Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

Preserving Error at Trial: Objections, Offers of Proof, and the Rule 50 Trap

Unpreserved error is error the appellate court cannot reach. Make and renew Rule 50 motions correctly, object to instructions and verdict defects in time, force definitive rulings under FRE 103, make offers of proof under pressure, and build a record the court can read.

2026-12-18 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-12-18 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-12-18 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-12-18 12:00:00

Course Overview

The appeal is won or lost before the verdict is read

2026-12-18 12:00:00

Preservation in federal court is not one rule but three. FRCP 50, FRCP 51, and FRE 103 interact to create waiver at the evidentiary, charge, verdict, and post-trial stages. Dupree v. Younger changed what must be renewed after trial. A renewal once required may no longer be; one still required is easy to miss.

Make a Rule 50 motion and fail to renew it, and the issue is gone. Propose an alternative instruction without a sufficient Rule 51 objection, and the charge error is gone. Let the jury be discharged before objecting to a verdict defect, and the defect is gone. Treat a tentative ruling on a motion in limine as definitive under FRE 103(b), and the evidentiary objection is gone. Introduce the evidence yourself to take the sting out, and the preserved objection goes with it.

Attendees leave with a working checklist for spotting and closing preservation gaps while the trial court can still fix them. They also leave with techniques for a record that can be read, verified, and relied upon. That means offers of proof made under pressure, continuing objections that protect, and sidebars, chambers conferences, and charge conferences that reach the transcript.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
The Rule 50 Trap
How to make and renew a Rule 50 motion so judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) survives, what Dupree v. Younger changed about what must be renewed after trial, and which post-trial motions preserve which issues.
02
Rule 51 Instruction Objections
What a legally sufficient objection to a jury instruction looks like under Rule 51, and why proposing an alternative instruction can fall short.
03
Verdict Defects and Discharge
When you must object to a verdict defect, and what is lost once the jury has already been discharged.
04
Definitive Rulings in Limine
How to tell a definitive ruling from a tentative one under FRE 103(b), when the objection must be renewed at trial, and what to do when the other side violates an order you won.
05
Offers of Proof Under Pressure
How to make a complete offer of proof when the judge will not give you the time, when a continuing objection protects you and when it is a preservation time bomb, and how the “taking the sting out” waiver destroys a preserved objection.
06
Building a Readable Record
How to get sidebars, chambers conferences, and charge conferences into a transcript the appellate court can use, and the checklist for closing preservation gaps while the trial court can still fix them.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Where Civil Trial Lawyers Waive Appellate Error

This session walks through the preservation failures that most often cost civil trial lawyers appellate review in federal court, pairing each trap with controlling authority and the practical mechanics for closing it. Attorneys will learn how FRCP 50, FRCP 51, and FRE 103 interact to create waiver at the evidentiary, charge, verdict, and post-trial stages, and what Dupree v. Younger changed about what must be renewed after trial. Attendees leave with a working checklist for spotting and closing preservation gaps while the trial court still has the power to fix them.

Douglas S. LangDouglas S. Lang
Monica E. GaudiosoMonica E. Gaudioso
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Making the Record Under Fire: Real-Time Preservation in a Hostile Courtroom

This session teaches civil trial attorneys how to execute error preservation in real time under adverse courtroom conditions — a fast-moving docket, a judge who truncates argument, unrecorded sidebars, and the constant risk of forfeiture through procedural misstep. Attorneys will learn the mechanics of FRE 103, the motion in limine preservation trap, offers of proof under pressure, continuing objections, and jury instruction preservation. Attendees leave with specific techniques for building an appellate record that can be read, verified, and relied upon.

Elisabeth C. ArkoElisabeth C. Arko
Elisabeth C. Arko

Elisabeth C. Arko

Tucker Ellis LLP

Monica E. Gaudioso

Monica E. Gaudioso

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Douglas S. Lang

Douglas S. Lang

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Elisabeth C. Arko

Elisabeth C. Arko

Tucker Ellis LLP

Elisabeth C. Arko has served as appellate counsel in multiple state and federal trials, working with trial teams on dispositive motions, jury instructions, and post-verdict motions so that issues are preserved for appeal. She is the author of “Preservation of Error in Ohio: Waiver Beware,” published in the OACTA Quarterly Review (Spring 2022), and co-chairs the Appellate Advocacy Committee of the Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Her practice at Tucker Ellis spans complex litigation and appeals, including hospitality and product liability defense, across every phase from consultation and dispositive motions through trial and appeal.

Education & Credentials

She earned her J.D., summa cum laude, from Cleveland State University College of Law in 2016, where she was Editor-in-Chief of the Cleveland State Law Review, and her B.A. from Ashland University in 2011 as an Ashbrook Scholar. She was admitted in Ohio in 2016 and is admitted to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Michigan and the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.

Recognition & Leadership

The Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys presented her with its Outstanding Young Lawyer Award in 2024. She has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America each year from 2023 through 2026 and to Ohio Super Lawyers Rising Stars in 2025 and 2026. Within OACTA she sits on the Board of Trustees (2024–present), chaired the 20

Professional Involvement

She presented “Reptile Theory in Appellate Courts” at the OACTA Annual Meeting in November 2024 and moderated “Back to the Courtroom: What We Can Expect from Courts Moving Forward” at the 2022 Annual Meeting. She has delivered the Supreme Court term-in-review session at the Tucker Ellis In-House Counsel Summit each year since 2021, most recently “SCOTUS for In-House Counsel: What Changed, What Matters, What’s Next” in October 2026. She also participates in the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s 3Rs Program.

Experience

She was lead appellate counsel in three RICO, negligence, and TVPRA cases against a hotel brand and operator, all resolved before verdict, and co-appellate counsel for a corporate client in a toxic tort case tried to verdict in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. She has argued appeals in the Ohio Eighth, Tenth, Seventh, and Ninth District Courts of Appeals and the Michigan Court of Appeals, and has handled briefing in the Sixth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits and in state appellate courts in Michigan, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, and Georgia. Her publications include “Understanding Labor Trafficking Laws as Litigation Surges” (Westlaw Today, August 2025) and articles in DRI’s For The Defense.
Monica E. Gaudioso

Monica E. Gaudioso

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Monica E. Gaudioso is a commercial litigator who tries and arbitrates disputes in state and federal courts on both the plaintiff and defense sides. She began her career as law clerk to the Hon. Samuel H. Mays, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (2013–14), where she managed the civil docket and prepared court documents in securities, complex commercial, employment discrimination, and First Amendment appeal matters, and she then spent four years as a litigation associate handling pre-trial discovery and second-chairing trials and arbitrations.

Education & Credentials

She earned her J.D. from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law in 2013, where she served as an Article Editor of the Texas Law Review, and her B.A. in History from Rhodes College in 2010. Immediately after law school she clerked for the Hon. Samuel H. Mays, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (2013–14). She has been licensed in Texas since 2013 and is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of Texas.

Recognition & Leadership

Best Lawyers has listed her among its Ones to Watch in Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Labor and Employment Litigation every year from 2021 through 2025, and Lawdragon 500 named her a Leading Litigator in America for Commercial Litigation in 2024 and 2025. She was recognized in the Legal 500 US City Elite for Dallas in 2025, named a Texas Rising Star by Super Lawyers in 2023, and listed among Attorney Intel’s Top 25 Blockchain and Digital Assets Attorneys in 2025. She is a Fellow of the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation.

Professional Involvement

She is a member of the State Bar of Texas, the Dallas Bar Association, and the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers, and is a Fellow of the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation. From 2019 to 2021 she was a member of the Patrick E. Higginbotham Inn of Court. Her firm lists her in both its Litigation, Disputes, Appeals and Technology & Innovation groups, and she speaks on the technology side of her practice: she appeared on the Texas Blockchain Council’s Block-Cast podcast in July 2024 to discuss the intersection of DAOs, digital assets, and AI, and on Access Tribe’s Bitcoin education podcast in July 2023, where the discussion covered Coinbase, the SEC, and Bitcoin in Texas.

Experience

Her practice runs the full length of a commercial dispute, from the pre-litigation demand through discovery and motion practice to trial, on both the plaintiff and defense sides. She has appeared as counsel of record in federal matters in the U.S. District Courts for the Western District of Missouri, the Southern District of Texas, and the Central District of California, including a RICO action, a patent case, and a contract dispute, and she represents financial services, technology, and blockchain and cryptocurrency clients in state and federal courts. Her matters include business ownership disputes, director-and-officer litigation, shareholder litigation, breach of contract and fraud claims, and trade-secret misappropriation, resolved through discovery, trial, and arbitration.
Douglas S. Lang

Douglas S. Lang

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Douglas S. Lang advises on litigation and appellate strategy, works alongside trial lawyers, and argues appeals in jurisdictions across the country. He returned to private practice after more than sixteen years on the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas, where he authored more than 2,100 opinions and took part in deciding more than 6,100 cases. He co-hosts the Appealing Strategies podcast, whose recent episodes include “Waivers, Rule 50, and Appeals: How Missing a Motion Can Cost You the Verdict” and “Preserving Error for Appeal in Federal Courts: Lessons from Clapper v. American Realty Investors.”

Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from the University of Missouri School of Law and his B.S.B.A. from Drake University, where he competed on athletic scholarship and lettered in football and wrestling, and he later completed a Graduate Certificate in Theological Studies at the University of Dallas. He is licensed in Texas and Missouri and admitted to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Recognition & Leadership

The Texas Bar Foundation presented him with its Outstanding 50 Year Lawyer Award in 2024, and Texas Lawyer named him a Texas Trailblazer in 2019. Appointed by the Supreme Court of Texas to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, he served from 2013 to 2018, including as Vice Chair, Secretary, and ultimately Chair from 2017 to 2018, and he sat for six years on the Texas Multi-District Litigation Panel. Earlier honors include the State Bar of Texas Presidents’ Award (2010), the Dallas Bar Association’s Morris Harrell Professionalism Award (2007) and President’s Citation (2018), and the Texas Bar Foundation’s Lola Wright Foundation Award (2007).

Professional Involvement

He serves on the Council of the Dallas Bar Association’s Appellate Law Section (2024–2025) and has been a member of the American Law Institute since 2004. A past President of the Dallas Bar Association (1991) and past Chair of the Dallas Bar Foundation (1998–2001), he also led the National Conference of Bar Presidents of the American Bar Association (2004–2005) and chaired the Texas Center for Legal Ethics and Professionalism (1999–2002). He founded the American Inns of Court Trial Academy, teaches as an Adjunct Professor at SMU Dedman School of Law (2023–present), and sat on the Editorial Board of The Federal Lawyer in 2023.

Experience

His current practice centers on appellate strategy from the trial court forward, and he has most recently represented clients before the Supreme Court of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with earlier appearances in Texas state and federal courts, the federal circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States. His sixteen years on a thirteen-judge intermediate appellate court inform how he approaches the trial record. His writing includes “Survey of Recent Mandamus Decisions of the Texas Supreme Court,” 10 SMU Annual Texas Survey 99 (2024), and “Wherefore Art Thou Civility?” in Texas Lawyer (September 2024).
Elisabeth C. Arko

Elisabeth C. Arko

Tucker Ellis LLP

Elisabeth C. Arko has served as appellate counsel in multiple state and federal trials, working with trial teams on dispositive motions, jury instructions, and post-verdict motions so that issues are preserved for appeal. She is the author of “Preservation of Error in Ohio: Waiver Beware,” published in the OACTA Quarterly Review (Spring 2022), and co-chairs the Appellate Advocacy Committee of the Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Her practice at Tucker Ellis spans complex litigation and appeals, including hospitality and product liability defense, across every phase from consultation and dispositive motions through trial and appeal.

Education & Credentials

She earned her J.D., summa cum laude, from Cleveland State University College of Law in 2016, where she was Editor-in-Chief of the Cleveland State Law Review, and her B.A. from Ashland University in 2011 as an Ashbrook Scholar. She was admitted in Ohio in 2016 and is admitted to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits and the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of Michigan and the Northern and Southern Districts of Ohio.

Recognition & Leadership

The Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys presented her with its Outstanding Young Lawyer Award in 2024. She has been named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America each year from 2023 through 2026 and to Ohio Super Lawyers Rising Stars in 2025 and 2026. Within OACTA she sits on the Board of Trustees (2024–present), chaired the 20

Professional Involvement

She presented “Reptile Theory in Appellate Courts” at the OACTA Annual Meeting in November 2024 and moderated “Back to the Courtroom: What We Can Expect from Courts Moving Forward” at the 2022 Annual Meeting. She has delivered the Supreme Court term-in-review session at the Tucker Ellis In-House Counsel Summit each year since 2021, most recently “SCOTUS for In-House Counsel: What Changed, What Matters, What’s Next” in October 2026. She also participates in the Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Association’s 3Rs Program.

Experience

She was lead appellate counsel in three RICO, negligence, and TVPRA cases against a hotel brand and operator, all resolved before verdict, and co-appellate counsel for a corporate client in a toxic tort case tried to verdict in the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas. She has argued appeals in the Ohio Eighth, Tenth, Seventh, and Ninth District Courts of Appeals and the Michigan Court of Appeals, and has handled briefing in the Sixth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits and in state appellate courts in Michigan, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, and Georgia. Her publications include “Understanding Labor Trafficking Laws as Litigation Surges” (Westlaw Today, August 2025) and articles in DRI’s For The Defense.
Monica E. Gaudioso

Monica E. Gaudioso

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Monica E. Gaudioso is a commercial litigator who tries and arbitrates disputes in state and federal courts on both the plaintiff and defense sides. She began her career as law clerk to the Hon. Samuel H. Mays, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (2013–14), where she managed the civil docket and prepared court documents in securities, complex commercial, employment discrimination, and First Amendment appeal matters, and she then spent four years as a litigation associate handling pre-trial discovery and second-chairing trials and arbitrations.

Education & Credentials

She earned her J.D. from The University of Texas at Austin School of Law in 2013, where she served as an Article Editor of the Texas Law Review, and her B.A. in History from Rhodes College in 2010. Immediately after law school she clerked for the Hon. Samuel H. Mays, Jr. of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee (2013–14). She has been licensed in Texas since 2013 and is admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, Southern, and Western Districts of Texas.

Recognition & Leadership

Best Lawyers has listed her among its Ones to Watch in Appellate Practice, Commercial Litigation, and Labor and Employment Litigation every year from 2021 through 2025, and Lawdragon 500 named her a Leading Litigator in America for Commercial Litigation in 2024 and 2025. She was recognized in the Legal 500 US City Elite for Dallas in 2025, named a Texas Rising Star by Super Lawyers in 2023, and listed among Attorney Intel’s Top 25 Blockchain and Digital Assets Attorneys in 2025. She is a Fellow of the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation.

Professional Involvement

She is a member of the State Bar of Texas, the Dallas Bar Association, and the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers, and is a Fellow of the Dallas Association of Young Lawyers Foundation. From 2019 to 2021 she was a member of the Patrick E. Higginbotham Inn of Court. Her firm lists her in both its Litigation, Disputes, Appeals and Technology & Innovation groups, and she speaks on the technology side of her practice: she appeared on the Texas Blockchain Council’s Block-Cast podcast in July 2024 to discuss the intersection of DAOs, digital assets, and AI, and on Access Tribe’s Bitcoin education podcast in July 2023, where the discussion covered Coinbase, the SEC, and Bitcoin in Texas.

Experience

Her practice runs the full length of a commercial dispute, from the pre-litigation demand through discovery and motion practice to trial, on both the plaintiff and defense sides. She has appeared as counsel of record in federal matters in the U.S. District Courts for the Western District of Missouri, the Southern District of Texas, and the Central District of California, including a RICO action, a patent case, and a contract dispute, and she represents financial services, technology, and blockchain and cryptocurrency clients in state and federal courts. Her matters include business ownership disputes, director-and-officer litigation, shareholder litigation, breach of contract and fraud claims, and trade-secret misappropriation, resolved through discovery, trial, and arbitration.
Douglas S. Lang

Douglas S. Lang

Carrington, Coleman, Sloman & Blumenthal, LLP

Douglas S. Lang advises on litigation and appellate strategy, works alongside trial lawyers, and argues appeals in jurisdictions across the country. He returned to private practice after more than sixteen years on the Fifth District Court of Appeals in Dallas, where he authored more than 2,100 opinions and took part in deciding more than 6,100 cases. He co-hosts the Appealing Strategies podcast, whose recent episodes include “Waivers, Rule 50, and Appeals: How Missing a Motion Can Cost You the Verdict” and “Preserving Error for Appeal in Federal Courts: Lessons from Clapper v. American Realty Investors.”

Education & Credentials

He earned his J.D. from the University of Missouri School of Law and his B.S.B.A. from Drake University, where he competed on athletic scholarship and lettered in football and wrestling, and he later completed a Graduate Certificate in Theological Studies at the University of Dallas. He is licensed in Texas and Missouri and admitted to the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Fifth and Sixth Circuits, the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern, Northern, and Western Districts of Texas, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

Recognition & Leadership

The Texas Bar Foundation presented him with its Outstanding 50 Year Lawyer Award in 2024, and Texas Lawyer named him a Texas Trailblazer in 2019. Appointed by the Supreme Court of Texas to the State Commission on Judicial Conduct, he served from 2013 to 2018, including as Vice Chair, Secretary, and ultimately Chair from 2017 to 2018, and he sat for six years on the Texas Multi-District Litigation Panel. Earlier honors include the State Bar of Texas Presidents’ Award (2010), the Dallas Bar Association’s Morris Harrell Professionalism Award (2007) and President’s Citation (2018), and the Texas Bar Foundation’s Lola Wright Foundation Award (2007).

Professional Involvement

He serves on the Council of the Dallas Bar Association’s Appellate Law Section (2024–2025) and has been a member of the American Law Institute since 2004. A past President of the Dallas Bar Association (1991) and past Chair of the Dallas Bar Foundation (1998–2001), he also led the National Conference of Bar Presidents of the American Bar Association (2004–2005) and chaired the Texas Center for Legal Ethics and Professionalism (1999–2002). He founded the American Inns of Court Trial Academy, teaches as an Adjunct Professor at SMU Dedman School of Law (2023–present), and sat on the Editorial Board of The Federal Lawyer in 2023.

Experience

His current practice centers on appellate strategy from the trial court forward, and he has most recently represented clients before the Supreme Court of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, with earlier appearances in Texas state and federal courts, the federal circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States. His sixteen years on a thirteen-judge intermediate appellate court inform how he approaches the trial record. His writing includes “Survey of Recent Mandamus Decisions of the Texas Supreme Court,” 10 SMU Annual Texas Survey 99 (2024), and “Wherefore Art Thou Civility?” in Texas Lawyer (September 2024).

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs