Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Pipeline Takings and Just Compensation: Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission and the Future of Natural Gas Act Condemnations

Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission will decide whether pipeline condemnations follow federal or state compensation rules, and with them whether landowners can recover attorney’s fees. Learn the arguments, the Rule 71.1 process, easement valuation, and how to negotiate while the decision is pending.

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-12-17 14:30:00

2026-12-17 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Course Overview

When a Private Pipeline Takes Land, Which Law Sets the Price

2026-12-17 14:30:00

Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act lets private pipeline companies holding a FERC certificate exercise federal eminent domain. In Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, the Supreme Court will decide whether just compensation in those condemnations follows the Fifth Amendment standard or state law. The Eighth Circuit applied the federal measure, and lower courts have divided on borrowing state compensation rules.

The choice is not academic. The Fifth Amendment fair-market-value standard excludes items such as attorney’s fees, while some state regimes award fees, costs, and additional damages. Whichever rule prevails changes project budgets, right-of-way acquisition, and settlement leverage. Fail to preserve the compensation-standard argument in a pending case, and the decision may arrive too late to help.

Attendees walk out with a clear map of the arguments and likely outcomes, a valuation and evidence checklist, and a negotiation framework adjusted to each possible result in Hoffmann. It is practitioner judgment for advising landowners, developers, and lenders, from counsel who represent both pipeline companies and property owners in condemnation.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
NGA Section 7(h) Authority
How a FERC certificate carries federal eminent domain power under 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h), and how PennEast read Section 7.
02
Federal or State Compensation
How the Fifth Amendment measure, state fee-shifting regimes, and United States v. Kimbell Foods frame the question in Hoffmann.
03
Possible Outcomes
What a ruling for the landowners or for WBI would mean for project budgets, settlement leverage, and other delegated takings.
04
Rule 71.1 and Immediate Possession
How condemnation actions proceed, and how pipeline companies obtain possession after East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. Sage.
05
Proving Just Compensation
How before-and-after valuation, severance damages, and Rule 702 expert evidence drive the compensation trial.
06
Negotiating While Hoffmann Is Pending
How fee recovery shapes offers, settlement timing, and counseling for landowners, developers, and lenders.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

The Question Before the Court: Federal or State Law for Just Compensation in Natural Gas Act Condemnations Under 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h)

This session examines the question the Supreme Court will hear on November 9, 2026 in Hoffmann v. WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.: whether, in condemnations brought by private pipeline companies under Section 7(h) of the Natural Gas Act, just compensation is measured by the Fifth Amendment standard or by state law. Attorneys will learn how Section 7(h) delegates the federal eminent domain power to certificate holders, how the Eighth Circuit resolved the issue, how the choice between federal and state compensation rules has divided courts, and why the answer matters for attorney’s fees and other recoverable items. Attendees will leave with a clear map of the arguments, the role the United States is playing at argument, and the likely consequences of each outcome for pending and future pipeline projects.

Elizabeth U. WitmerElizabeth U. Witmer
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Litigating and Negotiating Pipeline Condemnations: Valuation, Fees, and Right-of-Way Strategy for Landowners and Developers

This session walks through the practical side of natural gas pipeline condemnations as the industry awaits the Court’s decision. Attorneys will learn how condemnation actions proceed under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.1, how pipeline companies obtain immediate possession, how easement value and severance damages are proven, and how the fee question shapes offers, counteroffers, and settlement timing. Attendees will leave with a valuation and evidence checklist, a negotiation framework adjusted to each possible outcome in Hoffmann, and practical guidance for advising landowners, developers, and lenders.

Marshall WallMarshall Wall
Elizabeth U. Witmer

Elizabeth U. Witmer

Saul Ewing LLP

Marshall Wall

Marshall Wall

Cranfill Sumner LLP

Elizabeth U. Witmer

Elizabeth U. Witmer

Saul Ewing LLP

Elizabeth U. Witmer is Co-Chair of the Energy Practice and Vice Chair of the Transactional Department at Saul Ewing LLP, where she advises natural gas companies, public and private utilities, and commercial developers on interstate pipeline development, eminent domain and condemnations, land use, and appellate litigation. Over more than 25 years, she has helped clients secure federal, state, and local approvals and has defended those approvals through the appellate courts. She is especially well suited to this program: lead counsel in more than 150 federal condemnation actions, an amicus brief in Kelo v. City of New London, and appellate wins on FERC certificates and immediate possession of pipeline rights of way, bringing the perspective of counsel who takes pipeline projects from certificate through compensation.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Witmer earned her J.D. from Villanova University School of Law in 1989 and her B.B.A. from the College of William & Mary in 1985. She is admitted in New Jersey and Pennsylvania and before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and D.C. Circuits, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania and the Northern District of New York.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Witmer has been named to The Best Lawyers in America for Real Estate Law and Utilities Law since 2025 and for Land Use and Zoning Law since 2024. She was selected for Pennsylvania Super Lawyers from 2004 to 2007 and from 2014 to 2016, named a Top Attorney by Suburban Life magazine in 2010, and designated one of the Great Lawyers on the Main Line by Main Line Today in 2004.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Witmer serves on the Board of Directors of the Chester County Chamber of Business & Industry and is a member of the Energy Bar Association, the Southern Gas Association, the Women's Council on Energy and the Environment, and Women in Green Hydrogen. She is also a member of the American, Pennsylvania, and Chester County Bar Associations and is a former member of the Philadelphia Chapter of the International Right of Way Association.

Experience

Ms. Witmer is lead outside counsel for a $650 million, 124-mile greenfield interstate pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York and lead Pennsylvania counsel on a $2.65 billion, 123-mile pipeline expansion. She obtained a favorable jury award for a natural gas pipeline client in an eminent domain case in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and her appellate work includes Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Permanent Easements for 2.14 Acres (3d Cir. 2018), affirming immediate possession of pipeline rights of way, and Allegheny Defense Project v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2020) (en banc).
Marshall Wall

Marshall Wall

Cranfill Sumner LLP

F. Marshall Wall is a Partner in the Raleigh office of Cranfill Sumner LLP, where he focuses his practice on eminent domain and land condemnation law, representing property owners in disputes with the North Carolina Department of Transportation and local government agencies. His goal is to protect property rights and make sure clients receive fair compensation when land is taken for public use, and he has been practicing law since 1999. He is especially well suited to this program: representation of property owners in eminent domain negotiations and litigation, complex right-of-way disputes, and negotiated settlements for clients whose properties were partially taken, bringing the perspective of a landowner-side trial lawyer focused on fair compensation.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Wall earned his J.D., cum laude, from Campbell University School of Law in 1999 and his B.A. from the University of North Carolina in 1996. He is admitted in North Carolina and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of North Carolina, and he is AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Wall served as Managing Partner of Cranfill Sumner for 10 years. He was named Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year for Professional Malpractice Law – Defendants (2026) and Business Organizations (2027), has been selected for North Carolina Super Lawyers and its Top 100 list, and has been named to Business North Carolina's Legal Elite and Power List.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Wall is a member of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel and serves on the Boards of Visitors of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Campbell Law School. He presented the webinar North Carolina Highway and Utility Rights-of-Way in August 2025.

Experience

Mr. Wall has guided property owners through negotiation and litigation when government takings threatened operational continuity and property value, and he has achieved favorable resolutions for clients whose properties were partially taken. A seasoned trial attorney, he has served as lead counsel in state and federal courts across North Carolina, including the North Carolina Business Court, and has resolved complex disputes through litigation, mediation, and arbitration.
Elizabeth U. Witmer

Elizabeth U. Witmer

Saul Ewing LLP

Elizabeth U. Witmer is Co-Chair of the Energy Practice and Vice Chair of the Transactional Department at Saul Ewing LLP, where she advises natural gas companies, public and private utilities, and commercial developers on interstate pipeline development, eminent domain and condemnations, land use, and appellate litigation. Over more than 25 years, she has helped clients secure federal, state, and local approvals and has defended those approvals through the appellate courts. She is especially well suited to this program: lead counsel in more than 150 federal condemnation actions, an amicus brief in Kelo v. City of New London, and appellate wins on FERC certificates and immediate possession of pipeline rights of way, bringing the perspective of counsel who takes pipeline projects from certificate through compensation.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Witmer earned her J.D. from Villanova University School of Law in 1989 and her B.B.A. from the College of William & Mary in 1985. She is admitted in New Jersey and Pennsylvania and before the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second, Third, and D.C. Circuits, and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Middle Districts of Pennsylvania and the Northern District of New York.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Witmer has been named to The Best Lawyers in America for Real Estate Law and Utilities Law since 2025 and for Land Use and Zoning Law since 2024. She was selected for Pennsylvania Super Lawyers from 2004 to 2007 and from 2014 to 2016, named a Top Attorney by Suburban Life magazine in 2010, and designated one of the Great Lawyers on the Main Line by Main Line Today in 2004.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Witmer serves on the Board of Directors of the Chester County Chamber of Business & Industry and is a member of the Energy Bar Association, the Southern Gas Association, the Women's Council on Energy and the Environment, and Women in Green Hydrogen. She is also a member of the American, Pennsylvania, and Chester County Bar Associations and is a former member of the Philadelphia Chapter of the International Right of Way Association.

Experience

Ms. Witmer is lead outside counsel for a $650 million, 124-mile greenfield interstate pipeline from Pennsylvania to New York and lead Pennsylvania counsel on a $2.65 billion, 123-mile pipeline expansion. She obtained a favorable jury award for a natural gas pipeline client in an eminent domain case in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and her appellate work includes Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Permanent Easements for 2.14 Acres (3d Cir. 2018), affirming immediate possession of pipeline rights of way, and Allegheny Defense Project v. FERC (D.C. Cir. 2020) (en banc).
Marshall Wall

Marshall Wall

Cranfill Sumner LLP

F. Marshall Wall is a Partner in the Raleigh office of Cranfill Sumner LLP, where he focuses his practice on eminent domain and land condemnation law, representing property owners in disputes with the North Carolina Department of Transportation and local government agencies. His goal is to protect property rights and make sure clients receive fair compensation when land is taken for public use, and he has been practicing law since 1999. He is especially well suited to this program: representation of property owners in eminent domain negotiations and litigation, complex right-of-way disputes, and negotiated settlements for clients whose properties were partially taken, bringing the perspective of a landowner-side trial lawyer focused on fair compensation.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Wall earned his J.D., cum laude, from Campbell University School of Law in 1999 and his B.A. from the University of North Carolina in 1996. He is admitted in North Carolina and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Middle, and Western Districts of North Carolina, and he is AV Rated by Martindale-Hubbell.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Wall served as Managing Partner of Cranfill Sumner for 10 years. He was named Best Lawyers Lawyer of the Year for Professional Malpractice Law – Defendants (2026) and Business Organizations (2027), has been selected for North Carolina Super Lawyers and its Top 100 list, and has been named to Business North Carolina's Legal Elite and Power List.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Wall is a member of the Federation of Defense & Corporate Counsel and serves on the Boards of Visitors of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Campbell Law School. He presented the webinar North Carolina Highway and Utility Rights-of-Way in August 2025.

Experience

Mr. Wall has guided property owners through negotiation and litigation when government takings threatened operational continuity and property value, and he has achieved favorable resolutions for clients whose properties were partially taken. A seasoned trial attorney, he has served as lead counsel in state and federal courts across North Carolina, including the North Carolina Business Court, and has resolved complex disputes through litigation, mediation, and arbitration.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs