Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Company Counsel Sharing Investigation Findings with DOJ To Maximize Cooperation Credit and Minimize Risk of Waiving Privilege

DOJ’s March 2026 Corporate Enforcement Policy ties cooperation credit to attributing facts to specific sources, and every attribution risks waiver. Learn to draft interview memos that protect work product, disclose findings without a witness-by-witness download, and defend the follow-on motion to compel.

2026-11-19 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-19 12:00:00

2026-11-19 12:00:00

2h CLE Credits

2026-11-19 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-19 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-19 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-11-19 12:00:00

Course Overview

Full Cooperation Credit Now Comes with a Privilege Price Tag

2026-11-19 12:00:00

On March 10, 2026, the Department of Justice announced a new Corporate Enforcement Policy. It makes cooperation credit contingent upon attributing facts to specific sources. That sits in direct tension with DOJ’s No Request Rule, which directs prosecutors not to request privilege waivers. Companies must now weigh cooperation credit against the risk of waiving attorney-client privilege and work-product protection.

The exposure starts in the interview room. Draft the memo carelessly, and it may have to be disclosed in future proceedings. Leave AI note-takers, recordings, and drafts unmanaged, and they raise the same question. Deliver a witness-by-witness download, and you can trigger waiver. Rely on a confidentiality agreement, and protection turns on which federal circuit you are in. Then third parties come asking, in follow-on civil litigation, criminal prosecutions of individuals, and insurance coverage cases.

You walk out with a working framework for separating facts from communications and fact from opinion work product under Upjohn v. United States and Hickman v. Taylor. You also leave with do’s and don’ts for drafting interview memos and a strategy for meeting the attribution demand while maintaining privilege. Finally, you get best practices for opposing the waiver motion that follows.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
DOJ’s Attribution Demand
Reconcile DOJ’s No Request Rule with the March 2026 Corporate Enforcement Policy’s demand for attribution of facts to specific sources before deciding to cooperate.
02
Facts, Communications, Work Product
Apply Upjohn v. United States and Hickman v. Taylor to separate unprotected facts from privileged communications, and fact work product from opinion work product.
03
Drafting Interview Memos
Use concrete do’s and don’ts, including how to handle AI note-takers, recordings, and drafts, to keep interview memos protected in future proceedings.
04
Selective Waiver Circuit Map
Map how the various federal circuits treat selective waiver and scope of waiver, and when a non-waiver letter or confidentiality agreement with the Government helps.
05
Cooperating Without Waiver
Disclose investigation results in a way that maximizes cooperation credit without delivering the witness-by-witness download that can trigger waiver.
06
Defending Follow-On Motions
Defend privilege over investigation materials when follow-on civil litigation, individual prosecutions, or insurance coverage cases bring a subpoena or motion to compel.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Knowing the Law on Fact versus Opinion Work Product, and Best Practices for Drafting Interview Memos

The first hour begins by explaining the tension between the DOJ’s No Request Rule directing prosecutors not to request privilege waivers and the March 2026 corporate enforcement policy requiring fact attribution for full cooperation credit. This hour will cover federal privilege law on facts versus communications under Upjohn v. United States (1981), and fact versus opinion work product under Hickman v. Taylor (1947) and their progeny. We will finish the hour by discussing best practices for drafting interview memos to protect them from having to be disclosed in future proceedings.

Jennifer L. AchillesJennifer L. Achilles
Linda ImesLinda Imes
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Knowing the Law on Selective Waiver, Cooperating with DOJ, and Defending the Follow-On Waiver Motion

The second hour covers the various federal circuits’ views on selective waiver, scope of waiver, and whether having a confidentiality agreement with the Government helps protect information provided to the Government. It covers the strategy that comes after the decision to cooperate: how to meet the March 2026 Corporate Enforcement Policy’s demand for “attribution of facts to specific sources” without delivering the kind of witness-by-witness download that can trigger waiver. It covers the potential ramifications of not protecting the privilege and the most common situations in which third parties seek privileged information created during an internal investigation (e.g., follow on civil litigation, criminal prosecutions of individuals, and insurance coverage cases). We will also discuss best practices for defending a later motion to compel documents and information shared with the Government.

Jennifer L. AchillesJennifer L. Achilles
Linda ImesLinda Imes
Jennifer L. Achilles

Jennifer L. Achilles

Blank Rome

Linda Imes

Linda Imes

Blank Rome

Jennifer L. Achilles

Jennifer L. Achilles

Blank Rome

Jennifer Achilles focuses her practice on white collar criminal defense, regulatory enforcement and securities litigation, and internal investigations.

Jennifer defends public and private companies, as well as their officers and directors, in government investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and New York District Attorney’s (“DA”) and Attorney General’s (“AG”) offices. She has significant experience representing clients in matters involving insider trading, market manipulation, accounting fraud, cryptocurrency-related activities, anti-money laundering, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). She also leads internal investigations in advance of and in connection with government investigations, and counsels clients on cooperation and self-disclosure strategies. Jennifer leads Blank Rome’s internal working group on cryptocurrency enforcement.

Education & Credentials

Jennifer earned her A.B. from Vassar College, her M.S. from Yale University, and her J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, from Tulane University School of Law. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the District of Colorado, the Central District of California, and the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA reported that clients say that “Jennifer is a fantastic lawyer. She is strategic, knowledgeable and very experienced. She is reliable, responsive and adheres to deadlines.” 2026, “Litigation Star,” listed in Benchmark Litigation 2024–2026, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, listed in Chambers USA 2026, listed in The Legal 500 United States 2026, "Leading Global Investigations Lawyers," listed in Lawdragon 2016–2025, Criminal Defense: White Collar, listed in New York Metro Super Lawyers 2016, “Client Service All-Star,” listed by BTI Consulting Group 2013–2014, “Rising Star” for Criminal Defense: White Collar, listed in New York Metro Super Lawyers

Professional Involvement

Jennifer is a Board Member of Day One New York, a non-profit organization dedicated to ending dating violence. She also volunteers with the Schools Consent Project in New York City and is an active member of the Alumnae/i Association of Vassar College. She is a member of the Women’s White Collar Defense Association, the Federal Bar Council, the New York City Bar Association, and the New York Women’s Bar Association.

Experience

Jennifer is frequently called upon to speak at industry events and write for leading publications. Prior to joining Blank Rome, she led the Global Regulatory Enforcement Group of an Am Law 100 firm in New York City and practiced at a boutique litigation firm focused on high-profile white collar and regulatory matters and sophisticated business disputes.
Linda Imes

Linda Imes

Blank Rome

Linda Imes has been a criminal and civil litigator for over three decades, with substantial trial and appellate experience. She focuses on white collar criminal defense, regulatory investigations and proceedings (including securities enforcement defense), and complex civil litigation.

Early in her career, Linda was a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. There, she served in the Major Crimes Unit and the Securities and Commodities Fraud Unit prosecuting a wide variety of complex business and commercial crimes including tax evasion, money laundering, transportation of stolen property, bank fraud, mail and wire fraud, and securities fraud.

Education & Credentials

Linda earned her B.S. and M.A., both with honors, from Northwestern University, and her J.D., cum laude, from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Linda served as a law clerk for the Honorable John J. Gibbons, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers and Partners recognizes Linda as a “Band 1” Leader in the Field of White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations. Sources quoted by Chambers praise Linda as “a trailblazer” and “one of the leaders of the Bar,” noting that she is “always outstanding in her representations” and “very focused and diligent,” with “excellent” judgment and “brain power and experience.” In 2017, Linda received the Norman S. Ostrow Award from the New York Council of Defense Lawyers. The award, which is given annually, recognizes a lawyer for “outstanding contribution to the defense of liberty and the preservation of individual rights” and whose career has been “marked by numerous examples of a lawyer fighting for a client with vigor, dignity, and expertise.” In 2021, Chambers and Partners shortlisted Linda for its prestigious White-Collar Lawyer of the Year award. 2027, Thought Leader – Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) 2009–2026, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, listed in Chambers USA 2026, “Highly Recommended – Business Crime Defence,” listed in Lexology Index 2026, listed in The Legal 500 United States 2026, “Leading Global Investigations Lawyers,” listed in Lawdragon 2023, Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Who’s Who Legal 2023, USA and GIR Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Who’s Who Legal 2021, White-Collar Lawyer of the Year Award Shortlist, by Chambers and Partners 2017, Norman S. Ostrow Award, New York Council of Defense Lawyers

Professional Involvement

Linda is a member of the Federal Bar Council, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, and the New York Council of Defense Lawyers. She was a member of the Board of the New York Council of Defense Lawyers from 1997 through 1999 and from 2012 through 2014.

Experience

Linda has tried cases in federal court, before regulators, and to mediators. Linda has represented individuals and corporations in investigations by, and matters involving, numerous U.S. Attorney’s Offices, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the New York State Attorney General’s Office and numerous other state Attorneys General, the District Attorney’s Office, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and other governmental and regulatory bodies. Linda has experience representing individuals in connection with Congressional investigations and inquiries, including before the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Linda’s work frequently involves defending clients faced with more than one investigation at a time, often combined with civil litigation. Linda has been involved in appellate advocacy since the beginning of her legal career when she clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. While at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Linda served as Deputy Chief of Appeals. In private practice, Linda has briefed and argued numerous cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, New York’s Appellate Division, and the New York Court of Appeals.
Jennifer L. Achilles

Jennifer L. Achilles

Blank Rome

Jennifer Achilles focuses her practice on white collar criminal defense, regulatory enforcement and securities litigation, and internal investigations.

Jennifer defends public and private companies, as well as their officers and directors, in government investigations by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and New York District Attorney’s (“DA”) and Attorney General’s (“AG”) offices. She has significant experience representing clients in matters involving insider trading, market manipulation, accounting fraud, cryptocurrency-related activities, anti-money laundering, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”). She also leads internal investigations in advance of and in connection with government investigations, and counsels clients on cooperation and self-disclosure strategies. Jennifer leads Blank Rome’s internal working group on cryptocurrency enforcement.

Education & Credentials

Jennifer earned her A.B. from Vassar College, her M.S. from Yale University, and her J.D., magna cum laude, Order of the Coif, from Tulane University School of Law. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the District of Colorado, the Central District of California, and the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York, as well as the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA reported that clients say that “Jennifer is a fantastic lawyer. She is strategic, knowledgeable and very experienced. She is reliable, responsive and adheres to deadlines.” 2026, “Litigation Star,” listed in Benchmark Litigation 2024–2026, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, listed in Chambers USA 2026, listed in The Legal 500 United States 2026, "Leading Global Investigations Lawyers," listed in Lawdragon 2016–2025, Criminal Defense: White Collar, listed in New York Metro Super Lawyers 2016, “Client Service All-Star,” listed by BTI Consulting Group 2013–2014, “Rising Star” for Criminal Defense: White Collar, listed in New York Metro Super Lawyers

Professional Involvement

Jennifer is a Board Member of Day One New York, a non-profit organization dedicated to ending dating violence. She also volunteers with the Schools Consent Project in New York City and is an active member of the Alumnae/i Association of Vassar College. She is a member of the Women’s White Collar Defense Association, the Federal Bar Council, the New York City Bar Association, and the New York Women’s Bar Association.

Experience

Jennifer is frequently called upon to speak at industry events and write for leading publications. Prior to joining Blank Rome, she led the Global Regulatory Enforcement Group of an Am Law 100 firm in New York City and practiced at a boutique litigation firm focused on high-profile white collar and regulatory matters and sophisticated business disputes.
Linda Imes

Linda Imes

Blank Rome

Linda Imes has been a criminal and civil litigator for over three decades, with substantial trial and appellate experience. She focuses on white collar criminal defense, regulatory investigations and proceedings (including securities enforcement defense), and complex civil litigation.

Early in her career, Linda was a federal prosecutor in the Southern District of New York. There, she served in the Major Crimes Unit and the Securities and Commodities Fraud Unit prosecuting a wide variety of complex business and commercial crimes including tax evasion, money laundering, transportation of stolen property, bank fraud, mail and wire fraud, and securities fraud.

Education & Credentials

Linda earned her B.S. and M.A., both with honors, from Northwestern University, and her J.D., cum laude, from Northwestern Pritzker School of Law. She is admitted to practice in New York and before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York and the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Linda served as a law clerk for the Honorable John J. Gibbons, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers and Partners recognizes Linda as a “Band 1” Leader in the Field of White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations. Sources quoted by Chambers praise Linda as “a trailblazer” and “one of the leaders of the Bar,” noting that she is “always outstanding in her representations” and “very focused and diligent,” with “excellent” judgment and “brain power and experience.” In 2017, Linda received the Norman S. Ostrow Award from the New York Council of Defense Lawyers. The award, which is given annually, recognizes a lawyer for “outstanding contribution to the defense of liberty and the preservation of individual rights” and whose career has been “marked by numerous examples of a lawyer fighting for a client with vigor, dignity, and expertise.” In 2021, Chambers and Partners shortlisted Linda for its prestigious White-Collar Lawyer of the Year award. 2027, Thought Leader – Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Lexology Index (formerly Who’s Who Legal) 2009–2026, Litigation: White-Collar Crime & Government Investigations, listed in Chambers USA 2026, “Highly Recommended – Business Crime Defence,” listed in Lexology Index 2026, listed in The Legal 500 United States 2026, “Leading Global Investigations Lawyers,” listed in Lawdragon 2023, Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Who’s Who Legal 2023, USA and GIR Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Individuals and Thought Leader Business Crime Defence – Corporates, listed in Who’s Who Legal 2021, White-Collar Lawyer of the Year Award Shortlist, by Chambers and Partners 2017, Norman S. Ostrow Award, New York Council of Defense Lawyers

Professional Involvement

Linda is a member of the Federal Bar Council, the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, and the New York Council of Defense Lawyers. She was a member of the Board of the New York Council of Defense Lawyers from 1997 through 1999 and from 2012 through 2014.

Experience

Linda has tried cases in federal court, before regulators, and to mediators. Linda has represented individuals and corporations in investigations by, and matters involving, numerous U.S. Attorney’s Offices, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), the New York State Attorney General’s Office and numerous other state Attorneys General, the District Attorney’s Office, the Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and other governmental and regulatory bodies. Linda has experience representing individuals in connection with Congressional investigations and inquiries, including before the U.S. Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Linda’s work frequently involves defending clients faced with more than one investigation at a time, often combined with civil litigation. Linda has been involved in appellate advocacy since the beginning of her legal career when she clerked on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. While at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Linda served as Deputy Chief of Appeals. In private practice, Linda has briefed and argued numerous cases in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, New York’s Appellate Division, and the New York Court of Appeals.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs