The Intersection of Law and Mental Health: Leveraging Psychiatry, Neuroscience, and Psychology in PTSD and TBI Litigation

Octavio Choi, MD
James A. Armontrout
Alexis Smith
Octavio Choi, MD | Forensic Psychiatric Associates
James A. Armontrout | Forensic Psychiatric Associates
Alexis Smith | Forensic Psychiatric Associates
On-Demand: April 17, 2025

1.5 hour CLE

Tuition: $195.00
Subscribe to myLawCLEs All-Acces Pass...
Get this course, plus over 1,000+ of live webinars.
Learn More
Training 5 or more people?

Sign-up for a law firm subscription plan and each attorney in the firm receives free access to all CLE Programs

Program Summary

Psychiatry, neuroscience, and psychology play a critical role in both civil and criminal litigation, particularly in cases involving Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). This CLE webinar, led by distinguished forensic experts, will provide litigators with essential insights into how psychiatric conditions and brain injuries influence behavior, decision-making, and legal responsibility. Attendees will gain practical guidance on assessing expert testimony, leveraging scientific and psychiatric evidence in litigation, and effectively advocating for clients with PTSD or TBI.

Session I - Did his brain make him do it? Acquired criminality in the courtroom - Forensic Neuropsychiatrist Dr. Octavio Choi

The speaker plans to discuss how to approach cases of brain injury and assess whether they result in legally relevant impairment. This will be accomplished by reviewing case examples and explaining the neuroscience behind brain injury and resilience.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understand the scope and relevance of neuroscience based evidence in the courtroom
  • Understand the neural basis of moral reasoning
  • Understand how "phrenological thinking" gives rise to common errors in the courtroom
  • Appreciate how to integrate neurological, psychological, and forensic approaches to reach reliable legal conclusions

Session II - PTSD in Litigation - Forensic Psychiatrist and Addiction Medicine Specialist Dr. James Armontrout

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder is a commonly encountered issue in both civil and criminal proceedings. While expert assessment is typically needed in such matters, having a basic grasp of the modern understanding of PTSD can be helpful for attorneys who work with clients with PTSD. Dr. Armontrout will discuss basic information about responses to trauma. He will discuss how often people develop PTSD after a traumatic exposure and what the research shows about how PTSD usually unfolds. He will review the current best-evidence treatments for PTSD and provide insights into what such treatment looks like and how it might be experienced by a patient with PTSD. He will then provide some examples of ways PTSD might be relevant in civil and criminal proceedings

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Understanding the response to trauma, which can include PTSD
  • Understanding the course of PTSD, both treated and untreated
  • Reviewing modern approaches to treating PTSD and their anticipated effectiveness
  • Considering ways that a better understanding of PTSD can inform civil and criminal proceedings

Session III - Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment of PTSD and TBI - Forensic Psychologist Dr. Alexis Smith

The speaker's talk will provide an overview of the questions that can be addressed through a forensic neuropsychological assessment of PTSD and TBI. It will explain how psychological testing offers quantitative information regarding an examinee’s approach to the examination and their current functioning. The domains assessed by psychological tests will be briefly covered, and the concept of clinical significance will be explained. Additionally, there will be a discussion on how psychological test results are utilized to provide objective support, or lack thereof, for claims.

Key topics to be discussed:

  • Psychological testing provides quantitative data about social, emotional, behavioral, and neurocognitive functioning
  • Standardized administration and scoring, appropriate selection of norms
  • Detection of feigning or exaggeration of emotional distress and cognitive impairment
  • Assessment of clinically significant deficits, impairments, and changes in functioning
  • Integration with findings from forensic clinical examination

Closed-captioning available

Speakers

Speaker_Octavio Choi_myLawCLEOctavio Choi, MD, PhD | Forensic Psychiatric Associates

Dr. Choi’s clinical experience and extensive formal training qualify him as an expert in assessing the relevance and validity of neurological findings in forensic settings. His professional qualifications are summarized as follows:

Dr. Choi is currently a Clinical Associate Professor in the Psychiatry department at Stanford University and serves as the director of training in the Program in Psychiatry and the Law. In his forensic roles, he conducts evaluations on behalf of Stanford University and is responsible for developing and establishing Stanford’s Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship. As an MD, he engages in clinical and research work within the interventional psychiatry group, primarily focusing on treating patients with severe depression using advanced brain stimulation technologies such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS).

