Subscribe

Register for Annual Pass, Live Re-Broadcast, or On-Demand Video

All-Access Pass

Gain access to all of myLawCLE's 1,000+ Live webinars for only $395/yr. Includes this program and over 60 new webinars each month.

Subscribe to All-Access Pass – $395

Live Re-Broadcast

Register for the Live Re-Broadcast webinar of this one program.

Register for Re-Broadcast – $195.00

On-Demand Video

Receive access to recorded class and earn self-study credit. Recording is made available 5 business days after live broadcast.

Register for Recorded – $195.00

,

Handling PI Cases Involving Amazon DSPs and How to Hold Amazon Accountable

When an Amazon delivery driver causes a catastrophic wreck, Amazon’s DSP structure often leaves an undercapitalized contractor — not Amazon — on the hook. Learn to map Amazon’s operational control, depose DSP owners and drivers to establish it, plead dual-employer and joint-venture theories, and build demonstratives that put Amazon’s system before the jury.
Register for this program
JOIN PROGRAM

2026-07-24 14:00:00

1.5 hours

,

Brian T. Mohs

Fried Goldberg LLC

View speakers

Program Details

,

2026-07-24 14:00:00

2026-07-24 14:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-07-24 14:00:00

1.5 hours

,

See credits by state

Brian T. Mohs

Fried Goldberg LLC

View speakers

Program Details

,

2026-07-24 14:00:00

Program Details

2026-07-24 14:00:00

Over 1,000+ webinars

2026-07-24 14:00:00

1.5 hours

,

Course Overview

Amazon Built a Contractor Shield. A Georgia Jury Pierced It for $16 Million.

2026-07-24 14:00:00

Amazon’s Delivery Service Partner program is engineered to put a layer of “independent contractors” between the company and every collision its drivers cause. The same contracts, apps, and operations manual that run the network also document the control that defeats that defense.

Sue the DSP as a true independent contractor → you collect from an undercapitalized shell and Amazon walks. Depose only the corporate designee → you get scripted contract language, not daily control. Skip the 293-page Operations Manual and the driver-tracking apps → you lose what put 85% of the fault on Amazon in Bradfield v. Amazon Logistics.

You leave with the discovery requests, deposition outlines, and protective-order positions that surface Amazon’s control, the liability theories — dual employer, negligent training and supervision, joint venture — that reach the parent, and the demonstratives and closing themes that carried a 2024 Gwinnett County trial to a $16.2 million verdict, including exclusive video from the case.

Format

,

CLE Credit

1.5h CLE Credits

Level

Intermediate

Length

1.5

Key topics that will be covered

01
Contract Analysis
Three Amazon-drafted documents govern DSP relationships with no negotiation allowed.
02
Deposition Strategy
DSP and driver depositions establish Amazon’s daily control better than corporate designees.
03
App Control
Amazon’s Flex and Mentor apps control and monitor every aspect of driver activity.
04
Liability Theories
Recovery theories include dual employer, negligent training, supervision, and joint venture claims.
05
Trial Techniques
Effective demonstratives and closing arguments connect Amazon’s flawed system to accidents.
06
Discovery Tactics
Protective order negotiations must keep confidentiality burden on Amazon with challenge provisions.

Program schedule

clock 2:00 pm - 2:30 pm EST

Analysis of Amazon DSP program including contract terms and policies

Amazon relaunched its Delivery Service Partner program in 2018 to run last-mile delivery in-house. This session works through the contract terms and policies governing DSP partners and tests the independent-contractor framing against how Amazon actually operates the program.

Brian T. MohsBrian T. Mohs
clock 2:30 pm - 3:00 pm EST

Strategies for deposing Amazon DSPs, delivery drivers, and Amazon

This session builds a deposition strategy across the three layers of a DSP case: the DSP entity, the driver, and Amazon. It shows how to use program documents to establish the control Amazon exercises over partners it calls independent.

Brian T. MohsBrian T. Mohs
clock 3:10 pm - 3:40 pm EST

Theories of recovery and legal authority governing Amazon’s vicarious and direct liability in DSP cases

The closing session maps the theories of vicarious and direct liability against Amazon in DSP collision cases and includes exclusive footage from the firm’s 2024 Gwinnett County trial, showing how those theories were presented to a jury.

Brian T. MohsBrian T. Mohs
Brian T. Mohs

Brian T. Mohs

Fried Goldberg LLC

Brian T. Mohs

Brian T. Mohs

Fried Goldberg LLC

Brian is a partner and trial attorney at Fried Goldberg LLC in Atlanta, Georgia, where he maintains a national practice representing victims of catastrophic commercial motor vehicle collisions and their families. He joined the firm in 2014 and became a partner in 2019.

Education & Credentials

J.D. from Georgia State University College of Law (2008) and a B.S. in International Affairs from Georgia Tech (2002, highest honors); admitted before the State Bar of Georgia, the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Middle Districts of Georgia, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator since 2013.

Recognition & Leadership

Board-certified trial attorney holding ATAA Board Certified and National Board of Trial Advocacy credentials, with Super Lawyers recognition and service on the ATAA Board of Regents.

Professional Involvement

Member of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, the American Association for Justice and its Trucking Litigation Group, the Georgia Tech Bar Association, the Atlanta Bar Association, and the National Association of Fire Investigators.

Experience

Has obtained numerous seven-figure recoveries and some eight-figure recoveries for his clients; served as trial attorney in four jury trials, each resulting in a verdict for his clients; and tried a federal bench case arising from a collision between his client and a USPS vehicle that resulted in a $5.7 million judgment.
Brian T. Mohs

Brian T. Mohs

Fried Goldberg LLC

Brian is a partner and trial attorney at Fried Goldberg LLC in Atlanta, Georgia, where he maintains a national practice representing victims of catastrophic commercial motor vehicle collisions and their families. He joined the firm in 2014 and became a partner in 2019.

Education & Credentials

J.D. from Georgia State University College of Law (2008) and a B.S. in International Affairs from Georgia Tech (2002, highest honors); admitted before the State Bar of Georgia, the Georgia Supreme Court, the Georgia Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Courts for the Northern and Middle Districts of Georgia, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit; Certified Fire and Explosion Investigator since 2013.

Recognition & Leadership

Board-certified trial attorney holding ATAA Board Certified and National Board of Trial Advocacy credentials, with Super Lawyers recognition and service on the ATAA Board of Regents.

Professional Involvement

Member of the Georgia Trial Lawyers Association, the American Association for Justice and its Trucking Litigation Group, the Georgia Tech Bar Association, the Atlanta Bar Association, and the National Association of Fire Investigators.

Experience

Has obtained numerous seven-figure recoveries and some eight-figure recoveries for his clients; served as trial attorney in four jury trials, each resulting in a verdict for his clients; and tried a federal bench case arising from a collision between his client and a USPS vehicle that resulted in a $5.7 million judgment.

Credits by state

AK1.5
AL1.5
AR1.5
AZ1.5
CA1.5
CO2.0
CT1.5
DC1.5
DE1.5
FL1.5
GA1.5
HI1.5
IA1.5
ID1.5
IL1.5
IN1.5
KS1.5
KY1.5
LA1.5
MA1.5
MD1.5
ME1.5
MI1.5
MN1.5
MO1.8
MS1.5
MT1.5
NC1.5
ND1.5
NE1.5
NH90.0
NJ1.8
NM1.5
NV1.5
NY1.5
OH1.5
OK1.5
OR1.5
PA1.5
RI1.5
SC1.5
SD1.5
TN1.5
TX1.5
UT1.5
VA1.5
VT1.5
WA1.5
WI1.5
WV1.8
WY1.5

Upcoming Live Online CLE Broadcasts

Beyond NIL: Athlete Rights and Revenue in the House v. NCAA Era

July 7, 2026

,

Legal Strategies for Representing Today’s College Athletes: Drafting NIL Agreements, Navigating Revenue Sharing, and NCAA Reforms

July 8, 2026

,

The Ultimate Guide to Forming LLC to Hold Rentals Properties: Structure, taxes, 1031s, mortgage financing, and short-term rental liabilities

July 8, 2026

Advising Clients on AI Chatbot Deployment: Privacy, Consumer Protection, and High-Risk Use Cases in 2026

July 8, 2026

Class Actions and Mass Arbitration in 2026: The Plaintiff and Defense Playbooks Every Litigator Needs

July 9, 2026

,

A, B, C’s of Revocable and Irrevocable Trusts

July 9, 2026

The Scope of First Amendment Protection for Public Protest: Permits, Police Encounters, Recording Rights, and Arrest Procedures in 2026

July 10, 2026

Inside AI Training: Copyright Liability from Shadow Libraries to RAG Outputs

July 10, 2026

,

30(b)(6) Depositions Unveiled: The Ultimate Guide for Plaintiff and Defense Attorneys

July 10, 2026

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

10,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

1000+

Live stream programs

24/7

Access to live webinars & recordings

70,000+

Trusted by Legal Professionals

MCLE Credits

Alabama
Approved
1.5 General
Alaska
Approved
1.5 General
iOur programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Arizona
Approved
1.5 General
Arkansas
Approved
1.5 General
California
Approved
1.5 General
Colorado
Pending
2 General
Connecticut
Approved
1.5 General
Delaware
Approved
1.5 General
District of Columbia
No Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)
Florida
Approved
1.5 General Hours
iReceive CLE credit in Florida via Attorney Submission.
Georgia
Approved
1.5 General
Hawaii
Approved
1.5 General
Idaho
Pending
1.5 General
Illinois
Approved
1.5 General
Indiana
Approved
1.5 General
Iowa
Pending
1.5 General
Kansas
Approved
1.5 Substantive
Kentucky
Pending
1.5 General
Louisiana
Pending
1.5 General
Maine
Pending
1.5 General
Maryland
No Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)
Massachusetts
No Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)
Michigan
No Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)
Minnesota
Approved
1.5 General
Mississippi
Pending
1.5 General
Missouri
Approved
1.8 General
Montana
Pending
1.5 General
Nebraska
Pending
1.5 General
imyLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
Nevada
Approved
1.5 General
New Hampshire
Approved
90 General minutes
iAs of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey
Approved
1.8 General
iOur programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico
Approved
1.5 General
New York
Approved
1.5 General
iOur programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
North Carolina
Pending
1.5 General
North Dakota
Approved
1.5 General
iOur programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Ohio
Approved
1.5 General
Oklahoma
Pending
1.5 General
Oregon
Approved
1.5 General
Pennsylvania
Approved
1.5 General
Rhode Island
Pending
1.5 General
South Carolina
Pending
1.5 General
South Dakota
No Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)
Tennessee
Approved
1.5 General
Texas
Pending
1.5 General
Utah
Pending
1.5 General
Vermont
Approved
1.5 General
Virginia
Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours
Washington
Approved
1.5 Law & Legal Hours
iReceive CLE credit in Washington via Attorney Submission. myLawCLE will supply Washington state attorneys with instructions on how to gain credit.
West Virginia
Approved
1.8 General
Wisconsin
Approved
1.5 General
Wyoming
Approved
1.5 General

Alabama

Requirements

The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.  

Formats

  • Attorneys can earn unlimited “live” credit through live seminars, live webcasts, and co-sponsored locations with MyLAWCLE-Alabama approved programs
  • Attorneys are limited to 6 credits per compliance period of “online” programs through MyLAwCLE On-Demand programs