Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

SCOTUS Term in Review for 2025–2026 Term (Presented by the Federal Bar Association’s Professional Development Committee)

The Supreme Court’s 2025–2026 term is over; its fallout is not. Join SCOTUSblog co-founder Amy Howe to identify the term’s most significant rulings, evaluate their impact on lower courts, and apply their lessons to litigation strategy, advocacy, and issue-spotting.

2026-08-05 14:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-08-05 14:00:00

2026-08-05 14:00:00

1h CLE Credits

2026-08-05 14:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-08-05 14:00:00

Program Details

2026-08-05 14:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-08-05 14:00:00

1 hours

Course Overview

Every federal brief you file this fall answers to the 2025–2026 term

2026-08-05 14:00:00

Amy Howe—co-founder of the SCOTUSblog—returns to the Federal Bar Association for her fourth year to provide attendees with an overview and analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions during the 2025–2026 term. In this program, Amy Howe will offer commentary on the Supreme Court’s most significant rulings this year, and examine their legal reasoning, practical implications, and potential impact on practitioners and lower courts. Drawing on her extensive experience covering the Supreme Court, she will highlight key themes from the 2025–2026 term and place the decisions in broader doctrinal and institutional context.

This webinar is designed for attorneys, government practitioners, and law students seeking a clear, authoritative understanding of the Supreme Court’s most recent term and the developments shaping federal practice.

The 2025–2026 term is complete, and its decisions now govern federal practice. The Court ruled across executive power, culture wars, civil rights and election law, and immigration. Its emergency docket stayed just as consequential. Cite last year’s framework, and this term’s reasoning may cut against you. Miss an emergency-docket order, and a pending case can shift overnight. Overlook where the Court is heading, and your issue-spotting falls behind. The time to absorb this term is now.

Presented by the Federal Bar Association’s Professional Development Committee.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
The Merits Docket
How the term’s rulings on executive power, culture wars, civil rights and election law, and immigration change what you argue in federal court.
02
The Emergency Docket
How the Court’s emergency-docket orders shaped this term alongside the merits rulings — and why they demand equal attention.
03
Significant Decisions
Identify and analyze the U.S. Supreme Court’s most significant decisions from the 2025–2026 term, including the legal principles and reasoning underlying those rulings.
04
Practical Implications
Evaluate the practical implications of the Court’s decisions for practitioners and lower courts across key areas of federal practice.
05
Doctrinal Trends
Assess emerging doctrinal trends and themes from the term and how they may shape future Supreme Court jurisprudence.
06
Litigation Strategy
Litigation Strategy Apply insights from the Supreme Court’s recent decisions to inform litigation strategy, advocacy, and issue-spotting in federal practice.

Program schedule

clock 2:00 pm - 2:20 pm EST

The Merits Docket: Executive Power, Culture Wars, Civil Rights and Election Law, and Immigration

This session walks through the 2025–2026 term’s most significant merits decisions across executive power, culture wars, civil rights and election law, and immigration. It examines the legal principles and reasoning underlying each ruling and their practical implications for practitioners and lower courts across key areas of federal practice.

Amy HoweAmy Howe
Jean Phillip ShamiJean Phillip Shami
clock 2:20 pm - 2:40 pm EST

The Emergency Document

The Court’s emergency docket stayed as consequential as its merits work this term. This session reviews the term’s most significant emergency rulings, what they reveal about the Court’s reasoning and direction, and how practitioners should account for emergency-docket orders when advising clients and litigating pending cases in the lower courts.

Amy HoweAmy Howe
Jean Phillip ShamiJean Phillip Shami
clock 2:40 pm - 3:00 pm EST

Looking Ahead: Retirements?, 2026-2027 Term

Drawing on the term’s emerging doctrinal trends and themes, this session assesses where the Court may head next — including possible retirements and the cases shaping the 2026–2027 term. Attendees leave ready to apply these insights to litigation strategy, advocacy, and issue-spotting as the next term’s developments reach their federal practice.

Amy HoweAmy Howe
Jean Phillip ShamiJean Phillip Shami
Amy Howe

Amy Howe

SCOTUSblog

Jean Phillip Shami

Jean Phillip Shami

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Amy Howe

Amy Howe

SCOTUSblog

Amy Howe is a legal journalist and appellate attorney best known for her work covering the United States Supreme Court as a reporter for SCOTUSblog. She has extensive experience analyzing Supreme Court litigation, constitutional law, and federal appellate practice, and is widely recognized for making complex legal issues accessible to attorneys, academics, and the public. In addition to her work as a journalist, she has represented clients in significant appellate and Supreme Court matters and has written extensively on developments in Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Education & Credentials

Amy Howe earned her J.D. from Stanford Law School and her A.B., magna cum laude, from Georgetown University.

Recognition & Leadership

Amy is widely recognized as one of the nation's leading Supreme Court journalists. Through her work at SCOTUSblog, she has become a trusted authority on Supreme Court proceedings and decisions, providing in-depth reporting and analysis on the Court's docket and its impact on the legal profession.

Professional Involvement

Amy is a frequent speaker and commentator on Supreme Court practice and constitutional law. She has participated in numerous legal education programs, panel discussions, and professional events focused on Supreme Court advocacy, appellate litigation, and significant developments in federal law. She also contributes ongoing legal analysis through her reporting and commentary on Supreme Court cases.

Experience

Before focusing on legal journalism, Amy practiced appellate litigation and argued cases before federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. She co-founded SCOTUSblog and has spent many years reporting on Supreme Court litigation, covering virtually every aspect of the Court's work while providing analysis of major constitutional, statutory, and procedural issues affecting the legal community
Jean Phillip Shami

Jean Phillip Shami

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Jean-Phillip Shami is an associate at Bartlit Beck LLP, where he focuses on complex commercial litigation, appellate advocacy, and trial practice. He represents clients in high-stakes disputes involving constitutional law, antitrust, intellectual property, product liability, class actions, and other complex business litigation. His practice includes briefing and arguing appeals in federal and state courts, including matters before the United States Supreme Court.

Education & Credentials

Jean-Phillip Shami earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School, where he served as an Articles Editor of the Harvard Law Review. He received his B.A., summa cum laude, from Rice University.

Recognition & Leadership

Jean-Phillip has been recognized for his accomplishments in complex litigation and appellate advocacy. His practice includes representing clients in precedent-setting cases before appellate courts and the United States Supreme Court, reflecting his leadership in high-profile litigation and constitutional law.

Professional Involvement

Jean-Phillip is an active author and speaker on appellate advocacy, constitutional law, and complex litigation. He contributes to legal scholarship and regularly participates in professional programs addressing developments in Supreme Court practice and federal litigation.

Experience

Before joining Bartlit Beck LLP, Jean-Phillip served as a law clerk to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court and Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. At Bartlit Beck, he represents clients in complex commercial disputes, appellate litigation, and Supreme Court matters involving constitutional, antitrust, intellectual property, and other significant legal issues.
Amy Howe

Amy Howe

SCOTUSblog

Amy Howe is a legal journalist and appellate attorney best known for her work covering the United States Supreme Court as a reporter for SCOTUSblog. She has extensive experience analyzing Supreme Court litigation, constitutional law, and federal appellate practice, and is widely recognized for making complex legal issues accessible to attorneys, academics, and the public. In addition to her work as a journalist, she has represented clients in significant appellate and Supreme Court matters and has written extensively on developments in Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Education & Credentials

Amy Howe earned her J.D. from Stanford Law School and her A.B., magna cum laude, from Georgetown University.

Recognition & Leadership

Amy is widely recognized as one of the nation's leading Supreme Court journalists. Through her work at SCOTUSblog, she has become a trusted authority on Supreme Court proceedings and decisions, providing in-depth reporting and analysis on the Court's docket and its impact on the legal profession.

Professional Involvement

Amy is a frequent speaker and commentator on Supreme Court practice and constitutional law. She has participated in numerous legal education programs, panel discussions, and professional events focused on Supreme Court advocacy, appellate litigation, and significant developments in federal law. She also contributes ongoing legal analysis through her reporting and commentary on Supreme Court cases.

Experience

Before focusing on legal journalism, Amy practiced appellate litigation and argued cases before federal courts, including the United States Supreme Court. She co-founded SCOTUSblog and has spent many years reporting on Supreme Court litigation, covering virtually every aspect of the Court's work while providing analysis of major constitutional, statutory, and procedural issues affecting the legal community
Jean Phillip Shami

Jean Phillip Shami

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP

Jean-Phillip Shami is an associate at Bartlit Beck LLP, where he focuses on complex commercial litigation, appellate advocacy, and trial practice. He represents clients in high-stakes disputes involving constitutional law, antitrust, intellectual property, product liability, class actions, and other complex business litigation. His practice includes briefing and arguing appeals in federal and state courts, including matters before the United States Supreme Court.

Education & Credentials

Jean-Phillip Shami earned his J.D., magna cum laude, from Harvard Law School, where he served as an Articles Editor of the Harvard Law Review. He received his B.A., summa cum laude, from Rice University.

Recognition & Leadership

Jean-Phillip has been recognized for his accomplishments in complex litigation and appellate advocacy. His practice includes representing clients in precedent-setting cases before appellate courts and the United States Supreme Court, reflecting his leadership in high-profile litigation and constitutional law.

Professional Involvement

Jean-Phillip is an active author and speaker on appellate advocacy, constitutional law, and complex litigation. He contributes to legal scholarship and regularly participates in professional programs addressing developments in Supreme Court practice and federal litigation.

Experience

Before joining Bartlit Beck LLP, Jean-Phillip served as a law clerk to Justice Anthony M. Kennedy of the United States Supreme Court and Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. At Bartlit Beck, he represents clients in complex commercial disputes, appellate litigation, and Supreme Court matters involving constitutional, antitrust, intellectual property, and other significant legal issues.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.2
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs