Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

The TAKE IT DOWN Act in Force: Compliance for Any Business Hosting User Content

Platforms that host user content now face a hard 48-hour removal deadline and FTC civil penalties of up to $53,088 per violation. Learn to scope coverage, build a defensible notice-and-removal system, assess penalty exposure, and respond to Civil Investigative Demands.

2026-11-10 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-10 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-11-10 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-11-10 12:00:00

Course Overview

Missing the 48-Hour Removal Deadline Is Now an FTC Enforcement Problem

2026-11-10 12:00:00

The TAKE IT DOWN Act is no longer a compliance project for later. Section 3 requires every covered platform that hosts user-generated content to run a notice-and-removal system. The FTC enforces it as an unfair or deceptive act or practice, and the agency sent its first warning letters in May 2026.

The exposure is concrete. Misjudge coverage, and a single feature can trigger the full obligation. Miss the 48-hour hard deadline, and the platform is out of compliance. Ignore identical copies, and the duplicate-detection duty goes unmet. Recycle a DMCA Section 512 workflow, and the structural differences show. Each violation can carry a civil penalty of up to $53,088, and how the FTC will count violations remains unresolved.

Attendees walk out with a working toolkit: a covered-platform scoping analysis, an audit of content moderation infrastructure against the ten core elements of a defensible program, a penalty-exposure assessment, and a framework for counseling clients through warning letters, Civil Investigative Demands, and consent decree risk. This is practitioner judgment applied to a new statute, not a doctrine summary.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Covered Platform Scoping
How to decide whether a client’s service or feature makes it a covered platform with TIDA compliance obligations.
02
The 48-Hour Removal Clock
How to validate the four required elements of a removal request and meet the hard deadline, including identical copies never noticed.
03
Safe Harbor and Section 230
How the asymmetric safe harbor shapes compliance strategy, what it leaves exposed, and where Section 230 fits.
04
Compliance Infrastructure
How to audit intake-to-documentation workflows against the ten core elements and revise existing DMCA Section 512 takedown processes.
05
FTC Penalty Exposure
How UDAP classification unlocks penalties of up to $53,088 per violation and what the May 2026 warning letters signal.
06
Investigations and Open Questions
How to respond to Civil Investigative Demands, weigh consent decree risk, and track constitutional challenges and state law overlay.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Building a Notice-and-Removal System for Websites and Apps That Host User Content

This session provides attorneys with a practical, statute-grounded framework for building a TAKE IT DOWN Act (TIDA) compliant notice-and-removal system for any platform that hosts user-generated content. Attendees will learn who qualifies as a covered platform, what a valid removal request must contain, how the 48-hour removal deadline and duplicate-detection obligations work, and how the asymmetric safe harbor shapes compliance strategy. By the end of the session, attorneys will be able to audit an existing content moderation infrastructure, identify gaps, and advise clients on the ten core elements of a defensible TIDA compliance program before the May 19, 2026 effective date.

Meg HennesseyMeg Hennessey
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

Responding to FTC TAKE IT DOWN Act Enforcement

This session examines how the FTC enforces Section 3 of the TAKE IT DOWN Act, focusing on the agency’s enforcement architecture, penalty exposure, and the practical steps platforms and their counsel must take when responding to FTC scrutiny. Attorneys will learn how the FTC’s UDAP classification creates civil penalty liability of up to $53,088 per violation, what the agency’s first warning letters signal about investigative priorities, and how to prepare for Civil Investigative Demands and potential consent decrees. Attendees will leave with a working framework for counseling clients through FTC investigations, assessing penalty exposure, and navigating the unresolved legal questions—including ‘reasonable efforts’ ambiguity, per-violation counting methodology, and the Section 230 intersection—that will define the enforcement landscape through first contested actions.

Emily S. TabatabaiEmily S. Tabatabai
Emily S. Tabatabai

Emily S. Tabatabai

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Meg Hennessey

Meg Hennessey

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Emily S. Tabatabai

Emily S. Tabatabai

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Emily S. Tabatabai is a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and a founding member of the firm’s global Cyber, Privacy & Data Innovation Group. She counsels companies in social media, gaming, mobile apps, adtech and ecommerce on privacy, consumer protection and online safety, and she represents clients in regulatory investigations before the FTC, State Attorneys General and Congressional committees. She led the development of Orrick’s Online Safety Law Center & U.S. Law Tracker. She is especially well suited to this program: she has represented clients through FTC investigations and enforcement actions under Section 5 of the FTC Act, advises social media platforms on their online safety obligations, and tracks State AG enforcement through the law tracker she built, bringing the perspective of counsel who regularly sits across the table from the FTC.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Tabatabai received her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2006 and her B.B.A. from Emory University’s Goizueta Business School in 2001. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Texas and holds the Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) credential.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA has ranked Ms. Tabatabai nationwide in Privacy & Data Security (Band 1, 2019–2021; Band 2, 2022–2023), and The Legal 500 has ranked her Tier 1 in Cyber Law, including Data Protection and Privacy (2019–2023). She has served on the Law360 Privacy Editorial Advisory Board and the IAPP Publications Advisory Board.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Tabatabai is a member of the Privacy, Data Security and E-Commerce Committee of the Texas Bar’s Business Law Section and speaks frequently on children’s privacy and online safety laws for kids and teens, including a panel on navigating FTC security investigations. Her recent Orrick insights include “Nonconsensual Intimate Images Online: Take It Down Act Enforcement In Full Swing” (June 2026).

Experience

Ms. Tabatabai has represented a global gaming platform provider in an FTC investigation and enforcement action involving COPPA and Section 5 of the FTC Act, an EdTech platform provider in an FTC enforcement action over COPPA compliance, and a global IoT device maker in investigations by the FTC and multiple State Attorneys General into alleged unfair and deceptive practices. She also counsels online services and social media platforms on age verification, parental consent and age-appropriate design obligations for teen and child users.
Meg Hennessey

Meg Hennessey

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Meg Hennessey is Of Counsel at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in San Francisco and Orange County, where she advises online service providers, including social media platforms, on online safety and consumer protection law. She designs and implements digital trust and safety compliance programs, including programs for laws on detecting, reporting and removing non-consensual intimate images and online child sexual exploitation and abuse material, drawing on nearly 15 years of defending companies in high-stakes criminal, civil and regulatory investigations. She is especially well suited to this program: she designs compliance programs for laws requiring the removal of non-consensual intimate images, builds content moderation and transparency reporting policies, and has guided a client through a multi-year online trust and safety monitorship, bringing the perspective of counsel who builds removal systems from the inside.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Hennessey earned her J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law and her B.S. in Political Science from Santa Clara University. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Hennessey co-leads Orrick’s Orange County Women’s Inclusion Network. She has led multidisciplinary teams of lawyers and consultants in matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, congressional investigations, and an inquiry opened by the UK’s Ofcom.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Hennessey has worked on both sides of corporate monitorships, serving on two DOJ and SEC-appointed FCPA Monitor teams and representing two multinational companies under independent Compliance Monitors. She maintains an active pro bono practice, and her recent Orrick insights include “Nonconsensual Intimate Images Online: Take It Down Act Enforcement In Full Swing” (June 2026).

Experience

Ms. Hennessey has advised dozens of AI, social media and big tech providers on youth online safety laws and built internal compliance playbooks; conducted trust and safety risk assessments and drafted policies on identity verification, content moderation, transparency reporting and reporting to law enforcement; and responded for a leading creator platform to UK Parliament and Ofcom inquiries under the UK Online Safety Act. She has also represented peer-to-peer platforms responding to FTC and state attorney general Civil Investigative Demands and subpoenas.
Emily S. Tabatabai

Emily S. Tabatabai

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Emily S. Tabatabai is a partner at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP and a founding member of the firm’s global Cyber, Privacy & Data Innovation Group. She counsels companies in social media, gaming, mobile apps, adtech and ecommerce on privacy, consumer protection and online safety, and she represents clients in regulatory investigations before the FTC, State Attorneys General and Congressional committees. She led the development of Orrick’s Online Safety Law Center & U.S. Law Tracker. She is especially well suited to this program: she has represented clients through FTC investigations and enforcement actions under Section 5 of the FTC Act, advises social media platforms on their online safety obligations, and tracks State AG enforcement through the law tracker she built, bringing the perspective of counsel who regularly sits across the table from the FTC.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Tabatabai received her J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2006 and her B.B.A. from Emory University’s Goizueta Business School in 2001. She is admitted in the District of Columbia and Texas and holds the Certified Information Privacy Professional (CIPP) credential.

Recognition & Leadership

Chambers USA has ranked Ms. Tabatabai nationwide in Privacy & Data Security (Band 1, 2019–2021; Band 2, 2022–2023), and The Legal 500 has ranked her Tier 1 in Cyber Law, including Data Protection and Privacy (2019–2023). She has served on the Law360 Privacy Editorial Advisory Board and the IAPP Publications Advisory Board.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Tabatabai is a member of the Privacy, Data Security and E-Commerce Committee of the Texas Bar’s Business Law Section and speaks frequently on children’s privacy and online safety laws for kids and teens, including a panel on navigating FTC security investigations. Her recent Orrick insights include “Nonconsensual Intimate Images Online: Take It Down Act Enforcement In Full Swing” (June 2026).

Experience

Ms. Tabatabai has represented a global gaming platform provider in an FTC investigation and enforcement action involving COPPA and Section 5 of the FTC Act, an EdTech platform provider in an FTC enforcement action over COPPA compliance, and a global IoT device maker in investigations by the FTC and multiple State Attorneys General into alleged unfair and deceptive practices. She also counsels online services and social media platforms on age verification, parental consent and age-appropriate design obligations for teen and child users.
Meg Hennessey

Meg Hennessey

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

Meg Hennessey is Of Counsel at Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP in San Francisco and Orange County, where she advises online service providers, including social media platforms, on online safety and consumer protection law. She designs and implements digital trust and safety compliance programs, including programs for laws on detecting, reporting and removing non-consensual intimate images and online child sexual exploitation and abuse material, drawing on nearly 15 years of defending companies in high-stakes criminal, civil and regulatory investigations. She is especially well suited to this program: she designs compliance programs for laws requiring the removal of non-consensual intimate images, builds content moderation and transparency reporting policies, and has guided a client through a multi-year online trust and safety monitorship, bringing the perspective of counsel who builds removal systems from the inside.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Hennessey earned her J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law and her B.S. in Political Science from Santa Clara University. She is admitted in California and before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Hennessey co-leads Orrick’s Orange County Women’s Inclusion Network. She has led multidisciplinary teams of lawyers and consultants in matters involving the U.S. Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general, congressional investigations, and an inquiry opened by the UK’s Ofcom.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Hennessey has worked on both sides of corporate monitorships, serving on two DOJ and SEC-appointed FCPA Monitor teams and representing two multinational companies under independent Compliance Monitors. She maintains an active pro bono practice, and her recent Orrick insights include “Nonconsensual Intimate Images Online: Take It Down Act Enforcement In Full Swing” (June 2026).

Experience

Ms. Hennessey has advised dozens of AI, social media and big tech providers on youth online safety laws and built internal compliance playbooks; conducted trust and safety risk assessments and drafted policies on identity verification, content moderation, transparency reporting and reporting to law enforcement; and responded for a leading creator platform to UK Parliament and Ofcom inquiries under the UK Online Safety Act. She has also represented peer-to-peer platforms responding to FTC and state attorney general Civil Investigative Demands and subpoenas.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs