Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Drafting Severance Confidentiality and Non-Disparagement Terms Before the NLRB Changes the Rule

McLaren Macomb still governs severance agreements, and the Board that could overrule it has regained its quorum. Assess a client’s exposure under existing precedent, draft confidentiality and non-disparagement language that survives all three possible standards, and monitor Valley Radiology.

2026-09-18 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-09-18 14:30:00

2026-09-18 14:30:00

2h CLE Credits

Program Details

2026-09-18 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-09-18 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-18 14:30:00

Course Overview

The rule your severance templates were built for may not survive the year

2026-09-18 14:30:00

McLaren Macomb has not been overruled. But three things changed around it. The Board lost its quorum and recovered it. The General Counsel rescinded GC 23-05. And a concurrence in Prime Communications signaled imminent doctrinal change. The standard on the books is no longer the standard you can plan on.

Rescinding GC 23-05 did not eliminate prosecution risk. ALJs and the full Board still apply McLaren Macomb. Valley Radiology, Prime Communications, and Detrex Corporation mark the 2026 exposure line. A 34.7% dismissal rate for ULP charges changes the calculus, not the legal standard. Overbroad confidentiality language still draws findings.

You leave with a clause-by-clause standard for each provision type. A defamation-standard safe harbor for non-disparagement. The real limits of a savings clause. Bifurcated templates for supervisory employees, and a monitoring checklist tied to Valley Radiology. These are judgment calls under a moving standard — the work no clause library makes for you.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Board Composition Risk
How the NLRB’s quorum loss, its recovery, and current Board composition set the timeline on which your severance templates have to be revised.
02
The Controlling Standard
What McLaren Macomb requires of severance language, what it overruled, and how the three-regime problem — McLaren Macomb, the explicit-waiver test, and Baylor/IGT — changes how you draft today.
03
The 2026 Case Record
What Valley Radiology, Prime Communications, and Detrex Corporation establish about current exposure, including the unresolved Valley Radiology remedy question and the settlement posture it drives.
04
Enforcement Climate Assessment
Why the rescission of GC 23-05 and a 34.7% ULP dismissal rate shift prosecution risk without shifting the legal standard a client is measured against.
05
Drafting Both Provisions
A clause-by-clause standard for confidentiality provisions that survive any standard and for non-disparagement provisions built on the defamation-standard safe harbor.
06
Structural Drafting Traps
What a savings clause can and cannot cure, how cooperation and nondisclosure provisions create exposure, and when a bifurcated template for supervisory employees is warranted.

Program schedule

clock 2:30 pm - 3:30 pm EST

Severance Agreement Charges at the NLRB: The 2026 Enforcement Record

This session surveys the NLRB’s live enforcement record on severance agreement confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions from 2025 through mid-2026, tracing the impact of the Board’s quorum loss and recovery, the rescission of GC 23-05, and the continued application of McLaren Macomb by ALJs and the full Board. Attorneys will learn what the three 2026 decisions — Valley Radiology, Prime Communications, and Detrex Corporation — establish about current enforcement risk, what the Prime Communications concurrence signals about imminent doctrinal change, and how rising regional dismissal rates have reshaped the practical prosecution landscape. Attendees will leave able to assess a client’s current exposure under existing precedent and anticipate the conditions under which that precedent could be overruled.

Peter J. GillespiePeter J. Gillespie
clock 3:40 pm - 4:40 pm EST

Writing Severance Clauses That Survive an NLRB Reversal

This session provides a clause-by-clause drafting framework for severance confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions that remain defensible regardless of whether the NLRB overrules McLaren Macomb, adopts the GC’s explicit-waiver test, or reinstates the Baylor/IGT standard. Attorneys will examine the specific language that has drawn ALJ findings through 2026, learn what savings clauses can and cannot cure, and identify how cooperation/nondisclosure provisions and bifurcated templates for supervisory employees fit into a compliant drafting strategy. Attendees leave with a working standard for each provision type and a monitoring checklist tied to the Valley Radiology proceeding and Board composition developments through mid-2026.

William G. WakeWilliam G. Wake
Peter J. Gillespie

Peter J. Gillespie

Laner Muchin

William G. Wake

William G. Wake

Laner Muchin

Peter J. Gillespie

Peter J. Gillespie

Laner Muchin

Peter J. Gillespie is a partner in Laner Muchin’s Chicago office, where his counseling and transactional work centers on employment agreements and his litigation practice on employment contract disputes. He defends employers in claims and investigations brought by the EEOC, OSHA, and the U.S. Department of Labor, and litigates breach of executive employment contract cases, non-compete and trade secrets matters, and occupational safety proceedings. His practice also covers class action wage and hour disputes, discrimination, retaliation and harassment claims, and ERISA, disability, and leave-law matters. He conducts wage and hour compliance audits and workplace investigations, and trains executives and managers on documentation practices, hiring, leave, discrimination, social media, and workplace safety.

Education & Credentials

Peter earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 1997 and his B.A. in Economics and German Studies from Northwestern University in 1992. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. His federal trial court admissions include the Northern District of Illinois, the Southern District of Illinois, the Southern District of Indiana, the Western District of Michigan, and the District of Colorado.

Recognition & Leadership

Peter has been listed in Best Lawyers in America for Employment Law – Management from 2024 to the present, and he was named a Chick Evans Scholar. He chairs the Membership and Diversity Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Law and serves on the editorial board of The SciTech Lawyer.

Professional Involvement

Peter writes the Illinois Human Resources Manual, published annually by American Chamber of Commerce Resources, and contributed to the 2020 edition of Conducting the Employment Practices Audit for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education. He is a contributing author to The Internet of Things: Legal Issues, Policy and Practical Strategies for the ABA Section of Science and Technology Law, and his articles have appeared in The SciTech Lawyer in Winter 2021 and Spring 2017. He contributes regularly to the firm’s Fast Laner legal updates and has been quoted in Bloomberg Law on workplace COVID-19 litigation risk. He is a member of the Chicago Bar Association and the American Bar Association.

Experience

Peter’s representative matters include defending employers against EEOC, OSHA, and Department of Labor claims, breach of executive employment contract cases, class action wage and hour disputes, employment discrimination and retaliation cases, and prevailing wage issues. He is a frequent presenter to practitioner and management audiences, speaking on employee privacy in the hybrid work era at PLI’s Institute on Privacy and Cybersecurity Law in 2023 and on employment law updates at the 2021 Annual Employment Law Virtual Conference.
William G. Wake

William G. Wake

Laner Muchin

William G. Wake is a partner in Laner Muchin’s Chicago office whose management-side labor and employment practice encompasses collective bargaining, day-to-day labor relations counseling, and defense of employers before administrative agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board. He also defends class action wage and hour matters and employment discrimination, harassment and retaliation cases, conducts corporate investigations into harassment, retaliation and discrimination, and counsels employers in the temporary staffing, logistics, manufacturing, and educational sectors.

Education & Credentials

William earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2012 and his B.S. from Kansas State University in 2006. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Recognition & Leadership

William received the Illinois Emerging Lawyer designation from Leading Lawyers in 2017.

Professional Involvement

William’s published work addresses NLRB doctrine directly: he co-authored “The NLRB Turns Employer Handbooks From Useful Evidence To Potential Liabilities Under The NRA” for the 2016 Employment Law Update. He is a member of the Chicago Bar Association and the American Bar Association.

Experience

William represents management in collective bargaining and provides day-to-day labor relations counseling, and he defends employers in proceedings before administrative agencies including the National Labor Relations Board. Beyond that traditional labor work, he defends class action wage and hour matters and employment discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims, and conducts corporate investigations regarding harassment, retaliation, and discrimination. He counsels employers across the temporary staffing, logistics, manufacturing, and educational sectors, and trains managers and executives on leave, disability, discrimination, harassment, and hiring practices.
Peter J. Gillespie

Peter J. Gillespie

Laner Muchin

Peter J. Gillespie is a partner in Laner Muchin’s Chicago office, where his counseling and transactional work centers on employment agreements and his litigation practice on employment contract disputes. He defends employers in claims and investigations brought by the EEOC, OSHA, and the U.S. Department of Labor, and litigates breach of executive employment contract cases, non-compete and trade secrets matters, and occupational safety proceedings. His practice also covers class action wage and hour disputes, discrimination, retaliation and harassment claims, and ERISA, disability, and leave-law matters. He conducts wage and hour compliance audits and workplace investigations, and trains executives and managers on documentation practices, hiring, leave, discrimination, social media, and workplace safety.

Education & Credentials

Peter earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 1997 and his B.A. in Economics and German Studies from Northwestern University in 1992. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. His federal trial court admissions include the Northern District of Illinois, the Southern District of Illinois, the Southern District of Indiana, the Western District of Michigan, and the District of Colorado.

Recognition & Leadership

Peter has been listed in Best Lawyers in America for Employment Law – Management from 2024 to the present, and he was named a Chick Evans Scholar. He chairs the Membership and Diversity Committee of the American Bar Association Section of Science and Technology Law and serves on the editorial board of The SciTech Lawyer.

Professional Involvement

Peter writes the Illinois Human Resources Manual, published annually by American Chamber of Commerce Resources, and contributed to the 2020 edition of Conducting the Employment Practices Audit for the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education. He is a contributing author to The Internet of Things: Legal Issues, Policy and Practical Strategies for the ABA Section of Science and Technology Law, and his articles have appeared in The SciTech Lawyer in Winter 2021 and Spring 2017. He contributes regularly to the firm’s Fast Laner legal updates and has been quoted in Bloomberg Law on workplace COVID-19 litigation risk. He is a member of the Chicago Bar Association and the American Bar Association.

Experience

Peter’s representative matters include defending employers against EEOC, OSHA, and Department of Labor claims, breach of executive employment contract cases, class action wage and hour disputes, employment discrimination and retaliation cases, and prevailing wage issues. He is a frequent presenter to practitioner and management audiences, speaking on employee privacy in the hybrid work era at PLI’s Institute on Privacy and Cybersecurity Law in 2023 and on employment law updates at the 2021 Annual Employment Law Virtual Conference.
William G. Wake

William G. Wake

Laner Muchin

William G. Wake is a partner in Laner Muchin’s Chicago office whose management-side labor and employment practice encompasses collective bargaining, day-to-day labor relations counseling, and defense of employers before administrative agencies such as the National Labor Relations Board. He also defends class action wage and hour matters and employment discrimination, harassment and retaliation cases, conducts corporate investigations into harassment, retaliation and discrimination, and counsels employers in the temporary staffing, logistics, manufacturing, and educational sectors.

Education & Credentials

William earned his J.D. from Georgetown University Law Center in 2012 and his B.S. from Kansas State University in 2006. He is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Recognition & Leadership

William received the Illinois Emerging Lawyer designation from Leading Lawyers in 2017.

Professional Involvement

William’s published work addresses NLRB doctrine directly: he co-authored “The NLRB Turns Employer Handbooks From Useful Evidence To Potential Liabilities Under The NRA” for the 2016 Employment Law Update. He is a member of the Chicago Bar Association and the American Bar Association.

Experience

William represents management in collective bargaining and provides day-to-day labor relations counseling, and he defends employers in proceedings before administrative agencies including the National Labor Relations Board. Beyond that traditional labor work, he defends class action wage and hour matters and employment discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims, and conducts corporate investigations regarding harassment, retaliation, and discrimination. He counsels employers across the temporary staffing, logistics, manufacturing, and educational sectors, and trains managers and executives on leave, disability, discrimination, harassment, and hiring practices.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs