and founder-led issuers. Attendees will leave able to run a defensible domicile comparison for a specific client rather than a general one, and to tell the board which of the advertised advantages of Texas and Nevada would actually change the outcome of the litigation that company is likely to face.

Albert Z. KovacsAlbert Z. Kovacs
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Executing the Exit: Board Process, Disclosure, Mechanics, and Litigation Exposure | Wendy Grasso

This session moves from the domicile comparison to the execution of a reincorporation, treating the board record, the proxy, and the closing mechanics as the places where these transactions are won or lost. Attorneys will learn how to build a board record that earns business judgment deference and when a special committee is worth the cost, how to draft the comparative disclosure that institutional holders and proxy advisors will scrutinize, how to choose among conversion, merger, and holding company structures given tax, contract, and consent constraints, and how to anticipate the pre-closing and post-closing litigation the move invites. Attendees will leave with a sequenced execution plan, a checklist of the charter and bylaw terms that should be rewritten at the moment of the move rather than later, and a realistic account of what changes for the client the day after the certificate is filed.

Wendy GrassoWendy Grasso
Albert Z. Kovacs

Albert Z. Kovacs

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Wendy Grasso

Wendy Grasso

Fenwick & West LLP

Albert Z. Kovacs

Albert Z. Kovacs

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Albert Z. Kovacs is a shareholder in the Las Vegas office of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, where he counsels clients on corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions under Nevada law, in transactions and litigation, as lead or local Nevada counsel. As vice chair of the Executive Committee of the State Bar of Nevada’s Business Law Section, he has had a substantial hand in shaping, and frequently drafting, Nevada’s corporation and LLC statutes and policy in recent years. He is especially well suited to this program: he helps write the Nevada corporate statutes that boards now weigh as an alternative domicile, has co-authored commentary on corporate migration to Nevada and on the state’s move toward a dedicated business court, and advises on Nevada governance issues in deals and disputes, bringing an insider’s view of how Nevada law is built and how it works for companies that choose it.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Kovacs received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Duke University School of Law in 2002, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif and served on the editorial board of the Duke Law Journal. He earned his A.B., summa cum laude, from Wabash College in 1999 and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He is admitted to practice in Nevada and New York.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Kovacs is ranked in Chambers USA (2014–2026) and The Best Lawyers in America (2013–2027), which named him Las Vegas Lawyer of the Year for Corporate Law (2021), Mergers and Acquisitions Law (2022), and Business Organizations (2023). The Legal 500 placed him on its 2024 M&A Private Practice Powerlist for the USA region.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Kovacs is vice chair of the Executive Committee of the State Bar of Nevada's Business Law Section and a member of the Clark County Bar Association, the American Bar Association, and the New York State Bar Association.

Experience

Mr. Kovacs co-authored "Home Means Nevada: Corporate Migration to the Silver State" in Nevada Business (2025) and has written on Nevada's 2025 corporate legislation and dedicated business court initiative. He previously taught business ethics and legal studies as a teaching assistant professor at the University of Denver's Daniels College of Business, and began his career at Cleary Gottlieb Steen Hamilton LLP in New York.
Wendy Grasso

Wendy Grasso

Fenwick & West LLP

Wendy Grasso is counsel in the New York office of Fenwick & West LLP, where she practices in the firm’s corporate, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions groups. She counsels public and private companies, and their boards, on governance and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, covering everything from policy design and risk assessment to shareholder engagement, activism, and the disclosure, reporting, and compliance obligations that follow. She is especially well suited to this program: she advises boards on governance practice and shareholder engagement, handled SEC reporting, stock exchange compliance, and corporate reorganizations for public companies as a partner at an international firm, and contributes to Fenwick’s publications on proxy season results and SEC proxy rulemaking, bringing the perspective of a governance adviser who understands how a board’s record and disclosures will be read by the stockholders asked to approve them.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Grasso earned her J.D., cum laude, from the University of Pittsburgh. She also holds an M.A. in Teaching from the University of Charleston and a B.S. in Psychology from the University of Richmond. She is admitted to practice in New York and Pennsylvania.

Recognition & Leadership

Before joining Fenwick, Ms. Grasso was a partner at an international law firm, where she represented public companies across their securities, governance, and transactional needs.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Grasso contributes to Fenwick's securities and governance publications, including its review of 2026 proxy season results in Silicon Valley and at large companies nationwide, its analyses of the SEC's proposals to modernize the proxy solicitation rules and to rescind Rule 14a-8 while amending Rule 14a-4, and the firm's recurring Securities Law Updates.

Experience

Ms. Grasso's governance work spans ESG developments and best practices, the design and implementation of policies, the identification and assessment of risk, and engagement with shareholders and activists, together with ESG-related disclosure, commercial requirements, reporting, and regulatory compliance. In her prior partnership, her public-company practice included securities law and stock exchange compliance, SEC reporting and disclosure, corporate governance, public and private equity offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate restructurings and reorganizations.
Albert Z. Kovacs

Albert Z. Kovacs

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP

Albert Z. Kovacs is a shareholder in the Las Vegas office of Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, where he counsels clients on corporate governance and mergers and acquisitions under Nevada law, in transactions and litigation, as lead or local Nevada counsel. As vice chair of the Executive Committee of the State Bar of Nevada’s Business Law Section, he has had a substantial hand in shaping, and frequently drafting, Nevada’s corporation and LLC statutes and policy in recent years. He is especially well suited to this program: he helps write the Nevada corporate statutes that boards now weigh as an alternative domicile, has co-authored commentary on corporate migration to Nevada and on the state’s move toward a dedicated business court, and advises on Nevada governance issues in deals and disputes, bringing an insider’s view of how Nevada law is built and how it works for companies that choose it.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Kovacs received his J.D., magna cum laude, from Duke University School of Law in 2002, where he was elected to the Order of the Coif and served on the editorial board of the Duke Law Journal. He earned his A.B., summa cum laude, from Wabash College in 1999 and was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He is admitted to practice in Nevada and New York.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Kovacs is ranked in Chambers USA (2014–2026) and The Best Lawyers in America (2013–2027), which named him Las Vegas Lawyer of the Year for Corporate Law (2021), Mergers and Acquisitions Law (2022), and Business Organizations (2023). The Legal 500 placed him on its 2024 M&A Private Practice Powerlist for the USA region.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Kovacs is vice chair of the Executive Committee of the State Bar of Nevada's Business Law Section and a member of the Clark County Bar Association, the American Bar Association, and the New York State Bar Association.

Experience

Mr. Kovacs co-authored "Home Means Nevada: Corporate Migration to the Silver State" in Nevada Business (2025) and has written on Nevada's 2025 corporate legislation and dedicated business court initiative. He previously taught business ethics and legal studies as a teaching assistant professor at the University of Denver's Daniels College of Business, and began his career at Cleary Gottlieb Steen Hamilton LLP in New York.
Wendy Grasso

Wendy Grasso

Fenwick & West LLP

Wendy Grasso is counsel in the New York office of Fenwick & West LLP, where she practices in the firm’s corporate, corporate governance, and mergers and acquisitions groups. She counsels public and private companies, and their boards, on governance and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters, covering everything from policy design and risk assessment to shareholder engagement, activism, and the disclosure, reporting, and compliance obligations that follow. She is especially well suited to this program: she advises boards on governance practice and shareholder engagement, handled SEC reporting, stock exchange compliance, and corporate reorganizations for public companies as a partner at an international firm, and contributes to Fenwick’s publications on proxy season results and SEC proxy rulemaking, bringing the perspective of a governance adviser who understands how a board’s record and disclosures will be read by the stockholders asked to approve them.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Grasso earned her J.D., cum laude, from the University of Pittsburgh. She also holds an M.A. in Teaching from the University of Charleston and a B.S. in Psychology from the University of Richmond. She is admitted to practice in New York and Pennsylvania.

Recognition & Leadership

Before joining Fenwick, Ms. Grasso was a partner at an international law firm, where she represented public companies across their securities, governance, and transactional needs.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Grasso contributes to Fenwick's securities and governance publications, including its review of 2026 proxy season results in Silicon Valley and at large companies nationwide, its analyses of the SEC's proposals to modernize the proxy solicitation rules and to rescind Rule 14a-8 while amending Rule 14a-4, and the firm's recurring Securities Law Updates.

Experience

Ms. Grasso's governance work spans ESG developments and best practices, the design and implementation of policies, the identification and assessment of risk, and engagement with shareholders and activists, together with ESG-related disclosure, commercial requirements, reporting, and regulatory compliance. In her prior partnership, her public-company practice included securities law and stock exchange compliance, SEC reporting and disclosure, corporate governance, public and private equity offerings, mergers and acquisitions, and other corporate restructurings and reorganizations.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs