Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Litigation Funding, Time-Limited Demands, and the Making of a Nuclear Verdict

New state disclosure statutes and time-limited policy-limits demands are reshaping litigation exposure. Attendees will learn to assess whether a case may be fundable, evaluate TPLF disclosure obligations across jurisdictions, structure or challenge policy-limits demand letters, and advise clients when bad-faith exposure follows.

2026-09-18 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-18 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-18 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-18 13:00:00

Course Overview

Nuclear Verdicts Are Built Long Before Trial — in Funding Agreements and Demand Letters

2026-09-18 13:00:00

The ground rules have shifted on two fronts at once. Georgia, Kansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, and additional states have enacted litigation funding disclosure statutes. California, Georgia, and Florida have imposed new statutory frameworks on insurer responses to time-limited policy-limits demands. Neither playbook looks the way it did.

The stakes are already live. Overlook a funding agreement, and mandatory disclosure, discoverability, and admissibility fights follow in discovery. Assert attorney-work product protection without knowing its reach, and courts decide it for you. Mishandle a time-limited policy-limits demand, and the bad-faith case begins. Plaintiff attorneys construct these demands as strategic set-ups; a failed response converts policy limits into extracontractual exposure.

Attendees walk out with practitioner work product, not a doctrine recital. Assess whether a case may be fundable and evaluate disclosure obligations across jurisdictions. Build TPLF-related discovery considerations into litigation strategy. Structure or challenge demand letters, apply insurer safe-harbor procedures, and advise clients in the immediate aftermath of a demand.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Funding Mechanics
How commercial litigation funding works and how to assess whether a case may be fundable.
02
Disclosure Obligations
How states and courts address mandatory disclosure, discoverability, and admissibility of funding agreements under new statutes in Georgia, Kansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, and additional states.
03
Funding Discovery Strategy
How to handle common discovery-related issues involving litigation funding, including the applicability of attorney-work product protection, and incorporate TPLF considerations into litigation strategy.
04
Demand-Letter Set-Ups
How plaintiff attorneys construct time-limited policy-limits demands as strategic bad-faith setups, and what separates compliant from non-compliant demands.
05
Safe-Harbor Response
How insurers meet response obligations under the new statutory frameworks in California, Georgia, and Florida, including the safe-harbor procedures available to them.
06
Extracontractual Exposure
How bad-faith litigation unfolds after a failed response, and how to advise clients in the immediate aftermath of a policy-limits demand.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Understanding the Current Regulatory State of Commercial Litigation Funding

This session examines recent state litigation funding disclosure statutes — including enactments in Georgia, Kansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Montana, and additional states — and provides practitioners with a practical framework for understanding how these new laws, as well as applicable laws and rules, affect discovery involving third-party litigation funding (TPLF) agreements. Whether engaged in affirmative or defensive litigation, this session will equip lawyers with a framework for understanding the role funders play, what disclosure obligations may apply in a given jurisdiction, and how courts evaluate funding in particular cases. By the end of this session, attendees will be able to assess whether a case may be fundable, evaluate applicable disclosure obligations across jurisdictions, and incorporate TPLF-related discovery considerations into litigation strategy.

Dorothy V. DiFioreDorothy V. DiFiore
Stewart AckerlyStewart Ackerly
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Time-Limited Policy-Limits Demands: The Set-Up, the Response, and the Bad Faith Case that Follows

This session examines time-limited policy-limits demands from both sides of the coverage dispute — how plaintiff attorneys construct them as strategic bad-faith set-ups, what insurer response obligations now require under new statutory frameworks in California, Georgia, and Florida, and how bad-faith litigation unfolds when the insurer missteps. Attorneys will learn the mechanics of compliant and non-compliant demands, the safe-harbor procedures available to insurers, and the extracontractual exposure that follows a failed response. Attendees gain competency in identifying triggering conditions, structuring or challenging demand letters, and advising clients in the immediate aftermath of a policy-limits demand.

Dorothy V. DiFioreDorothy V. DiFiore
Stewart AckerlyStewart Ackerly
Stewart Ackerly

Stewart Ackerly

Statera Capital

Dorothy V. DiFiore

Dorothy V. DiFiore

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A

Stewart Ackerly

Stewart Ackerly

Statera Capital

Stewart Ackerly is a Director at Statera Capital, where he serves as Head of Originations and leads the firm’s business development, client engagement, and public policy initiatives. Based in Washington, D.C., he is responsible for bringing commercial litigation finance to new markets and expanding the universe of lawyers and clients that can use litigation finance to level the playing field and ensure access to justice. A former trial lawyer with experience in both the public and private sectors, he works closely with law firms, companies, and in-house legal departments on how litigation finance can de-risk the pursuit of meritorious disputes.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Ackerly received his B.A. and J.D. from the University of Virginia, where he received numerous honors. In law school, he graduated Order of the Coif, served on the Law Review, and served as the Student Member of the Board of Visitors. He was also the recipient of the Gray-Carrington Memorial Scholarship, the Ernest H. Ern Distinguished Student Award, and the Raven Award.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Ackerly was named to the 2026 Lawdragon 100 Global Leaders in Litigation Finance and is recognized by Chambers USA, where clients and market sources describe him as “a conscientious and thorough evaluator of cases” with “a strong ability to evaluate incoming cases, particularly the risks they present.” He previously served as Chief of Staff at the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, the U.S. Government's $60 billion development bank that facilitates financial solutions to critical challenges in emerging markets, and as Deputy Chief of Staff at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, where he helped negotiate the USMCA.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Ackerly frequently speaks at bar association meetings, conferences, law firm retreats, and CLE programs about commercial legal finance, best practices for its use, and its growing availability to lawyers and clients with meritorious legal disputes.

Experience

Before joining Statera Capital, Mr. Ackerly practiced law at Williams & Connolly LLP, one of the world's preeminent litigation law firms, where he represented Fortune 50 companies, sovereign nations, and other clients as a commercial litigator in complex commercial litigation and arbitration. Earlier in his career, he clerked for Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Dorothy V. DiFiore

Dorothy V. DiFiore

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A

Dorothy V. DiFiore is a partner in the Tampa office of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., with extensive experience in appellate work and legal research, representing clients in both litigation and appeals. Her practice focuses on insurance coverage and appeals for all personal and commercial lines, business and insurance defense litigation and appeals, PIP and fraud litigation and appeals, family law litigation and appeals, and appellate writs for adverse discovery and other interlocutory rulings. Throughout her more than 30 years of practice, she has represented a variety of corporate and institutional organizations as well as individual clients, and her defense experience is complemented by her contrasting experience representing injured persons in workers’ compensation claims and all types of personal injury litigation.

Education & Credentials

Ms. DiFiore received her Juris Doctor cum laude from Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Florida in 1992, and her Bachelor of Arts from the University of South Florida in 1987 with a major in mass communications. While in law school, she authored the Note Chisom v. Roemer: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back, 21 Stetson Law Review 985 (Summer 1992), received the trial advocacy award, and was the recipient of the Book Award in Real Property II. She is licensed to practice law in Florida and California, is a member of The Florida Bar and the State Bar of California, and is admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. DiFiore received the Pro Bono Award from the Hillsborough County Bar Association in 2003. She served as a member of the Florida Bar Grievance Committee for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit from 2004 to 2006, chairing the committee in 2006 and again in 2013–2014, and served on the Board of Directors of the Hillsborough Association for Women Lawyers from 1997 to 2005. She was also a member of the Judicial Nominating Commission for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit from 2014 to 2017.

Professional Involvement

Ms. DiFiore is committed to serving her legal community and has been active on multiple bar committees at both the local and state level. She has been a member of the Florida Bar since 1992 and the California State Bar since 2002, and belongs to the Florida Bar's Appellate Section (2000–present) and Trial Lawyers' Section (1993–present). She served on the Appellate Court Rules Committee from 2009 to 2015 and the Small Claims Rules Committee from 2005 to 2008. She has been a member of the Hillsborough County Bar Association since 1992, including its Appellate Section, and of the Hillsborough Association for Women Lawyers from 1993 to 2008 and 2012 to present. She is also involved with the Florida Defense Lawyers Association, the Claims and Litigation Management Alliance, and the Medical Claims Defense Network.

Experience

Prior to focusing her practice on insurance coverage and appeals, Ms. DiFiore worked as a litigator on all aspects of civil litigation, and her work in bad faith claims complements her coverage work, positioning her to provide a unique array of advice and representation. She has extensive experience in automobile defense litigation, including UM and PIP, and serves as an attorney fee expert in first party litigation and appeals; to bring balance to her practice and assist in underserved areas of the law, she has also worked on a variety of family law cases, including divorces, custody disputes, and dependency cases. She joined QPWB from a small insurance defense practice in Tampa, Florida, where since 2007 she managed the firm's appellate and trial support department, handled appellate and complex motion filings, provided coverage opinions to insurance clients, litigated coverage claims, and represented clients in actions involving insurance coverage, PIP, BI, UM, extra-contractual defense, family law, and commercial litigation. Her work includes numerous published appellate opinions in insurance coverage, liability, PIP, family law, and workers' compensation matters.
Stewart Ackerly

Stewart Ackerly

Statera Capital

Stewart Ackerly is a Director at Statera Capital, where he serves as Head of Originations and leads the firm’s business development, client engagement, and public policy initiatives. Based in Washington, D.C., he is responsible for bringing commercial litigation finance to new markets and expanding the universe of lawyers and clients that can use litigation finance to level the playing field and ensure access to justice. A former trial lawyer with experience in both the public and private sectors, he works closely with law firms, companies, and in-house legal departments on how litigation finance can de-risk the pursuit of meritorious disputes.

Education & Credentials

Mr. Ackerly received his B.A. and J.D. from the University of Virginia, where he received numerous honors. In law school, he graduated Order of the Coif, served on the Law Review, and served as the Student Member of the Board of Visitors. He was also the recipient of the Gray-Carrington Memorial Scholarship, the Ernest H. Ern Distinguished Student Award, and the Raven Award.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Ackerly was named to the 2026 Lawdragon 100 Global Leaders in Litigation Finance and is recognized by Chambers USA, where clients and market sources describe him as “a conscientious and thorough evaluator of cases” with “a strong ability to evaluate incoming cases, particularly the risks they present.” He previously served as Chief of Staff at the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation, the U.S. Government's $60 billion development bank that facilitates financial solutions to critical challenges in emerging markets, and as Deputy Chief of Staff at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, where he helped negotiate the USMCA.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Ackerly frequently speaks at bar association meetings, conferences, law firm retreats, and CLE programs about commercial legal finance, best practices for its use, and its growing availability to lawyers and clients with meritorious legal disputes.

Experience

Before joining Statera Capital, Mr. Ackerly practiced law at Williams & Connolly LLP, one of the world's preeminent litigation law firms, where he represented Fortune 50 companies, sovereign nations, and other clients as a commercial litigator in complex commercial litigation and arbitration. Earlier in his career, he clerked for Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Dorothy V. DiFiore

Dorothy V. DiFiore

Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A

Dorothy V. DiFiore is a partner in the Tampa office of Quintairos, Prieto, Wood & Boyer, P.A., with extensive experience in appellate work and legal research, representing clients in both litigation and appeals. Her practice focuses on insurance coverage and appeals for all personal and commercial lines, business and insurance defense litigation and appeals, PIP and fraud litigation and appeals, family law litigation and appeals, and appellate writs for adverse discovery and other interlocutory rulings. Throughout her more than 30 years of practice, she has represented a variety of corporate and institutional organizations as well as individual clients, and her defense experience is complemented by her contrasting experience representing injured persons in workers’ compensation claims and all types of personal injury litigation.

Education & Credentials

Ms. DiFiore received her Juris Doctor cum laude from Stetson University College of Law in Gulfport, Florida in 1992, and her Bachelor of Arts from the University of South Florida in 1987 with a major in mass communications. While in law school, she authored the Note Chisom v. Roemer: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back, 21 Stetson Law Review 985 (Summer 1992), received the trial advocacy award, and was the recipient of the Book Award in Real Property II. She is licensed to practice law in Florida and California, is a member of The Florida Bar and the State Bar of California, and is admitted to practice in the U.S. District Court for the Middle and Southern Districts of Florida and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. DiFiore received the Pro Bono Award from the Hillsborough County Bar Association in 2003. She served as a member of the Florida Bar Grievance Committee for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit from 2004 to 2006, chairing the committee in 2006 and again in 2013–2014, and served on the Board of Directors of the Hillsborough Association for Women Lawyers from 1997 to 2005. She was also a member of the Judicial Nominating Commission for the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit from 2014 to 2017.

Professional Involvement

Ms. DiFiore is committed to serving her legal community and has been active on multiple bar committees at both the local and state level. She has been a member of the Florida Bar since 1992 and the California State Bar since 2002, and belongs to the Florida Bar's Appellate Section (2000–present) and Trial Lawyers' Section (1993–present). She served on the Appellate Court Rules Committee from 2009 to 2015 and the Small Claims Rules Committee from 2005 to 2008. She has been a member of the Hillsborough County Bar Association since 1992, including its Appellate Section, and of the Hillsborough Association for Women Lawyers from 1993 to 2008 and 2012 to present. She is also involved with the Florida Defense Lawyers Association, the Claims and Litigation Management Alliance, and the Medical Claims Defense Network.

Experience

Prior to focusing her practice on insurance coverage and appeals, Ms. DiFiore worked as a litigator on all aspects of civil litigation, and her work in bad faith claims complements her coverage work, positioning her to provide a unique array of advice and representation. She has extensive experience in automobile defense litigation, including UM and PIP, and serves as an attorney fee expert in first party litigation and appeals; to bring balance to her practice and assist in underserved areas of the law, she has also worked on a variety of family law cases, including divorces, custody disputes, and dependency cases. She joined QPWB from a small insurance defense practice in Tampa, Florida, where since 2007 she managed the firm's appellate and trial support department, handled appellate and complex motion filings, provided coverage opinions to insurance clients, litigated coverage claims, and represented clients in actions involving insurance coverage, PIP, BI, UM, extra-contractual defense, family law, and commercial litigation. Her work includes numerous published appellate opinions in insurance coverage, liability, PIP, family law, and workers' compensation matters.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs