Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

Add the All-Access Pass and get this program —
plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Or register for just this program

Live Video Broadcast

Live webinar of this one program.
$195 Register

On-Demand Video

Recorded access + self-study credit.
$195 Register

High-Risk Commercial Contract Provisions in 2026: Performance Excuses, Price Allocation, and AI Vendor Terms

Tariff whiplash and AI vendor forms are rewriting commercial contract risk. Learn to draft tariff-resilient force majeure, price-allocation, and refund clauses, negotiate AI liability caps and indemnities, and lock down data rights before the next dispute lands.

2026-09-23 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-23 13:00:00

Program Details

2026-09-23 13:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-09-23 13:00:00

Course Overview

The clauses your contracts rely on were drafted for a world that no longer exists

2026-09-23 13:00:00

The Supreme Court’s invalidation of the IEEPA tariffs in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump did not end tariff exposure — it multiplied it. Replacement duties now issue under Section 122, Section 232, and Section 301, and refund fights over struck-down tariffs are already in court. In parallel, Mobley v. Workday and Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence are redrawing who bears AI vendor risk.

Invoke a standard force majeure clause against a tariff, and it will likely fail. Accept a liability cap set at annual fees, and a $50M downstream claim stays with you. Leave data-rights language silent, and the vendor may train on your inputs. The EU AI Act and Colorado SB 26-189 add obligations most vendor forms never mention.

Attendees leave with a framework for auditing existing contracts, tiered cost-sharing and refund-allocation drafting language, and a checklist of AI vendor provisions to reject, modify, or supplement — negotiation-ready work product, not a doctrine review.

Format

CLE Credit

2h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

2

Key topics that will be covered

01
Tariff Landscape Shifts
How the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the IEEPA tariffs and their replacement with Section 122, Section 232, and Section 301 duties create refund opportunities for importers and new drafting risk for every commercial agreement.
02
Force Majeure Pitfalls
Why standard force majeure and impracticability clauses largely fail as tariff defenses, and how to draft authority-agnostic, tariff-resilient language going forward.
03
Tariff Cost Allocation
Structuring importer-of-record designations, Incoterms, tariff cost-allocation and refund-allocation (“Trump Majeure”) clauses, tariff mitigation clauses, and indemnity provisions in light of heightened tariff enforcement at the border.
04
AI Indemnification Gap
Why standard vendor protections fail, and how Mobley v. Workday and Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence change the assumed risk allocation in standard AI vendor agreements.
05
Liability Caps and Warranties
How to structure liability caps with sufficient exclusions and output warranties that hold up against realistic AI claim sizes.
06
Data Rights and Compliance
Contract language separating customer inputs from vendor training data, ownership of embeddings, logs, and fine-tuning outputs, and the compliance warranties and audit rights the EU AI Act and Colorado SB 26-189 now demand.

Program schedule

clock 1:00 pm - 2:00 pm EST

Tariff Volatility and Considerations for Commercial Contract Drafters, Including Force Majeure, Tariff Cost-Allocation (and Tariff Refund), and Indemnity Clauses

This session examines how the 2025–2026 tariff cycle — from IEEPA imposition through the Supreme Court’s invalidation in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump and the subsequent shift to Section 122, Section 232, and Section 301 authority — has exposed critical gaps in commercial contract provisions governing force majeure, impracticability, and price allocation. Attorneys will analyze why standard force majeure and impracticability doctrines largely fail as tariff defenses, how courts are resolving post-SCOTUS refund-allocation disputes, and how to draft authority-agnostic, tariff-resilient contract language going forward. Attendees will leave with a framework for auditing existing contracts, structuring tiered cost-sharing provisions, and avoiding the most common drafting errors now appearing in active litigation.

Aaron M. ApplebaumAaron M. Applebaum
clock 2:10 pm - 3:10 pm EST

Negotiating AI Vendor Agreements: Liability Caps, Indemnity Gaps, and Data Rights

This session equips attorneys with an analytical framework and contractual language examples designed to identify and close the most dangerous gaps in AI vendor agreements — including liability caps with insufficient exclusions, indemnity provisions that exclude training-data and output liability, and data-rights clauses that allow vendors to exploit customer inputs. Attendees will learn how recent court decisions (Mobley v. Workday, Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence) and the emerging regulatory landscape (EU AI Act, Colorado SB 26-189) are reshaping risk allocation in AI procurement. Attorneys will leave with a working understanding of priority negotiation targets and actionable guidance on which vendor-form provisions to reject, modify, or supplement.

Kristopher J. ChandlerKristopher J. Chandler
Aaron M. Applebaum

Aaron M. Applebaum

Sidley Austin LLP

Kristopher J. Chandler

Kristopher J. Chandler

Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP

Aaron M. Applebaum

Aaron M. Applebaum

Sidley Austin LLP

Aaron M. Applebaum is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Sidley Austin LLP, where he practices international trade and customs law as a member of the firm’s Customs group. He counsels companies on every stage of U.S. customs compliance — planning and counseling, government inquiries and enforcement actions, and customs-related litigation — and coordinates with colleagues across offices and disciplines on cross-border matters. Before entering private practice, he began his legal career at a multinational consumer electronics company, where he represented the company before customs authorities in several countries and designed and administered its trade compliance programs.

Education & Credentials

Aaron earned his J.D. from Saint Louis University School of Law and his MBA from Saint Louis University, both in 2014, and holds a B.A. from the University of Illinois (2011). He is admitted in the District of Columbia, Missouri, and California, and before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Recognition & Leadership

Aaron practices within Sidley’s Customs group, which has earned top-band rankings in Chambers USA and Chambers Global for International Trade: Customs (USA – Nationwide) every year since 2008, and his commentary on tariff enforcement has been quoted in International Trade Today.

Professional Involvement

Aaron is a member of the American Bar Association’s International Section and a frequent speaker on international trade topics, including at ACI’s Conference on International Trade Investigations, Enforcement & Litigation (Washington, D.C., 2026). He has co-authored numerous client updates and articles on tariffs and customs enforcement, among them “The $150 Billion Problem: Trump Tariff Refunds in M&A Deals” (New York Law Journal, April 2026).

Experience

Aaron has obtained over US$100 million in Section 301 duty refunds for high-tech, consumer goods, and energy companies through administrative protests and litigation at the U.S. Court of International Trade, and has advised dozens of clients on Section 301 and Section 232 duties — from comments and testimony on proposed tariff actions to product exclusions producing millions of dollars in retroactive refunds and prospective savings. He also counsels on customs valuation and “first sale” programs, country-of-origin planning, defense of free trade agreement preference claims, UFLPA and forced-labor compliance, and customs issues in mergers and acquisitions.
Kristopher J. Chandler

Kristopher J. Chandler

Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP

Kristopher (Kris) J. Chandler practices in Benesch’s Columbus, Ohio office, focusing on technology transactions, data security and privacy, and intellectual property protection. He chairs the firm’s multidisciplinary AI Commission, which guides B2B and B2C businesses, AI developers, investors, service providers, and integrators in deploying AI technologies safely and legally while monitoring proposed laws, regulations, and litigation.

Education & Credentials

Kris earned his J.D. from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law in 2017, where he served as a staff editor of the Ohio State Business Law Journal and vice-president of the Business Law Society, together with an MBA from Ohio State’s Fisher College of Business (Weidler Scholar). He received his B.A., magna cum laude, in Political Science and History from The Ohio State University in 2013 and is admitted to practice in Ohio.

Recognition & Leadership

Kris was named an Ohio Leading Lawyer by Ohio Business Magazine in 2024 and 2025, and leads Benesch’s firmwide AI Commission as its Chair.

Professional Involvement

Kris speaks and writes regularly on the legal implications of AI, with engagements including “AI-Powered Freight: Contracting, Liability, and Compliance for Maritime and Intermodal Tech Tools” (2026), and he has been quoted in Law360 on evolving AI regulations.

Experience

Kris has assisted several clients in negotiating vendor agreements for the procurement of technology solutions that include and incorporate AI features and functionality, represented a large client through a competitive RFP for enterprise IT services relating to AI development and deployment, and developed responsible-use and AI-governance policies for a large energy and global materials science company and a large healthcare system. He also advises on CCPA and GDPR data privacy compliance, sophisticated technology and intellectual property transactions, and the corporate, IP, and privacy aspects of mergers and acquisitions.
Aaron M. Applebaum

Aaron M. Applebaum

Sidley Austin LLP

Aaron M. Applebaum is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Sidley Austin LLP, where he practices international trade and customs law as a member of the firm’s Customs group. He counsels companies on every stage of U.S. customs compliance — planning and counseling, government inquiries and enforcement actions, and customs-related litigation — and coordinates with colleagues across offices and disciplines on cross-border matters. Before entering private practice, he began his legal career at a multinational consumer electronics company, where he represented the company before customs authorities in several countries and designed and administered its trade compliance programs.

Education & Credentials

Aaron earned his J.D. from Saint Louis University School of Law and his MBA from Saint Louis University, both in 2014, and holds a B.A. from the University of Illinois (2011). He is admitted in the District of Columbia, Missouri, and California, and before the U.S. Court of International Trade.

Recognition & Leadership

Aaron practices within Sidley’s Customs group, which has earned top-band rankings in Chambers USA and Chambers Global for International Trade: Customs (USA – Nationwide) every year since 2008, and his commentary on tariff enforcement has been quoted in International Trade Today.

Professional Involvement

Aaron is a member of the American Bar Association’s International Section and a frequent speaker on international trade topics, including at ACI’s Conference on International Trade Investigations, Enforcement & Litigation (Washington, D.C., 2026). He has co-authored numerous client updates and articles on tariffs and customs enforcement, among them “The $150 Billion Problem: Trump Tariff Refunds in M&A Deals” (New York Law Journal, April 2026).

Experience

Aaron has obtained over US$100 million in Section 301 duty refunds for high-tech, consumer goods, and energy companies through administrative protests and litigation at the U.S. Court of International Trade, and has advised dozens of clients on Section 301 and Section 232 duties — from comments and testimony on proposed tariff actions to product exclusions producing millions of dollars in retroactive refunds and prospective savings. He also counsels on customs valuation and “first sale” programs, country-of-origin planning, defense of free trade agreement preference claims, UFLPA and forced-labor compliance, and customs issues in mergers and acquisitions.
Kristopher J. Chandler

Kristopher J. Chandler

Benesch Friedlander Coplan & Aronoff LLP

Kristopher (Kris) J. Chandler practices in Benesch’s Columbus, Ohio office, focusing on technology transactions, data security and privacy, and intellectual property protection. He chairs the firm’s multidisciplinary AI Commission, which guides B2B and B2C businesses, AI developers, investors, service providers, and integrators in deploying AI technologies safely and legally while monitoring proposed laws, regulations, and litigation.

Education & Credentials

Kris earned his J.D. from The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law in 2017, where he served as a staff editor of the Ohio State Business Law Journal and vice-president of the Business Law Society, together with an MBA from Ohio State’s Fisher College of Business (Weidler Scholar). He received his B.A., magna cum laude, in Political Science and History from The Ohio State University in 2013 and is admitted to practice in Ohio.

Recognition & Leadership

Kris was named an Ohio Leading Lawyer by Ohio Business Magazine in 2024 and 2025, and leads Benesch’s firmwide AI Commission as its Chair.

Professional Involvement

Kris speaks and writes regularly on the legal implications of AI, with engagements including “AI-Powered Freight: Contracting, Liability, and Compliance for Maritime and Intermodal Tech Tools” (2026), and he has been quoted in Law360 on evolving AI regulations.

Experience

Kris has assisted several clients in negotiating vendor agreements for the procurement of technology solutions that include and incorporate AI features and functionality, represented a large client through a competitive RFP for enterprise IT services relating to AI development and deployment, and developed responsible-use and AI-governance policies for a large energy and global materials science company and a large healthcare system. He also advises on CCPA and GDPR data privacy compliance, sophisticated technology and intellectual property transactions, and the corporate, IP, and privacy aspects of mergers and acquisitions.

Credits by state

AK2.0
AL2.0
AR2.0
AZ2.0
CA2.0
CO2.0
CT2.0
DC2.0
DE2.0
FL2.0
GA2.0
HI2.0
IA2.0
ID2.0
IL2.0
IN2.0
KS2.0
KY2.0
LA2.0
MA2.0
MD2.0
ME2.0
MI2.0
MN2.0
MO2.4
MS2.0
MT2.0
NC2.0
ND2.0
NE2.0
NH120.0
NJ2.4
NM2.0
NV2.0
NY2.0
OH2.0
OK2.5
OR2.0
PA2.0
RI2.5
SC2.0
SD2.0
TN2.0
TX2.0
UT2.0
VA2.0
VT2.0
WA2.0
WI2.0
WV2.4
WY2.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Pending
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Pending
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Approved
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Pending
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Pending
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Pending
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Pending
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs