View from the Bench I: DC Magistrate (Presented by National Organization of Social Security Claimants’ Representatives)

This session explores the critical distinction between ‘substantial evidence’ and ‘substantial evidence on the record as a whole’ in Social Security appeals. Judge Schultz explains that courts must evaluate whether ALJ decisions properly considered the entire record, not just whether some evidence supports the decision.

This session covers the supportability and consistency analysis for medical opinions, explaining that supportability is an internal measure while consistency requires examination of the entire record. Judge Schultz also addresses the logical bridge requirement and common ALJ errors like cataloging evidence without meaningful analysis.

This session provides practical guidance on writing persuasive briefs, including the importance of summaries, factual accuracy, and properly framing legal versus factual arguments. The Brian T.D. appointments clause case is examined, addressing challenges to ALJ authority under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.