Gain access to all of myLawCLE's 1,000+ Live webinars for only $395/yr. Includes this program and over 60 new webinars each month.
Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $395Register for instant access to the recorded video of this one webinar.
Register for Recorded – $395.00Course Overview
Assess IRS resource constraints affecting compliance activities.
Leverage ADR programs for efficient dispute resolution.
Navigate BBA procedures and modification elections strategically.
Document clean energy credits for audit defense.
Course Overview
Assess IRS resource constraints affecting compliance activities.
Leverage ADR programs for efficient dispute resolution.
Navigate BBA procedures and modification elections strategically.
Document clean energy credits for audit defense.
Why Attend
Agenda
Session 1
Welcome and Opening Remarks
Session 2
Tax Compliance and Enforcement Update Part I
Session 3
IRS Budget Policy and Future Enforcement Outlook
Session 4
IRS Independent Office of Appeals Update
Session 5
Tax Court and Chief Counsel Operations Update
Session 6
Psychology's Impact on Tax Enforcement Cases
Session 7
US Trade Agreements in Tax Disputes
Session 8
Partnership Audits and Litigation Under BBA
Session 9
Cross-Border Information Gathering and Discovery
Session 10
IRA Clean Energy Credits Audit Defense
Session 11
DOJ Tax Division Enforcement Update
Session 12
Criminal Tax Enforcement Priorities and Outlook
Session 13
IRS Whistleblower Office Program Update
Session 14
National Taxpayer Advocate Service Update
Session 15
IRS Collection Tools and Enforcement Update
Session 16
Employment Tax Civil and Criminal Enforcement
Session 17
Criminal Tax Trials: Tales from Trenches
Session 18
Exempt Organizations Tax Enforcement Issues
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Conference introduction by Assistant Director Kathleen Costello setting the stage for the two-day forum. Brief overview of the program structure and acknowledgment of participants.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Examination of unprecedented IRS upheaval including leadership turnover, staffing reductions of approximately 30,000 employees, and resource constraints affecting all divisions. Practitioners learn about disappearing agents mid-case and strategies for navigating the current environment.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Expert panel analyzes the proposed 37% IRS funding reduction and its impact on voluntary compliance and revenue collection. Discussion covers Pillar Two international tax implications, the 10-to-1 regulatory rule, and technology initiative challenges.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Chief of Appeals addresses staffing losses of approximately 28% while maintaining lowest cycle times in six years. Focus on ADR programs including Fast Track and Post-Appeals Mediation, with receipts increasing 25% in fiscal year 2024.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Overview of Tax Court statistics showing 62% electronic filing in 2024 and over 750 pending conservation easement cases. Discussion of Chief Counsel organizational changes including the pass-through division split and LB&I/SB/SE litigation consolidation.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Panel explores how psychological conditions including depression, PTSD, OCD, and addiction disorders affect tax compliance and create grounds for penalty relief. Strategies for working with psychiatric experts, building records, and overcoming IRS biases are examined.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties and Free Trade Agreements as mechanisms for challenging unfair tax treatment through international arbitration. Landmark cases including Feldman v. Mexico and Vodafone v. India illustrate potential remedies for expropriation claims.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Comprehensive review of the Bipartisan Budget Act centralized audit regime replacing TEFRA procedures for partnerships. Coverage of imputed underpayment calculations, modification procedures, push-out elections, and strategic choices available to partnerships.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Discussion of offshore information gathering mechanisms including FATCA, bilateral treaties, TIEAs, and the Multilateral Convention with 150+ signatories. Recent Canadian and Indian court decisions affecting taxpayer challenges to information exchange requests are analyzed.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Expert panel addresses substantiation challenges for $1.2 trillion in IRA tax credits involving begin construction determinations, placed-in-service tests, and basis step-up valuations. Best practices for documentation, coordination among multiple parties, and the growing role of tax insurance are covered.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Interview exploring historic leadership changes at the Tax Division and its evolving role in tax administration. Discussion covers resource curtailment impacts on representing the United States in refund, bankruptcy, and appellate courts.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Panel featuring IRS Criminal Investigation leadership provides inside perspective on current investigations and future enforcement signals. In resource-constrained environments, criminal case selection sends important compliance messages to taxpayers and practitioners.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Director update on the Whistleblower Program Improvement Plan focused on increasing high-value claims and accelerating award payments. Discussion includes characteristics of effective whistleblower submissions and recent court decisions in this practice area.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Erin Collins shares lessons from five years as National Taxpayer Advocate, navigating IRS challenges from the pandemic through current resource constraints. Focus on systemic issue resolution and handling individual taxpayer cases.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Update on resumed collection notice issuance and successful efforts targeting high-income non-filers that have recovered millions since FY 2023. Panel discusses new collection tools and future expectations affecting every tax practice.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Examination of employment tax compliance representing 70% of IRS revenue collection and its significant contribution to the tax gap. Panel explores government enforcement priorities including audits, civil penalties, injunctions, and criminal investigations.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Experienced trial lawyers share recent experiences taking criminal tax cases to trial, offering windows into enforcement challenges and priorities. Discussion of the unique circumstances in cases that survive the highly selective indictment process.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Expert panel reviews unique challenges in examining tax-exempt organizations arising from specialized substantive issues in organization and operation. Best practices for managing examinations and navigating enforcement activity in this distinct area are discussed.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
SESSION I
Deposing trucking company personnel…
SESSION II
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
SESSION III
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
SESSION IV
Defending the Company. Effective Deposition …
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
2:00 – 3:00 PM EST
In trucking accident litigation, plaintiff attorneys must strategically depose key company personnel to uncover negligence, regulatory violations, and systemic misconduct.
This session provides practical deposition strategies to hold carriers accountable and maximize case value. From frontline drivers to senior executives, attendees will learn how to ask precise questions that expose operational lapses, reveal liability patterns, and strengthen plaintiff claims.
Participants will gain tools to challenge unsafe company cultures, evaluate inadequate training and hiring, and document compliance gaps that often lead to catastrophic incidents.
Attorneys will learn about IRS staffing reductions, partnership audits under the BBA, clean energy credit substantiation, cross-border information gathering, and psychological factors affecting tax compliance.
Attorneys will gain practical strategies for navigating Appeals procedures, ADR programs, investment treaty protections, and documentation requirements for successful audit defense.
Attorneys will learn about IRS staffing reductions, partnership audits under the BBA, clean energy credit substantiation, cross-border information gathering, and psychological factors affecting tax compliance.
Attorneys will gain practical strategies for navigating Appeals procedures, ADR programs, investment treaty protections, and documentation requirements for successful audit defense.
Plans
| Access type | Individual Purchase | Basic | Premium Most Popular | Corporate CLE Plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price |
$95 – $245
Price varies based
on the course duration of 1 to 3+ hours |
$395/year
One-time purchase
|
$495/year
One-time purchase
|
Custom
based on firm size
|
| Access type | Pay per class | Unlimited annual access | Unlimited annual access | Unlimited access for all firm members |
| Number of Available Webinars | 1 | 1,000+ | 1,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Number of New Webinars Added Yearly | Limited | 500+ | 500+ | 500+ |
| Earn "Live" CLE credit |
|
|
|
|
|
Ability to Ask Questions During the Presentation via a Chat Box |
|
|
|
|
| Attend "Live" Re-Broadcasts |
|
|
|
|
| Exclusive Partner Webinars & Events |
|
|
|
|
|
Special credits (Ethics, Elimination of Bias, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
| Instant Certificates After Completion |
|
|
|
|
| Personalized CLE Platform |
|
|
|
|
| Live Conferences |
|
|
||
| Bootcamps |
|
|
| Access type |
Pay per class Unlimited annual access Unlimited annual access Unlimited access for all firm members |
|---|---|
| Number of Available Webinars | 1 1,000+ 1,000+ 1,000+ |
| Number of New Webinars Added Yearly | Limited 500+ 500+ 500+ |
| Earn "Live" CLE credit |
|
|
Ability to Ask Questions During the Presentation via a Chat Box |
|
| Attend "Live" Re-Broadcasts |
|
| Exclusive Partner Webinars & Events |
|
|
Special credits (Ethics, Elimination of Bias, etc.) |
|
| Instant Certificates After Completion |
|
| Personalized CLE Platform |
|
| Live Conferences |
|
| Bootcamps |
|
speakers
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
A 2013 graduate of the Gerry Spence Trial Lawyers College in Dubois, Wyoming, Joe is rated AV Preeminent™ by Martindale-Hubbell — the highest peer rating for exceptional legal ability and ethics. He is among the first nine attorneys nationwide to earn board certification in Truck Accident Law from the National Board of Trial Advocacy.
Joe received the Roadway Safety Award from the American Association for Justice (AAJ) for his commitment to improving highway safety. He currently serves as Co-Chair of the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys (ATAA) Safety Committee, advocating for higher safety standards across the trucking industry.
Joe serves on the faculty of the AAJ Advanced Trial Advocacy College: Litigating Truck Collision Cases (2015 & 2024). He is an active member of AAJ’s Trucking Litigation Group and sits on the Board of Regents for the Academy of Truck Accident Attorneys.
Joe frequently consults and co-counsels on complex commercial truck cases. His proven track record includes numerous successful trials against motor carriers and truck leasing companies — delivering justice for victims of commercial vehicle accidents.
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Kostelanetz
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Greenberg Traurig
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom
International Tax Affairs
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Kirkland & Ellis
IRS Independent Office of Appeals
Morgan Lewis & Bockius
United States Tax Court
DLA Piper
Law Offices of Daniel N. Price
Frost Law
Moore Tax Law Group
BakerHostetler
King & Spalding
Kostelanetz
Internal Revenue Service
Fox Rothschild
Moore & Van Allen
Zerbe, Miller, Fingeret, Frank & Jadav
Kirby McInerney
Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Williams & Aughtry, PC
Internal Revenue Service
National Tax Controversy Practice, Prager Metis
Robert J. Fedor, Esq. LLC
United States Tax Court
Gunster
Procopio
Kostelanetz
Jones Day
Holland & Knight
Internal Revenue Service
Covington & Burling
Citrin Cooperman
Vinson & Elkins
Aird & Berlis
CBIZ
Nishith Desai Associates
Crowell & Moring
Munich Re
Willis Towers Watson
Cal Poly Pomona
Holland & Knight
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Latham & Watkins
Miller & Chevalier, Chartered
Kostelanetz
Kaplan Marino
Marcus Neiman Rashbaum & Pineiro
Fogerty Mueller Harris
BakerHostetler
Reed Smith
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service
Loeb & Loeb
Being an attorney is hard enough without the bookkeeping/IOLTA nonsense. Ready to keep more of what you earn? Whether you’re launching a new law practice or been in your own practice for forty years, this program is your roadmap to slashing your tax bill and building real wealth. Want to write off that second home, or discover how to deduct your vacation? In this dynamic, eye-opening session, civil and criminal tax controversy attorney Eric Green will walk you through often-overlooked strategies to dramatically cut taxes, increase deductions, and protect your law practice from IRS audit adjustments. You’ll walk away armed with actionable insights you can put to work immediately and easily earn back 8-10X what you invested in this seminar!
The program will cover not just how to deduct these expenses but what documentation you need to maintain to make sure you are audit proof if Uncle Sam comes calling!
In this new expanded webinar, Eric and Leighanne will review other benefits like converting your practice to an S Corporation, retirement planning and discuss apps that can help tie all this together and make your record keeping a breeze!
Who Should Attend:
Don’t miss this opportunity to transform the way you think about taxes—and take home the tools you need to save thousands year after year.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: March 27, 2026
Closed-captioning available
2026-03-27 13:00:00
This program begins with the foundations of generative AI, introducing large language models and transformer architecture, then moves into practical applications for legal professionals. Participants will learn how to design and deploy custom GPTs in OpenAI and build agent-based automations in Microsoft Copilot, both of which enable legal teams to streamline repetitive work across transactional matters, litigation management, and broader legal operations. The program also highlights how to use OpenAI projects and Microsoft’s integrated tools to scale and organize AI-driven efficiencies across the legal function.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: December 19, 2025
Closed-captioning available
2025-10-30 14:00:00
Session I – Considerations: Revocable vs. Irrevocable – Georgia Bender
In this session, attorney Georgia Bender will present a brief analysis of the structures and considerations involved in revocable and irrevocable trusts and when each type of trust may be appropriate. Next, Ms. Bender will go into a broad discussion of revocable trusts and the advantages they bring in flexibility of administration, probate avoidance, and estate tax planning. She’ll then review who might be an ideal candidate for this type of trust.
Key topics to be discussed:
Session II – Irrevocable Trusts and Trust Administration – Joseph Donohue
In this session, Attorney Joseph Donohue will review four common types of irrevocable trusts and the contexts in which they are best used. Next, Mr. Donohue will offer some helpful drafting tips for trusts. Lastly, he will dive into topics surrounding trust administration from tax reporting to key phases, avoiding trust contests, and drafting documents to protect your fiduciary clients.
Key topics to be discussed:
Date / Time: December 11, 2025
Closed-captioning available
2026-03-30 14:00:00
FAQ
Yes — the Basic Unlimited Pass gives members access to all online live, replay, and on-demand CLEs, excluding only the live conferences. With the Premium Unlimited Pass, members receive access to over 11 multi-day live conferences as well.
Yes — myLawCLE is an officially accredited CLE provider and seeks CLE approval in all 50 states. Our live webinars, on-demand programs, and replays meet or exceed state bar requirements, ensuring your CLE credits are fully recognized wherever you practice.
Yes — after completing the CLE webinar, attendees select their state for CLE credit and fill out an online evaluation form. Once submitted, a CLE certificate is emailed to them and uploaded to their dashboard.
Yes — myLawCLE develops CLE programs meeting all required CLE types, including mental health, ethics, professionalism, technology, substance abuse, and elimination of bias.
myLawCLE maintains all CLE programs in its library for 12 months following the original broadcast date. Attendees can access any program that remains available in the system during this period.
Yes — all of myLawCLE’s programs are originally broadcast live, with a chat box available for attendees to submit questions during the webinar. Additionally, replays and on-demand versions offer email correspondence with the presenters for any follow-up questions.
Expand Your Legal Expertise
Requirements
The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.
Formats