Annual Pass Exclusive

This Class is Exclusive to Annual Pass Members

This program is only available to myLawCLE All-Access Pass subscribers. Subscribe now to unlock this class along with 1,000+ live webinars for only $395/yr — including 60+ new programs added every month.

Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $395

California’s Artificial Intelligence Data Transparency Law: Effective January 1, 2026

California’s AB 2013 requires AI developers to disclose training data information, with compliance challenges and enforcement uncertainties explored.

2026-01-15 13:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-01-15 13:00:00

2026-01-15 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-01-15 13:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-01-15 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-01-15 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-01-15 13:00:00

1 hours

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

Course Overview

Navigating California's AI Training Data Transparency Law

2026-01-15 13:00:00

Participants will learn AB 2013’s scope, disclosure requirements, and enforcement considerations for generative AI systems. Attorneys will gain practical guidance for advising clients on compliance strategies.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
Scope
AB 2013 covers developers who make generative AI systems available to Californians.
02
Disclosures
Developers must post a high level summary addressing 12 specific training data categories.
03
Enforcement
The Attorney General may enforce AB 2013 through the California Unfair Competition Law.
04
Trade Secrets
The statute contains no explicit trade secret protections, prompting industry concern.
05
XAI Lawsuit
XAI filed suit claiming takings, compelled speech, and void for vagueness violations.
06
Regulatory Context
AB 2013 exists alongside the Colorado AI Act and potential federal preemption actions.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 1:20 pm EST

Scope and Coverage of California's AB 2013

This session examines who and what falls under AB 2013’s training data transparency requirements, including the definitions of developer, substantial modification, and generative AI. Participants will explore the law’s narrow statutory exceptions and how its broad scope may extend beyond major AI developers to entities that modify existing systems.

Jim KofordJim Koford
clock 1:20 pm - 1:40 pm EST

Understanding AB 2013's Substantive Disclosure Requirements

This session breaks down the core requirement for developers to post documentation about training data, including the 12 specific categories that must be addressed in a high-level summary. Key interpretive tensions around specificity, trade secret concerns, and notable statutory omissions such as enforcement mechanisms will be analyzed.

Jim KofordJim Koford
clock 1:40 pm - 2:00 pm EST

AB 2013 Within the Broader AI Regulatory Landscape

This session places AB 2013 in context alongside other emerging AI regulations, including the Colorado AI Act, California’s SB 942 and SB 53, and federal developments. Participants will examine enforcement through the California UCL, the pending XAI lawsuit challenging the law, and potential federal preemption implications.

Jim KofordJim Koford

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CT1.0
DE1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
ND1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.2
NM1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
PA1.0
TN1.0
VT1.0
WI1.0

Legal updates that every attorney needs to know

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Pennsylvania
Approved
Tennessee
Approved
Vermont
Approved
Wisconsin
Approved

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs