Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Litigating Police Failure-to-Train and Other Claims Against Local-Governmental Entities Under Monell

Municipal liability can make or break recovery in police-misconduct cases. Learn to plead the four Monell failure-to-train elements, survive Rule 12(b)(6), defeat bifurcation motions, and build a damages case the verdict form preserves.

2026-08-07 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-08-07 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-08-07 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-08-07 13:00:00

Course Overview

Your Monell Claim Can Survive Even When the Officer’s Case Does Not

2026-08-07 13:00:00

Failure-to-train claims are among the most frequently dismissed theories in civil-rights litigation. Courts demand more than a bad outcome and a thin training file. This program treats the Monell claim as a standalone case — pleaded, discovered, and tried on its own proof.

The stakes compound at every stage. Plead the four elements generically and the complaint dies at Rule 12(b)(6). Fall short on deliberate indifference and summary judgment follows. Concede bifurcation and the jury never hears the training evidence. Lose the moving-force fight and causation collapses at verdict.

Attendees leave with working frameworks: a pleading approach for each Monell element, discovery targets for training deficiencies, pattern and single-incident proof strategies, causation evidence and expert testimony plans, and jury-instruction and verdict-form language that preserves the standalone municipal claim.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
The Four Elements
How to plead each required Monell failure-to-train element with facts that survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion.
02
Proving Deliberate Indifference
When pattern evidence is required and when a single-incident theory can carry the deliberate indifference standard.
03
Causation and Discovery
How circuit splits shape the moving-force causation showing and which discovery strategies expose training deficiencies.
04
Standalone Municipal Liability
How to defeat bifurcation motions and keep the Monell claim before the jury on its own proof.
05
Expert Testimony Strategy
How to marshal causation evidence and expert testimony connecting the training failure to the constitutional violation.
06
Damages and Verdict Preservation
How to structure a damages case against the municipality and protect the claim through jury instructions and the verdict form.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Pleading and Proving the Monell Failure-to-Train Claim

This session examines how plaintiffs plead and prove failure-to-train claims against municipalities under Monell v. Department of Social Services, with particular focus on the Supreme Court’s unanimous 2025 decision in Barnes v. Felix and its impact on the totality-of-circumstances framework. Attendees will learn the four required elements, the deliberate indifference standard, pattern versus single-incident proof strategies, and the most common pleading failures that doom these claims at the Rule 12(b)(6) stage. Attorneys will leave with a working framework for drafting constitutionally adequate complaints, identifying discoverable training deficiencies, and anticipating defense arguments on causation and the moving-force element.

David RudovskyDavid Rudovsky
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Trial Strategy and Damages in Failure-to-Train Cases

This session equips plaintiff’s attorneys with the trial-level strategy to litigate a Monell failure-to-train case from pretrial motions through verdict and damages. Attendees will learn how Barnes v. Felix reshapes the trial narrative, how to defeat bifurcation motions, how to marshal causation evidence and expert testimony, and how to structure a damages case against a municipality. Attorneys leave with a working framework for jury instructions, verdict form strategy, and preserving the standalone municipal claim.

Subodh ChandraSubodh Chandra
David Rudovsky

David Rudovsky

Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP

Subodh Chandra

Subodh Chandra

The Chandra Law Firm LLC

David Rudovsky

David Rudovsky

Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP

David Rudovsky is a founding partner of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP in Philadelphia, where he has practiced civil-rights and criminal-defense law for more than forty years. His caseload has centered on police and governmental misconduct, prisoners’ rights, First Amendment freedoms, and racial discrimination — including two civil-rights arguments before the United States Supreme Court, among them City of Canton v. Harris, the decision that defines municipal liability for police training failures.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Rudovsky earned his LL.B. from New York University School of Law in 1967, where he was a Fellow in the Arthur Garfield Hays Civil Liberties Program, and his B.A. from Queens College, City University of New York, in 1964.

Recognition & Leadership

In 1986 he received a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship for his work in criminal justice. The Philadelphia Bar Foundation has honored him with the Judge Gerald F. Flood Award for public-interest accomplishments, and he has received the ACLU Civil Liberties Award and the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Cesare Beccaria Award for criminal justice.

Professional Involvement

Since 1987, Mr. Rudovsky has been a Senior Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, teaching Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Criminal Law, and Evidence. He serves as President of the Board of Directors of the Defender Association of Philadelphia and Vice President of the Board of the Pennsylvania Innocence Project. He is the author of the practice treatises Police Misconduct: Law & Litigation and The Law of Arrest, Search and Seizure in Pennsylvania, along with numerous scholarly articles on civil rights and the criminal justice system.

Experience

Mr. Rudovsky argued two significant civil-rights cases in the United States Supreme Court: Mitchell v. Forsyth (1985), on the immunity of the Attorney General for illegal electronic surveillance, and City of Canton v. Harris (1989), on municipal liability for civil-rights violations by police. He has prepared numerous amicus briefs in Supreme Court civil-rights cases and argued scores of civil-rights and criminal-law matters in the federal and state courts.
Subodh Chandra

Subodh Chandra

The Chandra Law Firm LLC

Subodh Chandra is the founding and managing partner of The Chandra Law Firm LLC in Cleveland, Ohio. A former federal prosecutor and former Director of Law for the City of Cleveland, he concentrates on high-profile civil-rights litigation, white-collar criminal defense, and internal investigations, and is regularly engaged for high-stakes matters with public-policy and crisis-communications dimensions.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Chandra earned his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1994, where he served as executive editor of the Yale Law & Policy Review, and graduated from Stanford University in 1989 with honors and distinction in two departments, receiving the John Gardner Fellowship. He is admitted to practice in Ohio, California, and New Mexico (inactive), and in federal courts around the country.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Chandra was named the 2022 Lawyer of the Year in Civil Rights by Best Lawyers® in America and has been peer-review included in Best Lawyers® in America for civil rights and in Ohio Super Lawyers®. As a federal prosecutor he received a commendation from FBI Director Robert Mueller for demonstrated excellence, along with a special commendation from the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Cleveland office. Under his leadership, Chandra Law has been included in U.S. News & World Report’s Best Law Firms in America for civil rights.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Chandra serves as co-vice chair of the Special Ohio Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and as a member of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s Judicial Selection Committee. He has served as Distinguished Practitioner in Residence at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, teaching appellate practice and legal ethics, and has served as a legal-ethics and attorneys’-fees expert in litigation.

Experience

Mr. Chandra’s civil-rights matters include representing the family of 12-year-old Tamir Rice in the police-shooting case that resulted in a $6,000,000 settlement, obtaining nearly $1,000,000 in settlements for 2016 Republican National Convention protestors, and litigating voting-rights challenges to voter-suppression schemes in Ohio. As Cleveland’s Director of Law and Prosecuting Attorney (2002–05), he led an 82-lawyer department with criminal and civil divisions and at times served as acting mayor. He previously served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney (1999–2002), prosecuting healthcare fraud, corruption, and economic crimes, and in 2021 was the principal author, on behalf of police-misconduct victims’ families, of the Cleveland charter amendment establishing greater civilian disciplinary and policy oversight of police.
David Rudovsky

David Rudovsky

Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP

David Rudovsky is a founding partner of Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP in Philadelphia, where he has practiced civil-rights and criminal-defense law for more than forty years. His caseload has centered on police and governmental misconduct, prisoners’ rights, First Amendment freedoms, and racial discrimination — including two civil-rights arguments before the United States Supreme Court, among them City of Canton v. Harris, the decision that defines municipal liability for police training failures.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Rudovsky earned his LL.B. from New York University School of Law in 1967, where he was a Fellow in the Arthur Garfield Hays Civil Liberties Program, and his B.A. from Queens College, City University of New York, in 1964.

Recognition & Leadership

In 1986 he received a MacArthur Foundation Fellowship for his work in criminal justice. The Philadelphia Bar Foundation has honored him with the Judge Gerald F. Flood Award for public-interest accomplishments, and he has received the ACLU Civil Liberties Award and the Philadelphia Bar Association’s Cesare Beccaria Award for criminal justice.

Professional Involvement

Since 1987, Mr. Rudovsky has been a Senior Fellow at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, teaching Constitutional Criminal Procedure, Criminal Law, and Evidence. He serves as President of the Board of Directors of the Defender Association of Philadelphia and Vice President of the Board of the Pennsylvania Innocence Project. He is the author of the practice treatises Police Misconduct: Law & Litigation and The Law of Arrest, Search and Seizure in Pennsylvania, along with numerous scholarly articles on civil rights and the criminal justice system.

Experience

Mr. Rudovsky argued two significant civil-rights cases in the United States Supreme Court: Mitchell v. Forsyth (1985), on the immunity of the Attorney General for illegal electronic surveillance, and City of Canton v. Harris (1989), on municipal liability for civil-rights violations by police. He has prepared numerous amicus briefs in Supreme Court civil-rights cases and argued scores of civil-rights and criminal-law matters in the federal and state courts.
Subodh Chandra

Subodh Chandra

The Chandra Law Firm LLC

Subodh Chandra is the founding and managing partner of The Chandra Law Firm LLC in Cleveland, Ohio. A former federal prosecutor and former Director of Law for the City of Cleveland, he concentrates on high-profile civil-rights litigation, white-collar criminal defense, and internal investigations, and is regularly engaged for high-stakes matters with public-policy and crisis-communications dimensions.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Chandra earned his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1994, where he served as executive editor of the Yale Law & Policy Review, and graduated from Stanford University in 1989 with honors and distinction in two departments, receiving the John Gardner Fellowship. He is admitted to practice in Ohio, California, and New Mexico (inactive), and in federal courts around the country.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Chandra was named the 2022 Lawyer of the Year in Civil Rights by Best Lawyers® in America and has been peer-review included in Best Lawyers® in America for civil rights and in Ohio Super Lawyers®. As a federal prosecutor he received a commendation from FBI Director Robert Mueller for demonstrated excellence, along with a special commendation from the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Cleveland office. Under his leadership, Chandra Law has been included in U.S. News & World Report’s Best Law Firms in America for civil rights.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Chandra serves as co-vice chair of the Special Ohio Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights and as a member of the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s Judicial Selection Committee. He has served as Distinguished Practitioner in Residence at Case Western Reserve University School of Law, teaching appellate practice and legal ethics, and has served as a legal-ethics and attorneys’-fees expert in litigation.

Experience

Mr. Chandra’s civil-rights matters include representing the family of 12-year-old Tamir Rice in the police-shooting case that resulted in a $6,000,000 settlement, obtaining nearly $1,000,000 in settlements for 2016 Republican National Convention protestors, and litigating voting-rights challenges to voter-suppression schemes in Ohio. As Cleveland’s Director of Law and Prosecuting Attorney (2002–05), he led an 82-lawyer department with criminal and civil divisions and at times served as acting mayor. He previously served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney (1999–2002), prosecuting healthcare fraud, corruption, and economic crimes, and in 2021 was the principal author, on behalf of police-misconduct victims’ families, of the Cleveland charter amendment establishing greater civilian disciplinary and policy oversight of police.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs