Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Excessive Force by Police or ICE: Building the Case Under § 1983 and the FTCA

Barnes v. Felix erased the moment-of-threat shortcut, and Bivens is now closed to federal agents. Build the totality record, defeat qualified immunity at summary judgment, exhaust an SF-95 claim, and decide when to plead FTCA and Bivens together.

2026-09-03 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-03 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-03 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-03 13:00:00

Course Overview

You Can Win the Standard and Still Lose the Case

2026-09-03 13:00:00

Barnes v. Felix, 605 U.S. 73 (2025), unanimously rejected the moment-of-threat doctrine and made totality analysis mandatory in every circuit. In June 2025, Martin v. United States and Goldey v. Fields expanded FTCA access and foreclosed Bivens. The remedy map changed on both tracks.

Miss the SF-95, and the claim is jurisdictionally dead. Plead the wrong tort, and the discretionary function exception takes it. File Bivens alongside the FTCA, and the judgment bar may cost you both. Argue officer-created jeopardy carelessly, and County of Los Angeles v. Mendez supplies the answer against you.

You leave with a totality-of-the-circumstances record-building method, pleading language that survives the discretionary function exception, and a decision framework for parallel Bivens filings. These are drafting and discovery choices judgment produces — not doctrine a search engine returns.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Post-Barnes Standard
Apply the totality-of-the-circumstances analysis that Barnes v. Felix, 605 U.S. 73 (2025), made mandatory in every circuit, and identify what the Court expressly declined to decide.
02
Building the Record
Use the expanded temporal framework to drive discovery, video requests, and expert retention into pre-force conduct, including officer-created jeopardy arguments framed against County of Los Angeles v. Mendez.
03
Qualified Immunity Strategy
Defeat qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage using post-Barnes decisions such as Zorn v. Linton and Moore v. Oakland County, and the obvious-case exception under Taylor v. Riojas.
04
FTCA as Primary Remedy
Choose the FTCA as the primary damages path against ICE and CBP officers now that Martin v. United States and Goldey v. Fields have foreclosed Bivens.
05
Clearing Procedural Gates
Complete SF-95 administrative exhaustion, state a sum certain, meet the filing deadlines, and plead around the discretionary function exception through the law enforcement proviso.
06
Pleading and Bivens Tactics
Decide whether to file a parallel Bivens claim alongside the FTCA once the judgment bar’s consequences for that choice are on the table.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Building the Excessive Force Case Against State and Local Officers After Barnes v. Felix

This session examines how to construct a winning § 1983 excessive force claim against state and local officers in the wake of Barnes v. Felix, 605 U.S. 73 (2025), which unanimously rejected the Fifth Circuit’s moment-of-threat doctrine and mandated a totality-of-the-circumstances analysis in every circuit. Attorneys will learn how to build the factual record under the expanded temporal framework, navigate the unresolved officer-created jeopardy question, and overcome qualified immunity at the summary judgment stage. Participants will leave with concrete strategies for discovery, expert retention, and pleading choices that reflect the current post-Barnes litigation landscape.

Adam Wilson FombyAdam Wilson Fomby
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Suing Federal Agents Under the FTCA When Section 1983 Does Not Apply

This session examines the Federal Tort Claims Act as the primary—often the only—viable damages remedy when federal agents, including ICE and CBP officers, commit excessive force. Attorneys will learn how the Supreme Court’s June 2025 decisions in Martin v. United States and Goldey v. Fields have simultaneously expanded FTCA access and foreclosed Bivens, and how to navigate the procedural and substantive requirements that determine whether a claim survives. Attendees will leave with a working command of the SF-95 exhaustion process, the discretionary-function exception’s current scope, the law enforcement proviso’s pleading implications, and the tactical choices governing any parallel Bivens filing.

Christian ContrerasChristian Contreras
Adam Wilson Fomby

Adam Wilson Fomby

Borunda & Fomby PLLC

Christian Contreras

Christian Contreras

Law Offices of Christian Contreras, PLC

Adam Wilson Fomby

Adam Wilson Fomby

Borunda & Fomby PLLC

Adam Wilson Fomby is a founding partner of Borunda & Fomby PLLC, a Texas plaintiff-side firm, and focuses his practice on personal injury and complex civil litigation. His client base has ranged from large corporations to individuals who were wrongfully injured, and he has handled trials, hearings, depositions, appellate briefs, oral arguments, and a wide variety of other contested matters. He works across every stage of the litigation process, from the initial consultation through trial and appeal, in both Texas state and federal courts.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Fomby earned his J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center, where he served as Managing Editor of the Law Center’s energy and environmental law and policy journal, and he holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Texas at Austin. He is admitted to practice before the State Bar of Texas, the United States District Courts for the Southern and Western Districts of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Fomby has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Star each year since 2019, an honor awarded to fewer than 2.5% of Texas attorneys who are 40 years old or younger or who have been in practice for ten years or less. He is also a Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation, an invitation-only distinction extended annually to approximately one-third of one percent of Texas attorneys and one of the highest honors conferred by the State Bar of Texas.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Fomby is a Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation. His professional experience also includes serving as Managing Editor of the University of Houston Law Center’s energy and environmental law and policy journal.

Experience

Mr. Fomby focuses his practice on personal injury and complex civil litigation, representing a diverse client base that has included both large corporations and individuals who have been wrongfully injured, and he has guided clients through every stage of the litigation process—from initial consultation through trial and appeal—in both Texas state and federal courts. His practice encompasses car and commercial truck collisions, workplace and offshore injuries, premises liability, product defect claims, medical malpractice, nursing home negligence, burn and brain injuries, wrongful death, and other civil and commercial matters, and he has handled trials, hearings, depositions, appellate briefs, oral argument, and a wide range of other contested proceedings, with his cases frequently featured in news and media outlets.
Christian Contreras

Christian Contreras

Law Offices of Christian Contreras, PLC

Christian Contreras is a Los Angeles trial attorney, civil rights activist, and community advocate, and the principal and managing attorney of a multi-attorney plaintiff-side firm. His practice centers on civil rights cases involving constitutional rights and on wrongful death litigation, alongside personal injury work and a limited criminal defense docket. He carries an unusually heavy trial load — an average of at least seven jury trials each year — and maintains an active appellate practice.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Contreras earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, where he completed a Civil Litigation and Advocacy Concentration. During law school, he participated in the Scott Moot Court Honors Board and the Civil Rights Litigation Practicum and was a Young Lawyers Program participant and Change Lawyers Scholar.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Contreras is recognized as an expert in civil rights and appears regularly in prominent news outlets as a legal commentator on a range of legal topics. In 2024, the Daily Journal named his firm a top boutique in the State of California. He is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA).

Professional Involvement

He sits on the boards of directors of Los Angeles Trial Lawyers’ Charities, the East Los Angeles College Foundation, the National Police Accountability Project, and Peoples College of Law, and serves as legal advisor to the League of United Latin American Citizens. He has also taught law and civil rights at several educational institutions, including the law school Peoples College of Law.

Experience

His 2025 trial results include a $6,000,000 jury verdict in a police shooting case, a $3,300,000 jury verdict in a jail death case, and a $1,035,000 jury verdict in a second police shooting case — each of the three tried after a zero offer — together with an $8,500,000 settlement in a jail death case. He has prevailed on appeal before the Ninth Circuit and the California Court of Appeals. Firm results also listed on the source profile include a $25,000,000 civil rights recovery, a $2,836,800 street vendor verdict, and a $1,750,000 post-trial civil rights settlement.
Adam Wilson Fomby

Adam Wilson Fomby

Borunda & Fomby PLLC

Adam Wilson Fomby is a founding partner of Borunda & Fomby PLLC, a Texas plaintiff-side firm, and focuses his practice on personal injury and complex civil litigation. His client base has ranged from large corporations to individuals who were wrongfully injured, and he has handled trials, hearings, depositions, appellate briefs, oral arguments, and a wide variety of other contested matters. He works across every stage of the litigation process, from the initial consultation through trial and appeal, in both Texas state and federal courts.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Fomby earned his J.D. from the University of Houston Law Center, where he served as Managing Editor of the Law Center’s energy and environmental law and policy journal, and he holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Texas at Austin. He is admitted to practice before the State Bar of Texas, the United States District Courts for the Southern and Western Districts of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Fomby has been recognized as a Super Lawyers Rising Star each year since 2019, an honor awarded to fewer than 2.5% of Texas attorneys who are 40 years old or younger or who have been in practice for ten years or less. He is also a Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation, an invitation-only distinction extended annually to approximately one-third of one percent of Texas attorneys and one of the highest honors conferred by the State Bar of Texas.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Fomby is a Fellow of the Texas Bar Foundation. His professional experience also includes serving as Managing Editor of the University of Houston Law Center’s energy and environmental law and policy journal.

Experience

Mr. Fomby focuses his practice on personal injury and complex civil litigation, representing a diverse client base that has included both large corporations and individuals who have been wrongfully injured, and he has guided clients through every stage of the litigation process—from initial consultation through trial and appeal—in both Texas state and federal courts. His practice encompasses car and commercial truck collisions, workplace and offshore injuries, premises liability, product defect claims, medical malpractice, nursing home negligence, burn and brain injuries, wrongful death, and other civil and commercial matters, and he has handled trials, hearings, depositions, appellate briefs, oral argument, and a wide range of other contested proceedings, with his cases frequently featured in news and media outlets.
Christian Contreras

Christian Contreras

Law Offices of Christian Contreras, PLC

Christian Contreras is a Los Angeles trial attorney, civil rights activist, and community advocate, and the principal and managing attorney of a multi-attorney plaintiff-side firm. His practice centers on civil rights cases involving constitutional rights and on wrongful death litigation, alongside personal injury work and a limited criminal defense docket. He carries an unusually heavy trial load — an average of at least seven jury trials each year — and maintains an active appellate practice.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Contreras earned his Juris Doctor from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, where he completed a Civil Litigation and Advocacy Concentration. During law school, he participated in the Scott Moot Court Honors Board and the Civil Rights Litigation Practicum and was a Young Lawyers Program participant and Change Lawyers Scholar.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Contreras is recognized as an expert in civil rights and appears regularly in prominent news outlets as a legal commentator on a range of legal topics. In 2024, the Daily Journal named his firm a top boutique in the State of California. He is a member of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA).

Professional Involvement

He sits on the boards of directors of Los Angeles Trial Lawyers’ Charities, the East Los Angeles College Foundation, the National Police Accountability Project, and Peoples College of Law, and serves as legal advisor to the League of United Latin American Citizens. He has also taught law and civil rights at several educational institutions, including the law school Peoples College of Law.

Experience

His 2025 trial results include a $6,000,000 jury verdict in a police shooting case, a $3,300,000 jury verdict in a jail death case, and a $1,035,000 jury verdict in a second police shooting case — each of the three tried after a zero offer — together with an $8,500,000 settlement in a jail death case. He has prevailed on appeal before the Ninth Circuit and the California Court of Appeals. Firm results also listed on the source profile include a $25,000,000 civil rights recovery, a $2,836,800 street vendor verdict, and a $1,750,000 post-trial civil rights settlement.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.4
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs