Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

ADA Mental-Health Accommodation After Return-to-Office: Litigating and Defending Failure-to-Accommodate Claims

Return-to-office mandates are generating ADA mental-health accommodation disputes — and Tudor v. Whitehall changed the analysis. Learn to build essential-function records, document the interactive process, handle remote-work requests, and plead or defend failure-to-accommodate claims through summary judgment.

2026-09-30 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-30 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-30 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-30 12:00:00

Course Overview

Performing the Job Without an Accommodation No Longer Defeats the Claim

2026-09-30 12:00:00

The Second Circuit’s Tudor v. Whitehall decision decoupled the accommodation analysis from essential function performance. At the same time, return-to-office mandates are colliding with years of pandemic-era remote work. Mental-health accommodation disputes now sit at that intersection, and the old record no longer answers the new questions.

The exposure compounds fast. Deny a remote-work request without a documented essential-functions record, and the employer’s own pandemic-era history becomes the plaintiff’s evidence. Delay the interactive process, and the delay itself can become an independent failure to accommodate. Plead the wrong elements, and the circuit split on adverse-action pleading can sink the claim. Confuse a prospective accommodation request with an impermissible ‘do-over’ demand, and counsel loses the distinction that decides these cases.

Attendees leave with both sides of the file: concrete record-building checklists for litigation, deposition strategy, and interactive-process documentation, plus the doctrinal framework for pleading and defending mental-health failure-to-accommodate claims through summary judgment.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Essential-Function Records
How to document essential job functions after a return-to-office mandate so the record supports summary judgment.
02
Tudor v. Whitehall
Why the Second Circuit decoupled accommodation from essential-function performance, and what the ‘qualified individual’ standard now requires.
03
Pleading the Claim
How prima facie elements and the circuit split on adverse-action pleading shape complaints and defenses.
04
Remote-Work Requests
How pandemic-era remote-work history shapes the essential-function record when employees ask to keep working remotely.
05
Interactive-Process Documentation
What to document during the interactive process, and when delay becomes an independent failure to accommodate.
06
Damages and Disclosure
How to handle damages, documentation, and disclosure challenges unique to mental-health accommodation cases.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Best Practices for Handling ADA Accommodation Requests for Mental-Health Conditions Arising from Return-to-Office Mandates: Building a Strong Evidentiary Record of Essential Functions and Undue Hardship as Part of the Interactive Process

This session will cover best practices for handling the interactive process and undue hardship analysis in ADA mental health accommodation cases arising from return-to-office mandates. Attendees will learn how to establish essential job functions and how the Second Circuit’s Tudor v. Whitehall decision shifts the analysis beyond essential-function performance. The session will also focus on best practices for handling requests for remote work in this post-pandemic era. Attorneys will acquire solid strategies for defending claims of discrimination and retaliation and developing a record of evidence that can be used in support of summary judgment. Attorneys will leave with concrete record-building checklists for litigation, deposition strategy, and interactive-process documentation in mental-health accommodation disputes.

Melissa M. PesceMelissa M. Pesce
clock 1:10 pm - 2:10 pm EST

ADA Mental-Health Accommodation After Return-to-Work Mandates: Litigating and Defending Failure-to-Accommodate Claims

This session equips attorneys with the current doctrinal framework and litigation strategy for ADA mental-health failure-to-accommodate claims arising from return-to-office mandates, covering prima facie elements and circuit splits, recent circuit and district court decisions, and the evidentiary impact of pandemic-era remote-work history. Attorneys will learn how to plead and defend claims involving delay in the interactive process, the scope of the ‘qualified individual’ standard after Tudor v. Whitehall, and the distinction between prospective accommodation requests and impermissible ‘do-over’ demands. Attendees will leave with a practical understanding of mental-health accommodation disputes.

Kellee Boulais KruseKellee Boulais Kruse
Melissa M. Pesce

Melissa M. Pesce

Ogletree Deakins

Kellee Boulais Kruse

Kellee Boulais Kruse

The Employment Law Group, P.C

Melissa M. Pesce

Melissa M. Pesce

Ogletree Deakins

Melissa M. Pesce is a shareholder in Ogletree Deakins’ St. Louis office who focuses on employment law and litigation. She advises and represents employers on discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, leaves of absence, workplace accommodations, trade secrets, drug testing, and multistate employment compliance. She has more than 20 years of litigation experience in federal and state courts.

Education & Credentials

Melissa earned her J.D., cum laude, from Southern Illinois University School of Law in 1995 and her B.A. from Southern Illinois University in 1992. She is admitted in Missouri and Illinois, as well as the U.S. District Courts in Missouri and Illinois and the Seventh and Eighth Circuits.

Recognition & Leadership

Melissa has been recognized by Best Lawyers for Employment Law – Management from 2024–2026 and Litigation – Labor and Employment in 2026. She was also named 2026 St. Louis Employment Law – Management Lawyer of the Year by Best Lawyers.

Professional Involvement

Melissa is a frequent speaker on employment law and workplace issues, presenting to SHRM, legal associations, and other professional organizations. Her recent programs have addressed EEOC and DEI developments, paid leave, remote work, workplace investigations, accommodations, multistate compliance, and employment arbitration.

Experience

Melissa has served as lead or first-chair trial counsel in jury and bench trials involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, trade secrets, and breach of contract, as well as lead counsel in arbitrations and mediations. She also conducts workplace investigations and advises employers on wage and hour compliance, leave and accommodation policies, drug testing, restrictive covenants, trade secrets, and multistate employment policies.
Kellee Boulais Kruse

Kellee Boulais Kruse

The Employment Law Group, P.C

Kellee Boulais Kruse is a principal at The Employment Law Group, P.C. in Washington, D.C., where she represents private-sector and federal employees in civil rights matters, with a particular focus on discrimination, retaliation, and accommodation disputes. Earlier employment inside a federal agency — where she encountered civil rights violations firsthand — led her to the law and gives her an insider perspective on the federal-employee experience.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Kruse earned her J.D. from The George Washington University Law School and her B.A. in Management Information Systems from North Dakota State University. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, Virginia, and various federal courts.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Kruse is recognized by The Best Lawyers in America (2023–present) in Employment Law – Individuals and Litigation – Labor and Employment, and by Lawdragon (2020–present) on its list of the top 500 plaintiff-side employment lawyers in the country. Super Lawyers named her a Rising Star in 2019 — an honor extended to only 2.5% of practicing lawyers in each state — and returned her to its rankings beginning with the 2025 list. At her firm, she mentors law clerks and has guided associates on the path to becoming principals.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Kruse serves as co-chair of the Employment Law Forum of the Women’s Bar Association of the District of Columbia, where she mentors rising women attorneys and helps organize panels on topics such as equal pay and post-pandemic return-to-office issues. She is a member of the D.C. Bar, the National Employment Lawyers Association, and the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, where she spoke on a conference panel addressing newly emerging COVID-related cases.

Experience

Ms. Kruse has been with The Employment Law Group since 2006, when she joined as a law clerk during law school. She litigates claims under Title VII, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Energy Reorganization Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, and represents clients before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the Office of Administrative Law Judges at the U.S. Department of Labor. Her work in developing areas of employment law — family responsibilities discrimination, nuclear whistleblower cases, and one of the first district-court cases involving COVID-related discrimination — has produced decisions now cited by other litigants, including an appellate ruling establishing that federal whistleblowers have the right to a hearing if the MSPB denies them one.
Melissa M. Pesce

Melissa M. Pesce

Ogletree Deakins

Melissa M. Pesce is a shareholder in Ogletree Deakins’ St. Louis office who focuses on employment law and litigation. She advises and represents employers on discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, leaves of absence, workplace accommodations, trade secrets, drug testing, and multistate employment compliance. She has more than 20 years of litigation experience in federal and state courts.

Education & Credentials

Melissa earned her J.D., cum laude, from Southern Illinois University School of Law in 1995 and her B.A. from Southern Illinois University in 1992. She is admitted in Missouri and Illinois, as well as the U.S. District Courts in Missouri and Illinois and the Seventh and Eighth Circuits.

Recognition & Leadership

Melissa has been recognized by Best Lawyers for Employment Law – Management from 2024–2026 and Litigation – Labor and Employment in 2026. She was also named 2026 St. Louis Employment Law – Management Lawyer of the Year by Best Lawyers.

Professional Involvement

Melissa is a frequent speaker on employment law and workplace issues, presenting to SHRM, legal associations, and other professional organizations. Her recent programs have addressed EEOC and DEI developments, paid leave, remote work, workplace investigations, accommodations, multistate compliance, and employment arbitration.

Experience

Melissa has served as lead or first-chair trial counsel in jury and bench trials involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, trade secrets, and breach of contract, as well as lead counsel in arbitrations and mediations. She also conducts workplace investigations and advises employers on wage and hour compliance, leave and accommodation policies, drug testing, restrictive covenants, trade secrets, and multistate employment policies.
Kellee Boulais Kruse

Kellee Boulais Kruse

The Employment Law Group, P.C

Kellee Boulais Kruse is a principal at The Employment Law Group, P.C. in Washington, D.C., where she represents private-sector and federal employees in civil rights matters, with a particular focus on discrimination, retaliation, and accommodation disputes. Earlier employment inside a federal agency — where she encountered civil rights violations firsthand — led her to the law and gives her an insider perspective on the federal-employee experience.

Education & Credentials

Ms. Kruse earned her J.D. from The George Washington University Law School and her B.A. in Management Information Systems from North Dakota State University. She is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia, Virginia, and various federal courts.

Recognition & Leadership

Ms. Kruse is recognized by The Best Lawyers in America (2023–present) in Employment Law – Individuals and Litigation – Labor and Employment, and by Lawdragon (2020–present) on its list of the top 500 plaintiff-side employment lawyers in the country. Super Lawyers named her a Rising Star in 2019 — an honor extended to only 2.5% of practicing lawyers in each state — and returned her to its rankings beginning with the 2025 list. At her firm, she mentors law clerks and has guided associates on the path to becoming principals.

Professional Involvement

Ms. Kruse serves as co-chair of the Employment Law Forum of the Women’s Bar Association of the District of Columbia, where she mentors rising women attorneys and helps organize panels on topics such as equal pay and post-pandemic return-to-office issues. She is a member of the D.C. Bar, the National Employment Lawyers Association, and the Metropolitan Washington Employment Lawyers Association, where she spoke on a conference panel addressing newly emerging COVID-related cases.

Experience

Ms. Kruse has been with The Employment Law Group since 2006, when she joined as a law clerk during law school. She litigates claims under Title VII, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Energy Reorganization Act, and the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, and represents clients before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Merit Systems Protection Board, and the Office of Administrative Law Judges at the U.S. Department of Labor. Her work in developing areas of employment law — family responsibilities discrimination, nuclear whistleblower cases, and one of the first district-court cases involving COVID-related discrimination — has produced decisions now cited by other litigants, including an appellate ruling establishing that federal whistleblowers have the right to a hearing if the MSPB denies them one.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.0
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Pending
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs