Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

The Client File as a Target: Lawyer Data-Security Duties and Breach Obligations

A breached client file now means Rule 1.6(c) scrutiny, statutory notice deadlines, and malpractice exposure. Learn to conduct and document a reasonable-efforts security assessment, distinguish ethics-triggered from statute-triggered notification, and manage breach response while preserving privilege.

2026-11-05 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-05 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-05 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-11-05 12:00:00

Course Overview

Someone Else Now Defines What Reasonable Efforts Means for Your Firm

2026-11-05 12:00:00

Reasonable efforts under Model Rule 1.6(c) is no longer a firm’s own judgment call. Ethics opinions, enforcement actions, state safe-harbor statutes, and class action litigation now define the controls, vendor oversight, and governance a small firm must have. After a breach, ABA Formal Opinion 483 and NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2024-3 frame what the lawyer must do next.

The exposure runs on two parallel tracks. Leave a gap in the security program and Rule 1.6(c) and Comment 18 are in play. Suffer a breach and the duties under Rules 1.1, 1.4, 5.1, and 5.3 attach. Confuse ethics-triggered notification with statute-triggered notification and disciplinary and malpractice exposure follow. Skip the documentation and regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys will demand it after the breach. Handle the forensic investigation loosely and privilege over it can be lost.

This two-session program gives attorneys a working framework for both tracks. Attendees leave with a security assessment method anchored in the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ABA formal guidance. They can evaluate gaps, prioritize fixes, and build the documentation record. They gain a breach response framework that satisfies bar authorities and state breach-notification laws while preserving privilege over forensic investigations.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
The Reasonable Efforts Standard
How Rule 1.6(c), Comment 18, and the controlling ethics opinions define the security a small firm must have.
02
The Small Firm Threat Landscape
Read breach data, enforcement actions, and class action exposure to see where the small firm is the target.
03
The Security Assessment Framework
Evaluate technical controls, governance, vendor oversight, and documentation against the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ABA formal guidance.
04
Safe Harbors and Multi-State Compliance
Apply state safe-harbor statutes, emerging legislation, and multi-state compliance duties to the firm’s security program.
05
Post-Breach Ethics Duties
Identify the Model Rules a breach triggers and how ABA Formal Opinion 483 and NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2024-3 frame post-breach duties.
06
Notification Tracks and Response Mistakes
Distinguish ethics-triggered from statute-triggered notification and avoid the breach response mistakes that create disciplinary and malpractice liability.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Anatomy of a Small Firm Security Assessment Under the Reasonable Efforts Standard

This session teaches small firm attorneys how to conduct and document a security assessment that satisfies the ‘reasonable efforts’ standard under Model Rule 1.6(c) and its state equivalents. Attendees learn how ethics opinions, enforcement actions, state safe-harbor statutes, and class action litigation define what security controls, vendor oversight, and governance policies a small firm must have in place. Attorneys leave with a practical framework — anchored in the NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ABA formal guidance — for evaluating gaps, prioritizing fixes, and creating the documentation that regulators and plaintiffs’ attorneys will demand after a breach.

Kathryn C. NadroKathryn C. Nadro
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

After the Breach: Ethics Obligations, Client Notice, and Disciplinary Exposure

This session examines what attorneys must do after a data breach has occurred, covering the parallel tracks of ethics obligations and statutory breach-notification duties, client communication requirements under Model Rules 1.1, 1.4, 1.6(c), 5.1, and 5.3, and the disciplinary and malpractice exposure that follows inadequate response. Attorneys will learn how to distinguish ethics-triggered notification from statute-triggered notification, how ABA Formal Opinion 483 and NYC Bar Formal Opinion 2024-3 frame post-breach duties, and what common mistakes create disciplinary and civil liability. Attendees leave with a framework for managing breach response in a way that satisfies both bar authorities and state breach-notification laws while preserving privilege over forensic investigations.

Tricia Y. WagnerTricia Y. Wagner
Kathryn C. Nadro

Kathryn C. Nadro

Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC

Tricia Y. Wagner

Tricia Y. Wagner

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Kathryn C. Nadro

Kathryn C. Nadro

Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC

Katie Nadro is a Partner in the Corporate Group of Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC in Chicago, where she advises clients on cybersecurity, data privacy, and artificial intelligence matters. She counsels businesses and their leadership on the full data lifecycle — from how information is collected, used, and shared to how it is secured, governed, and defended when something goes wrong. Ms. Nadro drafts and implements privacy and security policies, manages compliance programs under evolving state, federal, and international data-protection regimes, and leads clients through data breach response when an incident occurs. Uniquely, she pairs that counseling practice with a deep background as a seasoned business litigator and former in-house counsel, giving her a first-hand understanding of how a lawyer’s own data-security duties, privilege obligations, and breach-notification requirements play out in real disputes.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Nadro earned her J.D., with honors, from the University of Chicago Law School and her B.A., with honors, from the University of California, Berkeley. She is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and an Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP), both credentials issued by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). She is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Nadro is a sought-after voice on cybersecurity, privacy, and AI liability. Her commentary on emerging technology risk has been featured in national outlets, including TechTarget, where she has analyzed liability, indemnification, and cyber-insurance exposure arising from AI-related security incidents. She is a frequent faculty member for accredited continuing legal education programs, including Strafford/BARBRI, Financial Poise, and the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, where she has taught on legal ethics and cybersecurity, U.S. privacy and data-security law, and privacy-policy fundamentals. Earlier in her career, she led the Data Security and Privacy practice at a Chicago business law firm.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Nadro is an active member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and the American Bar Association's Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Committee, for which she regularly writes and presents. She has served on the ABA Section of Litigation's Ethics & Professionalism Committee, including as its Newsletter Editor, and is a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and the Chicago Bar Association. She has also participated in the University of Chicago Law School's Women's Mentoring Program.

Experience

Ms. Nadro joined Levenfeld Pearlstein in 2024 from Raines Feldman Littrell LLP, where she was a partner, and previously was a partner at Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP, where she led the firm's Data Security and Privacy practice. Her practice spans policy drafting and program management, data-collection and use protocols, vendor and contract risk allocation, incident response and breach notification, and compliance with laws such as the GDPR, HIPAA, the CCPA, and the growing patchwork of state privacy statutes. Her earlier career as a trial lawyer handling commercial, contract, trade-secret, fiduciary-duty, and employment disputes — as both outside and in-house counsel — informs her practical, litigation-tested approach to helping law firms and other professionals protect client data, meet their ethical and statutory obligations, and respond when the client file itself becomes the target.
Tricia Y. Wagner

Tricia Y. Wagner

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Tricia Wagner is Counsel in the Data Privacy, Security, Safety & Risk Management practice of Lowenstein Sandler LLP, based in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. A rare lawyer-technologist, she brings more than 20 years of hands-on experience in cybersecurity, information governance, and compliance to her practice, having spent most of her career on the operational side of security before advising clients from the law-firm side. Ms. Wagner develops strategies that address data across its entire lifecycle, translating complex regulatory requirements under frameworks such as the CCPA, HIPAA, and the GDPR into concrete operational practices. She leads multidisciplinary teams, designs incident response protocols, and helps organizations build the security programs and governance evidence they need to withstand regulatory, client, and litigation scrutiny after a breach.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Wagner earned both her J.D. and her M.B.A. from the University of San Francisco, and her B.A. from the University of California, Davis. In addition to being a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US), she holds two of the most rigorous technical security credentials in the industry: Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) and Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA). She is also a former PCI Qualified Security Assessor (QSA), the credential required to formally audit organizations against the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Wagner is a core member of Lowenstein Sandler's Data360 team, the firm's technology-forward, multidisciplinary approach to data risk that is built around lawyers who have served as CISOs, CISSPs, PCI-QSAs, and ethical hackers. Her published work with the practice's chair includes client alerts on AI platform risk assessments and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, California's mandatory risk-assessment regulations, new state comprehensive privacy laws, and universal opt-out signal requirements, and her analysis appears regularly on JD Supra. Her hallmark approach to incident response emphasizes candor with regulators and stakeholders and rapid, durable remediation.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Wagner's practice sits at the intersection of law and security operations. She regularly works alongside chief information security officers, internal auditors, and compliance officers, and she maintains active certifications through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (CIPP/US), ISC2 (CISSP), and ISACA (CISA) — a combination that allows her to speak the language of the boardroom, the security operations center, and the regulator alike. She counsels organizations that hold highly sensitive personal, financial, and confidential client data on privacy program design, security-control implementation, vendor and third-party risk management, incident response planning, and regulatory compliance.

Experience

Before joining Lowenstein Sandler, Ms. Wagner served as Associate Director of Privacy and Security at a global consulting firm, and for more than a decade she led Governance, Risk, and Compliance at H5, a Silicon Valley AI/machine-learning eDiscovery technology company (acquired by Lighthouse in 2021), where she oversaw security, risk, and compliance for a platform entrusted with large volumes of sensitive and privileged legal data. That background — building and auditing security programs, managing incidents, and protecting legal data at scale — gives her an unusually practical perspective on what "reasonable" security actually looks like inside a law practice, how breaches unfold, and what regulators, clients, and courts expect afterward. She is uniquely positioned to translate lawyers' ethical and statutory data-security duties into the concrete technical and operational steps a firm must take before, during, and after a breach.
Kathryn C. Nadro

Kathryn C. Nadro

Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC

Katie Nadro is a Partner in the Corporate Group of Levenfeld Pearlstein, LLC in Chicago, where she advises clients on cybersecurity, data privacy, and artificial intelligence matters. She counsels businesses and their leadership on the full data lifecycle — from how information is collected, used, and shared to how it is secured, governed, and defended when something goes wrong. Ms. Nadro drafts and implements privacy and security policies, manages compliance programs under evolving state, federal, and international data-protection regimes, and leads clients through data breach response when an incident occurs. Uniquely, she pairs that counseling practice with a deep background as a seasoned business litigator and former in-house counsel, giving her a first-hand understanding of how a lawyer’s own data-security duties, privilege obligations, and breach-notification requirements play out in real disputes.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Nadro earned her J.D., with honors, from the University of Chicago Law School and her B.A., with honors, from the University of California, Berkeley. She is a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US) and an Artificial Intelligence Governance Professional (AIGP), both credentials issued by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP). She is admitted to practice in Illinois and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Nadro is a sought-after voice on cybersecurity, privacy, and AI liability. Her commentary on emerging technology risk has been featured in national outlets, including TechTarget, where she has analyzed liability, indemnification, and cyber-insurance exposure arising from AI-related security incidents. She is a frequent faculty member for accredited continuing legal education programs, including Strafford/BARBRI, Financial Poise, and the Illinois Institute for Continuing Legal Education, where she has taught on legal ethics and cybersecurity, U.S. privacy and data-security law, and privacy-policy fundamentals. Earlier in her career, she led the Data Security and Privacy practice at a Chicago business law firm.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Nadro is an active member of the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP) and the American Bar Association's Tort Trial and Insurance Practice Section Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Committee, for which she regularly writes and presents. She has served on the ABA Section of Litigation's Ethics & Professionalism Committee, including as its Newsletter Editor, and is a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and the Chicago Bar Association. She has also participated in the University of Chicago Law School's Women's Mentoring Program.

Experience

Ms. Nadro joined Levenfeld Pearlstein in 2024 from Raines Feldman Littrell LLP, where she was a partner, and previously was a partner at Sugar Felsenthal Grais & Helsinger LLP, where she led the firm's Data Security and Privacy practice. Her practice spans policy drafting and program management, data-collection and use protocols, vendor and contract risk allocation, incident response and breach notification, and compliance with laws such as the GDPR, HIPAA, the CCPA, and the growing patchwork of state privacy statutes. Her earlier career as a trial lawyer handling commercial, contract, trade-secret, fiduciary-duty, and employment disputes — as both outside and in-house counsel — informs her practical, litigation-tested approach to helping law firms and other professionals protect client data, meet their ethical and statutory obligations, and respond when the client file itself becomes the target.
Tricia Y. Wagner

Tricia Y. Wagner

Lowenstein Sandler LLP

Tricia Wagner is Counsel in the Data Privacy, Security, Safety & Risk Management practice of Lowenstein Sandler LLP, based in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office. A rare lawyer-technologist, she brings more than 20 years of hands-on experience in cybersecurity, information governance, and compliance to her practice, having spent most of her career on the operational side of security before advising clients from the law-firm side. Ms. Wagner develops strategies that address data across its entire lifecycle, translating complex regulatory requirements under frameworks such as the CCPA, HIPAA, and the GDPR into concrete operational practices. She leads multidisciplinary teams, designs incident response protocols, and helps organizations build the security programs and governance evidence they need to withstand regulatory, client, and litigation scrutiny after a breach.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Wagner earned both her J.D. and her M.B.A. from the University of San Francisco, and her B.A. from the University of California, Davis. In addition to being a Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP/US), she holds two of the most rigorous technical security credentials in the industry: Certified Information Systems Security Professional (CISSP) and Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA). She is also a former PCI Qualified Security Assessor (QSA), the credential required to formally audit organizations against the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Wagner is a core member of Lowenstein Sandler's Data360 team, the firm's technology-forward, multidisciplinary approach to data risk that is built around lawyers who have served as CISOs, CISSPs, PCI-QSAs, and ethical hackers. Her published work with the practice's chair includes client alerts on AI platform risk assessments and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, California's mandatory risk-assessment regulations, new state comprehensive privacy laws, and universal opt-out signal requirements, and her analysis appears regularly on JD Supra. Her hallmark approach to incident response emphasizes candor with regulators and stakeholders and rapid, durable remediation.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Wagner's practice sits at the intersection of law and security operations. She regularly works alongside chief information security officers, internal auditors, and compliance officers, and she maintains active certifications through the International Association of Privacy Professionals (CIPP/US), ISC2 (CISSP), and ISACA (CISA) — a combination that allows her to speak the language of the boardroom, the security operations center, and the regulator alike. She counsels organizations that hold highly sensitive personal, financial, and confidential client data on privacy program design, security-control implementation, vendor and third-party risk management, incident response planning, and regulatory compliance.

Experience

Before joining Lowenstein Sandler, Ms. Wagner served as Associate Director of Privacy and Security at a global consulting firm, and for more than a decade she led Governance, Risk, and Compliance at H5, a Silicon Valley AI/machine-learning eDiscovery technology company (acquired by Lighthouse in 2021), where she oversaw security, risk, and compliance for a platform entrusted with large volumes of sensitive and privileged legal data. That background — building and auditing security programs, managing incidents, and protecting legal data at scale — gives her an unusually practical perspective on what "reasonable" security actually looks like inside a law practice, how breaches unfold, and what regulators, clients, and courts expect afterward. She is uniquely positioned to translate lawyers' ethical and statutory data-security duties into the concrete technical and operational steps a firm must take before, during, and after a breach.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Pending
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Approved
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs