This program is available only with the All-Access Pass — subscribe to unlock it plus 1,000+ live CLE programs every year.
This program + 1,000+ CLE programs, all year
Program Details
2025-02-13 13:00:00
Over 1,000+ webinars
Course Overview
2025-02-13 13:00:00
1h CLE Credits
Intermediate
1
This session examines how courts address prejudice requirements when insurers deny coverage based on late notice. Key cases from Massachusetts, Michigan, and West Virginia illustrate varying approaches to timely notification obligations and the burden-shifting frameworks courts apply.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyExplore how courts determine whether claims are related, including Delaware’s meaningful linkage standard from the Alexion case. Learn how factors like identity of claimants, timing, and procedural grouping influence relatedness determinations and policy period allocation.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThis session covers the two-part subjective-objective test courts apply to prior knowledge exclusions. Through legal malpractice and other professional liability cases, discover why an insured’s subjective belief that no claim would arise is rarely determinative.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyExamine how retroactive dates and prior litigation exclusions affect coverage for wrongful acts spanning multiple policy periods. This session addresses the interplay between prior acts provisions and claims that straddle key policy dates.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyReview how courts interpret exclusions for dishonest acts and improper personal profit in D&O and professional liability policies. Understand the conditions precedent that must be satisfied before these exclusions bar coverage.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThe Beasley versus Foster Poultry Farms case demonstrates how unjust enrichment claims may be excluded through antitrust exclusions rather than loss definitions. Learn to analyze restitutionary damages by examining multiple policy provisions beyond the definition of loss.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThis session addresses when individuals qualify as insureds under D&O and professional liability policies. Explore how the capacity in which an insured acts affects whether coverage applies to specific claims.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyExamine how courts apply exclusions for claims between insureds, including the Divina Water and Walker County Hospital cases. Learn how bankruptcy contexts and technical arguments about insured status affect the exclusion’s application.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyReview how contractual liability exclusions operate in D&O and professional liability contexts. This session covers the distinction between claims arising from breach of contract versus those involving independent tortious conduct.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThrough cases involving law firm billing practices and trust account management, explore what constitutes professional services. Learn how courts distinguish between activities requiring professional skill and those incidental to professional practice.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThis session covers when insureds are entitled to independent counsel at the insurer’s expense. Examine the conflicts of interest that trigger independent counsel rights and applicable fee limitations.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyReview insurer obligations to advance defense costs during ongoing litigation before coverage determinations are final. This session addresses the tension between prompt defense funding and preservation of coverage defenses.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyExamine how courts allocate defense costs and settlements between covered and uncovered claims or parties. Learn the various methodologies courts apply when claims involve both insured and uninsured elements.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThrough California, Florida, and Massachusetts decisions, discover the varying requirements for insurers seeking reimbursement of defense costs. Learn why specificity in reservation of rights letters and adherence to jurisdictional procedures is critical.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. JefferyThis session covers limitations on consent provisions, including Indiana’s rule permitting post-loss assignment without insurer consent. The Hawkins case illustrates how non-defending insurers may challenge settlement reasonableness while being barred from relitigating the merits.
Jennifer Mathis
James A. Hazlehurst
Melina Kountouris
Molly McGinnis Stine
Jordan K. Jeffery
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Jennifer is a go-to adviser for complex professional liability insurance coverage disputes in California and nationwide. She handles high stakes coverage and bad faith litigation, assists with resolving complex professional liability claims, and maintains a general civil and commercial litigation practice.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
James represents clients in insurance coverage disputes and other complex litigation, with particular emphasis on general liability insurance and bad faith claims.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Melina assists insurance companies in navigating complex coverage-related matters, including first- and third-party cases across various policies such as general liability, errors and omissions, property and casualty, and cyber. She acts as coverage counsel for insurers evaluating claims under cyber policies.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Molly represents insurers and reinsurers on cyber, technology, media, data security, professional liability, directors and officers, errors and omissions, and financial liability policies. She provides legal advice to insurers developing or revising policy wording.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Jordan is an associate in the Insurance + Reinsurance Practice Group, focusing on representing clients in complex, high-stakes litigation including contract disputes, insurance coverage disputes, bad faith litigation, declaratory relief actions, and trademark disputes.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Jennifer is a go-to adviser for complex professional liability insurance coverage disputes in California and nationwide. She handles high stakes coverage and bad faith litigation, assists with resolving complex professional liability claims, and maintains a general civil and commercial litigation practice.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
James represents clients in insurance coverage disputes and other complex litigation, with particular emphasis on general liability insurance and bad faith claims.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Melina assists insurance companies in navigating complex coverage-related matters, including first- and third-party cases across various policies such as general liability, errors and omissions, property and casualty, and cyber. She acts as coverage counsel for insurers evaluating claims under cyber policies.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Molly represents insurers and reinsurers on cyber, technology, media, data security, professional liability, directors and officers, errors and omissions, and financial liability policies. She provides legal advice to insurers developing or revising policy wording.

Troutman Pepper Locke LLP
Jordan is an associate in the Insurance + Reinsurance Practice Group, focusing on representing clients in complex, high-stakes litigation including contract disputes, insurance coverage disputes, bad faith litigation, declaratory relief actions, and trademark disputes.
Requirements
The Alabama State Bar MCLE Commission requires attorneys to complete 12 credits, including 1 ethics, by December 31 of each year. All credits must be reported by February 15 of the following year. A maximum of 12 credits, including 1 ethics credit, may be carried over for 1 year only.
Formats