Annual Pass Exclusive

This Class is Exclusive to Annual Pass Members

This program is only available to myLawCLE All-Access Pass subscribers. Subscribe now to unlock this class along with 1,000+ live webinars for only $395/yr — including 60+ new programs added every month.

Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $395

Litigating Data Breach Cases in 2025 (Presented by The Federal Bar Annual Meeting & Convention 2025 sponsor Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP)

Data breach litigation essentials: Article III standing challenges, choice of law complexities, and case management strategies for multi-district cybersecurity cases.

2025-09-09 14:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2025-09-09 14:00:00

Program Details

2025-09-09 14:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2025-09-09 14:00:00

1 hours

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

Course Overview

Navigating Data Breach Litigation Challenges

2025-09-09 14:00:00

Participants will learn strategies for addressing Article III standing, choice of law complexities, and case management in large-scale data breach MDLs. These skills apply directly to representing clients in hub and spoke cybersecurity litigation.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
Standing Challenges
Article III standing requires injury in fact with concrete harm tied to common law analogs.
02
Traceability Issues
Demonstrating causal connection to defendants becomes contested when plaintiffs experience multiple breaches.
03
Choice of Law
Nationwide class actions require analysis of where injuries occur across multiple jurisdictions.
04
Hub and Spoke
Multi-level breach patterns involve software owners, customers, and affected end users.
05
Case Management
Bellwether processes and fact sheets from mass tort litigation address complex breach structures.
06
MDL Consolidation
Centralized adjudication reduces duplicative litigation and prevents inconsistent rulings across courts.

Program schedule

clock 2:00 pm - 2:05 pm EST

Macro Trends Shaping Modern Data Breach Litigation

This session explores the rise of hub and spoke litigation structures where breaches trace back to central software platforms affecting multiple downstream users. Practitioners will examine the evolving legal landscape, settlement dynamics, and critical distinctions between data breach and privacy tracking cases.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:05 pm - 2:15 pm EST

Article III Standing and Injury in Fact Requirements

This session analyzes the Spokeo and TransUnion frameworks that govern concrete injury requirements for data breach plaintiffs in federal court. Attendees will learn how courts assess risk of future harm, common law analogies, and the procedural timing of standing challenges.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:15 pm - 2:25 pm EST

Traceability Challenges for Data Breach Victims

This session addresses the growing complexity of demonstrating causal connections when plaintiffs have experienced multiple data breaches. Participants will explore how courts apply traditional causation principles to modern multi-breach scenarios.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:25 pm - 2:35 pm EST

Choice of Law for Common Law Claims

This session examines how transferee courts determine which state’s laws govern nationwide data breach class actions involving common law claims. Key focus areas include identifying where injury occurs and managing choice of law rules not designed for cases of this unprecedented scale.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:35 pm - 2:45 pm EST

Choice of Law for State Statutory Claims

This session addresses the complexity of applying differing state notification requirements across all 50 states in data breach litigation. Attendees will explore notification complications when third-party vendors are involved in the breach chain.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:45 pm - 2:50 pm EST

Managing Complex Multi-Defendant Data Breach Cases

This session covers evolving case management strategies including leadership structures, document review protocols, and e-discovery challenges. Practitioners will learn about the application of bellwether processes and fact sheets adapted from mass tort litigation.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:50 pm - 2:55 pm EST

MOVEit Bellwether Case Management Case Study

This session provides a deep dive into the In re MOVEit litigation structure before Judge Burrows, involving 190 million affected individuals and hundreds of defendants. Participants will examine the three-tier defendant categorization strategy and judicial management approaches for unprecedented scale.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:55 pm - 2:58 pm EST

Key Minnesota District Data Breach Cases

This session highlights significant pending cases including Change Healthcare, University of Minnesota, NetGain, and the foundational Target breach. Attendees will learn about dual-track litigation structures and settlement developments in these regional matters.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
clock 2:58 pm - 3:00 pm EST

National Data Breach Cases to Monitor

This session surveys critical data breach cases across the country including AT&T, Fortinet, and Nelnet litigation. Practitioners will examine varying levels of public engagement and the factors driving different plaintiff responses to breach notifications.

Kate Baxter-KaufKate Baxter-Kauf
Karen Hanson RiebelKaren Hanson Riebel
Emma Ritter GordonEmma Ritter Gordon
Kate Baxter-Kauf

Kate Baxter-Kauf

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Karen Hanson Riebel

Karen Hanson Riebel

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Emma Ritter Gordon

Emma Ritter Gordon

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Kate Baxter-Kauf

Kate Baxter-Kauf

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Ms. Baxter-Kauf’s practice is concentrated in data breach, antitrust law, business litigation, and securities litigation. She represents individuals, consumers, financial institutions and small businesses in litigation to protect their rights and the rights of class members they seek to represent.

Education & Credentials

2011 magna cum laude and Order of the Coif graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School.

Recognition & Leadership

In 2018, named a Rising Star by Law360 in Cybersecurity & Privacy (one of only five attorneys nationally). Recognized as an Up & Coming Attorney by Minnesota Lawyer magazine in 2016. Named one of Minnesota's Rising Stars by Minnesota Law & Politics magazine for 2015-2021. Award-winning coach of high school and college policy debate teams, coached the 2003 National Forensic League policy debate national champions.

Experience

Prior to joining the firm, clerked for the Honorable Alan C. Page, the Honorable Helen M. Meyer, and the Honorable Christopher J. Dietzen, Associate Justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Before law school, coached high school and college policy debate teams and facilitated debate teams at Twin Cities urban middle and high schools.
Karen Hanson Riebel

Karen Hanson Riebel

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Karen Hanson Riebel concentrates her practice in data breach, antitrust, and securities litigation. She has litigated complex class action matters and represented pension funds and institutional investors in corporate fraud cases, and since 2013 has been on the forefront of international data breach litigation.

Recognition & Leadership

Awarded the Trial Lawyers' For Public Justice Trial Lawyers of the Year award in 1994 for securing a $5 billion punitive damages jury verdict in In re The Exxon Valdez.

Experience

Began career as member of the trial team in In re The Exxon Valdez case in Anchorage, Alaska, securing a $5 billion punitive damages verdict. Has represented consumers and financial institutions against retailers, insurance companies, and software providers in data breach litigation since 2013. Served in leadership roles in data breach litigation involving Premera Blue Cross, Capital One, Yahoo!, and Progress (the MoveIt Data Breach).
Emma Ritter Gordon

Emma Ritter Gordon

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Emma Ritter Gordon is an Associate practicing in the firm’s data-breach and healthcare groups. She represents consumers and healthcare providers in individual and class litigation, with experience in data privacy and cybersecurity informed by her background in healthcare technology.

Education & Credentials

Graduated summa cum laude from Duke Law School. Served as Senior Articles Editor for the Duke Law Journal and Co-President of the Duke Law and Technology Society.

Professional Involvement

Has represented pro bono clients with criminal appeals before the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

Experience

Clerked at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Judge David R. Stras. Interned at the Department of Justice in the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and at the North Carolina Solicitor General's Office. Before law school, worked for a major healthcare technology company in operational strategy, data analysis, and product management roles working with large datasets of sensitive health data.
Kate Baxter-Kauf

Kate Baxter-Kauf

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Ms. Baxter-Kauf’s practice is concentrated in data breach, antitrust law, business litigation, and securities litigation. She represents individuals, consumers, financial institutions and small businesses in litigation to protect their rights and the rights of class members they seek to represent.

Education & Credentials

2011 magna cum laude and Order of the Coif graduate of the University of Minnesota Law School.

Recognition & Leadership

In 2018, named a Rising Star by Law360 in Cybersecurity & Privacy (one of only five attorneys nationally). Recognized as an Up & Coming Attorney by Minnesota Lawyer magazine in 2016. Named one of Minnesota's Rising Stars by Minnesota Law & Politics magazine for 2015-2021. Award-winning coach of high school and college policy debate teams, coached the 2003 National Forensic League policy debate national champions.

Experience

Prior to joining the firm, clerked for the Honorable Alan C. Page, the Honorable Helen M. Meyer, and the Honorable Christopher J. Dietzen, Associate Justices of the Minnesota Supreme Court. Before law school, coached high school and college policy debate teams and facilitated debate teams at Twin Cities urban middle and high schools.
Karen Hanson Riebel

Karen Hanson Riebel

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Karen Hanson Riebel concentrates her practice in data breach, antitrust, and securities litigation. She has litigated complex class action matters and represented pension funds and institutional investors in corporate fraud cases, and since 2013 has been on the forefront of international data breach litigation.

Recognition & Leadership

Awarded the Trial Lawyers' For Public Justice Trial Lawyers of the Year award in 1994 for securing a $5 billion punitive damages jury verdict in In re The Exxon Valdez.

Experience

Began career as member of the trial team in In re The Exxon Valdez case in Anchorage, Alaska, securing a $5 billion punitive damages verdict. Has represented consumers and financial institutions against retailers, insurance companies, and software providers in data breach litigation since 2013. Served in leadership roles in data breach litigation involving Premera Blue Cross, Capital One, Yahoo!, and Progress (the MoveIt Data Breach).
Emma Ritter Gordon

Emma Ritter Gordon

Lockridge Grindal Nauen PLLP

Emma Ritter Gordon is an Associate practicing in the firm’s data-breach and healthcare groups. She represents consumers and healthcare providers in individual and class litigation, with experience in data privacy and cybersecurity informed by her background in healthcare technology.

Education & Credentials

Graduated summa cum laude from Duke Law School. Served as Senior Articles Editor for the Duke Law Journal and Co-President of the Duke Law and Technology Society.

Professional Involvement

Has represented pro bono clients with criminal appeals before the Minnesota Court of Appeals.

Experience

Clerked at the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals for the Honorable Judge David R. Stras. Interned at the Department of Justice in the Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section and at the North Carolina Solicitor General's Office. Before law school, worked for a major healthcare technology company in operational strategy, data analysis, and product management roles working with large datasets of sensitive health data.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.2
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

Legal updates that every attorney needs to know

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Pending
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Pending
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Pending
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs