Importer IEEPA Refunds on Finally Liquidated Entries: The Sue-or-Wait Decision and the CAPE Phase 3 Path

Importers that paid IEEPA duties and never sued face a filing clock, pending class actions, and a Federal Circuit appeal. Decide whether to file a § 1581(i) suit now, calendar each accrual deadline, and turn a reliquidation order into paid refunds through CAPE Phase 3.

2026-12-09 14:30:00

1.5 hours

Live

Nithya Nagarajan

Husch Blackwell LLP

Program Details

Live

2026-12-09 14:30:00

1.5h CLE Credits

2026-12-09 14:30:00

1.5 hours

Live

Nithya Nagarajan

Husch Blackwell LLP

Program Details

Live

2026-12-09 14:30:00

Program Details

2026-12-09 14:30:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-12-09 14:30:00

1.5 hours

Live

Course Overview

For an Importer That Never Sued, Waiting on Someone Else's Case Is a Decision With a Deadline

2026-12-09 14:30:00

Importers that paid duties under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) and never sued face a new landscape. CBP now runs a phased refund process called CAPE. Class motions in Freestyle World and V.O.S. Selections are pending, and so is Federal Circuit No. 26-1895. CIT Administrative Order 26-01 ended the automatic stay. For finally liquidated entries, the stated route to CAPE Phase 3 runs through a § 1581(i) action and a plaintiff-specific reliquidation order.

Miss the § 2636(i) accrual date, and the claim is gone. Assume a class covers the client, and its definition may exclude it. Wait on No. 26-1895, and a non-plaintiff may hold nothing. Let a broker or DDP seller act as importer of record, and the refund cannot be redirected. Skip ACH refund enrollment, and payment is held. Withdraw a protest too quickly, and a classification claim may be given up.

This program follows one importer from the sue-or-wait decision to the ACH deposit. You leave with a sue-or-wait decision tree, a per-theory deadline calendar, an annotated reliquidation order, and a pre-filing checklist. Each rests on practice judgment about filing, fees, and Phase 3 submissions, not on doctrine alone.

Format

Live

CLE Credit

1.5h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1.5

Key topics that will be covered

Per-Theory Accrual Deadlines

Calendar § 2636(i) accrual by theory and tariff program, including the February 2027 date.

Class and Appeal Fit

Test client fit against Freestyle World, V.O.S., and each No. 26-1895 outcome.

Filing Cost and Timing

Weigh fees, break-even refund size, and § 1505 interest for a post-AO 26-01 filing.

Reading the Reliquidation Order

Annotate deposit, authority, and IOR conditions, and apply the July 30 eligibility line.

Importer of Record Traps

Spot refund risk when a broker, forwarder, or DDP seller is importer of record.

Getting the Refund Paid

Husch Blackwell LLP

Nithya Nagarajan is a partner in the Washington, DC office of Husch Blackwell LLP, where she leads the firm’s Trade Remedy and Trade Policy practice. Drawing on prior roles at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the Department of Justice, and the Department of Commerce, she represents importers and exporters before U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Commerce, and the International Trade Commission. She also defends appeals in the U.S. Court of International Trade, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, NAFTA panels, and the World Trade Organization.

Education & Credentials

Nithya served as Law Clerk to the Hon. Evan Wallach of the U.S. Court of International Trade from 2004 to 2006. She earned her J.D. cum laude from American University Washington College of Law, where she was on the International Law Review and served as Senior Associate for the First Year Moot Court Competition. She also holds an M.B.A. cum laude in Business and Finance and a B.A. in Political Science and Business, both from The George Washington University. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Maryland and before the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA ranks Nithya nationwide in International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy for 2025 and 2026, and the Chambers Global Guide recognizes her in the same area for 2026. The Legal 500 United States named her a Recommended lawyer for trade remedies and trade policy in 2025. She was named to the Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll with Honors in 2024 and 2025 and was a J.D. Supra Readers' Choice Top Author in International Law in 2020 and 2024. During her government service, the Department of Commerce awarded her a Gold Medal (1997) and a Bronze Medal (1998) for her work on steel cases.

Professional Involvement

Nithya serves as Vice Chair of the International Trade Committee of the Customs & International Trade Bar Association and as Co-Chair of the Imports & Supply Chain Committee of the Association of Women in International Trade (since 2022). She sat on the Law360 Editorial Advisory Board for International Trade from 2024 to 2026 and is a member of the American Institute for International Steel, the American Bar Association, the Washington International Trade Association, and the South Asian Bar Association. Her speaking includes the 22nd Judicial Conference of the U.S. Court of International Trade (2024), the ATCC Advanced Topics in Customs Compliance Conference (2026), and a March 2026 firm webinar on the U.S. Supreme Court and the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Experience

Nithya served on the steering committee for the Section 301 litigation challenging the List 3 and List 4A tariffs on goods from China, and she has obtained Section 301 exclusions for U.S. importers. She identified $200 million in erroneous duty bills caused by a programming error in Commerce's instructions to CBP and worked with Commerce to correct it, leaving the client paying less than $15,000 in duties. She has also guided importers through prior disclosures that ended with no penalty, a CBP RASA audit, and country-of-origin inquiries under the Colombia free trade agreement. In one matter she took Commerce's inaction to the Court of International Trade and then secured a changed circumstances review that preserved a client's zero deposit rate. Her trade remedy work includes a negative injury determination at the ITC on steel nails that spared importers potential duties, defense of exporters from China, India, Mexico, and Thailand, and negotiation of suspension agreements on behalf of Commerce.

Nithya Nagarajan

Husch Blackwell LLP

Education & Credentials

Recognition & Leadership

Professional Involvement

Experience

Credits by state

AK1.5

AL1.5

AR1.5

AZ1.5

CA1.5

CO1.5

CT1.5

DC1.5

DE1.5

FL1.5

GA1.5

HI1.5

IA1.5

ID1.5

IL1.5

IN1.5

KS1.5

KY1.5

LA1.5

MA1.5

MD1.5

ME1.5

MI1.5

MN1.5

MO1.8

MS1.5

MT1.5

NC1.5

ND1.5

NE1.5

NH90.0

NJ1.5

NM1.5

NV1.5

NY1.5

OH1.5

OK2.0

OR1.5

PA1.5

RI2.0

SC1.5

SD1.5

TN1.5

TX1.5

UT1.5

VA1.5

VT1.5

WA1.5

WI1.5

WV1.8

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Live Video Broadcast

On-Demand Video

Importer IEEPA Refunds on Finally Liquidated Entries: The Sue-or-Wait Decision and the CAPE Phase 3 Path

Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya Nagarajan

For an Importer That Never Sued, Waiting on Someone Else's Case Is a Decision With a Deadline

Format

CLE Credit

Level

Length

Key topics that will be covered

Program schedule

Deciding Whether a Non-Plaintiff Importer Should File an IEEPA Refund Suit Now

Turning an IEEPA Reliquidation Order into Paid Refunds Through CAPE Phase 3 | Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya Nagarajan

Nithya Nagarajan

Education & Credentials

Recognition & Leadership

Professional Involvement

Experience

Nithya Nagarajan

Education & Credentials

Recognition & Leadership

Professional Involvement

Experience

Credits by state

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

24/7

70,000+

1000+

24/7

70,000+

1000+

24/7

10,000+

1000+

24/7

70,000+

MCLE Credits

Alabama