Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Algorithmic Discrimination Beyond Employment: Credit, Housing, Tenant Screening, and Insurance Models Under Legal Fire

Credit, housing, tenant-screening, and insurance models now face disparate impact claims aimed at users and vendors alike. Learn to map liability under the Fair Housing Act and ECOA, test models for bias, search for less discriminatory alternatives, and build a defensible audit record.

2026-11-03 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-03 12:00:00

2026-11-03 12:00:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-11-03 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-03 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-03 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-11-03 12:00:00

Course Overview

The Model That Denies the Loan, the Lease, or the Policy Can Put Its Vendor in Court Too

2026-11-03 12:00:00

The algorithmic discrimination conversation has centered on hiring. Yet the models deciding who gets credit, housing, and insurance reach far more consumers. Louis v. SafeRent Solutions showed that a tenant-screening model’s disparate impact can bring the vendor, not just its users, into court. State regulators now require insurers to test their algorithms and external data for unfair discrimination.

The exposure is already concrete. License a score you cannot see inside, and you inherit its disparities. Send an adverse action notice that cannot explain the model, and ECOA and Regulation B problems follow. Skip the less-discriminatory-alternative search, and the business-justification defense weakens. Run model testing outside privilege, and the analysis can surface in discovery.

Attendees walk out with a liability map across credit, housing, and insurance, a working command of the fairness metrics experts rely on, a method for searching for less discriminatory alternatives, and a blueprint for the model file that withstands a regulator or a plaintiff’s expert. This is practitioner judgment drawn from fair lending counseling and litigation, not a doctrine summary.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Disparate Impact Liability
How burden-shifting and business justification apply to models under the Fair Housing Act, ECOA, and state insurance statutes.
02
Vendor Liability
What Louis v. SafeRent Solutions means when the model maker, not just the user, is the defendant.
03
Adverse Action Explainability
What notices must say when a machine-learning model makes or informs the decision.
04
Fairness Testing
How adverse impact ratios, calibration, and proxy analysis shape defensible methodology choices.
05
Less Discriminatory Alternatives
How LDA searches work and how plaintiffs, regulators, and defendants wield them.
06
The Audit Record
 The Audit Record How documentation, independent testing, and remediation position a model to withstand scrutiny.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Where the Liability Comes From: Disparate Impact and the Consequential-Decision Model in Credit, Housing, and Insurance

This session maps the liability landscape for algorithmic decision systems outside employment. Attorneys will learn how the disparate impact framework applies to models under the Fair Housing Act, ECOA and Regulation B, and the state statutes reaching insurance and consumer scoring, including the burden-shifting structure, the business-justification defense, and the less-discriminatory-alternative battleground. The session examines what Louis v. SafeRent Solutions established about vendor exposure for tenant-screening models, the adverse action notice obligations that apply when a model makes or informs the decision, and the state insurance rules requiring insurers to test algorithms and external data for unfair discrimination. Attendees will leave with a practical approach to allocating model risk by contract, handling the discovery fight over source code and training data, and counseling clients who license third-party scores they cannot see inside.

Sacha B. Markano-StarkSacha B. Markano-Stark
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Testing, Challenging, and Defending the Model: Fairness Metrics, Less Discriminatory Alternatives, and the Audit Record

This session goes inside the model to show how algorithmic fairness is measured, attacked, and defended. Attorneys will learn what adverse impact ratios, calibration, and error-rate disparities actually measure and where they conflict, how disparate impact testing is run in practice, including proxy analysis when protected-class data is unavailable, and how less discriminatory alternative searches are used by plaintiffs, regulators, and defendants. The session closes with the governance side: model documentation, independent testing, audits and monitorships, and remediation when a test finds a problem. Attendees will leave knowing how to structure model testing under privilege, translate quantitative evidence for judges and juries, and assemble a model file that holds up when the regulator or the plaintiff’s expert comes calling.

Eric P. SublettEric P. Sublett
Eric P. Sublett

Eric P. Sublett

Relman Colfax PLLC

Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Relman Colfax PLLC

Eric P. Sublett

Eric P. Sublett

Relman Colfax PLLC

Eric P. Sublett is a Partner at Relman Colfax PLLC, where he has practiced in the firm’s civil rights counseling group since 2012. He primarily counsels financial institutions on best practices for fair lending compliance, and much of his work addresses algorithmic fairness and the discrimination risk posed by statistical and machine learning models. He helps clients identify and reduce those risks in traditional lending as well as in the financial technology and online platform settings where they increasingly arise. He is especially well suited to this program: he has worked on the firm’s independent fair lending monitorship of Upstart Network’s lending model and on independent civil rights audits, bringing a hands-on view of how a model is tested, documented, and held accountable.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Sublett received his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School. He also holds an M.A. from Yale University and a B.A. with highest honors from The University of Texas at Austin. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Connecticut.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Sublett's featured matters at Relman Colfax include the firm's service as independent fair lending Monitor of Upstart Network's lending platform, an appointment made under a December 2020 agreement among Upstart, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and the Student Borrower Protection Center, which produced a series of periodic reports evaluating the platform's fair lending implications. His featured work also includes the independent civil rights audit of State Street Corporation, whose final report was published on May 30, 2023, and the firm's Civil Rights Audit of Facebook.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Sublett has spoken at conferences organized by the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association and by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, and he has appeared as a guest speaker at Howard University School of Law. He previously served as a visiting fellow with the Information Society Project at Yale Law School.

Experience

Before joining Relman Colfax, Mr. Sublett handled fair housing matters as a volunteer attorney with the Connecticut Fair Housing Center. At the firm, his counseling practice centers on fair lending, with particular emphasis on how statistical and machine learning models can create discrimination risk and how that risk can be detected and mitigated.
Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Relman Colfax PLLC

Sacha B. Markano-Stark is Counsel at Relman Colfax PLLC, which she joined in 2021, and she practices in both the firm’s civil rights counseling and litigation groups. She advises financial institutions and other organizations on compliance and best practices in fair housing, fair lending, and fair banking. Her counseling also covers tech bias, appraisal-related issues, financial equity, and affirmative lending programs, while her litigation work challenges redlining, appraisal discrimination, and other discriminatory practices. She is especially well suited to this program: she handles Fair Housing Act and ECOA matters on both the compliance and litigation side and has presented on algorithmic bias in housing-related transactions, bringing both a counseling perspective and a courtroom view of how discrimination claims against a model are built.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Markano-Stark earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law, and she also holds an M.A. from New York University and a B.A. from Reed College. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Virginia (inactive).

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Markano-Stark served as a judicial clerk at both the federal trial and appellate levels, clerking for the Hon. Martha Craig Daughtrey of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Hon. Paula Xinis of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Markano-Stark is a co-author of “Adding Robust Consideration Of Race To Community Reinvestment Act Regulations: An Essential And Constitutional Proposal,” published by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition in 2021. She was also one of the presenters of “Mining the Data: Algorithmic Bias in Housing Related Transactions,” an NFHTA Forum Online program held on January 19, 2022.

Experience

Before joining Relman Colfax, Ms. Markano-Stark was a litigation associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, where she handled complex civil litigation, internal investigations, corporate compliance, anti-corruption and anti-bribery, and data security matters while maintaining an active pro bono practice. During law school she worked with the Equal Justice Initiative in Alabama, the Promise of Justice Initiative in Louisiana, and the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section, and Criminal Division, Public Integrity Section. She also brings significant experience in voter protection and voting rights.
Eric P. Sublett

Eric P. Sublett

Relman Colfax PLLC

Eric P. Sublett is a Partner at Relman Colfax PLLC, where he has practiced in the firm’s civil rights counseling group since 2012. He primarily counsels financial institutions on best practices for fair lending compliance, and much of his work addresses algorithmic fairness and the discrimination risk posed by statistical and machine learning models. He helps clients identify and reduce those risks in traditional lending as well as in the financial technology and online platform settings where they increasingly arise. He is especially well suited to this program: he has worked on the firm’s independent fair lending monitorship of Upstart Network’s lending model and on independent civil rights audits, bringing a hands-on view of how a model is tested, documented, and held accountable.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Sublett received his J.D. cum laude from Harvard Law School. He also holds an M.A. from Yale University and a B.A. with highest honors from The University of Texas at Austin. He is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Connecticut.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Sublett's featured matters at Relman Colfax include the firm's service as independent fair lending Monitor of Upstart Network's lending platform, an appointment made under a December 2020 agreement among Upstart, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, and the Student Borrower Protection Center, which produced a series of periodic reports evaluating the platform's fair lending implications. His featured work also includes the independent civil rights audit of State Street Corporation, whose final report was published on May 30, 2023, and the firm's Civil Rights Audit of Facebook.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Sublett has spoken at conferences organized by the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association and by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition, and he has appeared as a guest speaker at Howard University School of Law. He previously served as a visiting fellow with the Information Society Project at Yale Law School.

Experience

Before joining Relman Colfax, Mr. Sublett handled fair housing matters as a volunteer attorney with the Connecticut Fair Housing Center. At the firm, his counseling practice centers on fair lending, with particular emphasis on how statistical and machine learning models can create discrimination risk and how that risk can be detected and mitigated.
Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Sacha B. Markano-Stark

Relman Colfax PLLC

Sacha B. Markano-Stark is Counsel at Relman Colfax PLLC, which she joined in 2021, and she practices in both the firm’s civil rights counseling and litigation groups. She advises financial institutions and other organizations on compliance and best practices in fair housing, fair lending, and fair banking. Her counseling also covers tech bias, appraisal-related issues, financial equity, and affirmative lending programs, while her litigation work challenges redlining, appraisal discrimination, and other discriminatory practices. She is especially well suited to this program: she handles Fair Housing Act and ECOA matters on both the compliance and litigation side and has presented on algorithmic bias in housing-related transactions, bringing both a counseling perspective and a courtroom view of how discrimination claims against a model are built.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Markano-Stark earned her J.D. from New York University School of Law, and she also holds an M.A. from New York University and a B.A. from Reed College. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Virginia (inactive).

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Markano-Stark served as a judicial clerk at both the federal trial and appellate levels, clerking for the Hon. Martha Craig Daughtrey of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the Hon. Paula Xinis of the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Markano-Stark is a co-author of “Adding Robust Consideration Of Race To Community Reinvestment Act Regulations: An Essential And Constitutional Proposal,” published by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition in 2021. She was also one of the presenters of “Mining the Data: Algorithmic Bias in Housing Related Transactions,” an NFHTA Forum Online program held on January 19, 2022.

Experience

Before joining Relman Colfax, Ms. Markano-Stark was a litigation associate at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, where she handled complex civil litigation, internal investigations, corporate compliance, anti-corruption and anti-bribery, and data security matters while maintaining an active pro bono practice. During law school she worked with the Equal Justice Initiative in Alabama, the Promise of Justice Initiative in Louisiana, and the U.S. Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section, and Criminal Division, Public Integrity Section. She also brings significant experience in voter protection and voting rights.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs