Program Details
2025-10-01 13:00:00
Over 1,000+ webinars
Course Overview
2025-10-01 13:00:00
1h CLE Credits
Intermediate
1
1:00 pm - 1:10 pm ESTThis session explores recent court developments addressing generative AI use in eDiscovery, including the landmark EEOC v. Tesla stipulated order. Learn how parties can reach agreements on AI use through meet-and-confer processes and what factors affect successful negotiations between parties with varying levels of technical sophistication.
George Socha
Susan Wortzman
Jaime Raba 1:10 pm - 1:20 pm ESTDiscover how validation criteria serve as a shield of methodological protection while maintaining prompt confidentiality. This session covers key metrics including recall, precision, and F1 scores, and explains how offering validation results can be an effective alternative to full prompt disclosure.
George SochaSusan WortzmanJaime Raba 1:20 pm - 1:30 pm ESTLearn essential documentation practices that ensure defensibility when using AI in eDiscovery workflows. This session emphasizes process-focused transparency over technical details and clarifies when disclosure of AI use becomes necessary versus when it remains privileged work product.
George SochaSusan WortzmanJaime Raba 1:30 pm - 1:40 pm ESTExamine practical applications of generative AI across first-pass review, early case assessment, incoming production review, and investigation support. This session covers prompt development considerations and demonstrates how current ESI protocols blend traditional search methods with cutting-edge AI technologies.
George SochaSusan WortzmanJaime Raba 1:40 pm - 1:50 pm ESTGain strategies for addressing security concerns in asymmetrical litigation and comparing AI review capabilities to human review. This session distinguishes discovery AI from drafting AI and addresses when expert witnesses may be needed to defend AI-assisted review processes.
George SochaSusan WortzmanJaime Raba 1:50 pm - 2:00 pm ESTEngage directly with presenters to address your specific questions about implementing generative AI in eDiscovery. This open discussion provides an opportunity to explore practical challenges and emerging best practices in AI-assisted document review workflows.
George SochaSusan WortzmanJaime RabaGeorge is the Senior Vice President of Brand Awareness at Reveal, where he promotes brand awareness, helps guide development of product roadmap and consults with customers on effective deployment of legal technology. Named an ‘E-Discovery Trailblazer’ by The American Lawyer, he has assisted corporate, law firm, and government clients with all facets of electronic discovery, including information governance, domestically and globally.
Susan is a partner in the Toronto offices of McCarthy Tétrault and leads the firm’s e-Discovery and information management practice.
Jaime’s legal practice is dedicated to information governance including eDiscovery litigation response, information security, and information technology issues. He draws on his technical background in advising clients on matters involving data analysis, privacy, forensics, legacy systems, and technology risk management.
George is the Senior Vice President of Brand Awareness at Reveal, where he promotes brand awareness, helps guide development of product roadmap and consults with customers on effective deployment of legal technology. Named an ‘E-Discovery Trailblazer’ by The American Lawyer, he has assisted corporate, law firm, and government clients with all facets of electronic discovery, including information governance, domestically and globally.
Susan is a partner in the Toronto offices of McCarthy Tétrault and leads the firm’s e-Discovery and information management practice.
Jaime’s legal practice is dedicated to information governance including eDiscovery litigation response, information security, and information technology issues. He draws on his technical background in advising clients on matters involving data analysis, privacy, forensics, legacy systems, and technology risk management.
Requirements
The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.
Formats