Prior to his current position, Dr. Choi was the Director of Forensic Evaluations at the Oregon State Hospital, where he supervised a staff of twenty forensic psychologists and psychiatrists and oversaw the production of over 1,400 forensic reports annually. In this capacity, he was frequently called upon to testify and provide expert opinions in complex cases involving defendants with brain damage, medical and genetic conditions affecting mental health, and neuroimaging evidence. He was often tasked with determining the relevance of neurological findings in supporting or disconfirming psychiatric conditions and legal hypotheses. Additionally, he served as an affiliate psychiatry professor at Oregon Health and Sciences University, where he was primarily responsible for training OHSU’s forensic psychiatric fellows in conducting evaluations and authoring forensic reports.

Dr. Choi completed his undergraduate studies at Stanford in the field of computational neuroscience and was honored to be invited to complete the Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP), a federally funded combined MD/PhD program designed to train the next generation of physician-scientists. He earned his PhD in Neurosciences for work conducted at the Salk Institute, where he investigated molecular mechanisms of brain development.

He is board-certified in both general psychiatry and forensic psychiatry. After completing his psychiatry residency at UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, he attended the University of Pennsylvania’s forensic psychiatry fellowship, specializing in neurolaw. Neurolaw is an academic field that examines the use of neuroimaging and biological information in legal contexts, such as criminal trials and sentencing hearings.

As a neurolaw expert, Dr. Choi has delivered professional talks, organized conferences, and authored articles and book chapters. He is the former chair of the Neuropsychiatry section. Dr. Choi has been an independent contractor to fpamed since 2019

 

Speaker_James A. Armontrout_myLawCLEJames A. Armontrout, MD | Forensic Psychiatric Associates

Dr. Armontrout received both his B.A. in Psychology and his M.D. from the University of Virginia. He completed residency training in Psychiatry at the Harvard Longwood Psychiatry Residency Training Program, followed by fellowship training in Forensic Psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco. He is board certified in Psychiatry with Added Qualification in Forensic Psychiatry by the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. He is also board certified in Addiction Medicine by the American Board of Preventive Medicine.

He served as a Staff Psychiatrist from August 2017 to May 2022 in the VA Palo Alto’s Trauma Recovery Program, a residential treatment program focused on treating PTSD and other trauma-based disorders. He also instructed and supervised Stanford medical students and residents completing rotations at the Trauma Recovery Program. He has since moved to the Stanford Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences where he serves as the Program Director for the Forensic Psychiatry Fellowship. He also serves as an attending psychiatrist in the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinic and the Dual Diagnosis (addiction) clinic.

He has performed over 100 Forensic Psychiatric Examinations and has been qualified as an expert in the field of psychiatry in courts in California. He is a member of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law and of the American Psychiatric Association. Dr. Armontrout has been an independent contractor to fpamed since 2018.

 

Speaker_Alexis Smith_myLawCLEAlexis Smith, PsyD | Forensic Psychiatric Associates

Forensic Psychologist with expertise in Neuropsychological Assessment of Adults, Adolescents, and Children.

Dr. Alexis Smith earned a doctorate in clinical psychology from the Wright Institute, a program accredited by the American Psychological Association, in 2014. Her studies emphasized evidence-based treatment of mental illness and psychological assessment. She completed her predoctoral internship at Anka Behavioral Health, which was accredited through the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers. There, she focused on the treatment of adolescents and their families, as well as formerly homeless adults with substance use disorders and serious, persistent mental illness. Her postdoctoral training was completed at the Wright Institute Assessment Service, where she provided low-fee neuropsychological assessment to adults and children.

She has been licensed as a clinical psychologist in the state of California since 2016. Since that time, she has completed neuropsychological assessments of over 250 clients in clinical and forensic contexts. She has testified in depositions, county courts, and federal court as an expert in clinical psychology, posttraumatic stress disorder, and neuropsychological assessment. Her assessments and testimonies have covered a wide range of civil and criminal matters, including psychological injury, brain injury, longterm disability, workplace risk, substance abuse, the impact of trauma, evaluation of youthful factors influencing culpability and eligibility for parole, competence to stand trial, competence to proceed pro se, immigration matters, and mitigation based on mental health issues. She serves as a court-appointed expert with the Contra Costa Superior Court and with  the Executive Office for Immigration Review. She evaluates employees of the Department of Energy for security clearance related matters. In her private practice, she also provides therapy to adults and adolescents.

Dr. Smith has been an independent contractor with fpamed since 2021

Agenda

Session I – Did his brain make him do it? Acquired criminality in the courtroom | 2:00pm – 2:30pm

  • Understand the scope and relevance of neuroscience based evidence in the courtroom
  • Understand the neural basis of moral reasoning
  • Understand how “phrenological thinking” gives rise to common errors in the courtroom
  • Appreciate how to integrate neurological, psychological, and forensic approaches to reach reliable legal conclusions

Session II – PTSD in Litigation | 2:30pm – 3:00pm

  • Understanding the response to trauma, which can include PTSD
  • Understanding the course of PTSD, both treated and untreated
  • Reviewing modern approaches to treating PTSD and their anticipated effectiveness
  • Considering ways that a better understanding of PTSD can inform civil and criminal proceedings

Break | 3:00pm – 3:10pm

Session III – Forensic Neuropsychological Assessment of PTSD and TBI | 3:10pm – 3:40pm

  • Psychological testing provides quantitative data about social, emotional, behavioral, and neurocognitive functioning
  • Standardized administration and scoring, appropriate selection of norms
  • Detection of feigning or exaggeration of emotional distress and cognitive impairment
  • Assessment of clinically significant deficits, impairments, and changes in functioning
  • Integration with findings from forensic clinical examination

Credits

Alaska

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through Alaska’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity.
Alabama

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Arkansas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Arizona

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

California

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Colorado

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Connecticut

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

District of Columbia

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Delaware

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Florida

Approved via Attorney Submission
2 General Hours

Receive CLE credit in Florida via attorney submission.
Georgia

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Hawaii

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Iowa

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Idaho

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Illinois

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Indiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Kansas

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 Substantive

Kentucky

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Louisiana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Massachusetts

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maryland

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Maine

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Michigan

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Minnesota

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Missouri

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.8 General

Mississippi

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Montana

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

North Dakota

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through North Dakota’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity. Section 1, Policy 1.14
Nebraska

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

myLawCLE reports attendance to Nebraska on each attorney’s behalf for all programs. Please do not self-report.
New Hampshire

Approved for CLE Credits
90 General minutes

As of July 1, 2014, the NHMCLE Board no longer provides pre- or post-approval of courses. Attendees must self-determine whether a program is eligible for credit, and self-report their attendance online at www.nhbar.org, based on qualification provisions of Rule 53.
New Jersey

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New Jersey’s recognition of multi-jurisdictional reciprocity, except for the courses required under BCLE Reg. 201:2
New Mexico

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Nevada

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

New York

Approved for CLE Credits
1.8 General

Our programs are CLE-eligible through New York’s Approved Jurisdiction Group “B”.
Ohio

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Oklahoma

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

Oregon

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Pennsylvania

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Rhode Island

Pending CLE Approval
2 General

South Carolina

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

South Dakota

No MCLE Required
1.5 CLE Hour(s)

Tennessee

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

Texas

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Utah

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

Virginia

Not Eligible
1.5 General Hours

Vermont

Approved for CLE Credits
1.5 General

Washington

Approved via Attorney Submission
1.5 Law & Legal Hours

Receive CLE credit in Washignton via attorney submission.
Wisconsin

Approved for Self-Study Credits
1.5 General

West Virginia

Pending CLE Approval
1.8 General

Wyoming

Pending CLE Approval
1.5 General

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


Register Now

#1 CLE Access Program

  • Over 1,000 Live CLE Webinars each year
  • All CLE webinars broadcasted in last 12 months
  • Programs covering over 35 practice areas
  • Hot topics & changes in the law
  • All formats: Live, Replay, and On-demand
  • Accreditation in every state

Access every CLE webinar,
every format, all year long!

myLawCLE All-Access Pass

only $395 yearly


More CLE Webinars
Upcoming CLE Webinars
Real Estate LLC Disputes
Real Estate LLC Disputes Wed, April 23, 2025
Live Webcast
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition)
Government Contracts 101 (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
Live Webcast
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition)
Abating Tax Penalties (2025 Edition) Thu, April 24, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition)
1031 Exchanges 101 (2025 Edition) Tue, April 29, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas
AI and the Law: Tools, Risks, and Ethical Dilemmas Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court
The Use of Deepfake AI Evidence in Court Wed, April 30, 2025
Live Webcast
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition)
IRS Offers-in-Compromise (2025 Edition) Wed, April 30, 2025
On-Demand
Live Replay