Ready to Register?

MyLawCLE All-Access Pass

Best choice

This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.


All specialty & ethics credits included
38 practice areas
New sections: AI & the Law, Practice Management
100s of current and trending legal topics
Nationally recognized and highly experienced presenters

$395 / year — this program included
Register with the All-Access Pass

This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year

Recent Developments in “Mass Arbitrations” (Presented by The Federal Bar Association Annual Meeting & Convention 2025 sponsor JAMS)

Mass arbitration has transformed aggregate dispute resolution. This program examines recent court decisions, new AAA and JAMS rules, enforceability of procedural mechanisms like batching and bellwethers, and practical strategies for navigating this rapidly evolving area of law.

2025-12-10 14:00:00

1 hours

Program Details

2025-12-10 14:00:00

Program Details

2025-12-10 14:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2025-12-10 14:00:00

1 hours

Course Overview

Navigating Mass Arbitration Procedures and Strategy

2025-12-10 14:00:00

Participants will learn how courts, arbitration providers, and practitioners are adapting to mass arbitration challenges. Gain practical skills for drafting agreements, meeting new filing requirements, and resolving aggregate disputes efficiently.

Format

CLE Credit

1h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1

Key topics that will be covered

01
Legal Foundation
AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion established FAA preemption of state laws banning class action waivers.
02
Provider Rules
AAA and JAMS adopted new mass arbitration rules in 2024 addressing fees and procedures.
03
Consolidation
Courts distinguish permissible consolidation from impermissible class arbitration with binding effect on others.
04
Batching Limits
Sequential batching creating indefinite bottlenecks may be found unenforceable by courts.
05
Bellwether Procedures
Bellwether procedures with binding effect on non-participating claimants are generally unenforceable.
06
Pre-Arbitration Requirements
Mandatory pre-filing notice requirements are generally enforceable if clearly presented and not onerous.

Program schedule

clock 2:00 pm - 2:20 pm EST

Mass Arbitration Origins and Provider Rule Changes

This session explores how mass arbitrations emerged as plaintiffs’ response to class action waivers, aggregating hundreds of individual claims to create fee pressure on defendants. Panelists examine the 2024 rule changes from AAA and JAMS, including new process arbitrator roles, vetting requirements, and restructured fee schedules designed to address procedural challenges.

Behdad SadeghiBehdad Sadeghi
Collin VierraCollin Vierra
Hon. Ellen L. MaasHon. Ellen L. Maas
Steve LuckeSteve Lucke
clock 2:20 pm - 2:40 pm EST

Court Decisions on Consolidated Arbitration Procedures

This session analyzes key court rulings on when parties may be subject to consolidated and streamlined arbitration proceedings. Topics include enforceability of pre-arbitration notice requirements, the distinction between permissible consolidation and impermissible batching that creates unreasonable delays, and why bellwether procedures with binding effects on non-participants have been struck down.

Behdad SadeghiBehdad Sadeghi
Collin VierraCollin Vierra
Hon. Ellen L. MaasHon. Ellen L. Maas
Steve LuckeSteve Lucke
clock 2:40 pm - 3:00 pm EST

Best Practices for Administering Mass Arbitrations

This session provides practical guidance for counsel and arbitrators navigating mass arbitration proceedings. Panelists discuss comprehensive initial filing preparation, effective communication with neutrals, technology considerations for virtual hearings, and the emerging trend toward actual merits-based resolution rather than fee-pressure settlements.

Behdad SadeghiBehdad Sadeghi
Collin VierraCollin Vierra
Hon. Ellen L. MaasHon. Ellen L. Maas
Steve LuckeSteve Lucke
Behdad Sadeghi

Behdad Sadeghi

Zimmerman Reed LLP

Collin Vierra

Collin Vierra

Eimer Stahl LLP

Hon. Ellen L. Maas

Hon. Ellen L. Maas

JAMS

Steve Lucke

Steve Lucke

JAMS

Behdad Sadeghi

Behdad Sadeghi

Zimmerman Reed LLP

Behdad Sadeghi is a Partner at Zimmerman Reed LLP, where he focuses on plaintiff-side representation of individuals and public entities in consumer fraud, data privacy, and civil rights disputes. He has litigated numerous mass arbitration cases from initiation to conclusion before JAMS, AAA, and NAM, achieving relief for tens of thousands of claimants, and also has experience litigating the enforceability of arbitration provisions in federal courts. His broader practice includes complex consumer protection, securities and financial fraud, antitrust, and civil rights litigation in state and federal courts across the country. He is a member of the firm’s Public Client group and has represented state governments in opioid litigation and litigation against e-cigarette manufacturers. He served as trial counsel in a three-week jury trial in 2023 that achieved a $60.5 million settlement the day before closing arguments. He holds a B.A. from Carleton College, an M.A. from the University of Chicago, and a J.D. from Mitchell Hamline School of Law (formerly William Mitchell College of Law).

Education & Credentials

Mr. Sadeghi holds a Bachelor of Arts from Carleton College, a Master of Arts from the University of Chicago, and a Juris Doctor from Mitchell Hamline School of Law (formerly William Mitchell College of Law), where he graduated in 2012. He has been admitted to practice in Minnesota since 2012. Earlier in his career, he gained experience through a clerkship at Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid and as a project attorney at Robins Kaplan LLP. He has been selected to Minnesota Super Lawyers every year from 2023 through 2026 and to the Rising Stars list from 2019 through 2022.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Sadeghi has been recognized by Minnesota Super Lawyers continuously from 2023 through 2026 and was on the Rising Stars list from 2019 through 2022. His plaintiff-side mass arbitration practice — involving proceedings before JAMS, AAA, and NAM on behalf of tens of thousands of claimants — reflects a level of volume and experience in this emerging field that is rare among plaintiff practitioners. His public client work representing state governments in high-profile opioid and e-cigarette litigation, and his 2023 trial record achieving a $60.5 million settlement on the eve of closing arguments, demonstrate a litigation practice of significant consequence and reach.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Sadeghi is a member of Zimmerman Reed's Public Client group and contributes to the firm's consumer fraud, mass arbitration, and civil rights litigation practices. He has litigated arbitration enforceability issues in federal courts alongside his mass arbitration docket, giving him a dual perspective on the procedural and substantive dimensions of the consumer arbitration landscape that is increasingly relevant to courts, counsel, and parties navigating this rapidly evolving area.

Experience

Behdad Sadeghi has built a plaintiff-side practice at Zimmerman Reed that spans consumer fraud, data privacy, civil rights, antitrust, and public client litigation — with a particular concentration in mass arbitration that has made him one of the most experienced plaintiff-side practitioners in this space. His work on behalf of tens of thousands of claimants in JAMS, AAA, and NAM proceedings, combined with his federal court experience challenging arbitration provision enforceability, gives him a comprehensive view of the mass arbitration landscape from the claimant's perspective. His state government representations in opioid and e-cigarette litigation, his Super Lawyers recognition, and his 2023 jury trial record reflect a practitioner whose impact extends well beyond any single practice area.
Collin Vierra

Collin Vierra

Eimer Stahl LLP

Collin Vierra is a Partner at Eimer Stahl LLP, where his nationwide practice focuses on complex trial and appellate litigation, commercial and consumer mass arbitration, and counseling. His work spans data privacy and AI, discrimination, products liability, commercial disputes, antitrust and unfair competition, environmental law, and government regulation, and clients trust him with their most high-stakes and cutting-edge disputes.

Education & Credentials

Collin earned his Juris Doctor from Stanford Law School, his Master of Arts in Economics from Stanford University (where he was a Gregory Terrill Cox Fellow in the John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics), and his Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he was a member of the Pi Tau Sigma Mechanical Engineering Honors Society and an engineering apprentice in the Pappalardo Laboratory. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and Tennessee (Practice Pending Admission), and is admitted before multiple U.S. District Courts and the Second, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals.

Recognition & Leadership

Collin chairs Eimer Stahl's Mass Arbitration Practice Group and co-chairs the firm's Data Privacy and AI Practice Group. He has been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a 40 & Under honoree in 2024 and 2025, named a Law.com/The Recorder Lawyer on the Fast Track in 2025, recognized by Legal 500 as a Recommended Lawyer in General Commercial Disputes (noting his "particular prowess in mass arbitration defense"), identified by Top Verdict as having obtained one of the top verdicts in California in 2024, and named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2026.

Professional Involvement

Collin is a featured speaker on mass arbitration and complex litigation issues, having presented to numerous institutions including the American Bar Association, the Federalist Society, the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Stanford Law School, MassArbCon, the Association of Corporate Counsel, and the Data Privacy and Cyber Security ConfEx. His expert analysis has been published in Law360 and EimerStahl Insights, and he is a current member of the MIT Free Speech Alliance.

Experience

Collin has helped companies respond to over a quarter of a million individual demands for arbitration across the social networking, consumer hardware, and consumer entertainment industries, obtaining tens of thousands of dismissals without settlement payment. He defends clients under BIPA, CIPA, CCPA, VPPA, and other privacy statutes, and has represented major companies in consumer class actions, MDLs, and investigations by the DOJ, FTC, SEC, FDA, and Attorneys General of more than 45 states.
Hon. Ellen L. Maas

Hon. Ellen L. Maas

JAMS

The Honorable Ellen L. Maas (Ret.) serves as a JAMS arbitrator and mediator in Minneapolis, bringing to her neutral practice the experience of a 28-year career as a Minnesota District Court judge. Appointed to the bench in 1995 by Governor Arne Carlson and subsequently elected five times, Judge Maas was nationally recognized for her handling of a six-week jury trial arising from a 2003 multiple-fatality train collision — Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. — and routinely presided over complex civil litigation matters including product liability, employment, professional liability, and consumer law cases. Before taking the bench, she had an active trial practice at Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman and Arthur, Chapman & Michaelson in the areas of toxic tort, product liability, negligence, employment, municipal liability, and insurance coverage. She holds a B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from Drake University and a J.D., With Distinction, from the University of Iowa College of Law.

Education & Credentials

Judge Maas holds a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from Drake University (1978) and a Juris Doctor, With Distinction, from the University of Iowa College of Law (1981). Following law school, she clerked for Justice Glenn E. Kelley of the Minnesota Supreme Court and for Judge Robert Schiefelbein of the Minnesota District Court (Fourth Judicial District), before entering private practice. She served on the bench for 28 years across Anoka County and Washington County, Minnesota, and served 13 years on the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards.

Recognition & Leadership

Judge Maas was nationally recognized for her handling of Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., a six-week jury trial arising from a multiple-fatality train collision — one of the most complex and high-profile trials in Minnesota District Court history. She served 13 years on the Board of Judicial Standards, reflecting sustained institutional recognition of her judicial leadership and integrity. She was elected to the bench five times following her initial gubernatorial appointment, a record of peer and public confidence that is among the strongest in Minnesota judicial history. Her JAMS panel appointment reflects recognition by the nation's leading ADR provider of her qualifications as a fair, experienced, and high-caliber neutral.

Professional Involvement

Judge Maas serves on the JAMS panel in Minneapolis handling business and commercial disputes, class action and mass tort matters, employment, personal injury and torts, government and public agency disputes, and family law cases. During her judicial tenure, she played an important role in the design and adoption of the 'one judge/one family' docketing plan in Anoka County family court — an innovation that influenced similar reforms in complex civil matter assignment across Minnesota.

Experience

Judge Maas brings to JAMS a neutral practice grounded in 28 years on the Minnesota District Court bench, a prior active trial practice spanning toxic tort, product liability, employment, and insurance coverage, and two Supreme Court clerkships — at both the state and trial court levels — that gave her a foundational perspective on judicial reasoning and procedural rigor. Her national recognition for the Frazier train collision trial, her 13-year Board of Judicial Standards tenure, and her five successful elections to the bench reflect a career of exceptional judicial achievement and public trust. As a JAMS neutral, she applies that depth of experience to help parties in complex commercial, consumer, employment, and mass tort disputes assess their positions and reach fair, efficient resolutions.
Steve Lucke

Steve Lucke

JAMS

Stephen (Steve) Lucke serves as a JAMS arbitrator and mediator in Minneapolis, bringing to his neutral practice nearly 40 years of litigation experience — including a nationwide practice handling some of the most complex ERISA, class action, and mass litigation matters in the country. Prior to joining JAMS, Steve spent his career at Dorsey & Whitney LLP, where he was a partner for more than 30 years and developed a nationally recognized practice in ERISA retirement and health plan disputes, class actions, and complex commercial litigation. His matters have included a ‘mass action’ brought against over 300 health plans and their claims administrator that the trial judge described as ‘perhaps the most complex case pending in the Central District of California.’ He also teaches Complex Litigation at the University of St. Thomas School of Law. He holds a B.A., magna cum laude, from the College of the Holy Cross and a J.D., magna cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center, and clerked for the Honorable Myron H. Bright of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Education & Credentials

Steve holds a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, from the College of the Holy Cross and a Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center — one of the country's leading law schools for litigation, government, and dispute resolution. Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Myron H. Bright of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, providing foundational appellate perspective that has informed his litigation and now his neutral practice. He is an adjunct professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law, where he teaches Complex Litigation.

Recognition & Leadership

Steve is a nationally recognized leader in ERISA litigation and complex class action practice, with a record of handling some of the largest and most consequential matters in the field during his nearly four decades at Dorsey & Whitney. His complex mass action against over 300 health plans — described by the presiding judge as perhaps the most complex case in the Central District of California — exemplifies the scale and difficulty of the matters he has resolved. His JAMS panel appointment reflects recognition by the nation's leading ADR provider of his qualifications as a neutral of exceptional depth and capability. His Georgetown Law magna cum laude distinction and his Eighth Circuit clerkship anchor a career of sustained academic and professional excellence.

Professional Involvement

Steve serves on the JAMS panel handling business and commercial litigation, health care, class action and mass tort, employment, banking and finance, insurance, and securities disputes. He teaches Complex Litigation as an adjunct professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law and is a frequent author on matters relating to employee benefit disputes. He is a volunteer attorney for the Children's Law Center and a board member of the Aim Higher Foundation, a scholarship-granting organization for elementary school students.

Experience

Steve Lucke's path to JAMS reflects a career built on the most demanding end of complex civil litigation — ERISA class actions, mass health plan disputes, 401(k) and 403(b) plan fee and fiduciary litigation, employee stock ownership plan challenges, and Department of Labor proceedings. His nearly 40 years at Dorsey & Whitney, his Eighth Circuit clerkship under Judge Bright, his Georgetown magna cum laude credential, and his Complex Litigation teaching at St. Thomas Law collectively define a practitioner whose mastery of procedural complexity, substantive depth, and case management strategy is directly applicable to the work he now does as a JAMS neutral. His experience both as lead trial counsel in bet-the-company litigation and as an educator on complex litigation gives him a dual perspective — practitioner and teacher — that enhances the quality and insight of his work as a mediator and arbitrator.
Behdad Sadeghi

Behdad Sadeghi

Zimmerman Reed LLP

Behdad Sadeghi is a Partner at Zimmerman Reed LLP, where he focuses on plaintiff-side representation of individuals and public entities in consumer fraud, data privacy, and civil rights disputes. He has litigated numerous mass arbitration cases from initiation to conclusion before JAMS, AAA, and NAM, achieving relief for tens of thousands of claimants, and also has experience litigating the enforceability of arbitration provisions in federal courts. His broader practice includes complex consumer protection, securities and financial fraud, antitrust, and civil rights litigation in state and federal courts across the country. He is a member of the firm’s Public Client group and has represented state governments in opioid litigation and litigation against e-cigarette manufacturers. He served as trial counsel in a three-week jury trial in 2023 that achieved a $60.5 million settlement the day before closing arguments. He holds a B.A. from Carleton College, an M.A. from the University of Chicago, and a J.D. from Mitchell Hamline School of Law (formerly William Mitchell College of Law).

Education & Credentials

Mr. Sadeghi holds a Bachelor of Arts from Carleton College, a Master of Arts from the University of Chicago, and a Juris Doctor from Mitchell Hamline School of Law (formerly William Mitchell College of Law), where he graduated in 2012. He has been admitted to practice in Minnesota since 2012. Earlier in his career, he gained experience through a clerkship at Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid and as a project attorney at Robins Kaplan LLP. He has been selected to Minnesota Super Lawyers every year from 2023 through 2026 and to the Rising Stars list from 2019 through 2022.

Recognition & Leadership

Mr. Sadeghi has been recognized by Minnesota Super Lawyers continuously from 2023 through 2026 and was on the Rising Stars list from 2019 through 2022. His plaintiff-side mass arbitration practice — involving proceedings before JAMS, AAA, and NAM on behalf of tens of thousands of claimants — reflects a level of volume and experience in this emerging field that is rare among plaintiff practitioners. His public client work representing state governments in high-profile opioid and e-cigarette litigation, and his 2023 trial record achieving a $60.5 million settlement on the eve of closing arguments, demonstrate a litigation practice of significant consequence and reach.

Professional Involvement

Mr. Sadeghi is a member of Zimmerman Reed's Public Client group and contributes to the firm's consumer fraud, mass arbitration, and civil rights litigation practices. He has litigated arbitration enforceability issues in federal courts alongside his mass arbitration docket, giving him a dual perspective on the procedural and substantive dimensions of the consumer arbitration landscape that is increasingly relevant to courts, counsel, and parties navigating this rapidly evolving area.

Experience

Behdad Sadeghi has built a plaintiff-side practice at Zimmerman Reed that spans consumer fraud, data privacy, civil rights, antitrust, and public client litigation — with a particular concentration in mass arbitration that has made him one of the most experienced plaintiff-side practitioners in this space. His work on behalf of tens of thousands of claimants in JAMS, AAA, and NAM proceedings, combined with his federal court experience challenging arbitration provision enforceability, gives him a comprehensive view of the mass arbitration landscape from the claimant's perspective. His state government representations in opioid and e-cigarette litigation, his Super Lawyers recognition, and his 2023 jury trial record reflect a practitioner whose impact extends well beyond any single practice area.
Collin Vierra

Collin Vierra

Eimer Stahl LLP

Collin Vierra is a Partner at Eimer Stahl LLP, where his nationwide practice focuses on complex trial and appellate litigation, commercial and consumer mass arbitration, and counseling. His work spans data privacy and AI, discrimination, products liability, commercial disputes, antitrust and unfair competition, environmental law, and government regulation, and clients trust him with their most high-stakes and cutting-edge disputes.

Education & Credentials

Collin earned his Juris Doctor from Stanford Law School, his Master of Arts in Economics from Stanford University (where he was a Gregory Terrill Cox Fellow in the John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics), and his Bachelor of Science in Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), where he was a member of the Pi Tau Sigma Mechanical Engineering Honors Society and an engineering apprentice in the Pappalardo Laboratory. He is licensed to practice in California, Texas, and Tennessee (Practice Pending Admission), and is admitted before multiple U.S. District Courts and the Second, Seventh, Eighth, and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeals.

Recognition & Leadership

Collin chairs Eimer Stahl's Mass Arbitration Practice Group and co-chairs the firm's Data Privacy and AI Practice Group. He has been recognized by Benchmark Litigation as a 40 & Under honoree in 2024 and 2025, named a Law.com/The Recorder Lawyer on the Fast Track in 2025, recognized by Legal 500 as a Recommended Lawyer in General Commercial Disputes (noting his "particular prowess in mass arbitration defense"), identified by Top Verdict as having obtained one of the top verdicts in California in 2024, and named to Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America for 2026.

Professional Involvement

Collin is a featured speaker on mass arbitration and complex litigation issues, having presented to numerous institutions including the American Bar Association, the Federalist Society, the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center, Stanford Law School, MassArbCon, the Association of Corporate Counsel, and the Data Privacy and Cyber Security ConfEx. His expert analysis has been published in Law360 and EimerStahl Insights, and he is a current member of the MIT Free Speech Alliance.

Experience

Collin has helped companies respond to over a quarter of a million individual demands for arbitration across the social networking, consumer hardware, and consumer entertainment industries, obtaining tens of thousands of dismissals without settlement payment. He defends clients under BIPA, CIPA, CCPA, VPPA, and other privacy statutes, and has represented major companies in consumer class actions, MDLs, and investigations by the DOJ, FTC, SEC, FDA, and Attorneys General of more than 45 states.
Hon. Ellen L. Maas

Hon. Ellen L. Maas

JAMS

The Honorable Ellen L. Maas (Ret.) serves as a JAMS arbitrator and mediator in Minneapolis, bringing to her neutral practice the experience of a 28-year career as a Minnesota District Court judge. Appointed to the bench in 1995 by Governor Arne Carlson and subsequently elected five times, Judge Maas was nationally recognized for her handling of a six-week jury trial arising from a 2003 multiple-fatality train collision — Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. — and routinely presided over complex civil litigation matters including product liability, employment, professional liability, and consumer law cases. Before taking the bench, she had an active trial practice at Popham, Haik, Schnobrich & Kaufman and Arthur, Chapman & Michaelson in the areas of toxic tort, product liability, negligence, employment, municipal liability, and insurance coverage. She holds a B.A., magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from Drake University and a J.D., With Distinction, from the University of Iowa College of Law.

Education & Credentials

Judge Maas holds a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa, from Drake University (1978) and a Juris Doctor, With Distinction, from the University of Iowa College of Law (1981). Following law school, she clerked for Justice Glenn E. Kelley of the Minnesota Supreme Court and for Judge Robert Schiefelbein of the Minnesota District Court (Fourth Judicial District), before entering private practice. She served on the bench for 28 years across Anoka County and Washington County, Minnesota, and served 13 years on the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards.

Recognition & Leadership

Judge Maas was nationally recognized for her handling of Frazier v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp., a six-week jury trial arising from a multiple-fatality train collision — one of the most complex and high-profile trials in Minnesota District Court history. She served 13 years on the Board of Judicial Standards, reflecting sustained institutional recognition of her judicial leadership and integrity. She was elected to the bench five times following her initial gubernatorial appointment, a record of peer and public confidence that is among the strongest in Minnesota judicial history. Her JAMS panel appointment reflects recognition by the nation's leading ADR provider of her qualifications as a fair, experienced, and high-caliber neutral.

Professional Involvement

Judge Maas serves on the JAMS panel in Minneapolis handling business and commercial disputes, class action and mass tort matters, employment, personal injury and torts, government and public agency disputes, and family law cases. During her judicial tenure, she played an important role in the design and adoption of the 'one judge/one family' docketing plan in Anoka County family court — an innovation that influenced similar reforms in complex civil matter assignment across Minnesota.

Experience

Judge Maas brings to JAMS a neutral practice grounded in 28 years on the Minnesota District Court bench, a prior active trial practice spanning toxic tort, product liability, employment, and insurance coverage, and two Supreme Court clerkships — at both the state and trial court levels — that gave her a foundational perspective on judicial reasoning and procedural rigor. Her national recognition for the Frazier train collision trial, her 13-year Board of Judicial Standards tenure, and her five successful elections to the bench reflect a career of exceptional judicial achievement and public trust. As a JAMS neutral, she applies that depth of experience to help parties in complex commercial, consumer, employment, and mass tort disputes assess their positions and reach fair, efficient resolutions.
Steve Lucke

Steve Lucke

JAMS

Stephen (Steve) Lucke serves as a JAMS arbitrator and mediator in Minneapolis, bringing to his neutral practice nearly 40 years of litigation experience — including a nationwide practice handling some of the most complex ERISA, class action, and mass litigation matters in the country. Prior to joining JAMS, Steve spent his career at Dorsey & Whitney LLP, where he was a partner for more than 30 years and developed a nationally recognized practice in ERISA retirement and health plan disputes, class actions, and complex commercial litigation. His matters have included a ‘mass action’ brought against over 300 health plans and their claims administrator that the trial judge described as ‘perhaps the most complex case pending in the Central District of California.’ He also teaches Complex Litigation at the University of St. Thomas School of Law. He holds a B.A., magna cum laude, from the College of the Holy Cross and a J.D., magna cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center, and clerked for the Honorable Myron H. Bright of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

Education & Credentials

Steve holds a Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, from the College of the Holy Cross and a Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Georgetown University Law Center — one of the country's leading law schools for litigation, government, and dispute resolution. Following law school, he clerked for the Honorable Myron H. Bright of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, providing foundational appellate perspective that has informed his litigation and now his neutral practice. He is an adjunct professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law, where he teaches Complex Litigation.

Recognition & Leadership

Steve is a nationally recognized leader in ERISA litigation and complex class action practice, with a record of handling some of the largest and most consequential matters in the field during his nearly four decades at Dorsey & Whitney. His complex mass action against over 300 health plans — described by the presiding judge as perhaps the most complex case in the Central District of California — exemplifies the scale and difficulty of the matters he has resolved. His JAMS panel appointment reflects recognition by the nation's leading ADR provider of his qualifications as a neutral of exceptional depth and capability. His Georgetown Law magna cum laude distinction and his Eighth Circuit clerkship anchor a career of sustained academic and professional excellence.

Professional Involvement

Steve serves on the JAMS panel handling business and commercial litigation, health care, class action and mass tort, employment, banking and finance, insurance, and securities disputes. He teaches Complex Litigation as an adjunct professor at the University of St. Thomas School of Law and is a frequent author on matters relating to employee benefit disputes. He is a volunteer attorney for the Children's Law Center and a board member of the Aim Higher Foundation, a scholarship-granting organization for elementary school students.

Experience

Steve Lucke's path to JAMS reflects a career built on the most demanding end of complex civil litigation — ERISA class actions, mass health plan disputes, 401(k) and 403(b) plan fee and fiduciary litigation, employee stock ownership plan challenges, and Department of Labor proceedings. His nearly 40 years at Dorsey & Whitney, his Eighth Circuit clerkship under Judge Bright, his Georgetown magna cum laude credential, and his Complex Litigation teaching at St. Thomas Law collectively define a practitioner whose mastery of procedural complexity, substantive depth, and case management strategy is directly applicable to the work he now does as a JAMS neutral. His experience both as lead trial counsel in bet-the-company litigation and as an educator on complex litigation gives him a dual perspective — practitioner and teacher — that enhances the quality and insight of his work as a mediator and arbitrator.

Credits by state

AK1.0
AL1.0
AR1.0
AZ1.0
CA1.0
CO1.0
CT1.0
DC1.0
DE1.0
FL1.0
GA1.0
HI1.0
IA1.0
ID1.0
IL1.0
IN1.0
KS1.0
KY1.0
LA1.0
MA1.0
MD1.0
ME1.0
MI1.0
MN1.0
MO1.2
MS1.0
MT1.0
NC1.0
ND1.0
NE1.0
NH60.0
NJ1.2
NM1.0
NV1.0
NY1.0
OH1.0
OK1.0
OR1.0
PA1.0
RI1.0
SC1.0
SD1.0
TN1.0
TX1.0
UT1.0
VA1.0
VT1.0
WA1.0
WI1.0
WV1.2
WY1.0

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
Alaska
Approved
Arizona
Approved
Arkansas
Approved
California
Approved
Colorado
Pending
Connecticut
Approved
Delaware
Pending
District of Columbia
No Required
Florida
Approved
Georgia
Approved
Hawaii
Approved
Idaho
Pending
Illinois
Pending
Indiana
Pending
Iowa
Pending
Kansas
Pending
Kentucky
Pending
Louisiana
Pending
Maine
Pending
Maryland
No Required
Massachusetts
No Required
Michigan
No Required
Minnesota
Approved
Mississippi
Pending
Missouri
Approved
Montana
Pending
Nebraska
Pending
Nevada
Pending
New Hampshire
Approved
New Jersey
Approved
New Mexico
Approved
New York
Approved
North Carolina
Pending
North Dakota
Approved
Ohio
Approved
Oklahoma
Pending
Oregon
Pending
Pennsylvania
Approved
Rhode Island
Pending
South Carolina
Pending
South Dakota
No Required
Tennessee
Approved
Texas
Approved
Utah
Pending
Vermont
Approved
Virginia
Not Eligible
Washington
Approved
West Virginia
Pending
Wisconsin
Approved
Wyoming
Pending

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs