Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

From Policy to Practice: The Appeals Council Since SSR 24-3p – NOSSCR 2026 Fall National Conference – Track II (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

How has the Appeals Council actually handled SSR 24-3p? A review of roughly 100 appeals — across age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues — reveals the emerging trends, notable outcomes, and what they mean for deciding whether Appeals Council review is worth pursuing.

2026-10-16 13:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-10-16 13:00:00

2026-10-16 13:00:00

1h CLE Credits

2026-10-16 13:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-10-16 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-10-16 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-10-16 13:00:00

1 hours

Course Overview

Everyone Expected SSR 24-3p to Reshape Appeals Council Review. The Decisions Say Otherwise

2026-10-16 13:00:00

When SSR 24-3p was first introduced, there was considerable interest in how it would influence Appeals Council review. This presentation answers with data rather than prediction: a review of approximately 100 recent Appeals Council decisions, spanning a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues.

The finding cuts against the expectation. The recent decisions examined suggest the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues. That is itself the practical lesson — knowing what the Council is actually deciding on tells a representative where an appeal’s real chances lie, and where SSR 24-3p arguments fit in the larger appellate picture.

You walk out with the emerging trends, notable outcomes, and practical lessons — useful insight for evaluating whether to pursue Appeals Council review, and what the recent decisions mean for appeals after SSR 24-3p.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
The 100-Appeal Review
Findings from approximately 100 recent Appeals Council decisions examined for this presentation.
02
SSR 24-3p at the Council
How the Appeals Council has addressed SSR 24-3p since it took effect.
03
What the Council Actually Decides
The finding that the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues.
04
Trends Across Case Types
Emerging trends across a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues.
05
Whether to Pursue Review
Using the decisions to evaluate whether Appeals Council review is worth pursuing.
06
Appeals After SSR 24-3p
What the recent decisions may mean for appeals going forward.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

From Policy to Practice: The Appeals Council Since SSR 24-3p

How has the Appeals Council addressed SSR 24-3p since it took effect? A review of recent Appeals Council decisions highlights emerging trends, notable outcomes, and practical lessons for representatives. Based on a review of approximately 100 appeals, this presentation examines Appeals Council decisions involving a wide range of age categories, past relevant work backgrounds, and appellate issues. When SSR 24-3p was first introduced, there was considerable interest in how it would influence Appeals Council review. However, the recent Appeals Council decisions examined suggest that the Council has generally continued to focus on other appeal issues. These decisions provide useful insight for representatives evaluating whether to pursue Appeals Council review and what recent Appeals Council decisions may mean for appeals after SSR 24-3p.

 

Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour

 

This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Fall National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.

 

Recorded Friday, October 16, 2026.

Erica CortizasErica Cortizas
Sarah DeaverSarah Deaver
Erica Cortizas

Erica Cortizas

Genex Services, LLC

Sarah Deaver

Sarah Deaver

Enlyte

Erica Cortizas

Erica Cortizas

Genex Services, LLC

Since being admitted to practice in 2001, Erica has practiced primarily in the area of Social Security Disability Benefits and Workers Compensation.

Professional Involvement

She has previously spoken at NOSSCR and FOSSCR conferences and has represented thousands of claimants at hearings.

Experience

Erica currently works for Genex Services, LLC where she handles mostly referrals from LTD companies, so she has the benefit of being able to appeal a large number of cases to the Appeals Council. Her senior managers are also regular speakers at NOSSCR. Erica appreciates the opportunity to share her findings from Appeals Council decisions since the implementation of SSR 24-3p in January of 2025.
Sarah Deaver

Sarah Deaver

Enlyte

Sarah Deaver, Esq. serves as the Senior Director for Disability Programs at Enlyte, where she oversees the entire Social Security program as well as the Disability Absence and Ticket to Work divisions from an operations and customer perspective.

Education & Credentials

She holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Memphis School of Law and a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from Emory University. Sarah is licensed to practice law and a registered nurse in the state of Georgia.

Recognition & Leadership

Additionally, as the head of legislative affairs with more than 17 years of diversified Social Security experience, she leads the department on emerging enforcement trends and regulatory interpretations before they impact case outcomes. Her workshops on strategic case development have been particularly valuable for her team navigating complex or changing fact patterns in the evolving disability landscape.

Experience

Drawing from her unique combination of legal practice, nursing expertise, and claims management leadership, Sarah has developed a systematic approach to translating complex regulatory shifts into actionable strategies for practitioners. Working as a licensed attorney and registered nurse, Sarah brings an interdisciplinary perspective to program integrity issues and medical evidence development—offering practitioners a blueprint for excellence in an increasingly complex field.
Erica Cortizas

Erica Cortizas

Genex Services, LLC

Since being admitted to practice in 2001, Erica has practiced primarily in the area of Social Security Disability Benefits and Workers Compensation.

Professional Involvement

She has previously spoken at NOSSCR and FOSSCR conferences and has represented thousands of claimants at hearings.

Experience

Erica currently works for Genex Services, LLC where she handles mostly referrals from LTD companies, so she has the benefit of being able to appeal a large number of cases to the Appeals Council. Her senior managers are also regular speakers at NOSSCR. Erica appreciates the opportunity to share her findings from Appeals Council decisions since the implementation of SSR 24-3p in January of 2025.
Sarah Deaver

Sarah Deaver

Enlyte

Sarah Deaver, Esq. serves as the Senior Director for Disability Programs at Enlyte, where she oversees the entire Social Security program as well as the Disability Absence and Ticket to Work divisions from an operations and customer perspective.

Education & Credentials

She holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Memphis School of Law and a Bachelor of Science in Nursing from Emory University. Sarah is licensed to practice law and a registered nurse in the state of Georgia.

Recognition & Leadership

Additionally, as the head of legislative affairs with more than 17 years of diversified Social Security experience, she leads the department on emerging enforcement trends and regulatory interpretations before they impact case outcomes. Her workshops on strategic case development have been particularly valuable for her team navigating complex or changing fact patterns in the evolving disability landscape.

Experience

Drawing from her unique combination of legal practice, nursing expertise, and claims management leadership, Sarah has developed a systematic approach to translating complex regulatory shifts into actionable strategies for practitioners. Working as a licensed attorney and registered nurse, Sarah brings an interdisciplinary perspective to program integrity issues and medical evidence development—offering practitioners a blueprint for excellence in an increasingly complex field.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.0
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs