Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Filing FLSA Collective Actions After Provencher: Plaintiff Forum and Notice Strategy

Nationwide FLSA collectives are effectively foreclosed in most federal forums after Provencher. Learn to choose the right filing forum, draft notice motions under four competing circuit standards, and structure hybrid Rule 23/FLSA settlements that preserve case value.

2026-09-29 12:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-09-29 12:00:00

2026-09-29 12:00:00

1h CLE Credits

2026-09-29 12:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2026-09-29 12:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-29 12:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-29 12:00:00

1 hours

Course Overview

A Single FLSA Filing No Longer Reaches a Nationwide Workforce

2026-09-29 12:00:00

In May 2026, the Second Circuit decided Provencher v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution LLC. The decision completed a 6-1 circuit supermajority applying Bristol-Myers Squibb‘s specific-jurisdiction rule to FLSA collective actions. The Supreme Court’s February 2026 cert denials then left four competing circuit notice standards in place, effectively foreclosing nationwide collectives in most federal forums.

The stakes surface at every stage. File in the wrong forum and out-of-state opt-ins fall outside the collective. Send notice too broadly and the motion draws a jurisdictional challenge. Overlook arbitration agreements and opt-in rates suffer. Move too slowly and the FLSA statute of limitations erodes case value.

Attendees walk out with a practical forum selection framework, a playbook for drafting notice motions under the applicable circuit standard, strategies for multi-forum filings and Rule 23 state-law vehicles, and hybrid Rule 23/FLSA settlement structures that recover case value lost to narrowed collectives.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
Circuit Split Landscape
How the 6-1 Bristol-Myers supermajority reshapes FLSA collective filings after Provencher.
02
Forum Selection Playbook
Three pathways for filing multi-state collectives, including the employer’s home forum.
03
Rule 23 Pivot
Capturing out-of-state employees through state-law classes, plus Fifth Amendment horizon issues.
04
Notice Standards
Four competing circuit certification standards and Bristol-Myers limits on notice scope.
05
Arbitration and Opt-Ins
Drafting notice around arbitration agreements while preserving the statute of limitations.
06
Hybrid Settlement Structures
Combining Rule 23 and FLSA releases to maximize global settlement value.

Program schedule

clock 12:00 pm - 12:30 pm EST

Choosing the Forum for Multi-State FLSA Collectives After Provencher

This session examines how the Second Circuit’s May 2026 decision in Provencher v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution LLC completed a 6-1 circuit supermajority applying Bristol-Myers Squibb’s specific-jurisdiction rule to FLSA collective actions, effectively foreclosing nationwide collectives in most federal forums. Attorneys will learn how to evaluate forum options for multi-state FLSA collectives—including filing in the employer’s home forum, leveraging the First Circuit’s Waters decision, and structuring parallel statespecific collectives. Attendees will leave with a practical framework for forum selection, an understanding of the Rule 23 pivot as a jurisdictional workaround, and awareness of the unresolved Fifth Amendment briefing argument and Supreme Court cert risk.

Scott MoriarityScott Moriarity
clock 12:30 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Winning Notice and Preserving Case Value in the Narrowed Collective Landscape

This session examines how plaintiffs’ FLSA counsel can secure court-authorized notice and maximize collective size and settlement leverage under the four competing circuit standards now left in place by the Supreme Court’s February 2026 cert denials. Attendees will learn how Bristol-Myers personal jurisdiction constraints, arbitration agreement conflicts, and the Provencher decision reshape notice scope and geographic strategy, and how hybrid Rule 23/FLSA settlement structures can recover case value lost to narrowed collectives. Attorneys will leave with a framework for drafting notice motions, choosing multi-forum filing strategies, and structuring settlements in a landscape where a single filing can no longer reach a nationwide workforce.

Scott MoriarityScott Moriarity
Scott Moriarity

Scott Moriarity

Moriarity Law Office PLC

Scott Moriarity

Scott Moriarity

Moriarity Law Office PLC

Scott Moriarity litigates complex employment and class action disputes throughout the United States, representing employees against large, well-funded adversaries. Based in downtown Minneapolis at Moriarity Law Office PLC, he brings more than 20 years of experience to tough workplace disputes, including discrimination, harassment, and whistleblower matters, ERISA benefit disputes, and sophisticated transactional work for executives, entrepreneurs, and creatives.

Education & Credentials

Scott earned his J.D., cum laude, from William Mitchell College of Law, where he served as a Staff Editor and Editorial Board Member of the William Mitchell Law Review, and holds a Bachelor of Music from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, where he was a Presidential Scholar. He has been licensed to practice in Minnesota since 2002 and is also admitted before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Third, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits.

Recognition & Leadership

Scott has been selected to Minnesota Super Lawyers each year from 2021 through 2026, including recognition in the Class Action/Mass Torts category, and was named to Minnesota Monthly's Top Lawyers list in 2023 and 2024. He is a member of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100. He has taught legal seminars on employment agreements, including for the Mitchell Hamline School of Law Alumni CLE Series, authored Making the Best Claim for ERISA Disability Benefits in Minnesota Trial (2019), and regularly mentors newer attorneys on legal writing and advocacy.

Professional Involvement

Scott is a member of the Federal Bar Association, Minnesota Chapter, the National Employment Lawyers Association, the Minnesota Association for Justice, the State Bar of Minnesota, and the Hennepin County Bar Association. He volunteers with Cancer Legal Care, the League of Women Voters, and In the Heart of the Beast Mask and Puppet Theater.

Experience

Scott served as a law clerk to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota from 2005 to 2011 and then practiced as an associate attorney at Lockridge Grindal Nauen from 2011 to 2018. He has since practiced with Baillon Thome and Wanta Thome PLC in Minneapolis before founding Moriarity Law Office PLC. While at Wanta Thome, Scott, together with attorney Nicholas DeMaris, secured conditional certification of a collective action in federal court in Vermont against Bimbo Bakeries USA and its affiliate Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution LLC in a misclassification lawsuit.
Scott Moriarity

Scott Moriarity

Moriarity Law Office PLC

Scott Moriarity litigates complex employment and class action disputes throughout the United States, representing employees against large, well-funded adversaries. Based in downtown Minneapolis at Moriarity Law Office PLC, he brings more than 20 years of experience to tough workplace disputes, including discrimination, harassment, and whistleblower matters, ERISA benefit disputes, and sophisticated transactional work for executives, entrepreneurs, and creatives.

Education & Credentials

Scott earned his J.D., cum laude, from William Mitchell College of Law, where he served as a Staff Editor and Editorial Board Member of the William Mitchell Law Review, and holds a Bachelor of Music from the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, where he was a Presidential Scholar. He has been licensed to practice in Minnesota since 2002 and is also admitted before the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First, Third, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits.

Recognition & Leadership

Scott has been selected to Minnesota Super Lawyers each year from 2021 through 2026, including recognition in the Class Action/Mass Torts category, and was named to Minnesota Monthly's Top Lawyers list in 2023 and 2024. He is a member of The National Trial Lawyers Top 100. He has taught legal seminars on employment agreements, including for the Mitchell Hamline School of Law Alumni CLE Series, authored Making the Best Claim for ERISA Disability Benefits in Minnesota Trial (2019), and regularly mentors newer attorneys on legal writing and advocacy.

Professional Involvement

Scott is a member of the Federal Bar Association, Minnesota Chapter, the National Employment Lawyers Association, the Minnesota Association for Justice, the State Bar of Minnesota, and the Hennepin County Bar Association. He volunteers with Cancer Legal Care, the League of Women Voters, and In the Heart of the Beast Mask and Puppet Theater.

Experience

Scott served as a law clerk to Magistrate Judge Jeanne J. Graham of the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota from 2005 to 2011 and then practiced as an associate attorney at Lockridge Grindal Nauen from 2011 to 2018. He has since practiced with Baillon Thome and Wanta Thome PLC in Minneapolis before founding Moriarity Law Office PLC. While at Wanta Thome, Scott, together with attorney Nicholas DeMaris, secured conditional certification of a collective action in federal court in Vermont against Bimbo Bakeries USA and its affiliate Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distribution LLC in a misclassification lawsuit.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.0
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Approved
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs