Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

AI-Assisted Patenting in 2026: Inventorship, Patentability, Prosecution and Post-Grant Strategy

Artificial intelligence is rewriting the rules of patent practice. Learn how the USPTO’s revised 2025 inventorship guidance governs AI-assisted inventions, how to build a prosecution record that withstands later challenges, and how AI-related patents are attacked and defended before the PTAB and in the courts.

2026-10-16 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-16 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-10-16 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-16 14:30:00

Course Overview

When AI Helps Invent, Every Stage of the Patent's Life Changes

2026-10-16 14:30:00

Artificial intelligence is changing not only what gets invented, but also how patent attorneys must evaluate inventorship, patentability, disclosure, prior art, prosecution strategy, and post-grant risk. The USPTO’s revised November 2025 guidance confirms that AI systems cannot be named as inventors and that the traditional human-inventorship standard continues to govern AI-assisted inventions.

At the same time, the USPTO has expanded its AI-related examination resources and updated its subject-matter-eligibility practices, creating new strategic considerations for practitioners handling software, AI, and other emerging technologies. Decisions made at the invention-disclosure and prosecution stages now echo years later, when the same records, positions, and claims are tested in contested proceedings.

This two-session program examines the practical patent-law consequences of AI-assisted innovation from invention disclosure through PTAB and Federal Circuit proceedings. Attendees will learn how to evaluate human contributions to AI-assisted inventions, build a defensible prosecution record, address §101 and prior-art issues, and anticipate how AI-related patentability decisions can affect later validity challenges.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
The 2025 USPTO AI Inventorship Reset
What changed, what did not, and why the revised guidance matters for patent counsel handling AI-assisted inventions.
02
Who Actually Invented It?
Applying the human-contribution requirement when AI generates concepts, alternatives, designs, or technical solutions—and when prompts, problem statements, and AI outputs may, or may not, constitute a meaningful inventive contribution.
03
AI-Assisted §101 and §112 Problems
Drafting claims and specifications demonstrate a concrete technological contribution rather than abstract AI implementation.
04
What Travels and What Doesn’t
The grounds available in IPR, PGR, and district court, why the nine-month post-grant window drives challenge strategy for AI-related patents, and how prosecution positions—disclaimer, prior-art characterizations, §101 arguments, and IDS strategy—resurface as petitioner exhibits and §325(d) leverage.
05
Inventorship After Issuance
The inventorship record in the other side’s hands: AI interaction logs, prompt records, and invention disclosures as discovery targets; privilege and waiver questions; correction under §256; and unenforceability exposure when an AI contribution goes undisclosed.
06
Petitioner and Patent Owner Playbooks
Who is the POSITA in a machine-learning case, competing expert declarations and technical-evidence disputes, motion-to-amend practice, and a prosecution checklist for reducing future validity and enforcement risk.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

AI-Assisted Inventions: Inventorship, Patentability and Building a Defensible Prosecution Record

AI-assisted invention is creating new risks for patent counsel well before a patent reaches litigation. This session examines how attorneys should approach inventorship, conception, disclosure, patentability, and prosecution strategy when AI tools participate in the inventive process. Using the USPTO’s revised 2025 inventorship guidance and current examination practices as the framework, attendees will learn how to distinguish meaningful human contributions from mere prompting or recognition of AI-generated results, preserve evidence of conception, and develop a prosecution record that can withstand later validity and inventorship challenges.

Michelle K. HoloubekMichelle K. Holoubek
Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

From Patent Office to PTAB: Challenging and Defending AI-Related Patents

AI and software patents present distinctive challenges when patentability decisions move beyond prosecution and into contested proceedings. This session examines how AI-related patents can be attacked and defended through §101, §§102/103, claim-scope, and technical-evidence disputes, with particular attention to the transition from prosecution to post-grant proceedings. Drawing on deep experience in PTAB litigation and the prosecution of software and AI technologies, the session provides a practical framework for identifying weaknesses before issuance and developing stronger positions when an AI-related patent is later challenged.

Michelle K. HoloubekMichelle K. Holoubek
Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.
Michelle K. Holoubek

Michelle K. Holoubek

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Michelle K. Holoubek

Michelle K. Holoubek

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Michelle K. Holoubek is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group. With a background in relativistic physics and computational modeling, Michelle combines her legal expertise and technical acumen to guide clients through evolving artificial intelligence and deep-learning landscape. She is well-versed in protecting software-based innovation through holistic complements of patents, trade secrets, and copyrights, as well as securing freedom to operate for startups and Fortune 100 companies alike. Having handled hundreds of computational applications at the USPTO, patent-eligible subject matter (§101) is Michelle’s special area of expertise.

Education & Credentials

Michelle earned her J.D. from George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School and her B.S. in Physics from Louisiana State University, where she focused her research on gravitational wave detection, working on both LSU's resonant bar detector ALLEGRO and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), including a summer research fellowship for LIGO at the California Institute of Technology.

Recognition & Leadership

Michelle has been named one of the Top 50 Women in PTAB Trials by the PTAB Bar Association each year the list has issued (2019, 2021, 2025). She serves on the Executive Committee for LSU's College of Science and is a member of the LSU Foundation's National Board.

Professional Involvement

Michelle is a contributing author of Patent Office Litigation (Thomson Reuters Westlaw, 2012) and its Second Edition (2017), as well as the chapter on “Patentability Challenges at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office” in the ABA's Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook, 4th Edition. She routinely speaks and publishes on AI and software patentability and eligibility.

Experience

Michelle has been lead counsel in inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and reexaminations for both patent owners and challengers, and provides infringement and invalidity opinions across biotech, fintech, and mechanical technologies. She brings an interdisciplinary approach to digital healthcare and bioinformatics—including deep-learning AI models for biomics, genomics, diagnostics, and drug discovery—and has deep experience in optics and photonics, from flexible photonics for medical applications to photon entanglement for imaging and cryptography.
Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Lestin is a leading PTAB litigator and IP strategist, specializing in IP portfolio development and monetization. He has successfully led over 100 PTAB proceedings, including IPR, PGR, and CBM reviews, across the electronics, mechanical, and life sciences industries, securing favorable outcomes for both petitioners and patent owners.

Education & Credentials

Lestin earned his J.D. from Widener University School of Law and his B.S.E. in Computer Science from the University of Pennsylvania. A former software developer specializing in ground-based air surveillance radar, he seamlessly bridges complex technical innovation and IP strategy.

Recognition & Leadership

Recognized nationally for his expertise, Patexia ranked Lestin among the most active and best-performing PTAB attorneys (2018–2023), including a top 50 ranking for Best Performing Attorneys Representing Patent Owners and a top 100 ranking overall.

Professional Involvement

Lestin is one of the firm's AI leaders, advising companies on protecting AI innovations, mitigating legal risks, and ensuring compliance with global regulations. With deep expertise in machine learning, NLP, deep-learning architectures, and AI governance, he helps clients audit, protect, and commercialize AI assets and navigate emerging issues such as AI-generated content, protection of AI training data and models, and AI model licensing. He spearheaded the development of the firm's AI IP Audit Program, a comprehensive suite of strategic audits designed to help companies navigate the complex legal landscape of AI-based intellectual property.

Experience

Lestin's technical expertise spans sensor technologies, autonomous systems and robotics, MedTech, bioinformatics, fintech, IoT, wireless and telecommunications, computer graphics and architecture, audio and video streaming, optics, computer vision, cloud computing, cybersecurity and data protection, and defense technologies. Beyond litigation, he works closely with startups, mid-sized enterprises, and multinational corporations to craft patent strategies that maximize commercial value through licensing, enforcement, strategic acquisitions, and defensive positioning.
Michelle K. Holoubek

Michelle K. Holoubek

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Michelle K. Holoubek is a director in Sterne Kessler’s Electronics Practice Group. With a background in relativistic physics and computational modeling, Michelle combines her legal expertise and technical acumen to guide clients through evolving artificial intelligence and deep-learning landscape. She is well-versed in protecting software-based innovation through holistic complements of patents, trade secrets, and copyrights, as well as securing freedom to operate for startups and Fortune 100 companies alike. Having handled hundreds of computational applications at the USPTO, patent-eligible subject matter (§101) is Michelle’s special area of expertise.

Education & Credentials

Michelle earned her J.D. from George Mason University's Antonin Scalia Law School and her B.S. in Physics from Louisiana State University, where she focused her research on gravitational wave detection, working on both LSU's resonant bar detector ALLEGRO and the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), including a summer research fellowship for LIGO at the California Institute of Technology.

Recognition & Leadership

Michelle has been named one of the Top 50 Women in PTAB Trials by the PTAB Bar Association each year the list has issued (2019, 2021, 2025). She serves on the Executive Committee for LSU's College of Science and is a member of the LSU Foundation's National Board.

Professional Involvement

Michelle is a contributing author of Patent Office Litigation (Thomson Reuters Westlaw, 2012) and its Second Edition (2017), as well as the chapter on “Patentability Challenges at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office” in the ABA's Patent Litigation Strategies Handbook, 4th Edition. She routinely speaks and publishes on AI and software patentability and eligibility.

Experience

Michelle has been lead counsel in inter partes reviews, post-grant reviews, and reexaminations for both patent owners and challengers, and provides infringement and invalidity opinions across biotech, fintech, and mechanical technologies. She brings an interdisciplinary approach to digital healthcare and bioinformatics—including deep-learning AI models for biomics, genomics, diagnostics, and drug discovery—and has deep experience in optics and photonics, from flexible photonics for medical applications to photon entanglement for imaging and cryptography.
Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Lestin L. Kenton, Jr.

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C

Lestin is a leading PTAB litigator and IP strategist, specializing in IP portfolio development and monetization. He has successfully led over 100 PTAB proceedings, including IPR, PGR, and CBM reviews, across the electronics, mechanical, and life sciences industries, securing favorable outcomes for both petitioners and patent owners.

Education & Credentials

Lestin earned his J.D. from Widener University School of Law and his B.S.E. in Computer Science from the University of Pennsylvania. A former software developer specializing in ground-based air surveillance radar, he seamlessly bridges complex technical innovation and IP strategy.

Recognition & Leadership

Recognized nationally for his expertise, Patexia ranked Lestin among the most active and best-performing PTAB attorneys (2018–2023), including a top 50 ranking for Best Performing Attorneys Representing Patent Owners and a top 100 ranking overall.

Professional Involvement

Lestin is one of the firm's AI leaders, advising companies on protecting AI innovations, mitigating legal risks, and ensuring compliance with global regulations. With deep expertise in machine learning, NLP, deep-learning architectures, and AI governance, he helps clients audit, protect, and commercialize AI assets and navigate emerging issues such as AI-generated content, protection of AI training data and models, and AI model licensing. He spearheaded the development of the firm's AI IP Audit Program, a comprehensive suite of strategic audits designed to help companies navigate the complex legal landscape of AI-based intellectual property.

Experience

Lestin's technical expertise spans sensor technologies, autonomous systems and robotics, MedTech, bioinformatics, fintech, IoT, wireless and telecommunications, computer graphics and architecture, audio and video streaming, optics, computer vision, cloud computing, cybersecurity and data protection, and defense technologies. Beyond litigation, he works closely with startups, mid-sized enterprises, and multinational corporations to craft patent strategies that maximize commercial value through licensing, enforcement, strategic acquisitions, and defensive positioning.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs